The palaeobiology of high latitude birds from the early Eocene greenhouse of Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada

Fossils attributable to the extinct waterfowl clade Presbyornithidae and the large flightless Gastornithidae from the early Eocene (~52–53 Ma) of Ellesmere Island, in northernmost Canada are the oldest Cenozoic avian fossils from the Arctic. Except for its slightly larger size, the Arctic presbyornithid humerus is not distinguishable from fossils of Presbyornis pervetus from the western United States, and the Gastornis phalanx is within the known size range of mid-latitude individuals. The occurrence of Presbyornis above the Arctic Circle in the Eocene could be the result of annual migration like that of its living duck and geese relatives, or it may have been a year-round resident similar to some Eocene mammals on Ellesmere and some extant species of sea ducks. Gastornis, along with some of the mammalian and reptilian members of the Eocene Arctic fauna, likely over-wintered in the Arctic. Despite the milder (above freezing) Eocene climate on Ellesmere Island, prolonged periods of darkness occurred during the winter. Presence of these extinct birds at both mid and high latitudes on the northern continents provides evidence that future increases in climatic warming (closer to Eocene levels) could lead to the establishment of new migratory or resident populations within the Arctic Circle

Disfonias: relação S/Z e tipos de voz Dysphonias: S/Z ratio and types of voice

OBJETIVO: verificar o resultado da relação s/z e do tipo de voz em pacientes com diagnóstico de disfonias orgânico-funcionais (DOF) e disfonias funcionais por uso incorreto da voz (DFUIV), bem como a ocorrência das diferentes patologias dentro das DOF. MÉTODOS: 70 indivíduos, de ambos os sexos, entre cinco e 65 anos de idade, atendidos numa clínica-escola, cadastrados em Banco de Dados, entre 1998 e 2006, com DOF e DFUIV, ambos classificados em três subgrupos: casos em que a relação s/z indicava hipercontração, normalidade, e falta de coaptação das pregas vocais durante a fonação. Os tipos de voz foram classificados conforme a ocorrência em: sem alteração; ruidosa; ruidosa, comprimida e/ou apresentando alteração de f0h; ruidosa e/ou apresentando alteração de f0h; e comprimida. RESULTADOS: ocorrência significativa de DOF e de DOF com nódulos vocais; nas DOF e DFUIV, ocorrência significante de relação s/z normal com tempos isolados de /s/ e /z/ abaixo do normal e voz ruidosa. CONCLUSÕES: O resultado da relação s/z foi estatisticamente significativo a favor da faixa de normalidade estabelecida, tanto nos pacientes com diagnóstico de DOF, quanto naqueles com DFUIV, sendo que, em ambos os grupos de pacientes, a voz ruidosa foi a mais freqüente. Dentro das DOF, os nódulos vocais foram significativamente mais freqüentes do que as demais patologias.<br>PURPOSE: to check the result of s/z ratio and types of voice in patients with diagnosis of organic-functional dysphonias (DOF) and functional dysphonias by incorrect use of voice (DFUIV), as well as the occurrence of the various pathologies within the DOF. METHODS: 70 subjects of both genders, between 5 and 65 years old, seen in a clinic-school, registered in a data bank from 1998 to 2006, with DOF and DFUIV, both classified in three sub-groups: cases in which the s/z ratio indicated hypercontraction, normality and lack of coaptation of the vocal folds during phonation. According to the occurrence, the types of voice were classified in: without alteration; noisy; compressed and/or presenting alteration of f0h; noisy and/or with alteration of f0h; and compressed. RESULTS: significant presence of DOF and DOF with vocal nodules; in DOF and DFUIV, significant presence of the normal s/z ratio with isolated times of /s/ and /z/ below the normal and noisy voice. CONCLUSIONS: the result of the s/z ratio was statistically significant in favor of the range of established normalcy, both in patients with a diagnosis of DOF, as well as with those with DFUIV, and that, in both groups of patients, the noisy voice was the most frequent. Within the DOF, the vocal nodules were significantly more frequent than the other pathologies

Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic

Aim This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Method This was an international cohort study of patients undergoing elective resection of colon or rectal cancer without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Centres entered data from their first recorded case of COVID-19 until 19 April 2020. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, postoperative SARS-CoV-2 and a comparison with prepandemic European Society of Coloproctology cohort data. Results From 2073 patients in 40 countries, 1.3% (27/2073) had a defunctioning stoma and 3.0% (63/2073) had an end stoma instead of an anastomosis only. Thirty-day mortality was 1.8% (38/2073), the incidence of postoperative SARS-CoV-2 was 3.8% (78/2073) and the anastomotic leak rate was 4.9% (86/1738). Mortality was lowest in patients without a leak or SARS-CoV-2 (14/1601, 0.9%) and highest in patients with both a leak and SARS-CoV-2 (5/13, 38.5%). Mortality was independently associated with anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 6.01, 95% confidence interval 2.58–14.06), postoperative SARS-CoV-2 (16.90, 7.86–36.38), male sex (2.46, 1.01–5.93), age >70 years (2.87, 1.32–6.20) and advanced cancer stage (3.43, 1.16–10.21). Compared with prepandemic data, there were fewer anastomotic leaks (4.9% versus 7.7%) and an overall shorter length of stay (6 versus 7 days) but higher mortality (1.7% versus 1.1%). Conclusion Surgeons need to further mitigate against both SARS-CoV-2 and anastomotic leak when offering surgery during current and future COVID-19 waves based on patient, operative and organizational risks

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AimThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery.MethodsThis was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin.ResultsOverall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P ConclusionOne in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease