Daniel C. Dennett, Vrste umova: K razumijevanju svijesti, prev. Ivan Kraljević (Zagreb: In.Tri, 2017), 183 str.

Daniel C. Dennett, Vrste umova: K razumijevanju svijesti, prev. Ivan Kraljević (Zagreb: In.Tri, 2017), 183 str

In Defence of Psychology: Science as a Victim of Its Own Method

Ovaj rad, na primjeru psihologije, pokušava ponuditi novu perspektivu na korištenje znanstvene metodologije u društvenim znanostima. U radu se predlaže novi koncept koji je nazvan bijegom u metodologiju, a definiran kao snažno metodološko usmjerenje psihologa. Razmatraju se njegove implikacije i posljedice na trenutni razvoj psihologije te na obrazovanje budućih znanstvenika. Kao alternativu bijegu u metodologiju u psihologiji razmatra se Feyerabendov epistemološki anarhizam kao moguća kritika koja će ga staviti u perspektivu i pogurnuti cijelu disciplinu u smjeru daljnjeg razvoja i napretka.This paper tries to provide a new perspective on using scientific methodology in social sciences on the example of psychology. The paper proposes a new concept called the escape to methodology, which is defined as a strong methodological orientation of psychologists. Its implications and consequences on current development of psychology and education of future scientists are being analyzed. Feyerabend’s epistemological anarchism is considered as an alternative to the escape to methodology in psychology, being a possible criticism that will put it into perspective and move the whole discipline towards further development and advancement

Znanstvena reforma i replikacijska kriza u psihologiji

Početkom 2010-ih godina u psihologiji se ubrzano počela širiti rasprava o problemima s replikacijom već objavljenih istraživanja. Rasprave su se uskoro pretvorile u višeslojnu kritiku kvantitativnih metoda i metodologija koje psiholozi koriste, posebice u dijelu inferencijalne statistike. Problemi s replikacijom opisani su kao simptom dublje krize uvriježenih nacrta istraživanja i statističkih postupaka, u kombinaciji s funkcioniranjem znanstvenoga objavljivanja rezultata i znanstvene komunikacije. U ovome ćemo radu ponuditi pregled rasprava o replikacijskoj krizi i reformskome pokretu u psihologiji, prvi put na hrvatskome jeziku

Znanstvena reforma i replikacijska kriza u psihologiji

Početkom 2010-ih godina u psihologiji se ubrzano počela širiti rasprava o problemima s replikacijom već objavljenih istraživanja. Rasprave su se uskoro pretvorile u višeslojnu kritiku kvantitativnih metoda i metodologija koje psiholozi koriste, posebice u dijelu inferencijalne statistike. Problemi s replikacijom opisani su kao simptom dublje krize uvriježenih nacrta istraživanja i statističkih postupaka, u kombinaciji s funkcioniranjem znanstvenoga objavljivanja rezultata i znanstvene komunikacije. U ovome ćemo radu ponuditi pregled rasprava o replikacijskoj krizi i reformskome pokretu u psihologiji, prvi put na hrvatskome jeziku

Scientific Reform and Replication Crisis in Psychology

Početkom 2010-ih godina u psihologiji se ubrzano počela širiti rasprava o problemima s replikacijom već objavljenih istraživanja. Rasprave su se uskoro pretvorile u višeslojnu kritiku kvantitativnih metoda i metodologija koje psiholozi koriste, posebice u dijelu inferencijalne statistike. Problemi s replikacijom opisani su kao simptom dublje krize uvriježenih nacrta istraživanja i statističkih postupaka, u kombinaciji s funkcioniranjem znanstvenoga objavljivanja rezultata i znanstvene komunikacije. U ovome ćemo radu ponuditi pregled rasprava o replikacijskoj krizi i reformskome pokretu u psihologiji, prvi put na hrvatskome jeziku.In the 2010s, psychological science was engulfed in a discussion about the replicability of already published studies. These discussions soon morphed into a multi-layered criticism of quantitative methods and methodologies in psychology, especially when it comes to inferential statistics. The replicability problems were described as a symptom of a deep crisis of commonly applied research designs and statistical analyses, in combination with the dysfunction of scientific publishing and scholarly communication. In this paper, an overview of the replication crisis and reform movement in psychology in Croatia will be provided for the first time

Open Science. A Brief Introduction to the Movement and its Methodological Significance

Forum - metodološka bilješkaForum - methodological not

Open Science. A Brief Introduction to the Movement and its Methodological Significance

Forum - metodološka bilješkaForum - methodological not

Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/ytbcs. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis

COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey dataset on psychological and behavioural consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak

This N = 173,426 social science dataset was collected through the collaborative COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey – an open science effort to improve understanding of the human experiences of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic between 30th March and 30th May, 2020. The dataset allows a cross-cultural study of psychological and behavioural responses to the Coronavirus pandemic and associated government measures like cancellation of public functions and stay at home orders implemented in many countries. The dataset contains demographic background variables as well as measures of Asian Disease Problem, perceived stress (PSS-10), availability of social provisions (SPS-10), trust in various authorities, trust in governmental measures to contain the virus (OECD trust), personality traits (BFF-15), information behaviours, agreement with the level of government intervention, and compliance with preventive measures, along with a rich pool of exploratory variables and written experiences. A global consortium from 39 countries and regions worked together to build and translate a survey with variables of shared interests, and recruited participants in 47 languages and dialects. Raw plus cleaned data and dynamic visualizations are available

COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey dataset on psychological and behavioural consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak

This N = 173,426 social science dataset was collected through the collaborative COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey - an open science effort to improve understanding of the human experiences of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic between 30th March and 30th May, 2020. The dataset allows a cross-cultural study of psychological and behavioural responses to the Coronavirus pandemic and associated government measures like cancellation of public functions and stay at home orders implemented in many countries. The dataset contains demographic background variables as well as measures of Asian Disease Problem, perceived stress (PSS-10), availability of social provisions (SPS-10), trust in various authorities, trust in governmental measures to contain the virus (OECD trust), personality traits (BFF-15), information behaviours, agreement with the level of government intervention, and compliance with preventive measures, along with a rich pool of exploratory variables and written experiences. A global consortium from 39 countries and regions worked together to build and translate a survey with variables of shared interests, and recruited participants in 47 languages and dialects. Raw plus cleaned data and dynamic visualizations are available.Measurement(s) psychological measurement center dot anxiety-related behavior trait center dot Stress center dot response to center dot Isolation center dot loneliness measurement center dot Emotional Distress Technology Type(s) Survey Factor Type(s) geographic location center dot language center dot age of participant center dot responses to the Coronavirus pandemic Sample Characteristic - Organism Homo sapiens Sample Characteristic - Location global Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data:Peer reviewe