14 research outputs found
Identification of milestone papers through time-balanced network centrality
Citations between scientific papers and related bibliometric indices, such as the h- index for authors and the impact factor for journals, are being increasingly used – often in controversial ways – as quantitative tools for research evaluation. Yet, a fundamental research question remains still open: to which extent do quantitative metrics capture the significance of scientific works? We analyze the network of citations among the 449,935 papers published by the American Physical Society (APS) journals between 1893 and 2009, and focus on the comparison of metrics built on the citation count with network-based metrics. We contrast five article-level metrics with respect to the rankings that they assign to a set of fundamental papers, called Milestone Letters, carefully selected by the APS editors for “making long-lived contributions to physics, either by announcing significant discoveries, or by initiating new areas of research”. A new metric, which combines PageRank centrality with the explicit requirement that paper score is not biased by paper age, is the best-performing metric overall in identifying the Milestone Letters. The lack of time bias in the new metric makes it also possible to use it to compare papers of different age on the same scale. We find that network-based metrics identify the Milestone Letters better than metrics based on the citation count, which suggests that the structure of the citation network contains information that can be used to improve the ranking of scientific publications. The methods and results presented here are relevant for all evolving systems where network centrality metrics are applied, for example the World Wide Web and online social networks. An interactive Web platform where it is possible to view the ranking of the APS papers by rescaled PageRank is available at the address http://www.sciencenow.info
Network-based ranking in social systems: three challenges
Ranking algorithms are pervasive in our increasingly digitized societies,
with important real-world applications including recommender systems, search
engines, and influencer marketing practices. From a network science
perspective, network-based ranking algorithms solve fundamental problems
related to the identification of vital nodes for the stability and dynamics of
a complex system. Despite the ubiquitous and successful applications of these
algorithms, we argue that our understanding of their performance and their
applications to real-world problems face three fundamental challenges: (i)
Rankings might be biased by various factors; (2) their effectiveness might be
limited to specific problems; and (3) agents' decisions driven by rankings
might result in potentially vicious feedback mechanisms and unhealthy systemic
consequences. Methods rooted in network science and agent-based modeling can
help us to understand and overcome these challenges.Comment: Perspective article. 9 pages, 3 figure
Algorithmic bias amplification via temporal effects: The case of PageRank in evolving networks
Biases impair the effectiveness of algorithms. For example, the age bias of the widely-used PageRank algorithm impairs its ability to effectively rank nodes in growing networks. PageRank’s temporal bias cannot be fully explained by existing analytic results that predict a linear relation between the expected PageRank score and the indegree of a given node. We show that in evolving networks, under a mean-field approximation, the expected PageRank score of a node can be expressed as the product of the node’s indegree and a previously-neglected age factor which can “amplify” the indegree’s age bias. We use two well-known empirical networks to show that our analytic results explain the observed PageRank’s age bias and, when there is an age bias amplification, they enable estimates of the node PageRank score that are more accurate than estimates based solely on local structural information. Accuracy gains are larger in degree-degree correlated networks, as revealed by a growing directed network model with tunable assortativity. Our approach can be used to analytically study other kinds of ranking bias
Eigenvector-Based Centrality Measures for Temporal Networks
Numerous centrality measures have been developed to quantify the importances
of nodes in time-independent networks, and many of them can be expressed as the
leading eigenvector of some matrix. With the increasing availability of network
data that changes in time, it is important to extend such eigenvector-based
centrality measures to time-dependent networks. In this paper, we introduce a
principled generalization of network centrality measures that is valid for any
eigenvector-based centrality. We consider a temporal network with N nodes as a
sequence of T layers that describe the network during different time windows,
and we couple centrality matrices for the layers into a supra-centrality matrix
of size NTxNT whose dominant eigenvector gives the centrality of each node i at
each time t. We refer to this eigenvector and its components as a joint
centrality, as it reflects the importances of both the node i and the time
layer t. We also introduce the concepts of marginal and conditional
centralities, which facilitate the study of centrality trajectories over time.
We find that the strength of coupling between layers is important for
determining multiscale properties of centrality, such as localization phenomena
and the time scale of centrality changes. In the strong-coupling regime, we
derive expressions for time-averaged centralities, which are given by the
zeroth-order terms of a singular perturbation expansion. We also study
first-order terms to obtain first-order-mover scores, which concisely describe
the magnitude of nodes' centrality changes over time. As examples, we apply our
method to three empirical temporal networks: the United States Ph.D. exchange
in mathematics, costarring relationships among top-billed actors during the
Golden Age of Hollywood, and citations of decisions from the United States
Supreme Court.Comment: 38 pages, 7 figures, and 5 table
Bibliometric Analysis of the Informal Caregiver’s Scientific Production
(1) Background: Due to the increase in care needs, especially in the elderly, the concept of caregiver has emerged. This concept has undergone changes over the years due to new approaches and new research in the area. It is in this context that the concept of informal caregiver emerged. (2) Objectives: To analyse the evolution of the caregiver concept. (3) Methods: Bibliometric analysis, data collection (Web of Science Core Collection) and analysis (Excel; CiteSpace; VOSviewer). (4) Results: Obtained 22,326 articles. The concept emerged in 1990, being subjected to changes, mostly using the term “informal caregiver” since 2016, frequently related to the areas of Gerontology and Nursing. The following research boundaries emerged from the analysis: “Alzheimer’s Disease”, “Elderly” and “Institutionalization”. (5) Conclusions: The informal caregiver emerges as a useful care partner, being increasingly studied by the scientific community, particularly in the last 5 years
Ranking in evolving complex networks
Complex networks have emerged as a simple yet powerful framework to represent and analyze a wide range of complex systems. The problem of ranking the nodes and the edges in complex networks is critical for a broad range of real-world problems because it affects how we access online information and products, how success and talent are evaluated in human activities, and how scarce resources are allocated by companies and policymakers, among others. This calls for a deep understanding of how existing ranking algorithms perform, and which are their possible biases that may impair their effectiveness. Many popular ranking algorithms (such as Google’s PageRank) are static in nature and, as a consequence, they exhibit important shortcomings when applied to real networks that rapidly evolve in time. At the same time, recent advances in the understanding and modeling of evolving networks have enabled the development of a wide and diverse range of ranking algorithms that take the temporal dimension into account. The aim of this review is to survey the existing ranking algorithms, both static and time-aware, and their applications to evolving networks. We emphasize both the impact of network evolution on well-established static algorithms and the benefits from including the temporal dimension for tasks such as prediction of network traffic, prediction of future links, and identification of significant nodes