29 research outputs found
Effect of Fluticasone propionate Aqueous Nasal Spray Treatment on Platelet Activating Factor and Eicosanoid Production By nasal Mucosa in Patients with A house Dust Mite Allergy
The relationship between the release of platelet activating factor
(PAF), leukotriene C4/D4/EE
(LTC4/D4/E4) and prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)
from nasal mucosa in vivo was examined in 24 rhinitis patients
allergic to the house dust mite (HDM). During a double blind placebo
controlled cross-over study 200 μg fluticasone propionate aqueous
nasal spray (FPANS) was administered twice daily for two weeks. In
response to allergen provocation (100, 1 000, 10 000 Bu/ml) and
during the 9.5 h after this challenge the nasal fluid was obtained
by washing the nose with saline and the levels of PAF, LTC4/D4/E4 and
PGD2, as indicators of mediator release, were measured at the
following time-points: baseline (t = − 1/2), allergen provocation with
10 000 Bu/ml (t = 0), 3.5 and 7.5 h (late phase). After allergen
provocation the levels of the mediators increased in the nasal
fluids of placebo treated patients (x-fold increase to baseline:
PAF, 15; LTC4/D4/E4, 12; PGD2, 1.5). In fluids of patients treated
with FPANS these levels tended to decrease. At the time of
provocation the levels of PAF, LTC4/D4/E4 and PGD2 showed a significant
correlation. The results indicate that these mediators can be used
as markers of allergic reactions against house dust mites and that
fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray tended to reduce the
release of mediators of inflammation correlated with beneficial
effects on clinical symptoms in this type of allergic reactions
Interleukin-5 and eosinophil cationic protein in nasal lavages of rhinitis patients
The production of interleukin-5 and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in the nasal cavity was examined in 24 patients with rhinitis who were allergic to the house dust mite. During a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study, fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (200 μg) was administered twice daily for 2 weeks. After four basal nasal lavages provocation with house dust mite extract was performed and nasal lavages were collected every hour for 9.5 h. Interleukin-5 was present in detectable amounts in nasal lavages from patients allergic to house dust mite. Nasal challenge with house dust mite extract caused immediate nasal symptoms and increased levels of interleukin-5. Between 3.5 and 8.5 h after the challenge symptoms recurred and interleukin-5 levels increased, reflecting a late phase reaction. Eosinophil cationic protein, a marker of activated eosinophils, was released between 6.5 and 9.5 h after challenge. Treatment with fluticasone propionate (as an aqueous nasal spray) significantly decreased the evoked interleukin-5 and ECP levels in the late phase reaction. This response was correlated with an improved symptom score. This could indicate that the number and activity of eosinophils are increased during the late phase allergic reaction, a response that is inhibited by corticosteroids
Prevalence of sensitization to the predatory mite Amblyseius cucumeris as a new occupational allergen in horticulture
Background: Protection against thrips, a common pest in bell pepper horticulture is effectively possible without pesticides by using the commercially available predatory mite Amblyseius cucumeris (Ac). The prevalence of sensitization to Ac among exposed greenhouse employees and its clinical relevance was studied. Methods: Four hundred and seventytwo employees were asked to fill in a questionnaire and were tested on location. Next to RAST, skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed with common inhalant allergens, the storage mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Tp) which serves as a temporary food source during the cultivation process and Ac. Furthermore, nasal challenge tests with Ac were carried out in 23 sensitized employees. Results: SPTs positive to Ac were found in 109 employees (23%). Work-related symptoms were reported by 76.1%. Sensitization to Tp was found in 62 employees of whom 48 were also sensitized to Ac. Immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated allergy to inhalant allergens appeared to be an important risk factor for sensitization to Ac. Employees with rhinitis symptoms showed a significantly higher response to all Ac doses during the nasal challenge test compared with employees without rhinitis symptoms. Conclusions: The predatory mite Ac is a new occupational allergen in horticulture which can cause an IgE-mediated allergy in exposed employees. It is biologically active on the mucous membranes of the nose and therefore clinically relevant for the development of work-related symptoms
EAACI position paper on occupational rhinitis
The present document is the result of a consensus reached by a panel of experts from European and non-European countries on Occupational Rhinitis (OR), a disease of emerging relevance which has received little attention in comparison to occupational asthma. The document covers the main items of OR including epidemiology, diagnosis, management, socio-economic impact, preventive strategies and medicolegal issues. An operational definition and classification of OR tailored on that of occupational asthma, as well as a diagnostic algorithm based on steps allowing for different levels of diagnostic evidence are proposed. The needs for future research are pointed out. Key messages are issued for each item
Biomarkers in asthma and allergic rhinitis
International audienceA biological marker (biomarker) is a physical sign or laboratory measurement that can serve as an indicator of biological or pathophysiological processes or as a response to a therapeutic intervention. An applicable biomarker possesses the characteristics of clinical relevance (sensitivity and specificity for the disease) and is responsive to treatment effects, in combination with simplicity, reliability and repeatability of the sampling technique. Presently, there are several biomarkers for asthma and allergic rhinitis that can be obtained by non-invasive or semi-invasive airway sampling methods meeting at least some of these criteria
Nasal hyperreactivity
Nasal hyperreactivity is an important feature of allergic and non- allergic rhinitis. This paper reviews the possible mechanisms behind hyperreactivity. Distinct mechanisms may play a role in allergic rhinitis - an inflammatory disease- and non-allergic rhinitis, mainly a non-inflammatory disease. In allergic rhinitis, particularly in perennial allergic rhinitis, there is a close connection between allergic response and non-specific hyperreactivity. In non-allergic rhinitis, a pathological entity comprising a heterogenous series of diseases, understanding and measuring nasal hyperreactivity is much more difficult. A variety of methods to assess nasal hyperreactivity are available. Given the heterogeneity of mechanisms, the various patients groups and the lack of standardization in tests, it is not surprising that measurement of nasal hyperreactivity is not included in the diagnostic arsenal of the clinician.</p
Relationship between nasal hyperreactivity, mediators and eosinophils in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and controls
Background - In perennial allergic rhinitis, patients are almost daily exposed to aeroallergens. This ongoing allergic reaction results in increased sensitivity to allergens and non-specific stimuli. It is generally known that inflammatory cells and mediators are involved in the pathogenesis of the allergic reaction. Objectives - To study the relationship between nasal hyperreactivity and nasal inflammation during natural allergen exposure. Methods - In 48 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and in 11 volunteers a nasal brush, a nasal lavage and a histamine challenge were performed. Nasal inflammation was estimated by the number of eosinophils, levels of albumin, tryptase, prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and leukotriene C4/D4/E4 (LTC4/D4/E4) Results - In contrast to PGD2 and tryptase, eosinophils (1.9 vs 0%, P = 0.0023), LTC4/ D4/E4 (17.51 vs 1.43 pg/mL, P < 0.0001) and albumin (8.61 vs 2.37 mg/mL, P = 0.0008) were significantly increased in rhinitis patients as compared with controls. Patients also showed increased responses to nasal histamine challenge assessed using a composite symptom score (21.5 vs 4 points, P < 0.0001). The nasal response to histamine was weakly correlated with the total number of eosinophils in the cytospin (correlation coefficient r = 0.38, P = 0.009). Conclusion - Nasal hyperreactivity is correlated with the percentage of eosinophils in patients with perennial rhinitis. The patients' mediator profiles suggest that eosinophils are important in the ongoing allergic reaction and nasal hyperreactivity.</p