"Happy to Close?": The relationship between surgical experience and incisional hernia rates following abdominal wall closure in colorectal surgery

Aim Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication of colorectal surgery, affecting up to 30% of patients at 2 years. Given the associated morbidity and high recurrence rates after attempted repair of IH, emphasis should be placed on prevention. There is an association between surgeon volume and outcomes in hernia surgery, yet there is little evidence regarding impact of the seniority of the surgeon performing abdominal wall closure on IH rate. The aim of our study was to assess the rates of IH at 1 year following abdominal wall closure between junior and senior surgeons in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Methods This was an exploratory analysis of patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer between 2014–2018 as part of the Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART), a prospective, multicentre randomised control trial comparing abdominal wall closure methods. Grade of surgeon performing abdominal closure was categorised into “trainee” and “consultant” and compared to IH rate at one year. Results A total of 663 patients were included in this retrospective analysis of patients in the HART trial. The rate of IH in patients closed by trainees was 20%, compared to 12% in those closed by consultants (p = <0.001). When comparing closure methods, IH rates were significantly higher in the Hughes closure arm between trainees and consultants (20% vs. 12%, p = 0.032), but not high enough in the mass closure arm to reach statistical significance (21% vs. 13%, p = 0.058). On multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.036, OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.04), Male sex (p = 0.049, OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.00–2.59) and closure by a trainee (p = 0.006, OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.20–2.85) were identified as risk factors for developing IH. Conclusion Patients who undergo abdominal wall closure by a surgeon in training have an increased risk of developing IH when compared to those closed by a consultant. Further work is needed to determine the impact of supervised and unsupervised trainees on IH rates, but abdominal wall closure should be regarded as a training opportunity in its own righ

What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: A qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants

Objective: The WOMAN Trial was the first in the UK to use the option of waiver of informed consent at the time of an obstetric emergency. This qualitative study aimed to investigate participants’ views of the acceptability of the recruitment methods used. Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews with women who did and did not give consent at the time of their recruitment to the WOMAN Trial. Setting: Highest UK recruitment site for the WOMAN Trial (129/569). Interviews were conducted in participants’ homes. Population: 40 of the 129 women who were recruited to the WOMAN Trial at one UK site were invited to take part, 15 women were interviewed. Methods: Qualitative, interview study Main outcome measures Facilitators and barriers to successful recruitment during obstetric emergencies. Guidance for future researchers. Results: Findings revealed that what is important is not so much the consent process used or a signature on a form, but the way in which consent is obtained. Clinicians who successfully negotiate consent to research during childbirth emergencies engage in a “humane choreography” of words and actions. This emphasises the importance of prompt decision making and treatment, whilst respecting the woman’s personal situation and experience. Conclusions Our findings do not support a single pathway to consent in the context of an obstetric emergency. Women understand that consent to research in an emergency is complex. Clinicians’ skills in considering the clinical, ethical and emotional aspects within the context of the clinical emergency can hamper or promote women’s satisfaction

High-resolution CT and angiographic evaluation of NexStent wall adaptation

Carotid stenting is a minimally invasive treatment for extracranial carotid artery stenosis. Stent design may affect technical success and complications in a certain subgroup of patients. We examined the wall adaptability of a new closed-cell carotid stent (NexStent), which has a unique rolled sheet design. Forty-one patients had 42 carotid arteries treated with angioplasty and stenting for internal carotid artery stenosis. The mean patient age was 65 +/- 10 years. All patients underwent high-resolution computed tomographic angiography after the stent implantation. Data analysis included pre- and postprocedural stenosis, procedure complications, plaque calcification, and stent apposition. We reviewed the angiographic and computed tomographic images for plaque coverage and stent expansion. All procedures were technically successful. Mean stenosis was reduced from 84 +/- 8% before the procedure to 15.7 +/- 7% after stenting. Two patients experienced transient ischemic attack; one patient had bradycardia and hypotension. Stent induced kinking was observed in one case. Good plaque coverage and proper overlapping of the rolled sheet was achieved in all cases. There was weak correlation between the residual stenosis and the amount of calcification. The stent provides adequate expansion and adaptation to the tapering anatomy of the bifurcation