ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ АДАПТАЦИЯ К БОЛЕЗНИ И КАЧЕСТВО ЖИЗНИ ПАЦИЕНТОВ С ОПУХОЛЕВЫМ ПОРАЖЕНИЕМ КОСТЕЙ

The article reflects the results of empirical research and theoretical understanding of the interaction of mechanisms of psychological adjustment to the disease and the main parameters of quality of life in chronic somatic disease. We examined139 patients suffering from different forms of oncological damage of bones of the musculoskeletal system, who treated in «N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology». Such psychodiagnostic methods as «BIG 5», «Ways of coping», «Purpose-in-Life Test», «Questionnaire of relation to disease «TOBOL», «SF-36 Health Status Survey», «Quality of Life Questionnaire» EORTC QLQ-C30 with additional module BM-22 for patients with bone tumor were used; Karnofsky scale and ECOG-WHO scale (from medical records) were used to assess the objective somatic status of patients. Cluster, factor and multifactorial dispersion analysis of data was performed, which showed the influence of the selected «profiles» (clusters) of personality («Neurotic person», «Mature, adapted person», «Person with a high level of self-consciousness and responsibility», «Socially maladjusted personality») on the generalized factors of quality of life («Life activity», «Optimal quality of life in the conditions of disease», as well as the factor «Gastrointestinal problems», reflecting the somatization of psychological problems in the situation of the disease). The results of the study show that the integrated study of the mechanisms of psychological adaptation and characteristics of the quality of life in the conditions of the disease opens up new ways of psychological care and social rehabilitation of cancer patients, as it allows to take into account in each case the influence of «the profile of personality» on individual domains of quality of life.Статья отражает результаты эмпирического исследования и теоретического осмысления взаимодействия механизмов психологической адаптации к болезни и основных параметров качества жизни в условиях хронического соматического заболевания. Исследованы 139 больных, страдающих разными формами онкологического поражения костей опорно-двигательного аппарата, находящихся на лечении в Национальном медицинском исследовательском центре онкологии им. Н. Н. Блохина. Использованы психодиагностические методы «Большая пятерка», «Способы совладающего поведения», «Тест смысложизненных ориентаций», «Тип отношения к болезни», а также «Краткий общий опросник оценки статуса здоровья» (SF-36), «Опросник качества жизни» EORTC QLQ-C30 с дополнительным модулем BM-22 для больных с опухолью костей; для оценки объективного соматического статуса пациентов использовали индекс Карновского и шкалу ECOG-ВОЗ (из медицинской документации). Выполнен кластерный, факторный, а также многофакторный дисперсионный анализ данных, который показал влияние выделенных «профилей» (кластеров) личности («Невротическая личность», «Зрелая, адаптированная личность», «Личность с высоким уровнем самосознания и ответственности», «Социально-дезадаптированная личность») на обобщенные факторы качества жизни («Жизненная активность», «Оптимальное качество жизни в условиях болезни», а также фактор «Желудочно-кишечные симптомы», отражающий соматизацию психологических проблем в ситуации болезни). Результаты исследования показывают, что интегрированное изучение механизмов психологической адаптации и характеристик качества жизни в условиях болезни открывает новые пути психологической помощи и социальной реабилитации онкологических больных, так как позволяет учитывать в каждом случае влияние «профиля личности» на отдельные домены качества жизни

О разработке новых опросников качества жизни при онкологической патологии

The article is devoted to summarizing the authors’ experience in the development of Russian-language versions of foreign quality of life questionnaires for cancer patients as well as their own questionnaires for studying various aspects of the quality of life in bone and soft tissue tumors of the musculoskeletal system. We briefly presented the results of the validation and testing of the modules of the «Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30» (EORTC QLQ-C30) developed by the Quality of Life Assessment Group at the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) – «Fatigue» module (FA12), «Spiritual wellbeing» module (SWB32), «Bone Metastases» module (BM22), as well as the specialized Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSG-OQ). We also presented the diagnostic tools developed by the authors’ themselves for studying the quality of life of patients with pelvic bone tumors and lower limb amputations due to cancer. The main objective of the article was to inform the scientific community, as well as practicing psycho-oncologists and oncologists about the existence of new diagnostic tools for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. The article also outlines the prospects for development of diagnostic tools for quality of life of cancer patients. Статья посвящена обобщению опыта авторов в разработке русскоязычных версий зарубежных опросников качества жизни при онкологических заболеваниях, а также собственных опросников для изучения различных аспектов качества жизни при опухолях костей и мягких тканей опорно-двигательного аппарата. Кратко представлены результаты валидизации и апробации модулей «Опросника качества жизни при онкологической патологии» («Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30», EORTC QLQ-C30), разработанного Группой оценки качества жизни при Европейской организации лечения и исследования рака (EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life) – модуля «Fatigue» («Утомление») (FA12), модуля «Spiritual Wellbeing» («Духовное благополучие») (SWB32), модуля «Bone Metastases» («Качество жизни при опухолях костей») (BM22), а также специализированного «Опросника качества жизни при опухолях позвоночника» («Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire», SOSG-OQ); представлены собственные разработки авторов для изучения качества жизни пациентов с опухолями костей таза и пациентов, перенесших ампутацию нижней конечности в связи с онкологическим заболеванием. Основная цель статьи – информирование научной общественности, а также практикующих онкопсихологов и онкологов о существовании ряда новых диагностических инструментов для оценки качества жизни онкологических больных. Намечены перспективы разработки инструментов диагностики качества жизни онкологических больных.

The first horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from AAAS via the DOI in this recordThe file includes the article, supplementary material and additional supplementary materialThe published version of the supplementary materials are at http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2018/05/08/science.aar7711.DC1Part of the additional supplementary materials for this article are in ORE at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/32792The Yamnaya expansions from the western steppe into Europe and Asia during the Early Bronze Age (~3000 BCE) are believed to have brought with them Indo-European languages and possibly horse husbandry. We analyze 74 ancient whole-genome sequences from across Inner Asia and Anatolia and show that the Botai people associated with the earliest horse husbandry derived from a hunter-gatherer population deeply diverged from the Yamnaya. Our results also suggest distinct migrations bringing West Eurasian ancestry into South Asia before and after but not at the time of Yamnaya culture. We find no evidence of steppe ancestry in Bronze Age Anatolia from when Indo-European languages are attested there. Thus, in contrast to Europe, Early Bronze Age Yamnaya-related migrations had limited direct genetic impact in Asia.The study was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation (EW), the Danish National Research Foundation (EW), and KU2016 (EW). Research at the Sanger Institute was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant 206194). RM was supported by an EMBO Long-Term Fellowship (ALTF 133-2017). JK was supported by the Human Frontiers Science Program (LT000402/2017). Botai fieldwork was supported by University of Exeter, Archeology Exploration Fund and Niobe Thompson, Clearwater Documentary. AB was supported by NIH grant 5T32GM007197-43. GK was funded by Riksbankens Jubileumsfond and European Research Council. MP was funded by Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), project number 276-70-028, IU was funded by the Higher education commission of Pakistan. Archaeological materials from Sholpan and Grigorievka were obtained with partial financial support of the budget program of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan “Grant financing of scientific research for 2018-2020” No. AP05133498 “Early Bronze Age of the Upper Irtysh”

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia.

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene <sup>1-5</sup> . Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations

137 ancient human genomes from across the Eurasian steppes

Descriptive and Comparative Linguistic

The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes

This is the final version. Available on open access from Nature Research via the DOI in this recordData availability: All collapsed and paired-end sequence data for samples sequenced in this study are available in compressed fastq format through the European Nucleotide Archive under accession number PRJEB44430, together with rescaled and trimmed bam sequence alignments against both the nuclear and mitochondrial horse reference genomes. Previously published ancient data used in this study are available under accession numbers PRJEB7537, PRJEB10098, PRJEB10854, PRJEB22390 and PRJEB31613, and detailed in Supplementary Table 1. The genomes of ten modern horses, publicly available, were also accessed as indicated in their corresponding original publications57,61,85-87.NOTE: see the published version available via the DOI in this record for the full list of authorsDomestication of horses fundamentally transformed long-range mobility and warfare. However, modern domesticated breeds do not descend from the earliest domestic horse lineage associated with archaeological evidence of bridling, milking and corralling at Botai, Central Asia around 3500 BC. Other longstanding candidate regions for horse domestication, such as Iberia and Anatolia, have also recently been challenged. Thus, the genetic, geographic and temporal origins of modern domestic horses have remained unknown. Here we pinpoint the Western Eurasian steppes, especially the lower Volga-Don region, as the homeland of modern domestic horses. Furthermore, we map the population changes accompanying domestication from 273 ancient horse genomes. This reveals that modern domestic horses ultimately replaced almost all other local populations as they expanded rapidly across Eurasia from about 2000 BC, synchronously with equestrian material culture, including Sintashta spoke-wheeled chariots. We find that equestrianism involved strong selection for critical locomotor and behavioural adaptations at the GSDMC and ZFPM1 genes. Our results reject the commonly held association between horseback riding and the massive expansion of Yamnaya steppe pastoralists into Europe around 3000 BC driving the spread of Indo-European languages. This contrasts with the scenario in Asia where Indo-Iranian languages, chariots and horses spread together, following the early second millennium BC Sintashta culture

The Origins and Spread of Domestic Horses from the Western Eurasian Steppes

Domestication of horses fundamentally transformed long-range mobility and warfare1. However, modern domesticated breeds do not descend from the earliest domestic horse lineage associated with archaeological evidence of bridling, milking and corralling2–4 at Botai, Central Asia around 3500 bc3. Other longstanding candidate regions for horse domestication, such as Iberia5 and Anatolia6, have also recently been challenged. Thus, the genetic, geographic and temporal origins of modern domestic horses have remained unknown. Here we pinpoint the Western Eurasian steppes, especially the lower Volga-Don region, as the homeland of modern domestic horses. Furthermore, we map the population changes accompanying domestication from 273 ancient horse genomes. This reveals that modern domestic horses ultimately replaced almost all other local populations as they expanded rapidly across Eurasia from about 2000 bc, synchronously with equestrian material culture, including Sintashta spoke-wheeled chariots. We find that equestrianism involved strong selection for critical locomotor and behavioural adaptations at the GSDMC and ZFPM1 genes. Our results reject the commonly held association7 between horseback riding and the massive expansion of Yamnaya steppe pastoralists into Europe around 3000 bc8,9 driving the spread of Indo-European languages10. This contrasts with the scenario in Asia where Indo-Iranian languages, chariots and horses spread together, following the early second millennium bc Sintashta culture11,12. © 2021, The Author(s).We thank all members of the AGES group at CAGT. We are grateful for the Museum of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology (UB RAS, Ekaterinburg) for providing specimens. The work by G. Boeskorov is done on state assignment of DPMGI SB RAS. This project was supported by the University Paul Sabatier IDEX Chaire d’Excellence (OURASI); Villum Funden miGENEPI research programme; the CNRS ‘Programme de Recherche Conjoint’ (PRC); the CNRS International Research Project (IRP AMADEUS); the France Génomique Appel à Grand Projet (ANR-10-INBS-09-08, BUCEPHALE project); IB10131 and IB18060, both funded by Junta de Extremadura (Spain) and European Regional Development Fund; Czech Academy of Sciences (RVO:67985912); the Zoological Institute ZIN RAS (АААА-А19-119032590102-7); and King Saud University Researchers Supporting Project (NSRSP–2020/2). The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (19-59-15001 and 20-04-00213), the Russian Science Foundation (16-18-10265, 20-78-10151, and 21-18-00457), the Government of the Russian Federation (FENU-2020-0021), the Estonian Research Council (PRG29), the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (PRG1209), the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (Project NF 104792), the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Momentum Mobility Research Project of the Institute of Archaeology, Research Centre for the Humanities); and the Polish National Science Centre (2013/11/B/HS3/03822). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie (grant agreement 797449). This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreements 681605, 716732 and 834616)

The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes

Analysis of 273 ancient horse genomes reveals that modern domestic horses originated in the Western Eurasian steppes, especially the lower Volga-Don region.Domestication of horses fundamentally transformed long-range mobility and warfare(1). However, modern domesticated breeds do not descend from the earliest domestic horse lineage associated with archaeological evidence of bridling, milking and corralling(2-4) at Botai, Central Asia around 3500 bc(3). Other longstanding candidate regions for horse domestication, such as Iberia(5) and Anatolia(6), have also recently been challenged. Thus, the genetic, geographic and temporal origins of modern domestic horses have remained unknown. Here we pinpoint the Western Eurasian steppes, especially the lower Volga-Don region, as the homeland of modern domestic horses. Furthermore, we map the population changes accompanying domestication from 273 ancient horse genomes. This reveals that modern domestic horses ultimately replaced almost all other local populations as they expanded rapidly across Eurasia from about 2000 bc, synchronously with equestrian material culture, including Sintashta spoke-wheeled chariots. We find that equestrianism involved strong selection for critical locomotor and behavioural adaptations at the GSDMC and ZFPM1 genes. Our results reject the commonly held association(7) between horseback riding and the massive expansion of Yamnaya steppe pastoralists into Europe around 3000 bc(8,9) driving the spread of Indo-European languages(10). This contrasts with the scenario in Asia where Indo-Iranian languages, chariots and horses spread together, following the early second millennium bc Sintashta culture(11,12).Descriptive and Comparative Linguistic

The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes

Domestication of horses fundamentally transformed long-range mobility and warfare. However, modern domesticated breeds do not descend from the earliest domestic horse lineage associated with archaeological evidence of bridling, milking and corralling at Botai, Central Asia around 3500 bc. Other longstanding candidate regions for horse domestication, such as Iberia and Anatolia, have also recently been challenged. Thus, the genetic, geographic and temporal origins of modern domestic horses have remained unknown. Here we pinpoint the Western Eurasian steppes, especially the lower Volga-Don region, as the homeland of modern domestic horses. Furthermore, we map the population changes accompanying domestication from 273 ancient horse genomes. This reveals that modern domestic horses ultimately replaced almost all other local populations as they expanded rapidly across Eurasia from about 2000 bc, synchronously with equestrian material culture, including Sintashta spoke-wheeled chariots. We find that equestrianism involved strong selection for critical locomotor and behavioural adaptations at the GSDMC and ZFPM1 genes. Our results reject the commonly held association between horseback riding and the massive expansion of Yamnaya steppe pastoralists into Europe around 3000 bc driving the spread of Indo-European languages. This contrasts with the scenario in Asia where Indo-Iranian languages, chariots and horses spread together, following the early second millennium bc Sintashta culture