9 research outputs found

    Discrimination between the main activating and inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor positive natural killer cell subsets using newly characterized monoclonal antibodies

    No full text
    Natural killer (NK) cells are key components of the innate anti-viral and anti-tumour immune responses. NK cell function is regulated by the interaction of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) with human leucocyte antigen (HLA) class I molecules. In this study, we report on the generation of KIR-specific antibodies allowing for discrimination between activating and inhibitory KIR. For this purpose, BALB/c mice were immunized with human KIR2DS2 recombinant protein. The precise specificity of KIR2DS2-specific clones was determined on KIR-transfected BW cells and KIR-genotyped NK cells. When used in combination with EB6 (KIR2DL1/2DS1) or GL183 (KIR2DL2/2DL3/2DS2), two KIR-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), 8C11 (specific for KIR2DL1/2DL2/2DL3/2DS2) and 1F12 (specific for KIR2DL3/2DS2), discriminated activating KIR2DS1 (8C11− EB6+) from inhibitory KIR2DL1 (8C11+ GL183−) and KIR2DL2 (1F12− GL183+), while excluding the main HLA-Cw-specific KIR. Using these mAbs, KIR2DS1 was shown to be expressed on the surface of NK cells from all individuals genotyped as KIR2DS1+ (n = 23). Moreover, KIR2DS1 and KIR2DL1 were independently expressed on NK cells. We also determined the amino acid position recognized by the 8C11 and 1F12 mAbs, which revealed that some KIR2DL1 allele-encoded proteins are not recognized by 8C11. Because most available anti-KIR mAbs recognize both inhibitory and activating forms of KIR, these newly characterized antibodies should help assess the expression of activating and inhibitory KIR and their functional relevance to NK biology

    Phenotypic and Functional Analyses of KIR3DL1+and KIR3DS1+NK Cell Subsets Demonstrate Differential Regulation by Bw4 Molecules and Induced KIR3DS1 Expression on Stimulated NK Cells

    No full text
    International audienceRecently, the Z27 mAb was shown to recognize the NK cell-activating receptor KIR3DS1, and several genetic studies suggest that the most probable ligands of KIR3DS1 are HLA class I molecules with the Bw4 motif. Despite these findings, the attempts to establish a functional interaction between KIR3DS1 and its potential ligand have been unsuccessful. Here, we study the proliferation and cytotoxicity of KIR3DS1 ؉ NK cells, compared with KIR3DL1 ؉ NK cells, according to the Bw4 ؉ or Bw4 ؊ allogeneic environment. Our results show for the first time that KIR3DS1 expression on NK cells can be induced after exposure to stimulator cells (221, K562, EBV-B cell lines, and B cells), polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid, IL-15, or IL-2. Furthermore, whereas KIR3DL1 ؉ NK cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were inhibited in a Bw4 ؉ but not a Bw4 ؊ context, KIR3DS1 ؉ NK cell functions were not influenced by the presence of Bw4 on target cells. Nevertheless, despite the absence of demonstrated regulation of KIR3DS1 ؉ NK cell functions by HLA-Bw4 molecules, we found a higher KIR3DS1 ؉ NK cell frequency and higher levels of KIR3DS1 expression in Bw4 ؉ compared with Bw4 ؊ individuals. Altogether, these results suggest that KIR3DS1 does not recognize HLA-Bw4 molecules in a physiological context, and they highlight the induced expression of KIR3DS1 observed on stimulated NK cells and the higher frequency of KIR3DS1 ؉ NK cells in Bw4 ؉ individuals. Because a protective KIR3DS1-Bw4 association has been reported in viral infections, our results further the understanding of the role of KIR3DS1 ؉ NK cells in controlling viral infections

    Investigation of the impact of HLA-DPB1 matching status in 10/10 HLA matched unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Results of a French single center study

    No full text
    International audienceThe impact of HLA-DPB1 mismatches after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of permissive/non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches on the outcome of 141 patients who underwent 10/10 HLA allelic-matched unrelated HSCT. Each pair was classified according to the 3 (TCE3) and 4-group (TCE4) algorithm based on DPB1 alleles immunogenicity. Outcome analysis revealed that TCE3 and TCE4 non-permissive HLA-DPB1 disparities were not associated with worsened overall survival, relapse risk neither risk of acute GvHD. Overall, this single center retrospective study does not confirm the adverse prognostic of non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches

    Relevance of KIR Gene Polymorphisms in Bone Marrow Transplantation Outcome

    No full text
    International audienceNatural Killer (NK) cells may be involved both in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The physiologic functions of NK cells appear to be regulated by diverse non-inhibitory and inhibitory receptors including the killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR). Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA) epitope mismatches are well-known causes of NK alloreactivity, the role of KIR genes in transplantation remains to be further investigated. In this study, we have evaluated whether KIR genotype differences between donors and recipients of HLA identical (related and unrelated) compared with HLA non-identical unrelated BMT, had an impact on transplantation outcome. Our results show that 5 of 15 KIR genes were always identical in donors and recipients and most variations were observed in the number and specificity of noninhibitory KIR genes. Based on the presence or absence of particular KIR genes, 70 different genotypes were obtained from all individuals. According to the donor or recipient KIR genotype, different combination patterns were described. Interestingly, when the recipient KIR genotype was "included" in the donor KIR genotype, 100% (11/11 pairs) of unrelated BMT developed GVHD compared with 60% (18/30) in all other combinations (p = 0.012). In contrast, no GVHD was observed in related BMT when the recipient KIR genotype was "included" in the donor KIR genotype (p = 0.0001). In conclusion, our results reveal a great diversity for KIR genotypes in donors and recipients of BMT and that the risk of GVHD was maximum in unrelated BMT when the recipient KIR genotype was "included" in the donor KIR genotype

    Programmes for the management of preoperative anaemia: audit in ten European hospitals within the PaBloE (Patient Blood Management in Europe) working group

    No full text
    Background and objectives Preoperative anaemia is an independent risk factor for a higher morbidity and mortality, a longer hospitalization and increased perioperative transfusion rates. Managing preoperative anaemia is the first of three pillars of Patient Blood Management (PBM), a multidisciplinary concept to improve patient safety. While various studies provide medical information on (successful) anaemia treatment pathways, knowledge of organizational details of diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia across Europe is scarce. Materials and methods To gain information on various aspects of preoperative anaemia management including organization, financing, diagnostics and treatment, we conducted a survey (74 questions) in ten hospitals from seven European nations within the PaBloE (Patient Blood Management in Europe) working group covering the year 2016. Results Organization and activity in the field of preoperative anaemia management were heterogeneous in the participating hospitals. Almost all hospitals had pathways for managing preoperative anaemia in place, however, only two nations had national guidelines. In six of the ten participating hospitals, preoperative anaemia management was organized by anaesthetists. Diagnostics and treatment focused on iron deficiency anaemia which, in most hospitals, was corrected with intravenous iron. Conclusion Implementation and approaches of preoperative anaemia management vary across Europe with a primary focus on treating iron deficiency anaemia. Findings of this survey motivated the hospitals involved to critically evaluate their practice and may also help other hospitals interested in PBM to develop action plans for diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia
    corecore