108 research outputs found

    Supplemental Information 1: Original questionnaire administered in southern Chile

    Get PDF
    Background Hundreds of millions of domestic carnivores worldwide have diverse positive affiliations with humans, but can provoke serious socio-ecological impacts when free-roaming. Unconfined dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus) interact with wildlife as predators, competitors, and disease-transmitters; their access to wildlife depends on husbandry, perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors of pet owners and non-owners. Methods To better understand husbandry and perceptions of impacts by unconfined, domestic carnivores, we administered questionnaires (n = 244) to pet owners and non-owners living in one of the last wilderness areas of the world, the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, located in southern Chile. We used descriptive statistics to provide demographic pet and husbandry information, quantify free-roaming dogs and cats, map their sightings in nature, and report experiences and perceptions of the impact of free-roaming dogs and cats on wildlife. We corroborated our results with an analysis of prey remains in dog feces (n = 53). With generalized linear models, we examined which factors (i.e., food provisioning, reproductive state, rural/village households, sex, and size) predicted that owned dogs and cats bring wildlife prey home. Results Thirty-one percent of village dogs (n = 121) and 60% of dogs in rural areas (n = 47) roamed freely day and/or night. Free-roaming dog packs were frequently observed (64% of participants) in the wild, including a feral dog population on Navarino Island. Dogs (31 of 168) brought home invasive muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) and avian prey, and over half of all cats (27 of 51) brought home mainly avian prey. Birds were also the most harassed wildlife category, affected by one third of all dogs and cats. Nevertheless, dog-wildlife conflicts were hardly recognized (<9% of observed conflicts and suspected problems), and only 34% of the participants thought that cats might impact birds. Diet analysis revealed that dogs consumed livestock (64% of 59 prey occurrences), beavers (Castor canadensis, 14%), and birds (10%). The probability that dogs brought prey to owners’ homes was higher in rural locations and with larger dogs. There was also evidence that cats from rural households and with an inadequate food supply brought more prey home than village cats. Discussion Although muskrat, beavers, and birds were brought home, harassed, or found in dog feces, free-roaming dogs and, to a lesser extent, cats are perceived predominantly in an anthropogenic context (i.e., as pets) and not as carnivores interacting with wildlife. Therefore, technical and legal measures should be applied to encourage neutering, increase confinement, particularly in rural areas, and stimulate social change via environmental education that draws attention to the possibility and consequences of unconfined pet interaction with wildlife in the southernmost protected forest ecoregion of the globe

    The role of manufacturing in affecting the social dimension of sustainability

    Full text link

    Resistance of Sorghum to Stem Borers 1

    No full text

    Identification of Cellular Proteins Important for Jaagsiekte Sheep Retrovirus Transformation

    No full text
    Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV) is the etiologic agent of a contagious lung cancer in sheep, ovine pulmonary adenocarcinoma (OPA). The envelope gene (env) also is an oncogene, since it induces cell transformation and tumors on its own. The subject of this thesis was to identify cellular proteins that interact with JSRV Env and to assess their roles in JSRV transformation. A previous yeast two-hybrid screen identified candidate proteins that can interact with the JSRV envelope protein. Two were studied here: Zinc Finger Protein 111 (Zfp111) and Ribonucleotide Reductase subunit 2 (RRM2). For Zfp111, shRNA knockdown of endogenous zfp111 in rat 208F fibroblasts reduced transformation by JSRV Env but not by another viral oncogene v-mos. Env transformation was restored by a knockdown-resistant Zfp111 cDNA, and over-expression of zfp111 increased transformation by Env but not v-mos. Knockdown of zfp111 decreased proliferation rates of Env transformed cells but not untransformed cells. Zfp111 bound to a smaller form of Env (P70env); while the Env polyprotein (Pr80env) is cytoplasmic, P70env is nuclear. P70env and Pr80env have the same polypeptide backbone, so they differ in glycosylation. Co-expression of Zfp111 with JSRV Env stabilizes both proteins. Selected alanine scanning mutants in the Env cytoplasmic tail (CT) were co-transfected with Zfp111; there was a strong correlation between mutant transformation efficiencies and levels of P70env and Zfp111 detected. The results suggested a putative interaction region for Zfp111 in the Env CT. With regard to RRM2, endogenous RRM2 co-localized with Env by re-localization to the plasma membrane in transfected NIH 3T3 cells. In rat 208F cells, RRM2 knockdown decreased Env transformation, but there was also a decrease (significantly less) in v-mos transformation. RRM2 knockdown cells showed a decrease in overall growth rates, which might explain the effect on v-mos transformation. Progress towards tandem affinity purification (TAP) of JSRV Env-associated cellular proteins is also described. JSRV Env with a C-terminal TAP tag (HBH) was generated. The HBH-tagged Env could transform cells, and it could be successfully purified over Ni2+ and streptavidin columns; JSRV Env peptide sequences (SU and TM) were identified in preliminary TAP/MS experiments
    corecore