104 research outputs found
The European Embryonic Stem-Cell Debate and the Difficulties of Embryological Kantianism
As elsewhere, the ethical debate on embryonic stem cell research in Central Europe, especially Germany and Switzerland, involves controversy over the status of the human embryo. There is a distinctive Kantian flavor to the standard arguments however, and we show how they often embody a set of misunderstandings and argumentative shortcuts we term "embryological Kantianism." We also undertake a broader analysis of three arguments typically presented in this debate, especially in official position papers, namely the identity, continuity, and potentiality arguments. It turns out that these arguments do not support the strong, quasi-personal status accorded to the embryos in these official opinion
Actions et omissions, effets voulus et effets latéraux : le conséquentialisme contre la morale intuitive
Intuitivement, nous jugeons que notre responsabilitĂ© concerne davantage ce que nous faisons que ce que nous omettons de faire, et quâelle sâĂ©tend plus aux effets voulus quâaux effets simplement prĂ©vus de nos actes. Ces intuitions ont Ă©tĂ© thĂ©matisĂ©es dans notre tradition par deux principes, celui de la distinction de lâaction et de lâomission (PDAO) et celui des actions Ă double effet (PADE). Jonathan Glover reconnaĂźt lâimportance de ces principes, mais considĂšre que, en dĂ©finitive, il nâest pas judicieux de les conserver et quâil vaut mieux sâen tenir Ă la doctrine consĂ©quentialiste que notre responsabilitĂ© sâĂ©tend Ă©galement Ă toutes les consĂ©quences de nos actes et de nos omissions. AprĂšs avoir examinĂ© les objections de Glover contre ces deux principes, je prĂ©sente les recherches de Joshua Greene sur la neuropsychologie du jugement moral. Elles sâappuient sur nos rĂ©actions Ă certains dilemmes moraux, particuliĂšrement Ă celui du wagon fou (trolley problem) et recourent Ă lâimagerie cĂ©rĂ©brale. Ses conclusions vont dans le mĂȘme sens que les arguments plus conceptuels de Glover. Toutefois, ces deux auteurs partagent une conception philosophique commune, le consĂ©quentialisme. Câest pourquoi jâexamine dans une derniĂšre partie certaines objections que rencontre cette conception morale, ce qui mâamĂšne, avec lâaide dâautres Ă©tudes de neuropsychologie, Ă conclure quâil est peu judicieux de mettre de cĂŽtĂ© les intentions de lâagent
Neuromodulation in the Service of Moral Enhancement
Human enhancement is a much debated topic in the bioethical literature. Human beings have long tried to improve their capacities and their performances through training and with the aid of tools; but more recently new means have come to the fore, such as drugs and biotechnological devices, especially in the domain of bodily strength and cognitive powers. Moral enhancement has been more seldom discussed. However, this question has recently been hotly debated between two philosophers, Thomas Douglas and John Harris. Douglas claims that modulating certain ugly emotions directly would consist in moral progressâdirectly, that is, without using cognitive means like persuasion or deliberation. Harris makes three objections against this thesis: such a direct neuromodulation would be inefficacious, would put our liberty in jeopardy and would lead to a moral decline. In this paper, I examine the third argument: with direct modulation, we risk intervening too much or too little, inducing an inappropriate emotion or an inappropriate level of an otherwise appropriate emotionâtwo upshots that will put morality in jeopardy. I conclude that the validity of this objection depends on several meta-ethical positions: if you are a rationalist or think that intentionality and consciousness are at the core of morality, you will agree with Harris, but if you are a sentimentalist or someone for whom results count, you will disagree. Here as elsewhere, ethical questions cannot be divorced from meta-ethical ones
Changing the Brain, Changing the Society: Clinical and Ethical Implications of Neuromodulation Techniques in Neurology and Psychiatry
New neurotechnologies for modulating brain functions are becoming increasingly powerful and applicable to diverse diseases, but raise new questions for clinicians, ethicists, policy makers, and laymen. This issue of Brain Topography gathers several papers exploring the clinical and ethical implications of several invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation approaches. The opportunities and challenges associated with the emergence of neuro-engineering solutions to brain research and brain repair require a close dialogue between multiple disciplines, as well as open discussion with the general public
Fostering responsible research with genome editing technologies : a European perspective
In this consensus paper resulting from a meeting that involved representatives from more than 20 European partners, we recommend the foundation of an expert group (European Steering Committee) to assess the potential benefits and draw-backs of genome editing (off-targets, mosaicisms, etc.), and to design risk matrices and scenarios for a responsible use of this promising technology. In addition, this European steering committee will contribute in promoting an open debate on societal aspects prior to a translation into national and international legislation.peer-reviewe
Clinical practice guidelines for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing
BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene pathogenic variants account for most hereditary breast cancer and are increasingly used to determine eligibility for PARP inhibitor (PARPi) therapy of BRCA-related cancer. Because issues of BRCA testing in clinical practice now overlap with both preventive and therapeutic management, updated and comprehensive practice guidelines for BRCA genotyping are needed. The integrative recommendations for BRCA testing presented here aim to (1) identify individuals who may benefit from genetic counselling and risk-reducing strategies; (2) update germline and tumour-testing indications for PARPi-approved therapies; (3) provide testing recommendations for personalised management of early and metastatic breast cancer; and (4) address the issues of rapid process and tumour analysis. An international group of experts, including geneticists, medical and surgical oncologists, pathologists, ethicists and patient representatives, was commissioned by the French Society of Predictive and Personalised Medicine (SFMPP). The group followed a methodology based on specific formal guidelines development, including (1) evaluating the likelihood of BRCAm from a combined systematic review of the literature, risk assessment models and expert quotations, and (2) therapeutic values of BRCAm status for PARPi therapy in BRCA-related cancer and for management of early and advanced breast cancer. These international guidelines may help clinicians comprehensively update and standardise BRCA testing practices
The Argument of Ethical Naturalism
Ethical naturalism, the theory claiming that natural facts and especially facts concerning human nature play a justificatory role in ethics, is not very popular amongst moral philosophers. Especially in countries where Kant's influence is large, the charge of naturalistic fallacy is often made against it. The aim of this paper is to show that this charge misses the point: every ethical theory is at a certain level based on pure facts, natural or not, and natural facts concerning human nature are particularly suited for this role. The arguments in favour of ethical naturalism rely on a concept of human nature that includes basic desires related to ends we ought to pursue, as Aristotle and the Scholastics already saw long ago
Le diagnostic prĂ©implantatoire (DPI) Ă lâĂšre de la mĂ©decine prĂ©dictive
Le sĂ©quençage Ă haut dĂ©bit est en train de rĂ©volutionner les diffĂ©rents diagnostics gĂ©nĂ©tiques et notamment le diagnostic prĂ©implantatoire (DPI), ouvrant les portes Ă une mĂ©decine prĂ©dictive de plus en plus performante. Le DPI nâest pas lui-mĂȘme nouveau, et les diffĂ©rentes lĂ©gislations sâen sont saisies depuis une vingtaine dâannĂ©es ; les comitĂ©s nationaux dâĂ©thique ont de leur cĂŽtĂ© largement dĂ©battu des tests antĂ©nataux dans le cadre de lâassistance mĂ©dicale Ă la procrĂ©ation. Cet article examine les travaux de ces comitĂ©s concernant le DPI dans trois Ătats, la France, la Belgique et la Suisse, afin de mettre en lumiĂšre leurs similitudes et leurs diffĂ©rences. Le sujet a par ailleurs Ă©tĂ© soulevĂ© et discutĂ© dans le cadre des Ătats gĂ©nĂ©raux de la bioĂ©thique qui se sont dĂ©roulĂ©s cette annĂ©e en France et, vu les progrĂšs diagnostiques rĂ©alisĂ©s depuis peu, ils se sont fait lâĂ©cho de certaines demandes de la sociĂ©tĂ© civile. Toutefois, en France, câest la prudence qui continue de dominer
- âŠ