28 research outputs found

    EMDR Effects on Pursuit Eye Movements

    Get PDF
    This study aimed to objectivize the quality of smooth pursuit eye movements in a standard laboratory task before and after an Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) session run on seven healthy volunteers. EMDR was applied on autobiographic worries causing moderate distress. The EMDR session was complete in 5 out of the 7 cases; distress measured by SUDS (Subjective Units of Discomfort Scale) decreased to a near zero value. Smooth pursuit eye movements were recorded by an Eyelink II video system before and after EMDR. For the five complete sessions, pursuit eye movement improved after their EMDR session. Notably, the number of saccade intrusions—catch-up saccades (CUS)—decreased and, reciprocally, there was an increase in the smooth components of the pursuit. Such an increase in the smoothness of the pursuit presumably reflects an improvement in the use of visual attention needed to follow the target accurately. Perhaps EMDR reduces distress thereby activating a cholinergic effect known to improve ocular pursuit

    Structural Characterization of Dihydrofolate Reductase Complexes by Top-Down Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry

    No full text
    The stepwise reduction of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate entails significant conformational changes of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). Binary and ternary complexes of DHFR containing cofactor NADPH, inhibitor methotrexate (MTX), or both NADPH and MTX were characterized by 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) mass spectrometry. UVPD yielded over 80% sequence coverage of DHFR and resulted in production of fragment ions that revealed the interactions between DHFR and each ligand. UVPD of the binary DHFR·NADPH and DHFR·MTX complexes led to an unprecedented number of fragment ions containing either an N- or C-terminal protein fragment still bound to the ligand via retention of noncovalent interactions. In addition, holo-fragments retaining both ligands were observed upon UVPD of the ternary DHFR·NADPH·MTX complex. The combination of extensive holo and apo fragment ions allowed the locations of the NADPH and MTX ligands to be mapped, with NADPH associated with the adenosine binding domain of DHFR and MTX interacting with the loop domain. These findings are consistent with previous crystallographic evidence. Comparison of the backbone cleavage propensities for apo DHFR and its holo counterparts revealed significant variations in UVPD fragmentation in the regions expected to experience conformational changes upon binding NADPH, MTX, or both ligands. In particular, the subdomain rotation and loop movements, which are believed to occur upon formation of the transition state of the ternary complex, are reflected in the UVPD mass spectra. The UVPD spectra indicate enhanced backbone cleavages in regions that become more flexible or show suppressed backbone cleavages for those regions either shielded by the ligand or involved in new intramolecular interactions. This study corroborates the versatility of 193 nm UVPD mass spectrometry as a sensitive technique to track enzymatic cycles that involve conformational rearrangements

    Substrate and inhibitor specificities differ between human cytosolic and mitochondrial thioredoxin reductases: Implications for development of specific inhibitors

    No full text
    32 páginas, 5 figuras, 4 tablas.The cytosolic and mitochondrial thioredoxin reductases (TrxR1 and TrxR2) and thioredoxins (Trx1 and Trx2) are key components of the mammalian thioredoxin system, which is important for antioxidant defense and redox regulation of cell function. TrxR1 and TrxR2 are selenoproteins generally considered to have comparable properties, but to be functionally separated by their different compartments. To compare their properties we expressed recombinant human TrxR1 and TrxR2 and determined their substrate specificities and inhibition by metal compounds. TrxR2 preferred its endogenous substrate Trx2 over Trx1, whereas TrxR1 efficiently reduced both Trx1 and Trx2. TrxR2 displayed strikingly lower activity with dithionitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), lipoamide, and the quinone substrate juglone compared to TrxR1, and TrxR2 could not reduce lipoic acid. However, Sec-deficient two-amino-acid-truncated TrxR2 was almost as efficient as full-length TrxR2 in the reduction of DTNB. We found that the gold(I) compound auranofin efficiently inhibited both full-length TrxR1 and TrxR2 and truncated TrxR2. In contrast, some newly synthesized gold(I) compounds and cisplatin inhibited only full-length TrxR1 or TrxR2 and not truncated TrxR2. Surprisingly, one gold(I) compound, [Au(d2pype)2]Cl, was a better inhibitor of TrxR1, whereas another, [(iPr2Im)2Au]Cl, mainly inhibited TrxR2. These compounds also inhibited TrxR activity in the cytoplasm and mitochondria of cells, but their cytotoxicity was not always dependent on the proapoptotic proteins Bax and Bak. In conclusion, this study reveals significant differences between human TrxR1 and TrxR2 in substrate specificity and metal compound inhibition in vitro and in cells, which may be exploited for development of specific TrxR1- or TrxR2-targeting drugs.The work was supported by The Australian Research Council (Future Fellowships FT0991008 to A.F. and FT0991113 to O.R. and Discovery Grants DP0986318 and DP0878438), the Karolinska Institutet, The Swedish Research Council (Medicine), and The Swedish Cancer Society. Mass spectrometry analyses were performed in facilities provided by the Lotterywest State Biomedical Facility–Proteomics Node, WAIMR.Peer reviewe
    corecore