Methodological confounds of measuring urinary oxidative stress in wild animals

Abstract Biomarkers of oxidative stress (OS) are useful in addressing a wide range of research questions, but thus far, they have had limited application to wild mammal populations due to a reliance on blood or tissue sampling. A shift toward non‐invasive measurement of OS would allow field ecologists and conservationists to apply this method more readily. However, the impact of methodological confounds on urinary OS measurement under field conditions has never been explicitly investigated. We combined a cross‐sectional analysis with a field experiment to assess the impact of four potential methodological confounds on OS measurements: (1) time of sampling, (2) environmental contamination from foliage; (3) delay between sample collection and flash‐freezing in liquid nitrogen; and (4) sample storage of up to 15 months below −80°C. We measured DNA oxidative damage (8‐hydroxy‐2′‐deoxyguanosine, 8‐OHdG), lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and uric acid (UA) in 167 urine samples collected from wild Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii). We found that MDA was higher in samples collected in the morning than in the afternoon but there were no diurnal patterns in any of the other markers. Contamination of samples from foliage and length of time frozen at −80°C for up to 15 months did not affect OS marker concentrations. Freezing delay did not affect OS levels cross‐sectionally, but OS values from individual samples showed only moderate‐to‐good consistency and substantial rank‐order reversals when exposed to different freezing delays. We recommend that diurnal patterns of OS markers and the impact of storage time before and after freezing on OS marker concentrations be considered when designing sampling protocols. However, given the high stability we observed for four OS markers subject to a variety of putative methodological confounds, we suggest that urinary OS markers provide a valuable addition to the toolkit of field ecologists and conservationists within reasonable methodological constraints

Electrostatic potential profiles of molecular conductors

The electrostatic potential across a short ballistic molecular conductor depends sensitively on the geometry of its environment, and can affect its conduction significantly by influencing its energy levels and wave functions. We illustrate some of the issues involved by evaluating the potential profiles for a conducting gold wire and an aromatic phenyl dithiol molecule in various geometries. The potential profile is obtained by solving Poisson's equation with boundary conditions set by the contact electrochemical potentials and coupling the result self-consistently with a nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) formulation of transport. The overall shape of the potential profile (ramp vs. flat) depends on the feasibility of transverse screening of electric fields. Accordingly, the screening is better for a thick wire, a multiwalled nanotube or a close-packed self-assembled monolayer (SAM), in comparison to a thin wire, a single-walled nanotube or an isolated molecular conductor. The electrostatic potential further governs the alignment or misalignment of intramolecular levels, which can strongly influence the molecular I-V characteristic. An external gate voltage can modify the overall potential profile, changing the current-voltage (I-V) characteristic from a resonant conducting to a saturating one. The degree of saturation and gate modulation depends on the metal-induced-gap states (MIGS) and on the electrostatic gate control parameter set by the ratio of the gate oxide thickness to the channel length.Comment: to be published in Phys. Rev. B 69, No.3, 0353XX (2004

Modulating the charge injection in organic field-effect transistors: fluorinated oligophenyl self-assembled monolayers for high work function electrodes

Financial support from the ERC project SUPRAFUNCTION (GA-257305), the EC Marie-Curie projects IEF-MULTITUDES (PIEF-GA-2012-326666) and ITN iSwitch (GA no. 642196), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the LabEx project Chemistry of Complex Systems (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC), and the International Center for Frontier Research in Chemistry (icFRC). The computational work was supported by the Interuniversity Attraction Pole Programme (P7/05) initiated by the Belgian Science Policy Office, and by the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS). J.C. is an FNRS research director. Colin Van Dyck is a recipient of a Gustave Boël – Sofina Fellowship of the Belgian American Educational Foundation (BAEF). K.M., F.R. and M.M. acknowledge financial support by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) and the Swiss Nanoscience Institute (SNI)

The interface structure of n-alkylthiolate self-assembled monolayers on coinage metal surfaces

The current state of understanding of the structure of the metal/thiolate interface of n-alkylthiolate self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on Cu(111), Ag(111) and Au(111) is reviewed. On Cu(111) and Ag(111) there is now clear evidence that adsorbate-induced reconstruction of the outermost metal layer occurs to a less atomically-dense structure, with the S head-group atom bonded to four-fold and three-fold coordinated hollow sites, respectively, and that intermolecular interaction plays some role in the periodicity of the resulting SAMs. On the far more heavily-studied Au(111) surface, the detailed interface structure remains controversial, but there is growing evidence for the role of Au-adatom-thiolate moieties in the layer ordering

Basic Atomic Physics

Contains reports on five research projects.National Science Foundation Grant PHY 96-024740National Science Foundation Grant PHY 92-21489U.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-96-1-0484Joint Services Electronics Program Grant DAAHO4-95-1-0038National Science Foundation Grant PHY95-14795U.S. Army Research Office Contract DAAHO4-94-G-0170U.S. Army Research Office Contract DAAG55-97-1-0236U.S. Army Research Office Contract DAAH04-95-1-0533U.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-96-1-0432National Science Foundation Contract PHY92-22768David and Lucile Packard Foundation Grant 96-5158National Science Foundation Grant PHY 95-01984U.S. Army Research OfficeU.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-96-1-0485AASERT N00014-94-1-080

Basic Atomic Physics

Contains reports on five research projects.Joint Services Electronics Program Grant DAAH04-95-1-0038National Science Foundation Grant PHY 92-21489U.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-90-J-1322National Science Foundation Grant PHY95-14795Charles S. Draper Laboratory Contract DL-H-484775U.S. Army Research Office Contract DAAH04-94-G-0170U.S. Army Research Office Contract DAAH04-95-1-0533U.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-89-J-1207U.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research Contract N000014-96-1-0432David and Lucile Packard Foundation Grant 96-5158National Science Foundation Grant PHY95-01984U.S. Army - Office of ResearchU.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-96-1-0485U.S. Navy - Office of Naval Research AASERT N00014-94-1-080