Fiat Lux: the effect of illuminance on acuity testing

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of changing illuminance on visual and stereo acuity. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects aged 21 to 60 years were assessed. Monocular visual acuity (ETDRS) of emmetropic subjects was assessed under 15 different illuminance levels (50–8000 lux), provided by a computer controlled halogen lighting rig. Three levels of myopia (−0.50DS, −1.00DS & 1.50DS) were induced in each subject using lenses and visual acuity (VA) was retested under the same illuminance conditions. Stereoacuity (TNO) was assessed under the same levels of illuminance. RESULTS: A one log unit change in illuminance level (lx) results in a significant change of 0.060 LogMAR (p < 0.001), an effect that is exacerbated in the presence of induced myopic refractive error (p < 0.001). Stereoacuity scores demonstrate statistically significant overall differences between illuminance levels (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate that changes in illuminance have a statistically significant effect on VA that may contribute to test/retest variability. Increases in illuminance from 50 to 500 lx resulted in an improved VA score of 0.12 LogMAR. Differences like these have significant clinical implications, such as false negatives during vision screening and non-detection of VA deterioration, as the full magnitude of any change may be hidden. In research where VA is a primary outcome measure, differences of 0.12 LogMAR or even less could affect the statistical significance and conclusions of a study. It is recommended that VA assessment always be performed between 400 lx and 600 lx, as this limits any effect of illuminance change to 0.012 LogMAR

Normative Values for Near and Distance Clinical Tests of Stereoacuity.

PurposeExtensive literature exists on normative stereoacuity values for younger children, but there is less information about normative stereoacuity in older children/adults. Individual stereotests cannot be used interchangeably-knowing the upper limit of normality for each test is important. This report details normative stereoacuity values for 5 near/distance stereotests drawn from a large sample of participants aged 16-40 years, across 3 studies.MethodsParticipants (n=206, mean age 22.18±5.31 years) were administered the following stereotests: TNO, Preschool Randot, Frisby, Distance Randot, and Frisby-Davis 2. Medians and upper limits were calculated for each test.ResultsUpper limits for each stereotest were as follows: TNO (n=127, upper limit=120" arc), Preschool Randot (PSR, n=206, upper limit=70" arc), Frisby (n=206, upper limit=40" arc), Distance Randot (n=127, upper limit=160" arc), and Frisby-Davis 2 (n=109, upper limit=25" arc).ConclusionsNormative values for each stereotest are identified and discussed with respect to other studies. Potential sources of variation between tests, within testing distances, are also discussed

The effect of induced fusional demand on static and dynamic stereoacuity thresholds: the digital Synoptophore.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:The ability to extract depth from disparity may be hindered under fusional stress, as alignment of the eyes may be more difficult to maintain consistently. Therefore we aim to determine the effect of fusional demand on stereoacuity in individuals with no known binocular vision impairments. METHODS:A novel static and dynamic binocular depth detection task, capable of assessing many discrete levels of stereoacuity, was presented on digital displays attached to each tube of the Synoptophore. Stereoacuity was measured with any latent deviation fully corrected and compared to that measured at the 'recovery' angle. This recovery angle is where single vision is restored after decompensation to diplopia, during vergence range assessment. RESULTS:Seventy-two subjects (50 Female, 22 Male; mean (SD) age 22 (6) years) were assessed. The amount of fusional demand was between 1 and 26 prism dioptres (PD), with a mean (SD) of 8(6)PD. Under zero fusion demand the mean (SD) static and dynamic depth detection thresholds were 322(53)" and 69(23)". Under fusional stress these were 224(40)" and 77(21)". There was no significant difference between thresholds in stressed and zero demand fusion (p = 0.08). Dynamic depth detection thresholds were significantly lower than static (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION:Fusional stress does not appear to impact on stereoacuity. The numerical value of the recovery point varied amongst individuals, but this represents a common point, where single vision is easily restored and binocularity well established. Due to individual differences in the ability to control a certain amount of fusional stress (e.g. vergences stress of 10PD, when recovery is 8PD, will perturb binocularity more than a person with a recovery of 20PD), previous reports may not accurately represent the effect of fusional stress. Whilst our findings are contrary to previous reports, we did not stress fusion beyond the recovery point and used a more accurate/repeatable method to measure stereoacuity

A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147868Science of the Total Environment78814786