IRON NOF trial: IV iron for anaemic patients with femoral fracture

Background: Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased use of blood transfusions, a greater risk of postoperative complications, and patient morbidity. The IRON NOF trial aimed to investigate whether the administration of i.v. iron in anaemic patients during hip fracture surgery reduced the need for blood transfusion and improved patient outcomes. Methods: This phase III double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial included patients >60 yr old with preoperative anaemia undergoing surgery for femoral neck or subtrochanteric fracture across seven Australian Hospitals. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to receive either i.v. iron carboxymaltose 1000 mg or placebo (saline) at operation. The primary endpoint was blood transfusion use, with secondary endpoints of haemoglobin concentration at 6 weeks, length of hospital stay, rehabilitation duration to discharge, and 6-month mortality. Subgroup analysis compared outcomes in patients 80 yr old. All analyses were performed by intention-to-treat. This trial was terminated early because of jurisdictional changes of more restrictive transfusion practices and changes in consent requirements. Results: Participants (n=143) were recruited between February 2013 and May 2017. There was no difference observed in the incidence of blood transfusion between the treatment group (18/70) (26%) compared with the placebo group (27/73) (37%) (odds ratio for transfusion if receiving placebo: 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–3.47; P=0.15) and there was no overall difference in the median number of blood units transfused between groups (odds ratio 1.52; 95% CI 0.77–3.00; P=0.22). Patients receiving i.v. iron had a higher haemoglobin 6 weeks after intervention compared with the placebo group (Hb 116 g L−1 vs 108 g L−1; P=0.01). No difference was observed in length of hospital stay, rehabilitation duration to discharge, or 6-month mortality. However, in younger patients without major bleeding, the use of placebo compared with i.v. iron was associated with an increased number of units of blood transfused (placebo transfusion incidence rate ratio 3.88; 95% CI 1.16–13.0; P=0.03). Conclusions: In anaemic patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture, i.v. iron did not reduce the overall proportion of patients receiving blood transfusion. The use of i.v. iron may reduce the amount of blood transfused in younger patients. The use of i.v. iron is associated with increased haemoglobin concentrations 6 weeks after the operation. Clinical trial registration: ACTRN12612000448842

How midwives manage rapid pre‐loading of fluid in women prior to low dose epidurals: a retrospective chart review

Aim:To describe contemporary routine practice regarding rapid pre-loading of intra-venous fluid management prior to epidural analgesia during labour and birth. Background: Midwives are the key health professionals providing care for women before, during and after an epidural in labour. Part of this management involves maternal hydration; however, how midwives assess and manage maternal hydration and fluid management is not well understood. Prior to the administration of a low dose epidural for pain relief a rapid intravenous pre-loading of between 500-1000 mls of crystalloid fluids is administered to the pregnant women. Currently, there is limited evidence available to assess if intravenous pre-loading reduces maternal hypotension and foetal bradycardia. Anecdotal evidence suggests that wide variation in clinical practice in relation to volume of fluid administered, fluid status assessment and clinical documentation occurs. Design: A retrospective medical health record review, in a regional Australian maternity hospital. Methods:A retrospective medical health record review chart review from women who received an epidural for pain relief during labour and birth (June–September 2015). Results: Data from 293 charts were collected, including: maternal factors; blood presssure distributions; maternal fluid status; types, concentration and timing of analgesia loading doses; IV fluid loading volumes; maternal hypotension, foetal outcomes and documentation of fluid balance charts. Wide variation in clinical practice was evident with midwives administering pre‐loading fluid volumes ranging from 250 ‐1000 ml. Midwifery assessment, documentation and practice pertaining to hydration was incon-sistent and lacking. Conclusion: Management of intravenous fluids during labour is fragmented. Although fluid balance charts are used internationally to assess maternal hydration, documentation of fluid balance status was poor. Multi‐professional collaboration between obstet-rics, anaesthetics and midwifery is required to address this wide variation and reach consensus on best practice based on what evidence is currently available

Comparison of Supraglottic Airway Devices With Endotracheal Intubation in Low-Risk Patients for Cesarean Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The safety and adverse event rate of supraglottic airway (SGA) devices for cesarean delivery (CD) is poorly characterized. The primary aims of this review were to determine whether the first-pass success was higher and time to insertion for SGA was faster than endotracheal intubation for elective CD. The secondary aim was to determine the airway-related adverse event rate associated with SGA use compared to endotracheal intubation in elective CD under general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: Six databases were systematically searched until September 2019. Included studies reported on the use of SGA in comparison to endotracheal tube intubation. A comparative meta-analysis between SGA and endotracheal intubation was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Dichotomous outcomes were reported using an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The results for continuous outcomes were reported using a weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 2236 patients compared SGA and endotracheal intubation. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in first-attempt success rate (OR = 1.92; 95% CI, 0.85-4.32; I = 0%; P = .44). There was no clinically significant difference in time to insertion (WMD = -15.80 seconds; 95% CI, -25.30 to -6.31 seconds; I= 100%; P = .001). Similarly, there was no difference in any adverse event rate except sore throat which was reduced with the use of an SGA (OR = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.32; I= 53%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the reasonable insertion success rate and safety profile of SGAs demonstrated in this meta-analysis, the analysis remains underpowered and therefore inconclusive. At present, further studies are required before the use of an SGA as the first-line airway for an elective CD can be recommended

Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Functional capacity is an important component of risk assessment for major surgery. Doctors' clinical subjective assessment of patients' functional capacity has uncertain accuracy. We did a study to compare preoperative subjective assessment with alternative markers of fitness (cardiopulmonary exercise testing [CPET], scores on the Duke Activity Status Index [DASI] questionnaire, and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT pro-BNP] concentrations) for predicting death or complications after major elective non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: We did a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study at 25 hospitals: five in Canada, seven in the UK, ten in Australia, and three in New Zealand. We recruited adults aged at least 40 years who were scheduled for major non-cardiac surgery and deemed to have one or more risk factors for cardiac complications (eg, a history of heart failure, stroke, or diabetes) or coronary artery disease. Functional capacity was subjectively assessed in units of metabolic equivalents of tasks by the responsible anaesthesiologists in the preoperative assessment clinic, graded as poor (10). All participants also completed the DASI questionnaire, underwent CPET to measure peak oxygen consumption, and had blood tests for measurement of NT pro-BNP concentrations. After surgery, patients had daily electrocardiograms and blood tests to measure troponin and creatinine concentrations until the third postoperative day or hospital discharge. The primary outcome was death or myocardial infarction within 30 days after surgery, assessed in all participants who underwent both CPET and surgery. Prognostic accuracy was assessed using logistic regression, receiver-operating-characteristic curves, and net risk reclassification. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2013, and March 25, 2016, we included 1401 patients in the study. 28 (2%) of 1401 patients died or had a myocardial infarction within 30 days of surgery. Subjective assessment had 19·2% sensitivity (95% CI 14·2-25) and 94·7% specificity (93·2-95·9) for identifying the inability to attain four metabolic equivalents during CPET. Only DASI scores were associated with predicting the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 0·96, 95% CI 0·83-0·99; p=0·03). INTERPRETATION: Subjectively assessed functional capacity should not be used for preoperative risk evaluation. Clinicians could instead consider a measure such as DASI for cardiac risk assessment. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science, UK National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia, UK Clinical Research Collaboration, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, and Monash University.This study was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science, UK National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia, UK Clinical Research Collaboration, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, and Monash University (Melbourne, VIC, Australia). DNW is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. DNW and BHC are partly supported by Merit Awards from the Department of Anesthesia at the University of Toronto. RMP is a Career Development Fellow for the British Journal of Anaesthesia and Royal College of Anaesthetists, and a professor for the UK National Institute for Health Research. TEFA is a clinical research training fellow for the UK Medical Research Council and British Journal of Anaesthesia. MPWG holds the British Oxygen Company Chair of Anaesthesia of the Royal College of Anaesthetists, which is awarded by the UK National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia. We thank the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital (Toronto, ON, Canada) for generously supporting the costs of international trial insurance for this study, and all the participating patients and staff across the 25 study sites