Cytoprotective pathways in the vascular endothelium. Do they represent a viable therapeutic target?

The vascular endothelium is a critical interface, which separates the organs from the blood and its contents. The endothelium has a wide variety of functions and maintenance of endothelial homeostasis is a multi-dimensional active process, disruption of which has potentially deleterious consequences if not reversed. Vascular injury predisposes to endothelial apoptosis, dysfunction and development of atherosclerosis. Endothelial dysfunction is an end-point, a central feature of which is increased ROS generation, a reduction in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and increased nitric oxide consumption. A dysfunctional endothelium is a common feature of diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus and chronic renal impairment. The endothelium is endowed with a variety of constitutive and inducible mechanisms that act to minimise injury and facilitate repair. Endothelial cytoprotection can be enhanced by exogenous factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor, prostacyclin and laminar shear stress. Target genes include endothelial nitric oxide synthase, heme oxygenase-1, A20 and anti-apoptotic members of the B cell lymphoma protein-2 family. In light of the importance of endothelial function, and the link between its disruption and the risk of atherothrombosis, interest has focused on therapeutic conditioning and reversal of endothelial dysfunction. A detailed understanding of cytoprotective signalling pathways, their regulation and target genes is now required to identify novel therapeutic targets. The ultimate aim is to add vasculoprotection to current therapeutic strategies for systemic inflammatory diseases, in an attempt to reduce vascular injury and prevent or retard atherogenesis

Probability to tolerate laryngoscopy and noxious stimulation response index as general indicators of the anaesthetic potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil

BACKGROUND: The probability to tolerate laryngoscopy (PTOL) and its derivative, the noxious stimulation response index (NSRI), have been proposed as measures of potency of a propofol-remifentanil drug combination. This study aims at developing a triple drug interaction model to estimate the combined potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil in terms of PTOL. We compare the predictive performance of PTOL and the NSRI with various anaesthetic depth monitors. METHODS: Data from three previous studies (n=120) were pooled and reanalysed. Movement response after laryngoscopy was observed with different combinations of propofol-remifentanil, sevoflurane-propofol, and sevoflurane-remifentanil. A triple interaction model to estimate PTOL was developed. The NSRI was derived from PTOL. The ability of PTOL and the NSRI to predict observed tolerance of laryngoscopy (TOL) was compared with the following other measures: (i) effect-site concentrations of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil (CeSEVO, CePROP, and CeREMI); (ii) bispectral index; (iii) two measures of spectral entropy; (iv) composite variability index; and (v) surgical pleth index. RESULTS: Sevoflurane and propofol interact additively, whereas remifentanil interacts in a strongly synergistic manner. The effect-site concentrations of sevoflurane and propofol at a PTOL of 50% (Ce50; se) were 2.59 (0.13) vol % and 7.58 (0.49) µg ml(-1). A CeREMI of 1.36 (0.15) ng ml(-1) reduced the Ce50 of sevoflurane and propofol by 50%. The common slope factor was 5.22 (0.52). The PTOL and NSRI predict the movement response to laryngoscopy best. CONCLUSIONS: The triple interaction model estimates the potency of any combination of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil expressed as either PTOL or NSRI. © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected]: publishe