8 research outputs found

    ā€˜We donā€™t know for sureā€™: discussion of uncertainty concerning multigene panel testing during initial cancer genetic consultations

    Get PDF
    Pre-test counseling about multigene panel testing involves many uncertainties. Ideally, counselees are informed about uncertainties in a way that enables them to make an informed decision about panel testing. It is presently unknown whether and how uncertainty is discussed during initial cancer genetic counseling. We therefore investigated whether and how counselors discuss and address uncertainty, and the extent of shared decision-making (SDM), and explored associations between counselorsā€™ communication and their characteristics in consultations on panel testing for cancer. For this purpose, consultations of counselors discussing a multigene panel with a simulated patient were videotaped. Simulated patients represented a counselee who had had multiple cancer types, according to a script. Before and afterwards, counselors completed a survey. Counselorsā€™ uncertainty expressions, initiating and the framing of expressions, and their verbal responses to scripted uncertainties of the simulated patient were coded by two researchers independently. Coding was done according to a pre-developed coding scheme using The Observer XT software for observational analysis. Additionally, the degree of SDM was assessed by two observers. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to assess associations of communicated uncertainties, responses and the extent of SDM, with counselorsā€™ background characteristics. In total, twenty-nine counselors, including clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, physician assistants-in-training, residents and interns, participated of whom working experience varied between 0 and 25 years. Counselors expressed uncertainties mainly regarding scientific topics (94%) and on their own initiative (95%). Most expressions were framed directly (77%), e.g. We donā€™t know, and were emotionally neutral (59%; without a positive/negative value). Counselors mainly responded to uncertainties of the simulated patient by explicitly referring to the uncertainty (69%), without providing space for further disclosure (66%). More experienced counselors provided less space to further disclose uncertainty (p < 0.02), and clinical geneticists scored lower on SDM compared with o

    Nasal oxytocin administration does not influence eye gaze or perceived relationship of male volunteers with physicians: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

    No full text
    The patient-physician relationship is a critical determinant for patient health outcomes. Verbal and non-verbal communication, such as eye gaze, are vital aspects of this bond. Neurobiological studies indicate that oxytocin may serve as a link between increased eye gaze and social bonding. Therefore, oxytocin signaling could serve as a key factor influencing eye gaze as well as the patient-physician relationship. We aimed to test the effects of oxytocin on gaze to the eyes of the physician and the patient-physician relationship by conducting a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial in healthy volunteers with intranasally administered oxytocin (24IU, number 2018-004081-34). Eye gaze of sixty-eight male volunteers was studied using eye-tracking. Volunteers engaged in a simulated video call consultation with a physician who provided information about vaccination against the human papilloma virus. Relationship outcomes, including trust, satisfaction and perceived physician communication style, were measured using questionnaires and corrected for possible confounders (social anxiety and attachment orientation). Additional secondary outcome measures were recall of information and pupil diameter and exploratory outcomes were mood and anxiety. Oxytocin did not affect eye tracking parameters of volunteersā€™ gaze towards the eyes of the physician. Moreover, oxytocin did not affect parameters of bonding between volunteers and the physician, nor other secondary and exploratory outcomes. Bayesian hypothesis testing provided evidence for the absence of effects. These results contradict the notion that oxytocin affects eye gaze patterns or bonding
    corecore