2,170 research outputs found
Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on menâs and womenâs sexist attitudes toward own and other gender
The present research investigated the antecedents of ambivalent sexism (i.e., hostile and benevolent forms) in both men and women toward own and other gender. In two heterogeneous adult samples (Study 1: N = 179 and Study 2: N = 222), it as revealed that gender itself was only a minor predictor of sexist attitudes compared to the substantial impact of individual differences in general motivated cognition (i.e., Need for closure). Analyses further showed that the relationship between Need for closure and sexism was mediated by social attitudes (i.e., right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation), which were differently related to benevolent and hostile forms of sexism. In the discussion it is argued that sexism primarily stems from individual differences in motivated cognitive style, which relates to peoples? perspective on the social world, rather than from group differences between men and women
Divergent paths to martyrdom and significance among suicide attackers
This research used open source information to investigate the motivational backgrounds of 219 suicide attackers from various regions of the world. We inquired as to whether the attackers exhibited evidence for significance quest as a motive for their actions, and whether the eradication of significance loss and/or the aspiration for significance gain systematically differed according to attackersâ demographics. It was found that the specific nature of the significance quest motive varied in accordance with attackersâ gender, age, and education. Whereas Arab-Palestinians, males, younger attackers, and more educated attackers seem to have been motivated primarily by the possibility of significance gain, women, older attackers, those with little education, and those hailing from other regions seem to have been motivated primarily by the eradication of significance loss. Analyses also suggested that the stronger an attackerâs significance quest motive, the greater the effectiveness of their attack, as measured by the number of casualties. Methodological limitations of the present study were discussed, and the possible directions for further research were indicated
Retrieval-induced forgetting as motivated cognition
Recalling information from a particular category can reduce one's memory capability for related, non-retrieved information. This is known as the retrieval-induced forgetting effect (RIF; Anderson et al., 1994). The present paper reviews studies that show that the RIF effect is motivated. More specifically, we describe research showing that the need for closure (NFC; the motivation to attain epistemic certainty; Kruglanski and Webster, 1996) generally enhances the RIF, because this prevents uncertainty and confusion from the intrusion of unwanted memories during selective-retrieval. However, when the content of the to-be-forgotten information serves the retriever's goals, NFC reduces RIF. Overall, the present findings are consistent with the view that motivation can affect the magnitude of RIF effects which, in turn, can serve as a mechanism for reaching preferred conclusion
Need for cognitive closure modulates how perceptual decisions are affected by task difficulty and outcome relevance
The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which Need for Cognitive Closure (NCC), an individual-level epistemic motivation, can explain inter-individual variability in the cognitive effort invested on a perceptual decision making task (the random motion task). High levels of NCC are manifested in a preference for clarity, order and structure and a desire for firm and stable knowledge. The study evaluated how NCC moderates the impact of two variables known to increase the amount of cognitive effort invested on a task, namely task ambiguity (i.e., the difficulty of the perceptual discrimination) and outcome relevance (i.e., the monetary gain associated with a correct discrimination). Based on previous work and current design, we assumed that reaction times (RTs) on our motion discrimination task represent a valid index of effort investment. Task ambiguity was associated with increased cognitive effort in participants with low or medium NCC but, interestingly, it did not affect the RTs of participants with high NCC. A different pattern of association was observed for outcome relevance; high outcome relevance increased cognitive effort in participants with moderate or high NCC, but did not affect the performance of low NCC participants. In summary, the performance of individuals with low NCC was affected by task difficulty but not by outcome relevance, whereas individuals with high NCC were influenced by outcome relevance but not by task difficulty; only participants with medium NCC were affected by both task difficulty and outcome relevance. These results suggest that perceptual decision making is influenced by the interaction between context and NC
From Oppression to Violence: The Role of Oppression, Radicalism, Identity, and Cultural Intelligence in Violent Disinhibition
Violent radicalization and terrorism continue to pose social and security problems.
Starting from the theoretical framework offered by the significance quest theory, the
purpose of this research was to analyze the different roles that radical intentions play
in the relationship between the loss of significance and violent disinhibition in Muslims
and non-Muslims. For this reason, we carried out two studies: the first one with 133
Muslims and 126 non-Muslims, and the second with 98 Muslims and 167 non-Muslims.
Specifically, we measured how perceived oppression influenced violent disinhibition
through radical intentions. Secondly, we also measured the impact of identity and
cultural intelligence in these relations. The main finding of the research was that there
was an indirect effect of perceived oppression on violent disinhibition through radical
intentions in the Muslim sample, whereas, in the non-Muslim sample, the effect of
perceived oppression on violent disinhibition was not mediated by radical intentions.
These results were replicated in both studies. Additionally, we found that identity
and culture were factors that moderated the proposed relations. This work therefore
shows that the conjunction of the loss of significance and radical intentions seems to
strongly exacerbate the likelihood of a process of violent disinhibition for those who
are considered to be in marginal contexts. Overall, different pathways and intervening
factors are in the process of radicalizing Muslims and non-Muslims in Western societies.This work was funded by the Centro Mixto UGR-MADOC
within the framework of the project with Reference 18/16 CEMIX
UGR-MADOC
All Thinking is 'Wishful' Thinking
Motivation to engage in any epistemic behavior can be decomposed into two basic types that emerge in various guises across different disciplines and areas of study.
The first basic dimension refers to a desire to approach versus avoid nonspecific certainty, which has epistemic value. It describes a need for an unambiguous, precise answer to a question, regardless of that answerâs specific content.
Second basic dimension refers to a desire to approach versus avoid specific certainty, which has instrumental value. It concerns a need for the specific content of oneâs beliefs and prior preferences.
Together, they explain diverse epistemic behaviors, such as seeking, avoiding, and biasing new information and revising and updating, versus protecting, oneâs beliefs, when confronted with new evidence.
The relative strength of these motivational components determines the form of (Bayes optimal) epistemic behavior that follows
- âŠ