La gran razón del cuerpo : un ensayo sobre el Zaratustra de Nietzsche

El cuarto discurso del libro primero del Zaratustra de Nietzsche está dedicado a criticar a los que desprecian el cuerpo mediante el concepto de una «gran razón». El presente artículo es un comentario e interpretación de este concepto nietzscheano que en realidad se identifica con el cuerpo mismo. El cuerpo es concebido por Nietzsche desde el modelo del artista creador, el genio, y la «gran razón» se lee como un concepto estético que justifica al tiempo su función organizadora, unificadora, y su carácter plural, su multiplicidad, así como su carácter al tiempo individual y comunitario.Zarathustra's fourth discourse of the first part is a critique of those who designate as «despisers of the body». With this critical aim Nietzsche introduces the concept of a «big reason». This paper offers a commentary and an interpretation of this concept that Nietzsche self identifies with the body. The body is understand by Nietzsche in analogy with the artistic genius, and the «big reason» is read as an aesthetic concept which justifies both its organisatorial, unifying function and its plural condition, its multiplicity. Such an aesthetical interpretation justifies also the fact that the «great reason» shows a twofold dimension, individual and communitarian

Resentimiento y Apocalipsis. La crítica de Nietzsche a las visiones del fin de los tiempos

Mediante el enlace copulativo entre Resentimiento y Apocalipsis se anuncia la construcción de un puente conceptual gracias al cual se proporciona una vía de paso segura hacia el abrupto complejo del Apocalipsis; mientras que, al mismo tiempo, se fi jan unas estables bases para la posterior ubicación del escurridizo concepto dentro del pensamiento nietzscheano. Las pesquisas genealógicas localizan el origen del enfrentamiento en dos sistemas de valores diametralmente opuestos: Roma y Judea. Dos claves arquitectónicas soportan el peso de este apocalíptico constructo: Juan el evangelista y Jesús el hebreo

Glaubensgewissheit und Weltvertrauen

Martin Luthers Reformation hat die Welt verändert, nicht nur Theologie und Kirche. In einem vielfältigen Prozess haben Luthers Ideen und ihre Wirkungen Kirche und Kultur, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft transformiert und Wege in die Neuzeit gebahnt. Die Beiträge im zweiten Band der „Hamburger Akademievorträge“ beschäftigen sich mit diesen Entwicklungen, die für das gegenwärtige Leben elementar sind.Martin Luther\u27s Reformation has changed not only theology and church, but the world itself. In a multifaceted process, Luther\u27s ideas and their effects have transformed church and culture, economy and society and paved the way for the modern age. The contributions in the second volume of the "Hamburger Akademievorträge" deal with these developments which are elementary for contemporary life

Editorial : participation framework revisited : (new) media and their audiences/users

Long before the wide-spread use of computer-mediated, electronically-based communication, Goffman (1979) pointed out that the denominations hearer and speaker are overly simplistic and not useful, based on the assumption that there are two parties only in talk, that both are fully focused on their neatly alternating roles, and that their main concern is the talk at hand. Hence, a dyadic model of communication with a speaker and a hearer has long since been replaced by such concepts as production format and participation framework with different roles which individuals may display in relation to a given utterance (Goffman 1979, Levinson 1988). Going beyond interpersonal dyadic faceto- face talk-in-interaction, the application of these notions still remains unsatisfactory. So, for instance, regarding classic mass media, there are ongoing discussions about the status of the television audience as overhearers (O’Keeffe 2006). Also, in studies on CMC (computer-mediated communication) often a rather superficial notion of multiple authorship is posited (cf. Landow 1994, Storrer 2008, Crystal 2011), even though the genuine interactivity of the web 2.0 seems to provide fruitful ground for an analysis in these terms. Because of these ongoing debates and unexplored fields, we find it timely to revisit the notion participation framework and describe how different reception roles are inscribed in different media or forms of communication, or, in other words, how different production formats allow their users and audiences to position themselves

Présence d'absence. Wspomnienie Xaviera Tilliette'a SJ

n/