Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy Predicts Cure in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Combined Analysis of Two IFCT Randomized Trials.

International audienceINTRODUCTION:: Our study aimed to evaluate whether pathologic complete response (pCR) in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in improved outcome, and to determine predictive factors for pCR. METHODS:: Eligible patients with stage-IB or -II NSCLC were included in two consecutive Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique phase-III trials evaluating platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pCR defined by the absence of viable cancer cells in the resected surgical specimen. RESULTS:: Among the 492 patients analyzed, 41 (8.3%) achieved pCR. In the pCR group, 5-year overall survival was 80.0% compared with 55.8% in the non-pCR group (p = 0.0007). In multivariate analyses, pCR was a favorable prognostic factor of overall survival (relative risk = 0.34; 95% confidence interval = 0.18-0.64) in addition to squamous-cell carcinoma, weight loss less than or equal to 5%, and stage-IB disease. Five-year disease-free survival was 80.1% in the pCR group compared to 44.8% in the non-pCR group (p < 0.0001). Two patients (4.9%) in the pCR group experienced disease recurrence compared to 193 patients (42.8%) in the non-pCR group. SCC subtype was the only independent predictor of pCR (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30; 95% confidence interval = 1.90-9.72). CONCLUSION:: Our results showed that pCR after preoperative chemotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor in stage-IB-II NSCLC. Our study is the largest published series evaluating pCRs after preoperative chemotherapy. The only factor predictive of pCR was squamous-cell carcinoma. Identifying molecular predictive markers for pCR may help in distinguishing patients likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in choosing the most adequate preoperative chemotherapy regimen

MSH2/BRCA1 expression as a DNA-repair signature predicting survival in early-stage lung cancer patients from the IFCT-0002 Phase 3 Trial

International audienceINTRODUCTION: DNA repair is a double-edged sword in lung carcinogenesis. When defective, it promotes genetic instability and accumulated genetic alterations. Conversely these defects could sensitize cancer cells to therapeutic agents inducing DNA breaks.METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess MSH2, XRCC5, and BRCA1 expression in 443 post-chemotherapy specimens from patients randomized in a Phase 3 trial, comparing two neoadjuvant regimens in 528 Stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (IFCT-0002). O6MGMT promoter gene methylation was analyzed in a subset of 208 patients of the same trial with available snap-frozen specimens.RESULTS: Median follow-up was from 90 months onwards. Only high BRCA1 (n = 221, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.07-2.34], p = 0.02) and low MSH2 expression (n = 356, HR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.11-2.08], p = 0.008) significantly predicted better overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analysis. A bootstrap re-sampling strategy distinguished three patient groups at high (n = 55, low BRCA1 and high MSH2, median OS >96 months, HR = 2.5, 95% CI [1.45-4.33], p = 0.001), intermediate (n = 82, median OS = 73.4 p = 0.0596), and low (high BRCA1 and low MSH2, n = 67, median OS = ND, HR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.31-0.83], p = 0.006) risk of death.INTERPRETATION: DNA repair protein expression assessment identified three different groups of risk of death in early-stage lung cancer patients, according to their tumor MSH2 and BRCA1 expression levels. These results deserve prospective evaluation of MSH2/BRCA1 theranostic value in lung cancer patients treated with combinations of DNA-damaging chemotherapy and drugs targeting DNA repair, such as Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors

Qu'est ce que le genre ?

Sous la direction de Laurie Laufer, Florence Rochefort ; [publié par l'Institut Émilie du Châtelet].International audienceA l'initiative de l'Institut Emilie du Châtelet et sous la direction de Laurie Laufer et Florence Rochefort, des spécialistes des domaines de l'éducation, du travail, de la sexualité, de la psychanalyse, du sport, de l'économie, de la linguistique, de la neurobiologie, de la religion et de la culture montrent toute la richesse des "études de genre", ces recherches multidisciplinaires qui analysent les rapport sociaux et de domination entre les sexes. Luttes contre les discriminations, combat pour l'égalité, avancées sociales et juridiques dans le droit de chacun : ils éclairent ainsi les effets concrets d'un outil scientifique - le genre - dans la société d'aujourd'hui (4e de couverture).Laurie Laufer et Florence Rochefort, ainsi que quinze de leurs collègues, ont travaillé ensemble pour produire les treize chapitres qui composent cet ouvrage. - 1er chapitre, intitulé « Ce que le genre doit à la grammaire », par Yannick Chevalier et Christine Planté.- 2e chapitre, par Marie-Élisabeth Handman, porte sur « L’anthropologie sociale du genre ». - 3e chapitre, rédigé par Evelyne Peyre et Joëlle Wiels, s’intitule « Le sexe par défaut ». - 4e chapitre, « La soi-disant “ théorie du genre ” à l’épreuve des neurosciences », Catherine Vidal.- 5e chapitre, intitulé « Le cinéma au prisme du genre », a été rédigé par Geneviève Sellier. - 6e chapitre, « Qu’est-ce qu’une “ vraie ” femme pour le monde du sport? » Catherine Louveau.- 7e et 8e chapitres abordent l’enjeu de l’égalité à l’école et dans le monde du travail en posant deux questions : la première est de Nicole Mosconi, « Les filles ne réussissent-elles qu’à l’école? »; la seconde, de Jacqueline Laufer, Séverine Lemière et Rachel Silvera, « Pourquoi le travail des femmes vaut-il moins? » .- 9e et 10e chapitres abordent aussi, sous des angles différents, la question de la sexualité. Pascale Molinier se penche sur la relation entre « Genre, travail et sexualité » ; Michel Bozon, pour sa part, s’interroge à savoir « Pourquoi sexualité et égalité ne font pas si bon ménage ». - 11e chapitre s’intéresse à « Ce que le genre fait à la psychanalyse ». Laurie Laufer. - 12e chapitre, « “ Mariage pour tous ” : genre, religions et sécularisation », a pour auteure Florence Rochefort. - 13e et dernier chapitre, titré « Le contrat social à l’épreuve de l’offensive contre ladite “ théorie du genre ” », est de Réjane Senac

Switch maintenance chemotherapy versus observation after carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer: IFCT-1201 MODEL trial

International audiencePurpose: Maintenance chemotherapy is a reasonable choice for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) not progressing after induction therapy with a platinum-based doublet. Nevertheless, there have been no studies dedicated to elderly patients.Patients and methods: We conducted a randomised trial in patients aged 70-89 years, with advanced NSCLC (with neither EGFR mutation nor ALK rearrangement), who had not progressed after four cycles of monthly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in order to compare maintenance with either pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 d1, 22) in patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma or gemcitabine (1,150 mg/m2 d1, 8, 22) in squamous cell carcinoma to simple observation. The patients were required to have a performance status (PS) 0-2, mini-mental score >23, and creatinine clearance ≥45 mL/min. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS).Results: 632 patients were enrolled from May 2013 to October 2016. Of the 328 (52.3%) patients randomised after induction therapy, 166 patients were assigned to the observation arm, versus 162 to the switch maintenance arm, 119 of whom received pemetrexed and 43 gemcitabine. The median OS from randomisation was 14.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0-17.0) in the observation arm and 14 months (95% CI: 10.9-16.9) in the maintenance arm (p = 0.72). The median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomisation was 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.6-3.1) in the observation arm versus 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.8-7.1) in the maintenance arm (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Switch maintenance therapy significantly prolonged PFS but not OS and, thus, should not be proposed to elderly patients with advanced NSCLC

Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial.

International audienceBACKGROUND: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in fit, non-elderly adults, but monotherapy is recommended for patients older than 70 years. We compared a carboplatin and paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy regimen with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised trial we recruited patients aged 70-89 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and WHO performance status scores of 0-2. Patients received either four cycles (3 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) of carboplatin (on day 1) plus paclitaxel (on days 1, 8, and 15) or five cycles (2 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) of vinorelbine or gemcitabine monotherapy. Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation method. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number NCT00298415. FINDINGS: 451 patients were enrolled. 226 were randomly assigned monotherapy and 225 doublet chemotherapy. Median age was 77 years and median follow-up was 30.3 months (range 8.6-45.2). Median overall survival was 10.3 months for doublet chemotherapy and 6.2 months for monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78; p<0.0001); 1-year survival was 44.5% (95% CI 37.9-50.9) and 25.4% (19.9-31.3), respectively. Toxic effects were more frequent in the doublet chemotherapy group than in the monotherapy group (most frequent, decreased neutrophil count (108 [48.4%] vs 28 [12.4%]; asthenia 23 [10.3%] vs 13 [5.8%]). INTERPRETATION: Despite increased toxic effects, platinum-based doublet chemotherapy was associated with survival benefits compared with vinorelbine or gemcitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC. We feel that the current treatment paradigm for these patients should be reconsidered. FUNDING: Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique, Institut National du Cancer

Comprehensive Genome Profiling in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Precision Medicine Phase II Randomized SAFIR02-Lung Trial

Purpose: Targeted therapies (TT) and immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) have revolutionized the approach to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment in the era of precision medicine. Their impact as switch maintenance therapy based on molecular characterization is unknown.Patients and Methods: SAFIR02-Lung was an open-label, randomized, phase II trial, involving 33 centers in France. We investigated eight TT (substudy-1) and one ICB (substudy-2), compared with standard-of-care as a maintenance strategy in patients with advanced EGFR, ALK wild-type (wt) NSCLC without progression after first-line chemotherapy, based on high-throughput genome analysis. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).Results: Among the 175 patients randomized in substudy-1, 116 received TT (selumetinib, vistusertib, capivasertib, AZD4547, AZD8931, vandetanib, olaparib, savolitinib) and 59 standard-of-care. Median PFS was 2.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6-2.9] with TT versus 2.7 months (1.6-4.1) with standard-of-care (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.7-1.36; P = 0.87). There were no significant differences in PFS within any molecular subgroup. In substudy-2, 183 patients were randomized, 121 received durvalumab and 62 standard-of-care. Median PFS was 3.0 months (2.3-4.4) with durvalumab versus 3.0 months (2.0-5.1) with standard-of-care (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.62-1.20; P = 0.38). Preplanned subgroup analysis showed an enhanced benefit with durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) >= 1%, (n = 29; HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.75) as compared with PD-L1 = 1 patients