55 research outputs found
Rethinking the Specious Present
In this chapter I argue that despite its current popularity the doctrine of the specious present, or at least every current version of it, should be rejected. I describe two alternative accounts, which deal with experiences of two different kinds of change. The first is what I call the dynamic snapshot theory, which accounts for the way we experience continuous changes such as motion and other motion-like phenomena. The second account deals with the way we experience discontinuous changes, those for which there is no finite rate of change. However I then argue that much of the current debate implicitly presupposes a problematic Cartesian view about the nature of conscious experience. If this view is rejected – as I think it should be – then a different kind of account emerges that avoids commitment both to the specious present and to its main current rival, the cinematic view
Locating the contradiction in our understanding of time
I offer some clarification concerning the kind of contradiction that Hoerl & McCormack's account could help explain and the scope of the metaphysical intuitions that could be explained by such a theory. I conclude that we need to know more about the sense in which the temporal reasoning system would represent time as a dimension.PostprintPeer reviewe
The dynamics and communication of concepts
The central claim of this thesis is that concepts, the components from which
cognitively significant truth evaluable content (thought) is composed, are unstructured
entities an account of whose individuation makes no essential reference to other
concepts in the possession of the thinking subject or to any particular means by which
the reference of the concept is identified by the thinking subject. This position is called
Conceptual Atomism and contrasts with Inferential Role Semantics, according to
which concepts are individuated by their inferential roles or their conditions of
warranted application.
The structure of the argument is as follows. Firstly, a principle called the
Transparency Principle is developed. This places constraints on the individuation of
concepts across differing contexts. The Transparency Principle is then used to show
that Inferential Role Semantics is false because it cannot provide a satisfactory account
of cognitive dynamics; that is, of the conditions under which a concept is retained
through changes in the epistemic state of the subject over a period of time. A version
of Conceptual Atomism is then defended and it is shown that this theory yields the
correct individuation of concepts. According to this theory the concepts of an
individual subject are individuated in terms of referential episodes, episodes of
ongoing reference to an object or property during which it is diachronically transparent
to the subject that the same thing is being referred to. The more general notion of a
referential practice is then used to account for the sharing of concepts by more than
one person. Finally, a novel account of the thoughts expressed using indexical terms is
defended in order to show that indexicals present no counterexample to Conceptual
Atomism. This account of indexical thoughts is of some consequence in its own right
A comparison of low-dose risperidone to paroxetine in the treatment of panic attacks: a randomized, single-blind study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Because a large proportion of patients with panic attacks receiving approved pharmacotherapy do not respond or respond poorly to medication, it is important to identify additional therapeutic strategies for the management of panic symptoms. This article describes a randomized, rater-blind study comparing low-dose risperidone to standard-of-care paroxetine for the treatment of panic attacks.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fifty six subjects with a history of panic attacks were randomized to receive either risperidone or paroxetine. The subjects were then followed for eight weeks. Outcome measures included the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (Ham-A), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D), the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale-Patient (SPAS-P), and the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All subjects demonstrated a reduction in both the frequency and severity of panic attacks regardless of treatment received. Statistically significant improvements in rating scale scores for both groups were identified for the PDSS, the Ham-A, the Ham-D, and the CGI. There was no difference between treatment groups in the improvement in scores on the measures PDSS, Ham-A, Ham-D, and CGI. Post hoc tests suggest that subjects receiving risperidone may have a quicker clinical response than subjects receiving paroxetine.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We can identify no difference in the efficacy of paroxetine and low-dose risperidone in the treatment of panic attacks. Low-dose risperidone appears to be tolerated equally well as paroxetine. Low-dose risperidone may be an effective treatment for anxiety disorders in which panic attacks are a significant component.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT100457106</p
Modeling the interactions between river morphodynamics and riparian vegetation
The study of river-riparian vegetation interactions is an important and intriguing research field in geophysics. Vegetation is an active element of the ecological dynamics of a floodplain which interacts with the fluvial processes and affects the flow field, sediment transport, and the morphology of the river. In turn, the river provides water, sediments, nutrients, and seeds to the nearby riparian vegetation, depending on the hydrological, hydraulic, and geomorphological characteristic of the stream. In the past, the study of this complex theme was approached in two different ways. On the one hand, the subject was faced from a mainly qualitative point of view by ecologists and biogeographers. Riparian vegetation dynamics and its spatial patterns have been described and demonstrated in detail, and the key role of several fluvial processes has been shown, but no mathematical models have been proposed. On the other hand, the quantitative approach to fluvial processes, which is typical of engineers, has led to the development of several morphodynamic models. However, the biological aspect has usually been neglected, and vegetation has only been considered as a static element. In recent years, different scientific communities (ranging from ecologists to biogeographers and from geomorphologists to hydrologists and fluvial engineers) have begun to collaborate and have proposed both semiquantitative and quantitative models of river-vegetation interconnections. These models demonstrate the importance of linking fluvial morphodynamics and riparian vegetation dynamics to understand the key processes that regulate a riparian environment in order to foresee the impact of anthropogenic actions and to carefully manage and rehabilitate riparian areas. In the first part of this work, we review the main interactions between rivers and riparian vegetation, and their possible modeling. In the second part, we discuss the semiquantitative and quantitative models which have been proposed to date, considering both multi- and single-thread river
Using a Personal Development Plan for Different Purposes: Its Influence on Undertaking Learning Activities and Job Performance
- …