Food of Eastern Moles, Scalopus aquaticus, on Cumberland Island, Georgia

Earthworms are usually the most heavily eaten food of eastern moles, Scalopus aquaticus, and scarabaeid larvae (grubworms), are also often very important. These were the two most important foods of this species on Cumberland Island, Georgia, making up 55.9% of the food by volume. Other important items were beetle larvae (11.3), ants (9.4), and centipedes (4.1). The purpose of this paper is to present information on the food of Eastern Moles on Cumberland Island, Georgia

Food of Bobcats and Coyotes from Cumberland Island, Camden County, Georgia

Fifty scats of bobcats and 105 scats of coyotes from Cumberland Island, Camden County, Georgia, were examined during this study. Major foods of bobcats were mammals (81.8% volume), followed by birds (13.8%) and vegetation (4.2%), with only 0.2% invertebrates. Major foods of coyotes were plant materials (46.6% volume), mammals (43.8%), and invertebrates (6.0%). This is apparently the first report of coyote foods from Cumberland Island

Multicenter phase II study of brequinar sodium in patients with advanced lung cancer

A total of 53 patients with advanced lung cancer [non-small-cell (NSC), 21; small-cell (SC), 32] were treated with brequinar sodium. All of the NSC patients were chemotherapy-naive, but 31/32 (97%) SC patients had failed a multiagent chemotherapy program prior to study entry. Brequinar was given intravenously at a median weekly dose of 1200 mg/m 2 . The toxicity was moderate, with 19 patients (36%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Objective responses were observed in one NSC and two SC patients. We conclude that at this dose and on this schedule, brequinar does not have sufficient activity in patients with NSC or in patients with previously treated SC to warrant further evaluation. However, since responses were observed in previously treated SC lung-cancer patients, further evaluation in chemotherapy-naive patients may be warranted.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46927/1/280_2004_Article_BF00685878.pd

Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers

Background Few intervention programs assist patients and their family caregivers to manage advanced cancer and maintain their quality of life (QOL). This study examined (i) whether patient–caregiver dyads (i.e., pairs) randomly assigned to a brief or extensive dyadic intervention (the FOCUS Program) had better outcomes than dyads randomly assigned to usual care and (ii) whether patients' risk for distress and other factors moderated the effect of the brief or extensive program on outcomes. Methods Advanced cancer patients and their caregivers ( N  = 484 dyads) were stratified by patients' baseline risk for distress (high versus low), cancer type (lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate), and research site and then randomly assigned to a brief (three‐session) or extensive (six‐session) intervention or control. The interventions offered dyads information and support. Intermediary outcomes were appraisals (i.e., appraisal of illness/caregiving, uncertainty, and hopelessness) and resources (i.e., coping, interpersonal relationships, and self‐efficacy). The primary outcome was QOL. Data were collected prior to intervention and post‐intervention (3 and 6 months from baseline). The final sample was 302 dyads. Repeated measures MANCOVA was used to evaluate outcomes. Results Significant group by time interactions showed that there was an improvement in dyads' coping ( p  < 0.05), self‐efficacy ( p  < 0.05), and social QOL ( p  < 0.01) and in caregivers' emotional QOL ( p  < 0.05). Effects varied by intervention dose. Most effects were found at 3 months only. Risk for distress accounted for very few moderation effects. Conclusions Both brief and extensive programs had positive outcomes for patient–caregiver dyads, but few sustained effects. Patient–caregiver dyads benefit when viewed as the ‘unit of care’. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96760/1/pon3036.pd

Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018.

Over the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives. Since the field continues to expand and novel mechanisms that orchestrate multiple cell death pathways are unveiled, we propose an updated classification of cell death subroutines focusing on mechanistic and essential (as opposed to correlative and dispensable) aspects of the process. As we provide molecularly oriented definitions of terms including intrinsic apoptosis, extrinsic apoptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, parthanatos, entotic cell death, NETotic cell death, lysosome-dependent cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, immunogenic cell death, cellular senescence, and mitotic catastrophe, we discuss the utility of neologisms that refer to highly specialized instances of these processes. The mission of the NCCD is to provide a widely accepted nomenclature on cell death in support of the continued development of the field

The impact of family presence on the physician-cancer patient interaction

Physician behaviors were studied in 473 interactions between oncologists and adult cancer outpatients. Ninety-nine of these interactions occured when family members were present during the visit. Patients with family members present were likely to be sicker as demonstrated by a poorer performance status. Contrary to earlier reports, age of the patient did not predict whether the patient was likely to be accompanied by a family member. The physician behaviors were factor analyzed to produce six factors and a multivariate analysis of variance was conducted using the presence of family and performance status as independent variables. The time the physician spent in the patient's room, patient satisfaction and quality of life were also examined in separate analyses. The time the physician spent with the patient was greater when family were present. The results showed that, in general, physicians provide more information when patients are accompanied by family members, or if no family are present, when the patient has a worse performance status. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were rated lower for patients with a worse performance status and were not impacted by physician behaviors. Physicians' behavior was affected by both the presence of a family member, and the patient's performance status.family physician-cancer patient relationship

Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients

Physician behaviors and patient responses were studied in 439 interactions between hospitalized adult cancer patients and oncologists to investigate patient preferences for a participatory role in the interaction. Patients were asked their preference for information to be given (minimal; only if it is good news; or all information, good or bad) and their preference for participation in decision-making (prefer doctor makes therapeutic decisions or prefer to participate in decisions). The majority (92%) preferred all information be given, but only 69% preferred to participate in therapeutic decisions. Of those wanting all the information, 24.9% preferred the physician to make the therapeutic decisions. This group was comprised primarily of older, sicker males. Those who did not want to participate were also slightly more satisfied (Pdoctor-cancer patient relationship