6 research outputs found
A heterogeneous field matching method for record linkage
Record linkage is the process of determining that two records refer to the same entity. A key subprocess is evaluating how well the individual fields, or attributes, of the records match each other. One approach to matching fields is to use hand-written domain-specific rules. This âexpert systems â approach may result in good performance for specific applications, but it is not scalable. This paper describes a new machine learning approach that creates expert-like rules for field matching. In our approach, the relationship between two field values is described by a set of heterogeneous transformations. Previous machine learning methods used simple models to evaluate the distance between two fields. However, our approach enables more sophisticated relationships to be modeled, which better capture the complex domain specific, common-sense phenomena that humans use to judge similarity. We compare our approach to methods that rely on simpler homogeneous models in several domains. By modeling more complex relationships we produce more accurate results. 1
Recommended from our members
Evaluation in Life Cycle of Information Technology (ELICIT) framework: Supporting the innovation life cycle from business case assessment to summative evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop an evaluation framework for electronic health record (EHR)-integrated innovations to support evaluation activities at each of four information technology (IT) life cycle phases: planning, development, implementation, and operation. METHODS: The evaluation framework was developed based on a review of existing evaluation frameworks from health informatics and other domains (human factors engineering, software engineering, and social sciences); expert consensus; and real-world testing in multiple EHR-integrated innovation studies. RESULTS: The resulting Evaluation in Life Cycle of IT (ELICIT) framework covers four IT life cycle phases and three measure levels (society, user, and IT). The ELICIT framework recommends 12 evaluation steps: (1) business case assessment; (2) stakeholder requirements gathering; (3) technical requirements gathering; (4) technical acceptability assessment; (5) user acceptability assessment; (6) social acceptability assessment; (7) social implementation assessment; (8) initial user satisfaction assessment; (9) technical implementation assessment; (10) technical portability assessment; (11) long-term user satisfaction assessment; and (12) social outcomes assessment. DISCUSSION: Effective evaluation requires a shared understanding and collaboration across disciplines throughout the entire IT life cycle. In contrast with previous evaluation frameworks, the ELICIT framework focuses on all phases of the IT life cycle across the society, user, and IT levels. Institutions seeking to establish evaluation programs for EHR-integrated innovations could use our framework to create such shared understanding and justify the need to invest in evaluation. CONCLUSION: As health care undergoes a digital transformation, it will be critical for EHR-integrated innovations to be systematically evaluated. The ELICIT framework can facilitate these evaluations