Gestión del autocuidado en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica, que asiste al programa de hemodiális, Hospital Escuela Antonio Lenin Fonseca, II semestre 2016

La Insuficiencia renal crónica, es considerada actualmente como un problema de salud pública a nivel mundial. El presente estudio investigativo se realizó en el Hospital Escuela Antonio Lenin Fonseca en el II semestre 2016, para conocer la gestión del autocuidado de los pacientes con Insuficiencia renal crónica en la sala de hemodiálisis. Se trata de un estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, prospectivo, y de corte transversal. Con un universo de 102 pacientes y una muestra de 72 pacientes con un 97% de confiabilidad y un margen de error del 3%. La recolección de la información se llevo a cabo a través de la encuesta conteniendo preguntas cerradas y abiertas dirigida a cada paciente. Las variables que se analizarón fueron características sociodemográficas, acciónes de autocuidado. Las demandas idenfitificadas fueron nutricionales donde los pacientes no controlan lo que es la ingesta de sodio, potasio, fosforo y en la ingesta de liquido. Las acciones que realiza el paciente para su autocuidado las saben pero no las aplican como deberían de ser siendo esto un factor importante por el cual el paciente puede presentar ceveras complicaciones perjudiciales para el bienestar del mismo y la familia. Se recomienda a los pacientes que en conjunto al personal de enfermería de la unidad de salud sigan siendo accesibles con los estudiantes de la carrera de enfermería, que lleguen a realizar estudios investigativos que ayudaran a informar situaciones que se presente

Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy:Study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project)

This study was funded by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias ISCIII (Grant Numbers PI15/00276, PI15/00572, PI15/00996), REDISSEC (Project Numbers RD12/0001/0012, RD16/0001/0005), and the European Regional Development Fund ("A way to build Europe").Background: Multimorbidity is associated with negative effects both on people's health and on healthcare systems. A key problem linked to multimorbidity is polypharmacy, which in turn is associated with increased risk of partly preventable adverse effects, including mortality. The Ariadne principles describe a model of care based on a thorough assessment of diseases, treatments (and potential interactions), clinical status, context and preferences of patients with multimorbidity, with the aim of prioritizing and sharing realistic treatment goals that guide an individualized management. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention that implements the Ariadne principles in a population of young-old patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The intervention seeks to improve the appropriateness of prescribing in primary care (PC), as measured by the medication appropriateness index (MAI) score at 6 and 12months, as compared with usual care. Methods/Design: Design:pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial. Unit of randomization: family physician (FP). Unit of analysis: patient. Scope: PC health centres in three autonomous communities: Aragon, Madrid, and Andalusia (Spain). Population: patients aged 65-74years with multimorbidity (≥3 chronic diseases) and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs prescribed in ≥3months). Sample size: n=400 (200 per study arm). Intervention: complex intervention based on the implementation of the Ariadne principles with two components: (1) FP training and (2) FP-patient interview. Outcomes: MAI score, health services use, quality of life (Euroqol 5D-5L), pharmacotherapy and adherence to treatment (Morisky-Green, Haynes-Sackett), and clinical and socio-demographic variables. Statistical analysis: primary outcome is the difference in MAI score between T0 and T1 and corresponding 95% confidence interval. Adjustment for confounding factors will be performed by multilevel analysis. All analyses will be carried out in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: It is essential to provide evidence concerning interventions on PC patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity, conducted in the context of routine clinical practice, and involving young-old patients with significant potential for preventing negative health outcomes. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02866799Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

Gestión del conocimiento. Perspectiva multidisciplinaria. Volumen 17

El libro “Gestión del Conocimiento. Perspectiva Multidisciplinaria”, Volumen 17 de la Colección Unión Global, es resultado de investigaciones. Los capítulos del libro, son resultados de investigaciones desarrolladas por sus autores. El libro es una publicación internacional, seriada, continua, arbitrada, de acceso abierto a todas las áreas del conocimiento, orientada a contribuir con procesos de gestión del conocimiento científico, tecnológico y humanístico. Con esta colección, se aspira contribuir con el cultivo, la comprensión, la recopilación y la apropiación social del conocimiento en cuanto a patrimonio intangible de la humanidad, con el propósito de hacer aportes con la transformación de las relaciones socioculturales que sustentan la construcción social de los saberes y su reconocimiento como bien público

Tiempos para pensar : investigación social y humanística hoy en Venezuela. Tomo II

En nuestros tiempos, hacer investigación en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades e intentar aportar pensamiento crítico es un hacer personal y también una tarea colectiva que se gesta en el intercambio y en el encuentro, en el debate y en la puesta en común de visiones, análisis, puntos de partida y espacios que se recorren. Hay desafíos del nuevo tiempo que son desafíos de las sociedades, e interpelan a la producción de conocimiento social y humano, le proponen preguntas y encomiendas, exigen que responda a sus demandas éticas y epistémicas desde el Sur, piden que se construyan saberes alternativos, decoloniales, que expliquen, acompañen y prefiguren la emancipación. Este libro, que cuenta con dos tomos, encara este desafío con rigurosidad y espíritu crítico

Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries

This was an investigator initiated study funded by Nestle Health Sciences through an unrestricted research grant, and by a National Institute for Health Research (UK) Professorship held by RP. The study was sponsored by Queen Mary University of London

Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research

Background The Clavien–Dindo classification is perhaps the most widely used approach for reporting postoperative complications in clinical trials. This system classifies complication severity by the treatment provided. However, it is unclear whether the Clavien–Dindo system can be used internationally in studies across differing healthcare systems in high- (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods This was a secondary analysis of the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), a prospective observational cohort study of elective surgery in adults. Data collection occurred over a 7-day period. Severity of complications was graded using Clavien–Dindo and the simpler ISOS grading (mild, moderate or severe, based on guided investigator judgement). Severity grading was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as frequencies and ICC values (with 95 per cent c.i.). The analysis was stratified by income status of the country, comparing HICs with LMICs. Results A total of 44 814 patients were recruited from 474 hospitals in 27 countries (19 HICs and 8 LMICs). Some 7508 patients (16·8 per cent) experienced at least one postoperative complication, equivalent to 11 664 complications in total. Using the ISOS classification, 5504 of 11 664 complications (47·2 per cent) were graded as mild, 4244 (36·4 per cent) as moderate and 1916 (16·4 per cent) as severe. Using Clavien–Dindo, 6781 of 11 664 complications (58·1 per cent) were graded as I or II, 1740 (14·9 per cent) as III, 2408 (20·6 per cent) as IV and 735 (6·3 per cent) as V. Agreement between classification systems was poor overall (ICC 0·41, 95 per cent c.i. 0·20 to 0·55), and in LMICs (ICC 0·23, 0·05 to 0·38) and HICs (ICC 0·46, 0·25 to 0·59). Conclusion Caution is recommended when using a treatment approach to grade complications in global surgery studies, as this may introduce bias unintentionally