Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors

Background: Several pathological parameters, including tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion and lymph node status, have been proposed as prognostic predictors in cervical cancer. However, given the high mortality and recurrence rate of cervical cancer, novel parameters that are able to provide additional prognostic information are needed in order to allow a better prognostic stratification of cervical cancer patients. Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed to identify relevant literature data regarding prognostic factors in cervical cancer. The key words “cervical cancer”, “prognostic factors”, “pathology”, and “outcome” were used. Results: The novel pathological grading system based on tumor budding and cell nest size appeared the most relevant prognostic factor in primary neoplasms. Moreover, other potentially useful prognostic factors were tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion, perineural invasion, tumor-free distance and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Prognostic factors related to advanced-stage cervical cancer, including lymph-nodes status, endometrial and cervical involvement as well as distant metastases, were also taken into consideration. Conclusions: According to our findings, tumor budding and cell nest size grading system, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion, perineural invasion, tumor-free distance and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes appeared the most relevant factors included in the pathology report

Parathyroidectomy and survival in a cohort of Italian dialysis patients: results of a multicenter, observational, prospective study

Background: Severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is associated with mortality in end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Parathyroidectomy (PTX) becomes necessary when medical therapy fails, thus highlighting the interest to compare biochemical and clinical outcomes of patients receiving either medical treatment or surgery. Methods: We aimed to compare overall survival and biochemical control of hemodialysis patients with severe hyperparathyroidism, treated by surgery or medical therapy followed-up for 36 months. Inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, renal failure requiring dialysis treatment (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) and ability to sign the consent form. A control group of 418 patients treated in the same centers, who did not undergo parathyroidectomy was selected after matching for age, sex, and dialysis vintage. Results: From 82 Dialysis units in Italy, we prospectively collected data of 257 prevalent patients who underwent parathyroidectomy (age 58.2 ± 12.8 years; M/F: 44%/56%, dialysis vintage: 15.5 ± 8.4 years) and of 418 control patients who did not undergo parathyroidectomy (age 60.3 ± 14.4 years; M/F 44%/56%; dialysis vintage 11.2 ± 7.6 y). The survival rate was higher in the group that underwent parathyroidectomy (Kaplan–Meier log rank test = 0.002). Univariable analysis (HR 0.556, CI: 0.387–0.800, p = 0.002) and multivariable analysis (HR 0.671, CI:0.465–0.970, p = 0.034), identified parathyroidectomy as a protective factor of overall survival. The prevalence of patients at KDOQI targets for PTH was lower in patients who underwent parathyroidectomy compared to controls (PTX vs non-PTX: PTH < 150 pg/ml: 59% vs 21%, p = 0.001; PTH at target: 18% vs 37% p = 0.001; PTH > 300 pg/ml 23% vs 42% p = 0.001). The control group received more intensive medical treatment with higher prevalence of vitamin D (65% vs 41%, p = 0.0001), calcimimetics (34% vs 14%, p = 0.0001) and phosphate binders (77% vs 66%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Our data suggest that parathyroidectomy is associated with survival rate at 36 months, independently of biochemical control. Lower exposure to high PTH levels could represent an advantage in the long term. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Effect of maternal age and body mass index on induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membrane at term: A retrospective cross-sectional study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of maternal age and body mass index (BMI) on induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membrane (PROM) at term. We have conducted retrospective cross-sectional study, including only term (37 weeks or more of gestation) PROM in healthy nulliparous women with a negative vaginal-rectal swab for group B streptococcus, a single cephalic fetus with normal birthweight, and uneventful pregnancy that were induced after 24 h from PROM. Ninety-one patients were included. According to the multivariate logistic regression, age and BMI odds ratio (OR) for induction success were 0.795 and 0.857, respectively. The study population was divided into two groups based on age (<35 and = 35 years) and obesity (BMI <30 and & GE;30). Older women reported a higher induction failure rate (p < 0.001); longer time to cervical dilation of 6 cm (p = 0.03) and delivery (p < 0.001). Obese women reported a higher induction failure rate (p = 0.01); number of misoprostol doses (p = 0.03), longer time of induction (p = 0.03) to cervical dilatation of 6 cm (p < 0.001), and delivery (p < 0.001); and higher cesarean section (p = 0.012) and episiotomy rate (p = 0.007). In conclusion, maternal age and BMI are two of the main factors that influence oral misoprostol efficacy and affect the failure of induction rate in term PROM

Structure and DNA cleavage properties of two copper(II) complexes of the pyridine-pyrazole-containing ligands mbpzbpy and Hmpzbpya

Metals in Catalysis, Biomimetics & Inorganic Material

Waves of infection and waves of communication: the importance of sharing in the era of Covid-19

No abstract availabl

[Lazio dialysis registry: natives vs foreigners]

An increasing number of foreigners was observed in Italy even among chronic dialysis patients. We compared demographic, clinical, treatment characteristics and survival probability between groups of Italian and foreign patients with chronic dialysis in Lazio

Risk factors and action thresholds for the novel coronavirus pandemic. Insights from the Italian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Survey

365noBackground and aim: Over 80% (365/454) of the nation’s centers participated in the Italian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Survey. Out of 60,441 surveyed patients, 1368 were infected as of April 23rd, 2020. However, center-specific proportions showed substantial heterogeneity. We therefore undertook new analyses to identify explanatory factors, contextual effects, and decision rules for infection containment. Methods: We investigated fixed factors and contextual effects by multilevel modeling. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was used to develop decision rules. Results: Increased positivity among hemodialysis patients was predicted by center location [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20–1.51], positive healthcare workers (IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.17), test-all policy (IRR 5.94, 95% CI 3.36–10.45), and infected proportion in the general population (IRR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001–1.003) (all p < 0.01). Conversely, lockdown duration exerted a protective effect (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94–0.98) (p < 0.01). The province-contextual effects accounted for 10% of the total variability. Predictive factors for peritoneal dialysis and transplant cases were center location and infected proportion in the general population. Using recursive partitioning, we identified decision thresholds at general population incidence ≥ 229 per 100,000 and at ≥ 3 positive healthcare workers. Conclusions: Beyond fixed risk factors, shared with the general population, the increased and heterogeneous proportion of positive patients is related to the center’s testing policy, the number of positive patients and healthcare workers, and to contextual effects at the province level. Nephrology centers may adopt simple decision rules to strengthen containment measures timely.nonenoneNordio M.; Reboldi G.; Di Napoli A.; Quintaliani G.; Alberici F.; Postorino M.; Aucella F.; Messa P.; Brunori G.; Brunori G.; Bosco M.; Malberti F.; Mandreoli M.; Mazzaferro S.; Movilli E.; Ravera M.; Salomone M.; Santoro D.; PostorinoLimido M.A.; Bonomini M.; Stingone A.; Maccarone M.; Di Loreto E.; Stacchiotti L.; Malandra R.; Chiarella S.; D'Agostino F.; Fuiano G.; Nicodemo L.; Bonofiglio R.; Greco S.; Mallamaci F.; Barreca E.; Caserta C.; Bruzzese V.; Galati D.; Tramontana D.; Viscione M.; Chiuchiolo L.; Tuccillo S.; Sepe M.; Vitale F.; Ciriana E.; Santoro D.; Martignetti V.; Caserta D.; Stizzo A.; Romano A.; Iulianiello G.; Cascone E.; Minicone P.; Chiricone D.; Delgado G.; Barbato A.; Celentano S.; Molfino I.; Coppola S.; Raiola I.; Abategiovanni M.; Borrelli S.; Margherita C.; Bruno F.; Ida M.; Aliperti E.; Potito D.; Cuomo G.; De Luca M.; Merola M.; Botta C.; Garofalo G.; Alinei P.; Paglionico C.; Roano M.; Vitale S.; Ierardi R.; Fimiani V.; Conte G.; Di Natale G.; Romano M.; Di Marino V.; Scafarto A.; Meccariello S.; Pecoraro C.; Di Stazio E.; Di Meglio E.; Cuomo A.; Maresca B.; Rotaia E.; Capasso G.; Auricchio M.; Pluvio C.; Maddalena L.; De Maio A.; Palladino G.; Buono F.; Gigliotti G.; Mandreoli M.; Mancini E.; La Manna G.; Storari A.; Mosconi G.; Cappelli G.; Scarpioni R.; Gregorini M.; Rigotti A.; Mancini W.; Bianco F.; Boscutti G.; Amici G.; Tosto M.; Fini R.; Pace G.; Cioffi A.; Boccia E.; Di Lullo L.; Di Zazzo G.; Simonelli R.; Bondatti F.; Miglio L.; Rifici N.; Treglia A.; Muci M.; Baldinelli G.; Rizzi E.; Lonzi M.; De Cicco C.; Forte F.; De Paolis P.; Grandaliano G.; Cuzziol C.; Torre V.M.; Sfregola P.; Rossi V.; Fabio G.; Flammini A.; Filippini A.; Onorato L.; Vendola F.; Di Daniela N.; Alfarone C.; Scabbia L.; Ferrazzano M.; Grotta B.D.; Gamberini M.; Fazzari L.; Mene P.; Morgia A.; Catucci A.; Palumbo R.; Puliti M.; Marinelli R.; Polito P.; Marrocco F.; Morabito S.; Rocca R.; Nazzaro L.; Lavini R.; Iamundo V.; Chiappini M.; Casarci M.; Morosetti M.; Hassan S.; Alfarone C.; Ferrazzano M.; Firmi G.; Galliani M.; Serraiocco M.; Feriozzi S.; Valentini W.; Sacco P.; Garibotto G.; Cappelli V.; Saffioti C.; Repetto M.; Rolla D.; Lorenz M.; Pedrini L.; Polonioli D.; Galli E.; Ruggenenti P.; Scolari F.; Bove S.; Costantino E.; Bracchi M.; Mangano S.; Depetri G.; Malberti F.; La Milia V.; Farina M.; Zecchini S.; Savino R.; Melandri M.; Guastoni C.; Paparella M.; Gallieni M.; Minetti E.; Bisegna S.; Messa P.; Righetti M.; Badalamenti S.; Guastoni C.; Alberghini E.; Bertoli S.; Fabbrini P.; Albrizio P.; Rampino T.; Colturi C.; Rombola G.; Lucatello A.; Guerrini E.; Ranghino A.; Lenci F.; Fanciulli E.; Santarelli S.; Damiani C.; Garofalo D.; Sopranzi F.; Santoferrara A.; Di Luca M.; Galiotta P.; Brigante M.; Manganaro M.; Maffei S.; Berto I.; Besso L.; Viglino G.; Besso L.; Cusinato S.; ChiarinottiChiappero D.F.; Tognarelli G.; Gianoglio B.; Salomone M.; Forneris G.; Biancone L.; Savoldi S.; Vitale C.; Boero R.; Filiberti O.; Borzumati M.; Gesualdo L.; Lomonte C.; Gernone G.; Pallotta G.; Di Paolo S.; Vernaglione L.; Specchio A.; Stallone G.; Dell'Aquila R.; Aucella F.; Sandri G.; Russo F.; Napoli M.; Marangi A.; Morrone L.; Di Stratis C.; Fresu A.; Cicu F.; Murtas S.; Manca O.; Pani A.; Pilloni M.; Pistis R.; Cadoni M.; Contu B.; Logias F.; Ivaldi R.; Fancello S.; Cossu M.; Lepori G.; Lepori G.; Vittoria S.; Battiati E.; Arnone M.; Rome M.; Barbera A.; Granata A.; Collura G.; Dico C.L.; Pugliese G.; Di Natale E.; Rizzari G.; Cottone L.; Longo N.; Battaglia G.; Marcantoni C.; Giannetto G.; Tumino G.; Randazzo F.; Bellissimo L.; Faro F.L.; Grippaldi F.; Urso S.; Quattrone G.; Todaro I.; Vincenzo D.; Murgo A.; Masuzzo M.; Pisacane A.; Monardo P.; Santoro D.; Pontorierro M.; Quari C.; Bauro A.; Chimenz R.R.; Alfio D.; Girasole F.; Cascio A.L.; Caviglia A.; Tornese F.; Sirna F.; Altieri C.; Cusumano R.; Saveriano V.; La Corte A.; Locascio G.; Rotolo U.; Rome M.; Musso S.; Risuglia L.; Blanco G.; Minardo G.; Castellino S.; Zappulla Z.; Randone S.; Di Francesca M.; Cassetti C.C.; Oddo G.; Buscaino G.; Mucaria F.; Barraco V.I.; Di Martino A.; Mucaria F.; Rallo D.; Dani L.; Campolo G.; Manescalchi F.; Biagini M.; Agate M.; Panichi V.; Casani A.; Traversari L.; Garosi G.; Brunori G.; Tabbi M.; Selvi A.; Cencioni L.; Fagugli R.; Timio F.; Leveque A.; Manes M.; Mennella G.; Calo L.; Fiorini F.; Abaterusso C.; Calzavara P.; Nordio M.; Meneghel G.; Bonesso C.; Gambaro G.; Gammaro L.; Rugiu C.; Dell'Aquila R.; Dell'Aquila R.; Ronco C.; Rugiu C.Nordio, M.; Reboldi, G.; Di Napoli, A.; Quintaliani, G.; Alberici, F.; Postorino, M.; Aucella, F.; Messa, P.; Brunori, G.; Brunori, G.; Bosco, M.; Malberti, F.; Mandreoli, M.; Mazzaferro, S.; Movilli, E.; Ravera, M.; Salomone, M.; Santoro, D.; Postorinolimido, M. A.; Bonomini, M.; Stingone, A.; Maccarone, M.; Di Loreto, E.; Stacchiotti, L.; Malandra, R.; Chiarella, S.; D'Agostino, F.; Fuiano, G.; Nicodemo, L.; Bonofiglio, R.; Greco, S.; Mallamaci, F.; Barreca, E.; Caserta, C.; Bruzzese, V.; Galati, D.; Tramontana, D.; Viscione, M.; Chiuchiolo, L.; Tuccillo, S.; Sepe, M.; Vitale, F.; Ciriana, E.; Santoro, D.; Martignetti, V.; Caserta, D.; Stizzo, A.; Romano, A.; Iulianiello, G.; Cascone, E.; Minicone, P.; Chiricone, D.; Delgado, G.; Barbato, A.; Celentano, S.; Molfino, I.; Coppola, S.; Raiola, I.; Abategiovanni, M.; Borrelli, S.; Margherita, C.; Bruno, F.; Ida, M.; Aliperti, E.; Potito, D.; Cuomo, G.; De Luca, M.; Merola, M.; Botta, C.; Garofalo, G.; Alinei, P.; Paglionico, C.; Roano, M.; Vitale, S.; Ierardi, R.; Fimiani, V.; Conte, G.; Di Natale, G.; Romano, M.; Di Marino, V.; Scafarto, A.; Meccariello, S.; Pecoraro, C.; Di Stazio, E.; Di Meglio, E.; Cuomo, A.; Maresca, B.; Rotaia, E.; Capasso, G.; Auricchio, M.; Pluvio, C.; Maddalena, L.; De Maio, A.; Palladino, G.; Buono, F.; Gigliotti, G.; Mandreoli, M.; Mancini, E.; La Manna, G.; Storari, A.; Mosconi, G.; Cappelli, G.; Scarpioni, R.; Gregorini, M.; Rigotti, A.; Mancini, W.; Bianco, F.; Boscutti, G.; Amici, G.; Tosto, M.; Fini, R.; Pace, G.; Cioffi, A.; Boccia, E.; Di Lullo, L.; Di Zazzo, G.; Simonelli, R.; Bondatti, F.; Miglio, L.; Rifici, N.; Treglia, A.; Muci, M.; Baldinelli, G.; Rizzi, E.; Lonzi, M.; De Cicco, C.; Forte, F.; De Paolis, P.; Grandaliano, G.; Cuzziol, C.; Torre, V. M.; Sfregola, P.; Rossi, V.; Fabio, G.; Flammini, A.; Filippini, A.; Onorato, L.; Vendola, F.; Di Daniela, N.; Alfarone, C.; Scabbia, L.; Ferrazzano, M.; Grotta, B. D.; Gamberini, M.; Fazzari, L.; Mene, P.; Morgia, A.; Catucci, A.; Palumbo, R.; Puliti, M.; Marinelli, R.; Polito, P.; Marrocco, F.; Morabito, S.; Rocca, R.; Nazzaro, L.; Lavini, R.; Iamundo, V.; Chiappini, M.; Casarci, M.; Morosetti, M.; Hassan, S.; Alfarone, C.; Ferrazzano, M.; Firmi, G.; Galliani, M.; Serraiocco, M.; Feriozzi, S.; Valentini, W.; Sacco, P.; Garibotto, G.; Cappelli, V.; Saffioti, C.; Repetto, M.; Rolla, D.; Lorenz, M.; Pedrini, L.; Polonioli, D.; Galli, E.; Ruggenenti, P.; Scolari, F.; Bove, S.; Costantino, E.; Bracchi, M.; Mangano, S.; Depetri, G.; Malberti, F.; La Milia, V.; Farina, M.; Zecchini, S.; Savino, R.; Melandri, M.; Guastoni, C.; Paparella, M.; Gallieni, M.; Minetti, E.; Bisegna, S.; Messa, P.; Righetti, M.; Badalamenti, S.; Guastoni, C.; Alberghini, E.; Bertoli, S.; Fabbrini, P.; Albrizio, P.; Rampino, T.; Colturi, C.; Rombola, G.; Lucatello, A.; Guerrini, E.; Ranghino, A.; Lenci, F.; Fanciulli, E.; Santarelli, S.; Damiani, C.; Garofalo, D.; Sopranzi, F.; Santoferrara, A.; Di Luca, M.; Galiotta, P.; Brigante, M.; Manganaro, M.; Maffei, S.; Berto, I.; Besso, L.; Viglino, G.; Besso, L.; Cusinato, S.; Chiarinottichiappero, D. F.; Tognarelli, G.; Gianoglio, B.; Salomone, M.; Forneris, G.; Biancone, L.; Savoldi, S.; Vitale, C.; Boero, R.; Filiberti, O.; Borzumati, M.; Gesualdo, L.; Lomonte, C.; Gernone, G.; Pallotta, G.; Di Paolo, S.; Vernaglione, L.; Specchio, A.; Stallone, G.; Dell'Aquila, R.; Aucella, F.; Sandri, G.; Russo, F.; Napoli, M.; Marangi, A.; Morrone, L.; Di Stratis, C.; Fresu, A.; Cicu, F.; Murtas, S.; Manca, O.; Pani, A.; Pilloni, M.; Pistis, R.; Cadoni, M.; Contu, B.; Logias, F.; Ivaldi, R.; Fancello, S.; Cossu, M.; Lepori, G.; Lepori, G.; Vittoria, S.; Battiati, E.; Arnone, M.; Rome, M.; Barbera, A.; Granata, A.; Collura, G.; Dico, C. L.; Pugliese, G.; Di Natale, E.; Rizzari, G.; Cottone, L.; Longo, N.; Battaglia, G.; Marcantoni, C.; Giannetto, G.; Tumino, G.; Randazzo, F.; Bellissimo, L.; Faro, F. L.; Grippaldi, F.; Urso, S.; Quattrone, G.; Todaro, I.; Vincenzo, D.; Murgo, A.; Masuzzo, M.; Pisacane, A.; Monardo, P.; Santoro, D.; Pontorierro, M.; Quari, C.; Bauro, A.; Chimenz, R. R.; Alfio, D.; Girasole, F.; Cascio, A. L.; Caviglia, A.; Tornese, F.; Sirna, F.; Altieri, C.; Cusumano, R.; Saveriano, V.; La Corte, A.; Locascio, G.; Rotolo, U.; Rome, M.; Musso, S.; Risuglia, L.; Blanco, G.; Minardo, G.; Castellino, S.; Zappulla, Z.; Randone, S.; Di Francesca, M.; Cassetti, C. C.; Oddo, G.; Buscaino, G.; Mucaria, F.; Barraco, V. I.; Di Martino, A.; Mucaria, F.; Rallo, D.; Dani, L.; Campolo, G.; Manescalchi, F.; Biagini, M.; Agate, M.; Panichi, V.; Casani, A.; Traversari, L.; Garosi, G.; Brunori, G.; Tabbi, M.; Selvi, A.; Cencioni, L.; Fagugli, R.; Timio, F.; Leveque, A.; Manes, M.; Mennella, G.; Calo, L.; Fiorini, F.; Abaterusso, C.; Calzavara, P.; Nordio, M.; Meneghel, G.; Bonesso, C.; Gambaro, G.; Gammaro, L.; Rugiu, C.; Dell'Aquila, R.; Dell'Aquila, R.; Ronco, C.; Rugiu, C

Risk factors and action thresholds for the novel coronavirus pandemic. Insights from the Italian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Survey

Background and aim: Over 80% (365/454) of the nation\u2019s centers participated in the Italian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Survey. Out of 60,441 surveyed patients, 1368 were infected as of April 23rd, 2020. However, center-specific proportions showed substantial heterogeneity. We therefore undertook new analyses to identify explanatory factors, contextual effects, and decision rules for infection containment. Methods: We investigated fixed factors and contextual effects by multilevel modeling. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was used to develop decision rules. Results: Increased positivity among hemodialysis patients was predicted by center location [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20\u20131.51], positive healthcare workers (IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02\u20131.17), test-all policy (IRR 5.94, 95% CI 3.36\u201310.45), and infected proportion in the general population (IRR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001\u20131.003) (all p &lt; 0.01). Conversely, lockdown duration exerted a protective effect (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94\u20130.98) (p &lt; 0.01). The province-contextual effects accounted for 10% of the total variability. Predictive factors for peritoneal dialysis and transplant cases were center location and infected proportion in the general population. Using recursive partitioning, we identified decision thresholds at general population incidence 65 229 per 100,000 and at 65 3 positive healthcare workers. Conclusions: Beyond fixed risk factors, shared with the general population, the increased and heterogeneous proportion of positive patients is related to the center\u2019s testing policy, the number of positive patients and healthcare workers, and to contextual effects at the province level. Nephrology centers may adopt simple decision rules to strengthen containment measures timely

Risk factors and action thresholds for the novel coronavirus pandemic. Insights from the Italian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Survey

Over 80% (365/454) of the nation's centers participated in the Italian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Survey. Out of 60,441 surveyed patients, 1368 were infected as of April 23rd, 2020. However, center-specific proportions showed substantial heterogeneity. We therefore undertook new analyses to identify explanatory factors, contextual effects, and decision rules for infection containment