No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) analysis by epochs in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab vs interferon beta-1a.

BackgroundNo evidence of disease activity (NEDA; defined as no 12-week confirmed disability progression, no protocol-defined relapses, no new/enlarging T2 lesions and no T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions) using a fixed-study entry baseline is commonly used as a treatment outcome in multiple sclerosis (MS).ObjectiveThe objective of this paper is to assess the effect of ocrelizumab on NEDA using re-baselining analysis, and the predictive value of NEDA status.MethodsNEDA was assessed in a modified intent-to-treat population (n = 1520) from the pooled OPERA I and OPERA II studies over various epochs in patients with relapsing MS receiving ocrelizumab (600 mg) or interferon beta-1a (IFN β-1a; 44 μg).ResultsNEDA was increased with ocrelizumab vs IFN β-1a over 96 weeks by 75% (p < 0.001), from Week 0‒24 by 33% (p < 0.001) and from Week 24‒96 by 72% (p < 0.001). Among patients with disease activity during Weeks 0‒24, 66.4% vs 24.3% achieved NEDA during Weeks 24‒96 in the ocrelizumab and IFN β-1a groups (relative increase: 177%; p < 0.001).ConclusionSuperior efficacy with ocrelizumab compared with IFN β-1a was consistently seen in maintaining NEDA status in all epochs evaluated. By contrast with IFN β-1a, the majority of patients with disease activity early in the study subsequently attained NEDA status with ocrelizumab

Gesellschaftliche Akzeptanzfragen bei der Umsetzung von Wasserstofftechnologien

Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat sich zum Ziel gesetzt, bis 2045 klimaneutral zu werden. Das kann nur funktionieren, wenn fossile Rohstoffe durch erneuerbare Energien ersetzt werden - insbesondere in den Bereichen Industrie und Verkehr. Ein wesentlicher Baustein in diesem Transformationsprozess ist die Errichtung einer Wasserstoffwirtschaft, innerhalb derer Strom aus erneuerbaren Energien in grünen Wasserstoff umgewandelt und dieser als Energieträger vor allem in den Bereichen Industrie und Verkehr angewendet wird

Characterisation of cultivation of the human cell line AGE1.HN.AAT

Skerhutt EM, Scholz S, Niklas J, et al. Characterisation of cultivation of the human cell line AGE1.HN.AAT. BMC Proceedings. 2011;5(8)

Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) proves prognostic relevance in gastric carcinoma and is based on a tumor–adipocyte interaction indicating an altered immune response

Background Recently, we presented Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) as a new histomorphologic negative prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer. It is defined as direct contact between tumor cells and fat cells. The aim of this study was to further elucidate the underlying genomic, transcriptional, and immunological mechanisms of the SARIFA phenomenon. Methods To address these questions, SARIFA was classified on H&E-stained tissue sections of three cohorts: an external cohort (n = 489, prognostic validation), the TCGA-STAD cohort (n = 194, genomic and transcriptomic analysis), and a local cohort (n = 60, digital spatial profiling (whole transcriptome) and double RNA in situ hybridization/immunostaining of cytokines). Results SARIFA status proved to be an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival in an external cohort of gastric carcinomas. In TCGA-STAD cohort, SARIFA is not driven by distinct genomic alterations, whereas the gene expression analyses showed an upregulation of FABP4 in SARIFA-positive tumors. In addition, the transcriptional regulations of white adipocyte differentiation, triglyceride metabolism, and catabolism were upregulated in pathway analyses. In the DSP analysis of SARIFA-positive tumors, FABP4 and the transcriptional regulation of white adipocyte differentiation were upregulated in macrophages. Additionally, a significantly lower expression of the cytokines IL6 and TNFα was observed at the invasion front. Conclusions SARIFA proves to be a strong negative prognostic biomarker in advanced gastric cancer, implicating an interaction of tumor cells with tumor-promoting adipocytes with crucial changes in tumor cell metabolism. SARIFA is not driven by tumor genetics but is very likely driven by an altered immune response as a causative mechanism

Correlation between the progressive cytoplasmic expression of a novel small heat shock protein (Hsp16.2) and malignancy in brain tumors

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Small heat shock proteins are molecular chaperones that protect proteins against stress-induced aggregation. They have also been found to have anti-apoptotic activity and to play a part in the development of tumors. Recently, we identified a new small heat shock protein, Hsp16.2 which displayed increased expression in neuroectodermal tumors. Our aim was to investigate the expression of Hsp16.2 in different types of brain tumors and to correlate its expression with the histological grade of the tumor.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Immunohistochemistry with a polyclonal antibody to Hsp16.2 was carried out on formalin-fixed, paraffin-wax-embedded sections using the streptavidin-biotin method. 91 samples were examined and their histological grade was defined. According to the intensity of Hsp16.2 immunoreactivity, low (+), moderate (++), high (+++) or none (-) scores were given.</p> <p>Immunoblotting was carried out on 30 samples of brain tumors using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western-blotting.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Low grade (grades 1–2) brain tumors displayed low cytoplasmic Hsp16.2 immunoreactivity, grade 3 tumors showed moderate cytoplasmic staining, while high grade (grade 4) tumors exhibited intensive cytoplasmic Hsp16.2 staining. Immunoblotting supported the above mentioned results. Normal brain tissue acted as a negative control for the experiment, since the cytoplasm did not stain for Hsp16.2. There was a positive correlation between the level of Hsp16.2 expression and the level of anaplasia in different malignant tissue samples.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Hsp16.2 expression was directly correlated with the histological grade of brain tumors, therefore Hsp16.2 may have relevance as becoming a possible tumor marker.</p

The genomes of two key bumblebee species with primitive eusocial organization

Background: The shift from solitary to social behavior is one of the major evolutionary transitions. Primitively eusocial bumblebees are uniquely placed to illuminate the evolution of highly eusocial insect societies. Bumblebees are also invaluable natural and agricultural pollinators, and there is widespread concern over recent population declines in some species. High-quality genomic data will inform key aspects of bumblebee biology, including susceptibility to implicated population viability threats. Results: We report the high quality draft genome sequences of Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens, two ecologically dominant bumblebees and widely utilized study species. Comparing these new genomes to those of the highly eusocial honeybee Apis mellifera and other Hymenoptera, we identify deeply conserved similarities, as well as novelties key to the biology of these organisms. Some honeybee genome features thought to underpin advanced eusociality are also present in bumblebees, indicating an earlier evolution in the bee lineage. Xenobiotic detoxification and immune genes are similarly depauperate in bumblebees and honeybees, and multiple categories of genes linked to social organization, including development and behavior, show high conservation. Key differences identified include a bias in bumblebee chemoreception towards gustation from olfaction, and striking differences in microRNAs, potentially responsible for gene regulation underlying social and other traits. Conclusions: These two bumblebee genomes provide a foundation for post-genomic research on these key pollinators and insect societies. Overall, gene repertoires suggest that the route to advanced eusociality in bees was mediated by many small changes in many genes and processes, and not by notable expansion or depauperation

ATRT–SHH comprises three molecular subgroups with characteristic clinical and histopathological features and prognostic significance

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is an aggressive central nervous system tumor characterized by loss of SMARCB1/INI1 protein expression and comprises three distinct molecular groups, ATRT–TYR, ATRT–MYC and ATRT–SHH. ATRT–SHH represents the largest molecular group and is heterogeneous with regard to age, tumor location and epigenetic profile. We, therefore, aimed to investigate if heterogeneity within ATRT–SHH might also have biological and clinical importance. Consensus clustering of DNA methylation profiles and confirmatory t-SNE analysis of 65 ATRT–SHH yielded three robust molecular subgroups, i.e., SHH-1A, SHH-1B and SHH-2. These subgroups differed by median age of onset (SHH-1A: 18 months, SHH-1B: 107 months, SHH-2: 13 months) and tumor location (SHH-1A: 88% supratentorial; SHH-1B: 85% supratentorial; SHH-2: 93% infratentorial, often extending to the pineal region). Subgroups showed comparable SMARCB1 mutational profiles, but pathogenic/likely pathogenic SMARCB1 germline variants were over-represented in SHH-2 (63%) as compared to SHH-1A (20%) and SHH-1B (0%). Protein expression of proneural marker ASCL1 (enriched in SHH-1B) and glial markers OLIG2 and GFAP (absent in SHH-2) as well as global mRNA expression patterns differed, but all subgroups were characterized by overexpression of SHH as well as Notch pathway members. In a Drosophila model, knockdown of Snr1 (the fly homologue of SMARCB1) in hedgehog activated cells not only altered hedgehog signaling, but also caused aberrant Notch signaling and formation of tumor-like structures. Finally, on survival analysis, molecular subgroup and age of onset (but not ASCL1 staining status) were independently associated with overall survival, older patients (> 3 years) harboring SHH-1B experiencing relatively favorable outcome. In conclusion, ATRT–SHH comprises three subgroups characterized by SHH and Notch pathway activation, but divergent molecular and clinical features. Our data suggest that molecular subgrouping of ATRT–SHH has prognostic relevance and might aid to stratify patients within future clinical trials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00401-022-02424-5

Predominant and novel de novo variants in 29 individuals with ALG13 deficiency: Clinical description, biomarker status, biochemical analysis, and treatment suggestions

Asparagine-linked glycosylation 13 homolog (ALG13) encodes a nonredundant, highly conserved, X-linked uridine diphosphate (UDP)-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase required for the synthesis of lipid linked oligosaccharide precursor and proper N-linked glycosylation. De novo variants in ALG13 underlie a form of early infantile epileptic encephalopathy known as EIEE36, but given its essential role in glycosylation, it is also considered a congenital disorder of glycosylation (CDG), ALG13-CDG. Twenty-four previously reported ALG13-CDG cases had de novo variants, but surprisingly, unlike most forms of CDG, ALG13-CDG did not show the anticipated glycosylation defects, typically detected by altered transferrin glycosylation. Structural homology modeling of two recurrent de novo variants, p.A81T and p.N107S, suggests both are likely to impact the function of ALG13. Using a corresponding ALG13-deficient yeast strain, we show that expressing yeast ALG13 with either of the highly conserved hotspot variants rescues the observed growth defect, but not its glycosylation abnormality. We present molecular and clinical data on 29 previously unreported individuals with de novo variants in ALG13. This more than doubles the number of known cases. A key finding is that a vast majority of the individuals presents with West syndrome, a feature shared with other CDG types. Among these, the initial epileptic spasms best responded to adrenocorticotropic hormone or prednisolone, while clobazam and felbamate showed promise for continued epilepsy treatment. A ketogenic diet seems to play an important role in the treatment of these individuals.Fil: Ng, Bobby G.. Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Eklund, Erik A.. Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute; Estados Unidos. Lund University; SueciaFil: Shiryaev, Sergey A.. Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Dong, Yin Y.. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Abbott, Mary Alice. University of Massachusetts Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Asteggiano, Carla Gabriela. Universidad Católica de Córdoba; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Medicina. Centro de Estudios de las Metabolopatías Congénitas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Bamshad, Michael J.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Barr, Eileen. University of Emory; Estados UnidosFil: Bernstein, Jonathan A.. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Chelakkadan, Shabeed. Monash Children's Hospital; AustraliaFil: Christodoulou, John. Sydney Medical School; Australia. University of Melbourne; AustraliaFil: Chung, Wendy K.. Columbia University; Estados UnidosFil: Ciliberto, Michael A.. University of Iowa; Estados UnidosFil: Cousin, Janice. National Human Genome Research Institute ; Estados UnidosFil: Gardiner, Fiona. University of Melbourne; AustraliaFil: Ghosh, Suman. University of Florida; Estados UnidosFil: Graf, William D.. University of Connecticut; Estados UnidosFil: Grunewald, Stephanie. University College London; Estados UnidosFil: Hammond, Katherine. University of Alabama at Birmingahm; Estados UnidosFil: Hauser, Natalie S.. Inova, Fairfax Hospital Falls Church; Estados UnidosFil: Hoganson, George E.. University Of Illinois At Chicago; Estados UnidosFil: Houck, Kimberly M.. Baylor College of Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Kohler, Jennefer N.. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Morava, Eva. Mayo Clinic; Estados UnidosFil: Larson, Austin A.. University Of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.; Estados UnidosFil: Liu, Pengfei. Baylor Genetics; Estados Unidos. Baylor College Of Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Madathil, Sujana. University of Iowa; Estados UnidosFil: McCormack, Colleen. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Meeks, Naomi J.L.. University Of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.; Estados UnidosFil: Papazoglu, Gabriela Magali. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Medicina. Centro de Estudios de las Metabolopatías Congénitas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentin

High-density mapping of the MHC identifies a shared role for HLA-DRB1*01:03 in inflammatory bowel diseases and heterozygous advantage in ulcerative colitis.

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from NPG at http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v47/n2/full/ng.3176.html#acknowledgmentsGenome-wide association studies of the related chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) known as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have shown strong evidence of association to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). This region encodes a large number of immunological candidates, including the antigen-presenting classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules. Studies in IBD have indicated that multiple independent associations exist at HLA and non-HLA genes, but they have lacked the statistical power to define the architecture of association and causal alleles. To address this, we performed high-density SNP typing of the MHC in >32,000 individuals with IBD, implicating multiple HLA alleles, with a primary role for HLA-DRB1*01:03 in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Noteworthy differences were observed between these diseases, including a predominant role for class II HLA variants and heterozygous advantage observed in ulcerative colitis, suggesting an important role of the adaptive immune response in the colonic environment in the pathogenesis of IBD.We would like to thank the International PSC study group (http://www.ipscsg.org/) for sharing data. We are grateful to B.A. Lie and K. Holm for helpful discussions. J.D.R. holds a Canada Research Chair, and this work was supported by a US National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant (NIDDK; R01 DK064869 and U01 DK062432). The laboratory of A.F. is supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) grant program e:Med (sysINFLAME). A.F. receives infrastructure support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Cluster of Excellence 'Inflammation at Interfaces' and holds an endowment professorship (Peter Hans Hofschneider Professorship) of the Foundation for Experimental Biomedicine (Zurich, Switzerland). Grant support for T.H.K. and A.F. was received from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013, grant number 262055, ESGI). M.N.C. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Frederick National Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research. This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, under contract HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the US Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the US government. J.C.B. was supported by a Wellcome Trust grant (WT098051). D.M. and V.K. are supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. L.P.S. is supported by an NIDDK grant (U01 DK062429-14). J.A.T. is supported by the UK Medical Research Council. D.P.B.M. is supported by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the European Union (305479) and by grants from the NIDDK (U01 DK062413, P01 DK046763-19, U54 DE023789-01), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID; U01 AI067068) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ; HS021747). R.H.D. holds the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetic Research endowed chair at the University of Pittsburgh and was supported by an NIDDK grant (U01 DK062420) and a US National Cancer Institute grant (CA141743). S.L.H. and J.R.O. would like to also acknowledge the support of the US NIH (R01 NS049477 and 1U19 A1067152) and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (RG 2899-D11). S.L. wishes to acknowledge support from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (R.D. Wright Career Development Fellowship, APP1053756)