A multi-decade record of high quality fCO2 data in version 3 of the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT)

The Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT) is a synthesis of quality-controlled fCO2 (fugacity of carbon dioxide) values for the global surface oceans and coastal seas with regular updates. Version 3 of SOCAT has 14.7 million fCO2 values from 3646 data sets covering the years 1957 to 2014. This latest version has an additional 4.6 million fCO2 values relative to version 2 and extends the record from 2011 to 2014. Version 3 also significantly increases the data availability for 2005 to 2013. SOCAT has an average of approximately 1.2 million surface water fCO2 values per year for the years 2006 to 2012. Quality and documentation of the data has improved. A new feature is the data set quality control (QC) flag of E for data from alternative sensors and platforms. The accuracy of surface water fCO2 has been defined for all data set QC flags. Automated range checking has been carried out for all data sets during their upload into SOCAT. The upgrade of the interactive Data Set Viewer (previously known as the Cruise Data Viewer) allows better interrogation of the SOCAT data collection and rapid creation of high-quality figures for scientific presentations. Automated data upload has been launched for version 4 and will enable more frequent SOCAT releases in the future. High-profile scientific applications of SOCAT include quantification of the ocean sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide and its long-term variation, detection of ocean acidification, as well as evaluation of coupled-climate and ocean-only biogeochemical models. Users of SOCAT data products are urged to acknowledge the contribution of data providers, as stated in the SOCAT Fair Data Use Statement. This ESSD (Earth System Science Data) “living data” publication documents the methods and data sets used for the assembly of this new version of the SOCAT data collection and compares these with those used for earlier versions of the data collection (Pfeil et al., 2013; Sabine et al., 2013; Bakker et al., 2014). Individual data set files, included in the synthesis product, can be downloaded here: doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.849770. The gridded products are available here: doi:10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.SOCAT_V3_GRID

Reducing the global burden of cerebral venous thrombosis:An international research agenda

Background:Due to the rarity of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), performing high-quality scientific research in this field is challenging. Providing answers to unresolved research questions will improve prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, and ultimately translate to a better outcome of patients with CVT. We present an international research agenda, in which the most important research questions in the field of CVT are prioritized.Aims:This research agenda has three distinct goals: (1) to provide inspiration and focus to research on CVT for the coming years, (2) to reinforce international collaboration, and (3) to facilitate the acquisition of research funding.Summary of review:This international research agenda is the result of a research summit organized by the International Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Consortium in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in June 2023. The summit brought together 45 participants from 15 countries including clinical researchers from various disciplines, patients who previously suffered from CVT, and delegates from industry and non-profit funding organizations. The research agenda is categorized into six pre-specified themes: (1) epidemiology and clinical features, (2) life after CVT, (3) neuroimaging and diagnosis, (4) pathophysiology, (5) medical treatment, and (6) endovascular treatment. For each theme, we present two to four research questions, followed by a brief substantiation per question. The research questions were prioritized by the participants of the summit through consensus discussion.Conclusions:This international research agenda provides an overview of the most burning research questions on CVT. Answering these questions will advance our understanding and management of CVT, which will ultimately lead to improved outcomes for CVT patients worldwide

Abstract 131: Trends in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2016‐2020

Introduction Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an uncommon form of stroke with relatively low mortality but higher incidence in younger adults.1–3 Previous work has suggested decreased overall stroke hospitalization volumes, but preserved CVT hospitalization volumes and increased CVT mortality during the COVID‐19 pandemic.4,5 We sought to provide updated incidence and trend data for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in the United States from 2016‐2020, examine the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on CVT, and identify predictors of in‐hospital mortality. Methods Validated ICD‐10 codes were used to identify patients with CVT in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2016 and 2020. The NIS is part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) and is maintained the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The NIS provides a stratified nationally representative 20% sample of all hospital discharges in the United States, excluding rehabilitation and long‐term acute care hospitals. Annual updates to the NIS are released approximately 20 months after the conclusion of the data year. Sample weights were applied to generate nationally representative estimates, and census data were used to compute incidence rates. The first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic was defined as January‐May 2020. Predictor variables for mortality were selected based upon previous studies of incidence and outcomes of CVT and biological plausibility.6–8 Multivariable logistic regression was conducted using all predictor variables that achieved p<0.10 in univariable regression. Trend analysis was completed using Joinpoint regression. Results From 2016 to 2020, the incidence of CVT increased from 24.34 per 1,000,000 population per year (MPY) to 33.63 per MPY (Annual Percentage Change (APC) 8.6%; p<0.001). CVT incidence was higher in women than men (37.07 per MPY vs 30.10 per MPY) and the rate of increase was also higher in women (APC 10.1% vs APC 6.8%). Racial differences in incidence rate increases were noted, with incidence increasing by 9.8% annually for White patients, 16.1% for Black patients, and 6.7% for Hispanic patients. All‐cause in‐hospital mortality was 4.9% [95% CI 4.5‐5.4]. On multivariable analysis, use of thrombectomy, increased age, atrial fibrillation, stroke diagnosis, infection, presence of prothrombotic hematologic conditions, and male sex were associated with in‐hospital mortality. CVT incidence was similar comparing the first 5 months of 2020 and 2019 (31.37 vs 32.04; p=0.322) with no difference in median NIHSS (2 [IQR 1‐10] vs. 2 [1‐9]; p=0.959) or mortality (4.2% vs. 5.6%; p=0.176). Mortality was 6.7% [2.3‐17.9] in patients with both CVT and COVID (vs. no COVID 5.5% [4.6‐6.6]; p=0.705). Conclusion CVT incidence increased in the US from 2016 to 2020 while mortality did not change. CVT incidence was higher in women and Black patients. Increased age, prothrombotic state, stroke diagnosis, infection, atrial fibrillation, male sex, and use of thrombectomy were associated with in‐hospital mortality following CVT. During the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic, CVT volumes and mortality were similar to the prior year