Addition to inhaled corticosteroids of long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes for chronic asthma

Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite being on regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) represent a management challenge. Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) or anti-leukotrienes (LTRA) are two treatment options that could be considered as add-on therapy to ICS.ObjectivesWe compared the efficacy and safety profile of adding either daily LABA or LTRA in adults and children with asthma who remain symptomatic on ICS.Search strategyWe searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (up to and including March 2010). We consulted reference lists of all included studies and contacted authors and pharmaceutical manufacturers for other published or unpublished studies.Selection criteriaWe included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in adults or children with recurrent asthma that was treated with ICS and where a fixed dose of a long-acting beta2-agonist or leukotriene agent was added for a minimum of 28 days.Data collection and analysisTwo authors independently assessed the risk of bias of included studies and extracted data. We sought unpublished data and further details of study design, where necessary.Main resultsWe included 17 RCTs (7032 participants), of which 16 recruited adults and adolescents (6850) and one recruited children aged 6 to 17 years (182). Participants demonstrated substantial reversibility to short-acting beta-agonist at baseline. The studies were at a low risk of bias. The risk of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids was lower with the combination of LABA and ICS compared with LTRA and ICS, from 11% to 9% (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.97; six studies, 5571 adults). The number needed to treat (NNT) with LABA compared to LTRA to prevent one exacerbation over 48 weeks was 38 (95% CI 22 to 244). The choice of LTRA did not significantly affect the results. The effect appeared stronger in the trials using a single device to administer ICS and LABA compared to those using two devices. In the absence of data from the paediatric trial and the clinical homogeneity of studies, we could not perform subgroup analyses. The addition to ICS of LABA compared to LTRA was associated with a statistically greater improvement from baseline in several of the secondary outcomes, including lung function, functional status measures and quality of life. Serious adverse events were more common with LABA than LTRA, although the estimate was imprecise (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.82), and the NNT to harm for one additional patient to suffer a serious adverse event on LABA over 48 weeks was 78 (95% CI 33 to infinity). The risk of withdrawal for any reason in adults was significantly lower with LABA and ICS compared to LTRA and ICS (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.96).Authors' conclusionsIn adults with asthma that is inadequately controlled on low doses of inhaled steroids and showing significant reversibility with beta2-agonists, LABA is superior to LTRA in reducing oral steroid treated exacerbations. Differences favouring LABA in lung function, functional status and quality of life scores are generally modest. There is some evidence of increased risk of SAEs with LABA. The findings support the use of a single inhaler for the delivery of LABA and inhaled corticosteroids. We are unable to draw conclusions about which treatment is better as add-on therapy for children.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYWhat are the effects of long-acting beta2-agonists compared with anti-leukotrienes when added to inhaled steroids?People who continue to experience asthma symptoms despite regularly taking inhaled corticosteroids are a challenge for management. It is not clear whether the addition of a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) such as formoterol or salmeterol would provide more benefit in comparison with an oral anti-leukotriene agent (LTRA), for example zafirlukast or montelukast.Seventeen trials (16 in adults and one in children) were included in this review and were of good quality. We found that the addition of a LABA provides significantly greater protection against exacerbations requiring oral steroids when compared with a LTRA for adults. Based on the results of our analyses, approximately 38 adults (with a range of between 22 and 244) would need to be treated with a LABA rather than a LTRA for 48 weeks to prevent one experiencing an exacerbation needing a course of oral steroids. The trial on children did not contribute data on the main outcome and therefore we could not draw any conclusions for children.LABAs also led to a greater improvement in lung function, improvement in symptoms, use of rescue medication, quality of life and symptoms compared to the use of LTRAs. The magnitude of the improvements was modest. Serious adverse events were more frequent with LABA than with LTRAs although this result was imprecise. Based on our analyses, around 78 people would need to be treated for 48 weeks with a LABA rather than a LTRA for one of them to experience a serious adverse event. However, due to the lack of precision around our result, the true number could be between 33 and infinity. There are currently insufficient data to draw any conclusions about the effects of these drugs in children

Long-term safety of Mometasone Furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler in children: Results of an open-label study comparing Mometasone Furoate with Beclomethasone Dipropionate in children with persistent asthma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess the long-term pediatric safety of 2 doses of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) for mild-to-moderate persistent asthma and compare them with that of beclomethasone dipropionate administered via a metered dose inhaler (BDP-MDI) in the treatment of persistent asthma. Both MF-DPI doses tested are twice the approved pediatric dosage of 100 μg once-daily (QD) for children aged 4–11 years.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Children (N = 233) aged 4–11 years were randomized to 52 weeks of treatment with MF-DPI 200 μg QD AM, MF-DPI 100 μg twice daily (BID), or BDP-MDI 168 μg BID. Patients had used inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) daily for ≥ 30 days before the screening visit and were on stable ICS doses for ≥ 2 weeks before screening. The primary safety variable was the incidence of adverse events. Secondary safety variables were laboratory tests (including cortisol concentrations), vital signs, and physical examination.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The incidence of adverse events was similar in all 3 treatment groups. The most frequently reported adverse event was upper respiratory tract infection, reported by 47%–49% of the MF-DPI-treated patients and 51% of the BPD-treated patients. Most adverse events were considered unrelated to study drug. The most frequently reported related adverse events were headache (MF-DPI 200 μg QD AM, 8%; MF-DPI 100 μg BID, 4%; BDP-MDI 168 μg BID, 2%) and oral candidiasis (4% in each treatment group). No clinically relevant changes in laboratory values, including plasma cortisol, vital signs, or physical examinations were noted in any treatment group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Both MF-DPI doses were well tolerated, with no unusual or unexpected adverse events or safety concerns, and had a similar adverse event profile to that of BDP-MDI 168 μg BID.</p

Dupilumab as an Adjunct to Oral Immunotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Peanut Allergy.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is a common, life-threatening food allergy in children. We evaluated whether dupilumab, which blocks the activity of interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13, enhances the efficacy of oral immunotherapy (OIT) AR101 in pediatric patients with peanut allergy. METHODS: A Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in the USA (NCT03682770) in pediatric patients (6-≤ 17 years old) with confirmed peanut allergy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive dupilumab + OIT or placebo + OIT during a 28-40-week up-dosing period. Patients in the dupilumab + OIT group were re-randomized 1:1 and received dupilumab + OIT or placebo + OIT during 24-week OIT maintenance, undergoing a 2044 mg (cumulative) of peanut protein double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) following up-dosing, maintenance, and at 12-week post-treatment follow-up. RESULTS: The study enrolled 148 patients, 123 of whom were included in the modified full analysis set, with a mean age of 11.1 years. Dupilumab + OIT treatment (n = 84) led to a 20.2% increase (p &lt; 0.05) in the number of patients who passed a DBPCFC to 2044 mg (cumulative) of peanut protein following the up-dosing period versus placebo (OIT alone, n = 39). Following the OIT maintenance period, continuous dupilumab treatment improved the number of patients who passed a DBPCFC to 2044 mg (cumulative) of peanut protein versus patients continuously on OIT alone (16.6% difference [95% CI -9.7, 42.8], p = 0.2123). Safety was consistent with known dupilumab safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab provided a modest increase efficacy of OIT in children and adolescents with peanut allergy, though it did not provide protection against OIT-related anaphylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03793608

Severe Asthma Standard-of-Care Background Medication Reduction With Benralizumab: ANDHI in Practice Substudy

Background: The phase IIIb, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled ANDHI double-blind (DB) study extended understanding of the efficacy of benralizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Patients from ANDHI DB could join the 56-week ANDHI in Practice (IP) single-arm, open-label extension substudy. Objective: Assess potential for standard-of-care background medication reductions while maintaining asthma control with benralizumab. Methods: Following ANDHI DB completion, eligible adults were enrolled in ANDHI IP. After an 8-week run-in with benralizumab, there were 5 visits to potentially reduce background asthma medications for patients achieving and maintaining protocol-defined asthma control with benralizumab. Main outcome measures for non-oral corticosteroid (OCS)-dependent patients were the proportions with at least 1 background medication reduction (ie, lower inhaled corticosteroid dose, background medication discontinuation) and the number of adapted Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step reductions at end of treatment (EOT). Main outcomes for OCS-dependent patients were reductions in daily OCS dosage and proportion achieving OCS dosage of 5 mg or lower at EOT. Results: For non-OCS-dependent patients, 53.3% (n = 208 of 390) achieved at least 1 background medication reduction, increasing to 72.6% (n = 130 of 179) for patients who maintained protocol-defined asthma control at EOT. A total of 41.9% (n = 163 of 389) achieved at least 1 adapted GINA step reduction, increasing to 61.8% (n = 110 of 178) for patients with protocol-defined EOT asthma control. At ANDHI IP baseline, OCS dosages were 5 mg or lower for 40.4% (n = 40 of 99) of OCS-dependent patients. Of OCS-dependent patients, 50.5% (n = 50 of 99) eliminated OCS and 74.7% (n = 74 of 99) achieved dosages of 5 mg or lower at EOT. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate benralizumab's ability to improve asthma control, thereby allowing background medication reduction

Once-daily use of inhaled corticosteroids: A new regimen in the treatment of persistent asthma

ABSTRACTAsthma is a disease of chronic airway inflammation that is characterized clinically by bronchial hyper-responsiveness and airflow limitation. Chronic inflammation, coupled with ongoing repair of airways damaged by the persistent inflammatory process in asthma, results in permanent structural and functional airway changes (remodeling) that can lead to irreversible airflow obstruction. Current guidelines emphasize treatment of the underlying inflammatory process in asthma and recommend early, long-term anti-inflammatory treatment to diminish or prevent the irreversible component of airflow obstruction. Furthermore, they recognize that inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective anti-inflammatory agents available for the treatment of asthma. Patient adherence to prescribed inhaled corticosteroid medication is associated with decreased airway inflammation, improved pulmonary function and symptom control. Moreover, marked declines in morbidity and mortality due to asthma have been attributed to appropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids.Strict patient adherence with prescribed anti-inflammatory medication is crucial for obtaining optimal therapeutic benefit for patients with asthma. Despite the proven effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids, patient adherence to prescribed therapy is often low, resulting in increased patient morbidity. Complex dosing regimens contribute greatly to patient non-adherence. Thus, new once-daily regimens of inhaled corticosteroid treatment have been introduced as means to improve patient adherence and provide optimal therapeutic benefit. In the present review, the complex inflammatory and remodeling processes in asthma and their contributions to the clinical manifestations of the disease will be discussed. Currently available, once-daily inhaled corticosteroid treatment options and the advantages of these therapeutic options in the treatment of persistent asthma also will be discussed

Abstract PD3-03: EZH2 T367 phosphorylation activates p38 signaling through lysine methylation to promote breast cancer progression

Abstract Introduction: Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) are frequently poorly differentiated with higher propensity for metastasis than all other subtypes. Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) is a lysine methyltransferase that mediates transcriptional repression of pro-differentiation genes in normal and neoplastic cells. The oncogenic role of EZH2 through H3K27me3 is well established. However, non-canonical H3K27me3-independent functions are unclear. We have reported that p38 phosphorylates T367 of EZH2, increasing TNBC metastasis. Recent reports show that EZH2 can regulate signaling pathways through direct methylation of proteins suggesting the hypothesis that EZH2 may methylate p38 in TNBC. Methods: Human tissue samples from 16 primary invasive breast carcinomas and matched distant metastasis arrayed in tissue microarrays were interrogated for pEZH2 T367 and p-p38 by immunohistochemistry. To study p38 methylation, we performed LC-MS/MS analyses GST-p38α, and GST-EZH2 were each incubated with or without recombinant PRC2 complex (EZH2/E ED/SUZ12/RbAp48/AEBP2) and S-adenosyl methionine methyl donor. MDA-MB-231, mouse and human primary TNBC cells and murine 4T1 cells were used in funcional assays in vitro and in vivo. EZH2 knockdown and rescue was carried out using lentiviral transduction of EZH2 with pBabe-myc-EZH2 (wild-type) or pBabe-myc-EZH2 (T367A). We developed p38 methylation mutants: HA-p38a K139A, HA-p38a K165A, and HA-p38a K130A/K165K. To investigate the importance of EZH2 and p38 enzymatic activities we used the EZH2 methyltransferase inhibitors GSK-343 and EPZ-6438 and the p38 inhibitor SB202190 in vitro and in vivo. For animal studies, MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells were orthotopically injected into the right inguinal mammary fat pad of eight-week old NOD/SCID or BALBc mice, respectively. When tumors reached 100 mm3 mice were treated 5 days/week by intraperitoneal injection with SB202190 (1mg/kg/day), EPZ-6438 (10mg/kg/day), combination of SB202190 and EPZ-6438, or control. We monitored tumor growth for 50 days, and harvested primary tumors, lungs, and sites of metastasis for histopathology, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry. Primary xenografts from the control and treatment groups were subjected to RNA sequencing. Results: EZH2 methylates p38 at lysines 139 and 165 leading to enhanced p38 stability and increased invasion, and p38 activation requires T367 phosphorylation of EZH2. Dual inhibition of EZH2 methyltransferase and p38 kinase activities downregulates pEZH2 T367, H3K27me3, and p-p38 in vivo, reduces TNBC growth and metastasis, and results in gene expression changes towards a better differentiated phenotype. pEZH2 T367 and p-p38 proteins are significantly coexpressed in human primary and metastatic breast cancer. Conclusions: We provide direct evidence that EZH2 methylates p38 with resultant p38 activation, and that EZH2 phosphorylation at T367 is important for this function. Dual targeting of EZH2 methyltransferase and p38 kinase activities with specific inhibitors reduces breast cancer growth and metastasis indicating a cooperation between EZH2 canonical and non-canonical mechanisms and suggesting therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Maria E Gonzalez, Shilpa R. Tekula, Talha Anwar, Shoshana A. Leflein, Celina G. Kleer. EZH2 T367 phosphorylation activates p38 signaling through lysine methylation to promote breast cancer progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-03.</jats:p