31 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Humanism in the Age of COVID-19: Renewing Focus on Communication and Compassion
The global COVID-19 pandemic has become one of the largest clinical and operational challenges faced by emergency medicine, and our EDs continue to see increased volumes of infected patients, many of whom are not only ill, but acutely aware and fearful of their circumstances and potential mortality. Given this, there may be no more important time to focus on staff-patient communication and expression of compassion.However, many of the techniques usually employed by emergency clinicians to provide comfort to patients and their families are made more challenging or impossible by the current circumstances. Geriatric ED patients, who are at increased risk of severe disease, are particularly vulnerable to the effects of isolation.Despite many challenges, emergency clinicians have at their disposal a myriad of tools that can still be used to express compassion and empathy to their patients. Placing emphasis on using these techniques to maximize humanism in the care of COVID-19 patients during this crisis has the potential to bring improvements to ED patient care well after this pandemic has passed
Recommended from our members
Emergency department quality and safety indicators in resource-limited settings: an environmental survey
Background: As global emergency care grows, practical and effective performance measures are needed to ensure high quality care. Our objective was to systematically catalog and classify metrics that have been used to measure the quality of emergency care in resource-limited settings. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and the gray literature using standardized terms. The references of included articles were also reviewed. Two researchers screened titles and abstracts for relevance; full text was then reviewed by three researchers. A structured data extraction tool was used to identify and classify metrics into one of six Institute of Medicine (IOM) quality domains (safe, timely, efficient, effective, equitable, patient-centered) and one of three of Donabedianâs structure/process/outcome categories. A fourth expert reviewer blinded to the initial classifications re-classified all indicators, with a weighted kappa of 0.89. Results: A total of 1705 articles were screened, 95 received full text review, and 34 met inclusion criteria. One hundred eighty unique metrics were identified, predominantly process (57 %) and structure measures (27 %); 16 % of metrics were related to outcomes. Most metrics evaluated the effectiveness (52 %) and timeliness (28 %) of care, with few addressing the patient centeredness (11 %), safety (4 %), resource-efficiency (3 %), or equitability (1 %) of care. Conclusions: The published quality metrics in emergency care in resource-limited settings primarily focus on the effectiveness and timeliness of care. As global emergency care is built and strengthened, outcome-based measures and those focused on the safety, efficiency, and equitability of care need to be developed and studied to improve quality of care and resource utilization. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12245-015-0088-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users
Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018.
Over the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives. Since the field continues to expand and novel mechanisms that orchestrate multiple cell death pathways are unveiled, we propose an updated classification of cell death subroutines focusing on mechanistic and essential (as opposed to correlative and dispensable) aspects of the process. As we provide molecularly oriented definitions of terms including intrinsic apoptosis, extrinsic apoptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, parthanatos, entotic cell death, NETotic cell death, lysosome-dependent cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, immunogenic cell death, cellular senescence, and mitotic catastrophe, we discuss the utility of neologisms that refer to highly specialized instances of these processes. The mission of the NCCD is to provide a widely accepted nomenclature on cell death in support of the continued development of the field
Goals of Care Conversations Documented by an Embedded Emergency Department-Palliative Care Team during COVID
Background: There has been growing interest around integrating palliative care (PC) into emergency department (ED) practice but concern about feasibility and impact. In 2020, as the COVID pandemic was escalating, our hospital's ED and PC leadership created a new service of PC clinicians embedded in the ED. Objectives: To describe the clinical work of the embedded ED-PC team, in particular what was discussed during goals of care conversations. Design: Prospective patient identification followed by retrospective electronic health record chart extraction and analysis. Settings/Subjects: Adult ED patients in an academic medical center in the United States. Measurements/Results: The embedded ED-PC team saw 159 patients, whose mean age was 77.5. Nearly all patients were admitted, 48.0% had confirmed or presumed COVID, and overall mortality was 29.1%. Of the patients seen, 58.5% had a serious illness conversation documented as part of the consult. The most common topics addressed were patient (or family) illness understanding (96%), what was most important (92%), and a clinical recommendation (91%). Clinicians provided a prognostic estimate in 57/93 (61.3%) of documented discussions. In the majority of cases where prognosis was discussed, it was described as poor. Conclusion: Specialist PC clinicians embedded in the ED can engage in high-quality goals of care conversations that have the potential to align patients' hospital trajectory with their preferences
Morbidity and Mortality Conference in Emergency Medicine Residencies and the Culture of Safety
Introduction: Morbidity and mortality conferences (M+M) are a traditional part of residency training
and mandated by the Accreditation Counsel of Graduate Medical Education. This studyâs objective
was to determine the goals, structure, and the prevalence of practices that foster strong safety
cultures in the M+Ms of U.S. emergency medicine (EM) residency programs.
Methods: The authors conducted a national survey of U.S. EM residency program directors. The
survey instrument evaluated five domains of M+M (Organization and Infrastructure; Case Finding;
Case Selection; Presentation; and Follow up) based on the validated Agency for Healthcare
Research & Quality Safety Culture survey.
Results: There was an 80% (151/188) response rate. The primary objectives of M+M were
discussing adverse outcomes (53/151, 35%), identifying systems errors (47/151, 31%) and
identifying cognitive errors (26/151, 17%). Fifty-six percent (84/151) of institutions have anonymous
case submission, with 10% (15/151) maintaining complete anonymity during the presentation and
21% (31/151) maintaining partial anonymity. Forty-seven percent (71/151) of programs report a
formal process to follow up on systems issues identified at M+M. Forty-four percent (67/151) of
programs report regular debriefing with residents who have had their cases presented.
Conclusion: The structure and goals of M+Ms in EM residencies vary widely. Many programs lack
features of M+M that promote a non-punitive response to error, such as anonymity. Other programs
lack features that support strong safety cultures, such as following up on systems issues or reporting
back to residents on improvements. Further research is warranted to determine if M+M structure is
related to patient safety culture in residency programs
Recommended from our members
Goals-of-Care Conversations for Older Adults With Serious Illness in the Emergency Department: Challenges and Opportunities
During the last 6 months of life, 75% of older adults with preexisting serious illness, such as advanced heart failure, lung disease, and cancer, visit the emergency department (ED). ED visits often mark an inflection point in these patients' illness trajectories, signaling a more rapid rate of decline. Although most patients are there seeking care for acute issues, many of them have priorities other than to simply live as long as possible; yet without discussion of preferences for treatment, they are at risk of receiving care not aligned with their goals. An ED visit may offer a unique "teachable moment" to empower patients to consider their ability to influence future medical care decisions. However, the constraints of the ED setting pose specific challenges, and little research exists to guide clinicians treating patients in this setting. We describe the current state of goals-of-care conversations in the ED, outline the challenges to conducting these conversations, and recommend a research agenda to better equip emergency physicians to guide shared decisionmaking for end-of-life care. Applying best practices for serious illness communication may help emergency physicians empower such patients to align their future medical care with their values and goals
The âSurprise Questionâ Asked of Emergency Physicians May Predict 12-Month Mortality among Older Emergency Department Patients
BackgroundIdentification of older adults with serious illness (life expectancy less than one year) who may benefit from serious illness conversations or other palliative care interventions in the emergency department (ED) is difficult.ObjectivesTo assess the performance of the "surprise question (SQ)" asked of emergency physicians to predict 12-month mortality.DesignWe asked attending emergency physician "Would you be surprised whether this patient died in the next 12 months?" regarding patients â„65 years old that they had cared for that shift. We prospectively obtained death records from Massachusetts Department of Health Vital Records.SettingAn urban, university-affiliated ED.MeasurementTwelve-month mortality.ResultsWe approached 38 physicians to answer the SQ, and 86% participated. The mean age of our cohort was 76 years, 51% were male, and 45% had at least one serious illness. Out of 207 patients, the physicians stated that they "would not be surprised" if the patient died in the next 12 months for 102 of the patients (49%); 44 of the 207 patients (21%) died within 12 months. The SQ demonstrated sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 56%, positive predictive value of 32%, and negative predictive value of 90%. When combined with other predictors, the model sorted the patient who lived from the patient who died correctly 72% of the time (c-statisticâ=â0.72).ConclusionUse of the SQ by emergency physicians may predict 12-month mortality in older ED patients and may help emergency physicians identify older adults in need of palliative care interventions
Recommended from our members
The âSurprise Questionâ Asked of Emergency Physicians May Predict 12-Month Mortality among Older Emergency Department Patients
BackgroundIdentification of older adults with serious illness (life expectancy less than one year) who may benefit from serious illness conversations or other palliative care interventions in the emergency department (ED) is difficult.ObjectivesTo assess the performance of the "surprise question (SQ)" asked of emergency physicians to predict 12-month mortality.DesignWe asked attending emergency physician "Would you be surprised whether this patient died in the next 12 months?" regarding patients â„65 years old that they had cared for that shift. We prospectively obtained death records from Massachusetts Department of Health Vital Records.SettingAn urban, university-affiliated ED.MeasurementTwelve-month mortality.ResultsWe approached 38 physicians to answer the SQ, and 86% participated. The mean age of our cohort was 76 years, 51% were male, and 45% had at least one serious illness. Out of 207 patients, the physicians stated that they "would not be surprised" if the patient died in the next 12 months for 102 of the patients (49%); 44 of the 207 patients (21%) died within 12 months. The SQ demonstrated sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 56%, positive predictive value of 32%, and negative predictive value of 90%. When combined with other predictors, the model sorted the patient who lived from the patient who died correctly 72% of the time (c-statisticâ=â0.72).ConclusionUse of the SQ by emergency physicians may predict 12-month mortality in older ED patients and may help emergency physicians identify older adults in need of palliative care interventions