2002 Convocation

Prelude: Minji Ro, 2002 IMSA Graduate Pledge of Allegiance: Urvi Purohit, Student Council President Welcome: Urvi Purohit, Student Council President; Dr. Stephanie Pace Marshall, President; Eric McLaren, Principal Musical Selection: Minji Ro, 2002 IMSA Graduate Keynote Speaker: Jennifer Nesbitt Styrsky, Charter Class Graduat

Migratory Restlessness in an Equatorial Nonmigratory Bird

The urge of captive birds to migrate manifests itself in seasonally occurring restlessness, termed “Zugunruhe.” Key insights into migration and an endogenous basis of behavior are based on Zugunruhe of migrants but have scarcely been tested in nonmigratory birds. We recorded Zugunruhe of African stonechats, small passerine birds that defend year-round territories and have diverged from northern migrants at least 1 million years ago. We demonstrate that Zugunruhe is a regular feature of their endogenous program, one that is precisely timed by photoperiod. These results extend ideas of programs for periodic movement to include nonmigratory birds. Such programs could be activated when movements become necessary, in line with observed fast changes and high flexibility of migration. Attention to Zugunruhe of resident birds promises new insights into diverse and dynamic migration systems and enhances predictions of avian responses to global change

Comparative Analysis Of Factors Associated With First‐Year Survival In Two Species Of Migratory Songbirds

Our understanding of the full life cycle of most migratory birds remains limited. Estimates of survival rates, particularly for first‐year birds are notably lacking. This knowledge gap results in imprecise parameters in population models and limits our ability to fully understand life history trade‐offs. We used eleven years of field data to estimate first‐year apparent survival (φ1st) for two species of migratory grassland songbirds that breed in the same managed habitats but have substantially different migration distances. We used a suite of life‐history, habitat and individually‐based covariates to explore causes of variation in φ1st. The interaction between fledge date and body mass was the best supported model of apparent survival. We found differential effects of fledging date based on nestling body mass. Overall, lighter nestlings had greater apparent survival than heavier nestlings; average or heavy nestlings within‐brood had greater apparent survival when they fledged earlier in the summer. We hypothesize that heavier birds that fledge earlier in the season have a longer window of opportunity to evaluate potential breeding sites and are more likely to disperse greater distances from the natal region, thus confounding survival with permanent emigration. Lighter birds, particularly those fledged late in the breeding season may spend more time on self‐maintenance and consequently have less time to evaluate potential future breeding sites, showing greater fidelity to their natal region. We found no support for management treatment (timing of mowing), sex, brood size, or species as important covariates in explaining apparent survival. Our results suggest that differential migration distances may not have a strong effect on first‐year apparent survival

Ants defend coffee from berry borer colonization

Ants frequently prevent herbivores from damaging plants. In agroecosystems they may provide pest control services, although their contributions are not always appreciated. Here we compared the ability of eight ant species to prevent the coffee berry borer from colonizing coffee berries with a field exclusion experiment. We removed ants from one branch (exclusion) and left ants to forage on a second branch (control) before releasing 20 berry borers on each branch. After 24 h, six of eight species had significantly reduced the number of berries bored by the berry borer compared to exclusion treatment branches. While the number of berries per branch was a significant covariate explaining the number of berries bored, ant activity (that varied greatly among species) was not a significant factor in models. This study is the first field experiment to provide evidence that a diverse group of ant species limit the berry borer from colonizing coffee berries. © 2013 International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC)

Ants impact the energy reserves of natural enemies through the shared honeydew exploitation

[EN] Ants, as well as many species of parasitoids and predators, rely on sugar-richfoodssuchashoneydewtofulfilltheirenergeticneeds.Thus,antsandnatural enemies may interact through the shared honeydew exploitation. 2.Ant-exclusionexperimentswereperformedinacitrusorchardtotestthehypothesis that ants may impact the energy reserves of predators and parasitoids through the competitionforhoneydew.Throughtheuseofhigh-performanceliquidchromatography (HPLC)thelevelofantactivitywiththeenergyreservesandfeedinghistoryofindividual specimens collected in the field during representative days of spring, summer, and autumn were related. 3. Out of 145 Aphytis chrysomphali Mercet parasitoids captured in the field, 65% were classified as sugar-fed and 24.7% as honeydew-fed. In summer, when ant activity peaked,therewasasignificant negativecorrelationbetweenthelevelofantactivityand the total sugar content and honeydew feeding incidence by A.chrysomphali. Out of 47 individuals of the predator Chrysoperla carnea sensu lato (Stephens), captured in the field, 55.3% were classified as sugar-fed. We found a significant negative effect of the level of ant activity on the sugar-feeding incidence by C.carneain spring. 4.Thepresentstudyprovidesevidencethatantscaninterferewiththeenergyreserves of natural enemies. This interaction may be widespread in various ecosystems with important consequences for the arthropod community composition and with practical implicationsforbiologicalcontrolgiventhatabsenceofsugarfeedingisdetrimentalfor thefitness of many species of predatorsand parasitoidsDr Jerome Casas is greatly acknowledged for valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript and Dr Petr Duelli for providing help with the Chrysoperla identifications. We also thank Dr Cristina Navarro Campos and Dr Aleixandre Beltra for their help in the field samplings and for stimulating discussions, Barbara Rodriguez for help in the laboratory analyses and the reviewers for their helpful comments. This work was supported by the project (RTA2010-00012-C02-02) assigned to F. G. M from the Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Spain and the project (BIO2013-48779-C4-1-R) from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and COST action CM1303 on Systems Biocatalysis.Calabuig Gomar, A.; Tena Barreda, A.; Wäkers, FL.; Lucia Fernandez-Arrojo; Plou, FJ.; García Mari, F.; Pekas, A. (2015). Ants impact the energy reserves of natural enemies through the shared honeydew exploitation. Ecological Entomology. 40:687-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12237S68769540Avidov, Z., Balshin, M., & Gerson, U. (1970). Studies onAphytis coheni, a parasite of the California red scale,Aonidiella aurantii in Israel. Entomophaga, 15(2), 191-207. doi:10.1007/bf02371871Bartlett, B. R. (1961). The Influence of Ants Upon Parasites, Predators, and Scale Insects1. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 54(4), 543-551. doi:10.1093/aesa/54.4.543Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., & Olesen, J. M. (2006). Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance. Science, 312(5772), 431-433. doi:10.1126/science.1123412Blüthgen, N., E. Stork, N., & Fiedler, K. (2004). Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos, 106(2), 344-358. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12687.xCalabuig, A., Garcia-Marí, F., & Pekas, A. (2013). Ants affect the infestation levels but not the parasitism of honeydew and non-honeydew producing pests in citrus. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 104(4), 405-417. doi:10.1017/s0007485313000564Campbell, M. M. (1976). Colonisation of Aphytis melinus DeBach (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) in Aonidiella aurantii (Mask.) (Hemiptera, Coccidae) on citrus in South Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 65(4), 659-668. doi:10.1017/s0007485300006350Carroll, C. R., & Janzen, D. H. (1973). Ecology of Foraging by Ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 231-257. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.001311Cerdá, X., Palacios, R., & Retana, J. (2009). Ant Community Structure in Citrus Orchards in the Mediterranean Basin: Impoverishment as a Consequence of Habitat Homogeneity. Environmental Entomology, 38(2), 317-324. doi:10.1603/022.038.0203DUELLI, P. (1980). Adaptive dispersal and appetitive flight in the green lacewing, Chrysopa cornea. Ecological Entomology, 5(3), 213-220. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1980.tb01144.xDuelli, P. (1980). Preovipository migration flights in the green lacewing, Chrysopa carnea (Planipennia, Chrysopidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 7(3), 239-246. doi:10.1007/bf00299370Eubanks, M. D., & Finke, D. L. (2014). Interaction webs in agroecosystems: beyond who eats whom. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 2, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2014.06.005Faria, C. A., Wäckers, F. L., & Turlings, T. C. J. (2008). The nutritional value of aphid honeydew for non-aphid parasitoids. Basic and Applied Ecology, 9(3), 286-297. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2007.02.001Finney, G. L. (1948). Culturing Chrysopa californica and Obtaining Eggs for Field Distribution. Journal of Economic Entomology, 41(5), 719-721. doi:10.1093/jee/41.5.719HEIMPEL, G. E., & COLLIER, T. R. (1996). THE EVOLUTION OF HOST-FEEDING BEHAVIOUR IN INSECT PARASITOIDS. Biological Reviews, 71(3), 373-400. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1996.tb01279.xHeimpel, G. E., Rosenheim, J. A., & Mangel, M. (1997). Predation on adult Aphytis parasitoids in the field. Oecologia, 110(3), 346-352. doi:10.1007/s004420050168Heimpel, G. E., Rosenheim, J. A., & Kattari, D. (1997). Adult feeding and lifetime reproductive success in the parasitoid Aphytis melinus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 83(3), 305-315. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00185.xHOGERVORST, P. A. M., WÄCKERS, F. L., & ROMEIS, J. (2007). Detecting nutritional state and food source use in field-collected insects that synthesize honeydew oligosaccharides. Functional Ecology, 21(5), 936-946. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01297.xHölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D., & Case, T. J. (2002). The Causes and Consequences of Ant Invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33(1), 181-233. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150444James, D. G., Stevens, M. M., O’Malley, K. J., & Faulder, R. J. (1999). Ant Foraging Reduces the Abundance of Beneficial and Incidental Arthropods in Citrus Canopies. Biological Control, 14(2), 121-126. doi:10.1006/bcon.1998.0678JERVIS, M. A., & KIDD, N. A. C. (1986). HOST-FEEDING STRATEGIES IN HYMENOPTERAN PARASITOIDS. Biological Reviews, 61(4), 395-434. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1986.tb00660.xJervis, M. A., Kidd, N. A. C., Fitton, M. G., Huddleston, T., & Dawah, H. A. (1993). Flower-visiting by hymenopteran parasitoids. Journal of Natural History, 27(1), 67-105. doi:10.1080/00222939300770051Kaplan, I., & Eubanks, M. D. (2005). APHIDS ALTER THE COMMUNITY-WIDE IMPACT OF FIRE ANTS. Ecology, 86(6), 1640-1649. doi:10.1890/04-0016Lach, L. (2007). Argentine ants displace floral arthropods in a biodiversity hotspot. Diversity and Distributions, 14(2), 281-290. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00410.xLaverty, T. M., & Plowright, R. C. (1985). Competition between hummingbirds and bumble bees for nectar in flowers of Impatiens biflora. Oecologia, 66(1), 25-32. doi:10.1007/bf00378548LeVan, K. E., Hung, K.-L. J., McCann, K. R., Ludka, J. T., & Holway, D. A. (2013). Floral visitation by the Argentine ant reduces pollinator visitation and seed set in the coast barrel cactus, Ferocactus viridescens. Oecologia, 174(1), 163-171. doi:10.1007/s00442-013-2739-zTeresa Martinez-Ferrer, M., Grafton-Cardwell, E. E., & Shorey, H. H. (2003). Disruption of parasitism of the California red scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) by three ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biological Control, 26(3), 279-286. doi:10.1016/s1049-9644(02)00158-5McEwen, P. K., Clow, S., Jervis, M. A., & Kidd, N. A. C. (1993). Alteration in searching behaviour of adult female green lacewingsChrysoperla carnea (Neur.: Chrysopidae) following contact with honeydew of the black scaleSaissetia oleae (Hom.: Coccidae) and solutions containing acidhydrolysed L-tryptophan. Entomophaga, 38(3), 347-354. doi:10.1007/bf02374452Miller, T. E. (1994). Direct and Indirect Species Interactions in an Early Old-Field Plant Community. The American Naturalist, 143(6), 1007-1025. doi:10.1086/285646Moreno, D. S., Haney, P. B., & Luck, R. F. (1987). Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon as Barriers to Argentine Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Foraging on Citrus Trees1. Journal of Economic Entomology, 80(1), 208-214. doi:10.1093/jee/80.1.208Ohgushi, T. (2008). Herbivore‐induced indirect interaction webs on terrestrial plants: the importance of non‐trophic, indirect, and facilitative interactions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 128(1), 217-229. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00705.xOLSON, D. M., & WÄCKERS, F. L. (2006). Management of field margins to maximize multiple ecological services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44(1), 13-21. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01241.xPace, M. L., Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R., & Kitchell, J. F. (1999). Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(12), 483-488. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01723-1Pekas, A., Aguilar, A., Tena, A., & Garcia-Marí, F. (2010). Influence of host size on parasitism by Aphytis chrysomphali and A. melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in Mediterranean populations of California red scale Aonidiella aurantii (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Biological Control, 55(2), 132-140. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.07.010Pekas, A., Tena, A., Aguilar, A., & Garcia-Marí, F. (2010). Effect of Mediterranean Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on California Red Scale (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) Populations in Citrus Orchards. Environmental Entomology, 39(3), 827-834. doi:10.1603/en09207Pekas, A., Tena, A., Aguilar, A., & Garcia-Marí, F. (2010). Spatio-temporal patterns and interactions with honeydew-producing Hemiptera of ants in a Mediterranean citrus orchard. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 13(1), 89-97. doi:10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00501.xRosen, D., & DeBach, P. (1979). Species of Aphytis of the World. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9603-8Rosumek, F. B., Silveira, F. A. O., de S. Neves, F., de U. Barbosa, N. P., Diniz, L., Oki, Y., … Cornelissen, T. (2009). Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia, 160(3), 537-549. doi:10.1007/s00442-009-1309-xRudgers, J. A., & Gardener, M. C. (2004). EXTRAFLORAL NECTAR AS A RESOURCE MEDIATING MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS. Ecology, 85(6), 1495-1502. doi:10.1890/03-0391Sheldon, J. K., & MacLeod, E. G. (1971). Studies on the Biology of the Chrysopidae II. The Feeding Behavior of the Adult of Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). Psyche: A Journal of Entomology, 78(2), 107-121. doi:10.1155/1971/505909Stelzl, M., & Devetak, D. (1999). Neuroptera in agricultural ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 74(1-3), 305-321. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00040-7STEPPUHN, A., & WACKERS, F. L. (2004). HPLC sugar analysis reveals the nutritional state and the feeding history of parasitoids. Functional Ecology, 18(6), 812-819. doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00920.xStyrsky, J. D., & Eubanks, M. D. (2006). Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1607), 151-164. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3701Tena, A., Hoddle, C. D., & Hoddle, M. S. (2013). Competition between honeydew producers in an ant–hemipteran interaction may enhance biological control of an invasive pest. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 103(6), 714-723. doi:10.1017/s000748531300045xTena, A., Llácer, E., & Urbaneja, A. (2013). Biological control of a non-honeydew producer mediated by a distinct hierarchy of honeydew quality. Biological Control, 67(2), 117-122. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.07.018TENA, A., PEKAS, A., WÄCKERS, F. L., & URBANEJA, A. (2013). Energy reserves of parasitoids depend on honeydew from non-hosts. Ecological Entomology, 38(3), 278-289. doi:10.1111/een.12018Tena, A., Pekas, A., Cano, D., Wäckers, F. L., & Urbaneja, A. (2015). Sugar provisioning maximizes the biocontrol service of parasitoids. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(3), 795-804. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12426Völkl, W., Woodring, J., Fischer, M., Lorenz, M. W., & Hoffmann, K. H. (1999). Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia, 118(4), 483-491. doi:10.1007/s004420050751Wackers, F. L. (2000). Do oligosaccharides reduce the suitability of honeydew for predators and parasitoids? A further facet to the function of insect-synthesized honeydew sugars. Oikos, 90(1), 197-201. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900124.xWäckers, F. L. (2001). A comparison of nectar- and honeydew sugars with respect to their utilization by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. Journal of Insect Physiology, 47(9), 1077-1084. doi:10.1016/s0022-1910(01)00088-9Wäckers, F. L. (2005). Suitability of (extra-)floral nectar, pollen, and honeydew as insect food sources. Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects, 17-74. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542220.003Wäckers, F. L., van Rijn, P. C. J., & Heimpel, G. E. (2008). Honeydew as a food source for natural enemies: Making the best of a bad meal? Biological Control, 45(2), 176-184. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.007Wade, M. R., Zalucki, M. P., Wratten, S. D., & Robinson, K. A. (2008). Conservation biological control of arthropods using artificial food sprays: Current status and future challenges. Biological Control, 45(2), 185-199. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.10.024Way, M. J. (1963). Mutualism Between Ants and Honeydew-Producing Homoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 8(1), 307-344. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.08.010163.001515Wilder, S. M., Barnum, T. R., Holway, D. A., Suarez, A. V., & Eubanks, M. D. (2012). Introduced fire ants can exclude native ants from critical mutualist-provided resources. Oecologia, 172(1), 197-205. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2477-7YOO, H. J. S., KIZNER, M. C., & HOLWAY, D. A. (2013). Ecological effects of multi-species, ant-hemipteran mutualisms in citrus. Ecological Entomology, 38(5), 505-514. doi:10.1111/een.12042ZAPPALA, L., CAMPOLO, O., GRANDE, S. B., SARACENO, F., BIONDI, A., SISCARO, G., & PALMERI, V. (2012). Dispersal of Aphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) after augmentative releases in citrus orchards. European Journal of Entomology, 109(4), 561-568. doi:10.14411/eje.2012.070Zoebelein, G. (2009). Der Honigtau als Nahrung der Insekten: Teil I. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 38(4), 369-416. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1956.tb01612.

Oecophylla smaragdina ants provide pest control in Australian cacao

Ecosystem service-driven methods of agricultural production that make optimal use of an ecosystem’s natural services are often effective in smallholder crops, leading increases in habitat heterogeneity at large spatial scales that encourage beneficial species. Pollination services in cacao farms can be enhanced through efforts to conserve pollinator habitats, such as adding cacao fruit husks underneath trees to provide habitat and food resources for midge pollinators. However, it remains unclear how this habitat manipulation affects pest densities or biological control. Here, we evaluated the effects of the predaceous ant Oecophylla smaragdina on three major pests of Australian cacao (Helopeltis spp., Amblypelta spp. and Rhyparida nitida) in an Australian cacao farm, in the presence and absence of cacao fruit husks. We also evaluated the effect of O. smaragdina on their potentially plant-damaging, mutualistic mealybug (Pseudococcidae) partners in the presence and absence of cacao fruit husks. O. smaragdina reduced the combined densities of Helopeltis spp. and Amblypelta spp., regardless of cacao fruit husk addition. The ants also reduced the densities of R. nitida in the absence of cacao fruit husks, but R. nitida densities were naturally low in the experimental plots that received the addition of cacao fruit husks, regardless of ant presence. In contrast, ants generally increased the densities of mealybugs. These data suggest that O. smaragdina ants provide pest control services for three major insect pests in Australian cacao farms. Furthermore, this control may be compatible with habitat manipulations (i.e., the addition of cacao fruit husks) to improve pollinator habitat

Red Imported Fire Ant in Australia: What if we lose the war?

In Australia, a national eradication programme for the Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren), one of the world's most invasive species, has been in operation since 2001 when the pest was first detected in Brisbane, Queensland. Since that time, four separate incursions of this ant have been successfully eradicated from this country, but the main Brisbane population remains. Cost-benefit analyses already conducted put the likely impact of Red Imported Fire Ant in Australia, if not eradicated, at between A$8.5 and A$45 billion. Despite this, ongoing funding for the eradication programme is not assured. A recent external review has concluded that it remains technically feasible, cost beneficial and in the national interest to eradicate. In support of previous analyses, our study highlights some of the potential impacts of Red Imported Fire Ant in Australia in more detail and provides case examples. Results show that adverse impacts are likely in most sectors of the economy, and will be felt not only by agricultural industries, but also the building and construction, tourism, electrical and communications industries. In addition to industry effects, there will also be negative impacts on public health and lifestyle, the environment and infrastructure such as main roads, airports and schools. Our estimates of potential cost impacts in the case examples where extrapolation was possible exceed A$1.65 billion/year and support previous predictions. We conclude that increased spending is justified to avert ‘invasion debt’ – the future cost of battling pests that escape today. This is a war that Australia cannot afford to lose

Disruption of Ant-Aphid Mutualism in Canopy Enhances the Abundance of Beetles on the Forest Floor

Ant-aphid mutualism is known to play a key role in the structure of the arthropod community in the tree canopy, but its possible ecological effects for the forest floor are unknown. We hypothesized that aphids in the canopy can increase the abundance of ants on the forest floor, thus intensifying the impacts of ants on other arthropods on the forest floor. We tested this hypothesis in a deciduous temperate forest in Beijing, China. We excluded the aphid-tending ants Lasius fuliginosus from the canopy using plots of varying sizes, and monitored the change in the abundance of ants and other arthropods on the forest floor in the treated and control plots. We also surveyed the abundance of ants and other arthropods on the forest floor to explore the relationships between ants and other arthropods in the field. Through a three-year experimental study, we found that the exclusion of ants from the canopy significantly decreased the abundance of ants on the forest floor, but increased the abundance of beetles, although the effect was only significant in the large ant-exclusion plot (80*60 m). The field survey showed that the abundance of both beetles and spiders was negatively related to the abundance of ants. These results suggest that aphids located in the tree canopy have indirect negative effects on beetles by enhancing the ant abundance on the forest floor. Considering that most of the beetles in our study are important predators, the ant-aphid mutualism can have further trophic cascading effects on the forest floor food web

Do Herbivores Eavesdrop on Ant Chemical Communication to Avoid Predation?

Strong effects of predator chemical cues on prey are common in aquatic and marine ecosystems, but are thought to be rare in terrestrial systems and specifically for arthropods. For ants, herbivores are hypothesized to eavesdrop on ant chemical communication and thereby avoid predation or confrontation. Here I tested the effect of ant chemical cues on herbivore choice and herbivory. Using Margaridisa sp. flea beetles and leaves from the host tree (Conostegia xalapensis), I performed paired-leaf choice feeding experiments. Coating leaves with crushed ant liquids (Azteca instabilis), exposing leaves to ant patrolling prior to choice tests (A. instabilis and Camponotus textor) and comparing leaves from trees with and without A. instabilis nests resulted in more herbivores and herbivory on control (no ant-treatment) relative to ant-treatment leaves. In contrast to A. instabilis and C. textor, leaves previously patrolled by Solenopsis geminata had no difference in beetle number and damage compared to control leaves. Altering the time A. instabilis patrolled treatment leaves prior to choice tests (0-, 5-, 30-, 90-, 180-min.) revealed treatment effects were only statistically significant after 90- and 180-min. of prior leaf exposure. This study suggests, for two ecologically important and taxonomically diverse genera (Azteca and Camponotus), ant chemical cues have important effects on herbivores and that these effects may be widespread across the ant family. It suggests that the effect of chemical cues on herbivores may only appear after substantial previous ant activity has occurred on plant tissues. Furthermore, it supports the hypothesis that herbivores use ant chemical communication to avoid predation or confrontation with ants

Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss

The composition of species communities is changing rapidly through drivers such as habitat loss and climate change, with potentially serious consequences for the resilience of ecosystem functions on which humans depend. To assess such changes in resilience, we analyse trends in the frequency of species in Great Britain that provide key ecosystem functions-specifically decomposition, carbon sequestration, pollination, pest control and cultural values. For 4,424 species over four decades, there have been significant net declines among animal species that provide pollination, pest control and cultural values. Groups providing decomposition and carbon sequestration remain relatively stable, as fewer species are in decline and these are offset by large numbers of new arrivals into Great Britain. While there is general concern about degradation of a wide range of ecosystem functions, our results suggest actions should focus on particular functions for which there is evidence of substantial erosion of their resilience