26 research outputs found

    Polarization of Rheumatoid Macrophages by TNF Targeting Through an IL-10/STAT3 Mechanism

    Get PDF
    Macrophages contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They can display different states of activation or “polarization,” notably the so-called inflammatory “M1” and the various alternative “M2” polarizations, characterized by distinct functions. Data regarding the effects of RA anti-cytokine biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on macrophage polarization are scarce. We aimed to assess in vitro modulation of macrophage polarization by bDMARDs targeting pro-inflammatory cytokines in RA. We generated monocyte derived macrophages using blood samples from 20 RA patients with active RA and 30 healthy controls. We evaluated in vitro the impact on M1 inflammatory macrophages of: etanercept (ETA), adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab (CZP), tocilizumab (TCZ), and rituximab (RTX). We assessed the impact on macrophage polarization using flow cytometry and RTqPCR to study the expression of surface markers and perform functional studies of cytokine production, phagocytosis, and negative feedback control of inflammation. Among evaluated bDMARDs, anti-TNF agents modulated the polarization of inflammatory macrophages by decreasing inflammatory surface markers (CD40, CD80) and favoring alternative markers (CD16, CD163, MerTK). Anti-TNF agents also induced alternative functions in macrophages activated in inflammatory condition with (i) the inhibition of inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-6, IL-12), (ii) an increase in phagocytosis. These findings were mechanistically related to an increase in early IL-10 production, responsible for higher negative feedback control of inflammation involving SOCS3 and Gas6. This IL-10 effect was STAT3-dependent. Anti-TNF agents not only inhibit in vitro inflammatory functions of macrophages, but also favor resolution of inflammation through polarization toward alternative features specifically involving the IL-10/STAT3 axis

    Modulation of pro-inflammatory activation of monocytes and dendritic cells by aza-bis-phosphonate dendrimer as an experimental therapeutic agent

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to assess the capacity of dendrimer aza-bis-phosphonate (ABP) to modulate phenotype of monocytes (Mo) and monocytes derived dendritic cells (MoDC) activated in response to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and interferon Îł (IFN- Îł) stimulation. METHODS: Mo (n = 12) and MoDC (n = 11) from peripheral blood of healthy donors were prepared. Cells were preincubated or not for 1 hour with dendrimer ABP, then incubated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS; as a TLR4 ligand) and (IFN-Îł) for 38 hours. Secretion of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin (IL) -1, IL-6, IL-12, IL-10 and IL-23 in the culture medium was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Cytokine Bead Array. Differentiation and subsequent maturation of MoDC from nine donors in the presence of LPS were analyzed by flow cytometry using CD80, CD86, CD83 and CD1a surface expression as markers. RESULTS: Mo and MoDC were orientated to a pro-inflammatory state. In activated Mo, TNFα, IL-1ÎČ and IL-23 levels were significantly lower after prior incubation with dendrimer ABP. In activated MoDC, dendrimer ABP promoted IL-10 secretion while decreasing dramatically the level of IL-12. TNFα and IL-6 secretion were significantly lower in the presence of dendrimer ABP. LPS driven maturation of MoDC was impaired by dendrimer ABP treatment, as attested by the significantly lower expression of CD80 and CD86. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that dendrimer ABP possesses immunomodulatory properties on human Mo and MoDC, in TLR4 + IFN-Îł stimulation model, by inducing M2 alternative activation of Mo and promoting tolerogenic MoDC

    Value of ultrasonography as a marker of early response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results from the APPRAISE study

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To study the responsiveness of a combined power Doppler and greyscale ultrasound (PDUS) score for assessing synovitis in biologic-naĂŻve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting abatacept plus methotrexate (MTX). Methods: In this open-label, multicentre, single-arm study, patients with RA (MTX inadequate responders) received intravenous abatacept (∌10 mg/kg) plus MTX for 24 weeks. A composite PDUS synovitis score, developed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology–European League Against Rheumatism (OMERACT–EULAR)-Ultrasound Task Force, was used to evaluate individual joints. The maximal score of each joint was added into a Global OMERACT–EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS) for bilateral metacarpophalangeal joints (MCPs) 2–5 (primary objective). The value of GLOESS containing other joint sets was explored, along with clinical efficacy. Results: Eighty-nine patients completed the 24-week treatment period. The earliest PDUS sign of improvement in synovitis was at week 1 (mean change in GLOESS (MCPs 2–5): −0.7 (95% CIs −1.2 to −0.1)), with continuous improvement to week 24. Early improvement was observed in the component scores (power Doppler signal at week 1, synovial hyperplasia at week 2, joint effusion at week 4). Comparable changes were observed for 22 paired joints and minimal joint subsets. Mean Disease Activity Score 28 (C reactive protein) was significantly reduced from weeks 1 to 24, reaching clinical meaningful improvement (change ≄1.2) at week 8. Conclusions: In this first international prospective study, the composite PDUS score is responsive to abatacept. GLOESS demonstrated the rapid onset of action of abatacept, regardless of the number of joints examined. Ultrasound is an objective tool to monitor patients with RA under treatment. Trial registration number: NCT00767325

    Modulation thérapeutique du phénotype du macrophage dans la polyarthrite rhumatoïde

    Get PDF
    Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most frequent chronic inflammatory rheumatism. This disease is characterized by an auto-immunity and a hyperplasic synovitis, both responsible for peripheral joints destruction. Macrophages contribute to inflammatory aspects of RA. This cell type can present various states of activation or "polarization", reversible and dependent on its environment, notably cytokines. Biologics (bDMARDs) represented a revolution in severe RA treatment. However, data regarding their specific action on macrophage are scarce. The aim of our translational work was: (i) to assess the in vitro effect of RA bDMARDs (anti-TNF: etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab; anti-IL-6R: tocilizumab; CTLA4-Ig: abatacept) on the phenotype of monocytes-derived-macrophages from RA patients and healthy volunteers, during differentiation and activation phases, (ii) to identify polarization markers correlated with disease activity (DAS28). Among bDMARDs, only anti-TNF modulated macrophage polarization. During differentiation, anti-TNF bDMARDs induced a bias toward the so-called alternative non-inflammatory polarization. In inflammatory context, anti-TNF bDMARDs induced a selective preservation of markers associated with IL-10 (CD16, CD163, MerTK) and an inhibition of inflammatory markers (CD40, CD80). We showed that these changes in phenotype were associated with changes in functions consistent with: (i) a polarization induced by IL10, (ii) a decrease in inflammatory cytokines production (TNF, IL-6, IL-12), (iii) and an increase in phagocytosis. We showed that this mechanism was dependant on early IL-10 production and STAT3 signaling. Moreover, we have showed that certolizumab, an anti-TNF agent, induced an anti-inflammatory response, implicating the transcription factor NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid-2- related factor 2), a central regulator of the response to oxidative stress. We observed that CD16 expression on non-activated macrophages was negatively correlated with RA activity. This work contributes to demonstrate the relevance of macrophage targeting in RA, and enabled us to identify theranostic targets for RA treatment with anti-TNF bDMARDs.La polyarthrite rhumatoĂŻde (PR) est le rhumatisme inflammatoire chronique le plus frĂ©quent. Cette maladie est caractĂ©risĂ©e par une auto-immunitĂ© et une synovite hypertrophique, responsables d'une destruction des articulations pĂ©riphĂ©riques. Les macrophages contribuent aux phĂ©nomĂšnes inflammatoires de la PR. Ces cellules peuvent prĂ©senter diffĂ©rents Ă©tats d'activation ou " polarisation ", rĂ©versibles, dĂ©pendant de leur environnement, notamment cytokinique. Les biothĂ©rapies (bDMARDs) ont reprĂ©sentĂ© une avancĂ©e majeure dans la prise en charge des manifestations inflammatoires des formes sĂ©vĂšres de PR. Toutefois, peu d'Ă©tudes ont Ă©valuĂ© si ce bĂ©nĂ©fice Ă©tait liĂ© Ă  une action spĂ©cifique sur le macrophage. L'objectif de ce travail de transversal Ă©tait : (i) d'Ă©valuer in vitro l'effet des principales biothĂ©rapies de la PR (anti-TNF : etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab ; anti-IL- 6R : tocilizumab ; CTLA4-Ig : abatacept) sur la diffĂ©renciation et l'activation de macrophages dĂ©rivĂ©s de monocytes issus de patients atteints de PR et de sujets sains, (ii) d'identifier des marqueurs de polarisation du macrophage, corrĂ©lĂ©s Ă  l'activitĂ© de la maladie (DAS28). Parmi les bDMARDs Ă©valuĂ©s, seuls les anti-TNF ont montrĂ© une action sur la polarisation des macrophages. En contexte de diffĂ©renciation avec M-CSF, les bDMARDs anti-TNF ont induit un biais vers une polarisation non inflammatoire dite alternative. En contexte d'activation inflammatoire, les bDMARDs anti-TNF ont induit une prĂ©servation sĂ©lective des marqueurs de polarisation liĂ©s Ă  l'IL-10 (CD16, CD163, MerTK) et une inhibition des marqueurs inflammatoires (CD40, CD80). Nous avons montrĂ© que ce changement phĂ©notypique s'accompagnait : (i) d'un changement fonctionnel concordant avec une polarisation induite par l'IL-10, (ii) d'une inhibition de la production des cytokines de l'inflammation (TNF, IL-6, IL-12), (iii) et d'une majoration de la phagocytose. Nous avons montrĂ© que ce mĂ©canisme Ă©tait dĂ» Ă  une production prĂ©coce d'IL-10 et dĂ©pendant de STAT3. De plus, nous avons pu montrer que le certolizumab, un anti-TNF, induisait une rĂ©ponse anti-inflammatoire, impliquant le facteur de transcription NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2), un rĂ©gulateur central dans la rĂ©ponse au stress oxydatif. Enfin, nous avons observĂ© que l'expression de CD16, Ă  la surface des macrophages non activĂ©s, Ă©tait corrĂ©lĂ©e nĂ©gativement Ă  l'activitĂ© de la PR. Ces travaux concourent Ă  montrer l'intĂ©rĂȘt du ciblage du macrophage dans la PR et nous ont d'identifier de potentielles cibles thĂ©ranostiques dans le traitement de la PR par anti-TNF

    Therapeutic modulation of the phenotype of the macrophage in rheumatoid arthritis

    No full text
    La polyarthrite rhumatoĂŻde (PR) est le rhumatisme inflammatoire chronique le plus frĂ©quent. Cette maladie est caractĂ©risĂ©e par une auto-immunitĂ© et une synovite hypertrophique, responsables d'une destruction des articulations pĂ©riphĂ©riques. Les macrophages contribuent aux phĂ©nomĂšnes inflammatoires de la PR. Ces cellules peuvent prĂ©senter diffĂ©rents Ă©tats d'activation ou " polarisation ", rĂ©versibles, dĂ©pendant de leur environnement, notamment cytokinique. Les biothĂ©rapies (bDMARDs) ont reprĂ©sentĂ© une avancĂ©e majeure dans la prise en charge des manifestations inflammatoires des formes sĂ©vĂšres de PR. Toutefois, peu d'Ă©tudes ont Ă©valuĂ© si ce bĂ©nĂ©fice Ă©tait liĂ© Ă  une action spĂ©cifique sur le macrophage. L'objectif de ce travail de transversal Ă©tait : (i) d'Ă©valuer in vitro l'effet des principales biothĂ©rapies de la PR (anti-TNF : etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab ; anti-IL- 6R : tocilizumab ; CTLA4-Ig : abatacept) sur la diffĂ©renciation et l'activation de macrophages dĂ©rivĂ©s de monocytes issus de patients atteints de PR et de sujets sains, (ii) d'identifier des marqueurs de polarisation du macrophage, corrĂ©lĂ©s Ă  l'activitĂ© de la maladie (DAS28). Parmi les bDMARDs Ă©valuĂ©s, seuls les anti-TNF ont montrĂ© une action sur la polarisation des macrophages. En contexte de diffĂ©renciation avec M-CSF, les bDMARDs anti-TNF ont induit un biais vers une polarisation non inflammatoire dite alternative. En contexte d'activation inflammatoire, les bDMARDs anti-TNF ont induit une prĂ©servation sĂ©lective des marqueurs de polarisation liĂ©s Ă  l'IL-10 (CD16, CD163, MerTK) et une inhibition des marqueurs inflammatoires (CD40, CD80). Nous avons montrĂ© que ce changement phĂ©notypique s'accompagnait : (i) d'un changement fonctionnel concordant avec une polarisation induite par l'IL-10, (ii) d'une inhibition de la production des cytokines de l'inflammation (TNF, IL-6, IL-12), (iii) et d'une majoration de la phagocytose. Nous avons montrĂ© que ce mĂ©canisme Ă©tait dĂ» Ă  une production prĂ©coce d'IL-10 et dĂ©pendant de STAT3. De plus, nous avons pu montrer que le certolizumab, un anti-TNF, induisait une rĂ©ponse anti-inflammatoire, impliquant le facteur de transcription NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2), un rĂ©gulateur central dans la rĂ©ponse au stress oxydatif. Enfin, nous avons observĂ© que l'expression de CD16, Ă  la surface des macrophages non activĂ©s, Ă©tait corrĂ©lĂ©e nĂ©gativement Ă  l'activitĂ© de la PR. Ces travaux concourent Ă  montrer l'intĂ©rĂȘt du ciblage du macrophage dans la PR et nous ont d'identifier de potentielles cibles thĂ©ranostiques dans le traitement de la PR par anti-TNF.Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most frequent chronic inflammatory rheumatism. This disease is characterized by an auto-immunity and a hyperplasic synovitis, both responsible for peripheral joints destruction. Macrophages contribute to inflammatory aspects of RA. This cell type can present various states of activation or "polarization", reversible and dependent on its environment, notably cytokines. Biologics (bDMARDs) represented a revolution in severe RA treatment. However, data regarding their specific action on macrophage are scarce. The aim of our translational work was: (i) to assess the in vitro effect of RA bDMARDs (anti-TNF: etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab; anti-IL-6R: tocilizumab; CTLA4-Ig: abatacept) on the phenotype of monocytes-derived-macrophages from RA patients and healthy volunteers, during differentiation and activation phases, (ii) to identify polarization markers correlated with disease activity (DAS28). Among bDMARDs, only anti-TNF modulated macrophage polarization. During differentiation, anti-TNF bDMARDs induced a bias toward the so-called alternative non-inflammatory polarization. In inflammatory context, anti-TNF bDMARDs induced a selective preservation of markers associated with IL-10 (CD16, CD163, MerTK) and an inhibition of inflammatory markers (CD40, CD80). We showed that these changes in phenotype were associated with changes in functions consistent with: (i) a polarization induced by IL10, (ii) a decrease in inflammatory cytokines production (TNF, IL-6, IL-12), (iii) and an increase in phagocytosis. We showed that this mechanism was dependant on early IL-10 production and STAT3 signaling. Moreover, we have showed that certolizumab, an anti-TNF agent, induced an anti-inflammatory response, implicating the transcription factor NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid-2- related factor 2), a central regulator of the response to oxidative stress. We observed that CD16 expression on non-activated macrophages was negatively correlated with RA activity. This work contributes to demonstrate the relevance of macrophage targeting in RA, and enabled us to identify theranostic targets for RA treatment with anti-TNF bDMARDs

    Background Glucocorticoid Therapy Has No Impact on Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept or Adalimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

    No full text
    International audienceTo date, the impact of background glucocorticoids (GC) on the efficacy and safety of abatacept or adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is not clearly established. This post hoc analysis of (AMPLE) trial (NCT00929864) compared efficacy and safety outcomes over 2 years in patients treated with abatacept or adalimumab plus background methotrexate (MTX), who continued GC (≀10 mg/day) versus those who were not receiving GC (no-GC). Of 646 randomized patients, 317 received abatacept + MTX (161 GC, 156 no-GC) and 326 received adalimumab + MTX (162 GC, 164 no-GC). At Year 2, the adjusted mean changes from baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28 C-reactive protein (CRP)) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were not significantly different in the GC versus no-GC subgroups receiving abatacept or adalimumab. A similar proportion of patients achieved remission, HAQ-DI score improvement ≄0.3 and radiographic progression rates. No clinically meaningful safety differences were observed between GC versus no-GC subgroups either with abatacept or adalimumab. In patients with active RA of similar baseline disease activity treated with abatacept or adalimumab plus background MTX, there was no additional value of background GC on clinical, functional or radiographic outcomes over two years

    Anti-TNF certolizumab pegol induces antioxidant response in human monocytes via reverse signaling

    No full text
    International audienceAbstractBackgroundAnti TNF drugs have been widely used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but only 70 to 80 % of patients respond to this therapy. Exploring the mode of action of anti-TNF drugs remains important in order to improve the efficiency of the treatment and enhance our knowledge of inflammation. TNF-α exists as classical soluble cytokine as well as transmembrane protein (tmTNF-α). Evidence suggests that tmTNF-α can induce reverse signaling. In the present study, we have explored consequences of reverse signaling in human monocytes using certolizumab pegol (CZP).MethodsMonocytes were purified from healthy blood donors and were incubated with CZP. Nuclear translocation of Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) was evaluated by wide-field microscopy and cell fractionation. Heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) was assessed by RT-qPCR and western blot. Monocytes were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). IL-1ÎČ was quantitated by RT-qPCR. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were evaluated by flow cytometry using the H2DCFDA fluorescent marker.ResultsCZP induced rapid minimal ROS production and Nrf2 nuclear translocation. This was followed by HO-1 mRNA and protein production. IL-1ÎČ induction by LPS was inhibited at the mRNA and protein level. At a later time-point, CZP was able to counteract the strong production of ROS induced by LPS.Reverse signaling was suggested by short kinetics of Nrf2 translocation, extensive washing of CZP and the use of anti-TNF-Rs antibodies.ConclusionOur data suggest a novel mechanism of ROS modulation by CZP. This observation sheds new light on the function of reverse signaling and on potential mechanisms of action of anti-TNF drugs

    Osteoporosis and ischemic cardiovascular disease.

    No full text
    International audienceOsteoporosis and cardiovascular disease were long viewed as independent of each other. However, numerous epidemiological studies, which are discussed in the first part of this review, have provided incontrovertible evidence of a link. Thus, the risk of coronary artery disease and stroke is higher in patients with a history of osteoporotic fracture or low bone mineral density than in non-osteoporotic patients. In the other direction, patients with cardiovascular disease are at higher risk for bone loss and osteoporotic fracture. The link between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease is due in part to shared conventional risk factors such as estrogen deprivation in women, smoking, low physical activity, and diabetes. In addition, atheroma plaque calcification involves cytokines and growth factors that also play a role in bone turnover, including proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNFα), osteoprotegerin, sclerostin, matrix GLA protein, and FGF-23. Several recent studies have provided support for these pathophysiological hypotheses. Thus, elevation of osteoprotegerin, sclerostin, or FGF-23 levels may explain and predict the occurrence of both osteoporotic fractures and cardiovascular events. The association between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease found in most epidemiological and pathophysiological studies suggests a need for evaluating potential benefits from routine bone absorptiometry and osteoporotic fracture detection in patients with cardiovascular disease and from exercise testing and arterial Doppler imaging in patients with osteoporosis
    corecore