A Muscle-Specific p38 MAPK/Mef2/MnSOD Pathway Regulates Stress, Motor Function, and Life Span in Drosophila

SummaryMolecular mechanisms that concordantly regulate stress, life span, and aging remain incompletely understood. Here, we demonstrate that in Drosophila, a p38 MAP kinase (p38K)/Mef2/MnSOD pathway is a coregulator of stress and life span. Hence, overexpression of p38K extends life span in a MnSOD-dependent manner, whereas inhibition of p38K causes early lethality and precipitates age-related motor dysfunction and stress sensitivity, that is rescued through muscle-restricted (but not neuronal) add-back of p38K. Additionally, mutations in p38K are associated with increased protein carbonylation and Nrf2-dependent transcription, while adversely affecting metabolic response to hypoxia. Mechanistically, p38K modulates expression of the mitochondrial MnSOD enzyme through the transcription factor Mef2, and predictably, perturbations in MnSOD modify p38K-dependent phenotypes. Thus, our results uncover a muscle-restricted p38K-Mef2-MnSOD signaling module that influences life span and stress, distinct from the insulin/JNK/FOXO pathway. We propose that potentiating p38K might be instrumental in restoring the mitochondrial detoxification machinery and combating stress-induced aging

Glossary on atmospheric electricity and its effects on biology

[EN] There is an increasing interest to study the interactions between atmospheric electrical parameters and living organisms at multiple scales. So far, relatively few studies have been published that focus on possible biological effects of atmospheric electric and magnetic fields. To foster future work in this area of multidisciplinary research, here we present a glossary of relevant terms. Its main purpose is to facilitate the process of learning and communication among the different scientific disciplines working on this topic. While some definitions come from existing sources, other concepts have been re-defined to better reflect the existing and emerging scientific needs of this multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary area of research.This paper is based upon work from the COST Action "Atmospheric Electricity Network: coupling with the Earth System, climate and biological systems (ELECTRONET)," supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). AO received funding from Poland Ministry of Science and Higher Education for statutory research of the Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (Grant No 3841/E-41/S/2019).Fdez-Arroyabe, P.; Kourtidis, K.; Haldoupis, C.; Savoska, S.; Matthews, J.; Mir, LM.; Kassomenos, P.... (2021). Glossary on atmospheric electricity and its effects on biology. International Journal of Biometeorology. 65(1):5-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-02013-9S529651Adrovic F (2012) Editor, Gamma radiation, IntechOpen.Alberts B (2014). Molecular biology of the cell (6th ed.). New York. ISBN 9780815344322Ambus Per, (2015) Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern Sophie, in Biology of the Nitrogen Cycle, 2007.G.P. Robertson1, P.M. Groffman2, in Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry (4th Edition)Apollonio F, Liberti M, Paffi A, Merla C, Marracino P, Denzi A, Marino C, d’Inzeo G (2013) Feasibility for microwaves energy to affect biological systems via nonthermal mechanisms: a systematic approach. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Techn 61(5):2031–2045. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2013.2250298Arnold F (1986) Atmospheric ions. Stud Environ Sci 26(103-133):135–142Barrington-Leigh CP, Inan US, Stanley M (2001) Identification of sprites and elves with intensified video and broadband array photometry. J Geophys Res 106(2):1741Bazilevskaya G (2000) Observations of variability in cosmic rays. Space Sci Rev 94:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026721912992Benson D, Markovich A, Lee SH (2010) Ternary homogeneous nucleation of H2SO, NH3, H2O under conditions relevant to the lower troposphere. Atmos Chem Phys 10(9):22395–22414Bonnafous P et al (1999) The generation of reactive-oxygen species associated with long-lasting pulse-induced electropermeabilization of mammalian cells is based on a non-destructive alteration of the plasma membrane. Biochim et BiophysActa (BBA) - Biomembr 1461:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00154-6Bór (2013) Optically perceptible characteristics of sprites observed in Central Europe in 2007-2009. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 92:151–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.10.008Bowker GE, Crenshaw HC (2007) Electrostatic forces in wind-pollination, Part 1: Measurement of the electrostatic charge on pollen. Atmos Environ 41(8):1587–1595Buonsanto MJ (1999) Ionospheric storms–a review. Space Sci Rev 88:563–601Chafai DE et al (2019) Reversible and irreversible modulation of tubulin self-assembly by intense nanosecond pulsed electric fields. Adv Mater 31:e1903636Chalmers JA (1949) Atmospheric electricity, 1st edn. Pergamon Press, OxfordChilingarian A, Soghomonyan S, Khanikyanc Y, Pokhsraryan D (2019) On the origin of particle fluxes from thunderclouds. Astropart Phys 105:54–62Cifra M, Pospíšil P (2014) Ultra-weak photon emission from biological samples: definition, mechanisms, properties, detection and applications. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 139:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.009Cifra M, Fields JZ, Farhadi A (2011) Electromagnetic cellular interactions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 105(3):223–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.07.003Cifra M, Apollonio F, Liberti M et al (2020) Possible molecular and cellular mechanisms at the basis of atmospheric electromagnetic field bioeffects. Int J Biometeorol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01885-1Clarke D, Whitney H, Sutton G, Robert D (2013) Detection and learning of floral electric fields by bumblebees. Science 340:66–69Clarke D, Morley E, Robert D (2017) The bee, the flower, and the electric field: electric ecology and aerial electroreception. J Comp Physiol A 203(9):737–748Corbet SA, Beament J, Eisikowitch D (1982) Are electrostatic forces involved in pollen transfer? Plant Cell Environ 5(2):125–129Daintith and Gould (2006) The facts on file dictionary of astronomy/edited by John Daintith, William Gould New York, NY: Facts on File, c1994. Call # 520.3 FA. “Cosmic rays are a global source of ionization distributed through the Galaxy.” Source: Dalgarno, A. (2006), InterstelDal Maso M, Kulmala M, Lehtinen KEJ, Mäkelä JM, Aalto P, O’Dowd CD (2002) Condensation and coagulation sinks and formation of nucleation mode particles in coastal and boreal forest boundary layers. J Geophys Res 107. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd00Dal Maso M, Kulmala M, Riipinen I, Wagner R, Hussein T, Aalto PP, Lehtinen KEJ (2005) Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland. Boreal Environ Res 1:2005Diaz AF, Felix-Navarro RM (2004) A semi-quantitative tribo-electric series for polymeric materials: the influence of chemical structure and properties. J Electrost 62(4):277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2004.05.005Djafer D, Irbah A (2013) Estimation of atmospheric turbidity over Ghardaïa city. Atmos Res, Elsevier 128:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.03.009ff.ffhal-00801475fDusenbery DB (1992) Sensory ecology. W.H. Freeman, New York ISBN 0-7167-2333-6EC-GPHSW (2013) European Commission. Guidance on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the potential risks related to nanomaterials at work-guidance for employers and health and safety practitioners. BrusselsEncyclopedia Britannica, (2019) https://www.britannica.com/ Accessed 1.10.2019European Committee for Standardization (1993) CEN-EN 481-workplace atmospheres-size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles.Fernandez de Arroyabe P, Lecha Estela L, Schimt F (2017) Digital divide, biometeorological data infrastructures and human vulnerability definition. Int J Biometeorol 2018:733–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1398-xFeynman R (1970) The Feynman lectures on physics Vol II Addison-Wesley Publishing Longman.Finlay CC et al (2010) International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the eleventh generation. Geophys J Int 183(3):1216–1230Fishman GJ, Bhat PN, Mallozzi R, Horack JM, Koshut T, Kouveliotou C, Pendleton GN, Meegan CA, Wilson RB, Paciesas WS, Goodman SJ, Christian HJ (1994) Discovery of intense gamma-ray flashes of atmospheric origin. Science 264(5163):1313–1316. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.264.5163.1313Forbush SE (1937) On the effects in cosmic-ray intensity observed during the recent magnetic storm. Phys Rev 51(12):1108–1109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.51.1108.3Franz RC, Nemzek RJ, Winckler JR (1990) Television image of a large upward electrical discharge above a thunderstorm system. Science 249:48–51Freeman S, Quilin K, Allison L (1965) Biological science 5th edition. (2013) Pearson Publishing.p.1059.Fullekrug, M., and M. J. Rycroft (2006) The contribution of sprites to the global atmospheric electric circuit. Earth Planets Space 58(9):1193–1196Fundamentals of Electronics (1965) Volume 1b — Basic Electricity - Alternating Current. Bureau of Naval Personnel. 1965. p. 197GFCS. WMO-WHO Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS) (2020) http://www.wmo.int/gfcs/about-gfcs, Accessed 1.10.2019Gonzalez WD, Joselyn JA, Kamide Y, Kroehl HW, Rostoker G, Tsurutani BT, Vasyliunas VM (1994) What is a geomagnetic storm? J Geophys Res Space 99(A4):5771–5792. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02867GSFT - Glossary for the Solar Flare Theory (n.d.) web site by Gordon Holman and Sarah Benedict. Responsible NASA Official: Gordon D. Holman, Heliophysics Science Division, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Laboratory / Code 671, [email protected] C (1998) Turbidity determination from broadband irradiance measurements: a detailed multi-coefficient approach. J Appl Meteorol 37:414–435Gunn R (1954) Diffusion charging of atmospheric droplets by ions, and the resulting combination coefficients. J Atmos Sci 11(5):339–347Haldoupis C (2012) Midlatitude sporadic E. A typical paradigm of atmosphere-ionosphere coupling. Space Sci Rev 168:441–461Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (third), (2007) Edited by Frank S. Barnes and Ben Greenebaum, 2007, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group Boca Raton 33487-32742Hargreaves JK (1992) The solar-terrestrial environment. Cambridge Atmospheric and Space Science Series. Cambridge University PressHarrison RG (2000) Cloud formation and the possible significance of charge for atmospheric condensation and ice nuclei. Space Sci Rev 94(1):381–396Harrison RG (2013) The Carnegie curve. Surv Geophys 34:209–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-012-9210-2Harrison RG, Nicoll KA (2018) Fair weather criteria for atmospheric electricity measurements. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 179:239–250Harrison RG, Tammet H (2008) Ions in the terrestrial atmosphere and other solar system atmospheres. Space Sci Rev 137:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9356-xHayakawa M, Hattori K, Ando Y (2004) Natural electromagnetic phenomena and electromagnetic theory: a review. IEEJ Trans Fundam Mater 124(2004):72–79Hekstra DR et al (2016) Electric-field-stimulated protein mechanics. Nature 540.7633(2016):400Hinds W C (1982, 1999) Aerosol technology: properties, behavior and measurement of airborne particles, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.Hirsikko A, Nieminen T, Gagné S, Lehtipalo K, Manninen HE, Ehn M, Hõrrak U, Kerminen VM, Laakso L, McMurry PH, Mirme A, Mirme S, Petäjä T, Tammet H, Vakkari V, Vana M, Kulmala M (2011) Atmospheric ions and nucleation: a review of observations. Atmos Chem Phys 11:767–798. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-767-2011Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) Aquantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerves. J Physiol 117(4):500–544 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1392413/Hoppel WA (1969) Application of three-body recombination and attachment coefficients to tropospheric ions. Pure Appl Geophys 75:158–166Hörrak U, Salm J, Tammet H (2000) Statistical characterization of air ion mobility spectra at Tahkuse Observatory: classification of air ions. J Geophys Res 105(D7):9291–9302Hundhausen AJ (1995) The solar wind. In: Kivelson MG, Russell CT (eds) Introduction to space physics. Cambridge University Press, pp 91–198Hunting, E.R., Matthews, J., de Arróyabe Hernáez, P.F., England, S.J., Kourtidis, K., Koh, K., Nicoll, K., Harrison, R.G., Manser, K., Price, C. and Dragovic, S., (2020). Challenges in coupling atmospheric electricity with biological systems. u, pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01960-7ICRP (1994) International Commission on Radiological Protection Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection, Annual 66.Imyanitov IM (1957) Instruments and methods for the study of atmospheric electricity (in Russian), Gostekhizdat.Imyanitov IM, Chubarina EV (1967) Electricity of free atmosphere, (Gidrometeoizdat, 1965) NASA/NSF Israel Program for Scientific Translations.Israël H (1971) Atmospheric electricity, Vol. I, Fundamentals, conductivity, ions, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, JerusalemIsraël H (1973) Atmospheric electricity, Vol. II, Fields, charges, currents, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.James MR, Wilson L, Lane SJ, Gilbert JS, Mather TA, Harrison RG, Martin RS (2008) Electrical charging of volcanic plumes, Space Sci. Rev. 137:399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9362-zJärvinen A, Aitomaa M, Rostedt A, Keskinen J, Yli-Ojanperä J (2014) Calibration of the new electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI+). J Aerosol Sci 69:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.006Kathren, RL (1998) NORM sources and their origins. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 49(3):149–168.Kirkby J, Duplissy J, Sengupta K, Frege C, Gordon H, Williamson C, Heinritzi M, Simon M, Yan C, Almeida J, Tröstl J, Nieminen T, Ortega IK, Wagner R, Adamov A, Amorim A, Bernhammer AK, Bianchi F, Breitenlechner M, Brilke S, Chen X, Craven J, Dias A, Ehrhart S, Flagan RC, Franchin A, Fuchs C, Guida R, Hakala J, Hoyle CR, Jokinen T, Junninen H, Kangasluoma J, Kim J, Krapf M, Kürten A, Laaksonen A, Lehtipalo K, Makhmutov V, Mathot S, Molteni U, Onnela A, Peräkylä O, Piel F, Petäjä T, Praplan AP, Pringle K, Rap A, Richards NAD, Riipinen I, Rissanen MP, Rondo L, Sarnela N, Schobesberger S, Scott CE, Seinfeld JH, Sipilä M, Steiner G, Stozhkov Y, Stratmann F, Tomé A, Virtanen A, Vogel AL, Wagner AC, Wagner PE, Weingartner E, Wimmer D, Winkler PM, Ye P, Zhang X, Hansel A, Dommen J, Donahue NM, Worsnop DR, Baltensperger U, Kulmala M, Carslaw KS, Curtius J (2016) Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles. Nature 533:521–526. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953Kivelson MG, Russel ZT (1995) Introduction to space physics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeKulkarni P, Baron PA, Willeke K (2011) Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques, and applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkKulmala M, Petäjä T, Nieminen T, Sipilä M, Manninen HE, Lehtipalo K, Dal Maso M, Aalto PP, Junninen H, Paasonen P, Riipinen I, Lehtinen KE, Laaksonen A, Kerminen VM (2012) Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles. Nat Protoc 7(9):1651–1667. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091https://www.nature.com/articles/nprot.2012.091Kulmala M, Petaja T, Ehn M, Thornton J, Sipila M, Worsnop DR, Kerminen VM (2014) Chemistry of atmospheric nucleation: on the recent advances on precursor characterization and atmospheric cluster composition in connection with atmospheric new particle formation. Annu Rev Phys Chem 65:21–37L’Annunziata MF (2016) Radioactivity, ElsevierLaakso L, Anttila T, Lehtinen KEJ, Aalto PP, Kulmala M, Hõrrak U, Paatero J, Hanke M, Arnold F (2004) Kinetic nucleation and ions in boreal forest particle formation events. Atmos Chem Phys 4:2353–2366. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2353-2004Lee J-H, Jang A, Bhadri PR, Myers RR, Timmons W, Beyette FR, Papautsky I (2006) Fabrication of microelectrode arrays for in situ sensing of oxidation reduction potentials. Sensors Actuators B 115:220–226.Liberti M, Apollonio F, Merla C, D’Inzeo G (2009) Microdosimetry in the microwave range: a quantitative assessment at single cell level. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Lett 8(5170009):865–868Lidén G (2011) The European Commission tries to define nanomaterials. Ann OccupHyg 55:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq092Liu KN (2002) An introduction to atmospheric radiation. Academic Press, CambridgeLove JJ, Bedrosian PA (2019) Extreme-event geoelectric hazard maps. In: Buzulukova N (ed) Extreme events in geospace-origins, predictability, and consequences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 209–230Lui ATY (1992) Magnetospheric substorms. Physics Fluids B: Plasma Physics 4:2257–2263. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.860194Maccarrone M, Fantini C, Finazzi Agrò A, Rosato N (1998) Kinetics of ultraweak light emission from human erythroleukemia K562 cells upon electroporation. Biochim et BiophysActa (BBA) - Biomembr 1414:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(98)00150-3MacGorman D, Rust WD (1998) The electrical nature of storms. Oxford University Press, New YorkMach DM, Blakeslee RJ, Bateman MG (2011) Global electric circuit implications of combined aircraft storm electric current measurements and satellite-based diurnal lightning statistics. J Geophys Res 116:D05201. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014462Magono C (1980) Thunderstorms. Elsevier, AmsterdamMarkson R (2007) The global circuit intensity: its measurement and variation over the last 50 years. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88(2):223–242. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-2-223Marracino P et al (2019) Tubulin response to intense nanosecond-scale electric field in molecular dynamics simulation. Sci Rep 9.1(2019):10477Mathews JD (1998) Sporadic E: current views and recent progress. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 60:413McIver SB (1985) Mechanoreception. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive Insect Physiol, Biochem and Pharma, 6th edn. Pergamon Press, OxfordMcPherron RL (1995) Magnetospheric dynamics. In: Kivelson MG, Russell CT (eds) Introduction to space physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 400–457Mirabel PJ, Jaecker-Voirol A (1988) Binary homogeneous nucleation. In: Wagner PE, Vali G (eds) Atmospheric aerosols and nucleation. Lecture Notes in Physics, 309th edn. Springer, BerlinMirme A, Tamm E, Mordas G, Vana M, Uin J, Mirme S, Bernotas T, Laakso L, Hirsikko A, Kulmala M (2007) A wide-range multi-channel air ion spectrometer. Boreal Environ Res 12:247–264Miroshnichenko L (2015) Solar cosmic rays: fundamentals and applications. Springer, BerlinMitsutake G, Otsuka K, Hayakawa M, Sekiguchi M, Corndlissen G, Halberg F (2005) Does Schumann resonance affect our blood pressure? Biomed Pharmacother 59:S10–S14Munn RE (1987) Bioclimatology. In: Climatology. Encyclopedia of Earth Science. Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30749-4_26NASA (2020) https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/rbsp/science/rbsp-spaceweather.html Accessed in February 2020Neubert T, Rycroft M, Farges T, Blanc E, Chanrion O, Arnone E, Odzimek A, Arnold N, Enell C-F, Turunen E, Bosinger T, Mika A, Haldoupis C, Steiner RJ, Van der Velde O, Soula S, Berg P, Boberg F, Thejll P, Christiansen B, Ignaccolo M, Fullekrug M, Verronen PT, Montanya J, Crosby N (2008) Recent results from studies of electric discharges in the mesosphere. Surv Geophys 29:71–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9043-1Nickolaenko AP, Hayakawa M, Hobara Y, (2010) Q-Bursts: natural ELF radio transients, Surv Geophys, Volume 31 4:409-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712010-9096-9Nickolaenko AP, Hayakawa M (2002) Resonances in the Earth–ionosphere cavity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtOdzimek A, Baranski P, Kubicki M, Jasinkiewicz D (2018) Electrical signatures of nimbostratus and stratus clouds in ground-level vertical atmospheric electric field and current density at mid-latitude station Swider, Poland. Atmos Res 109C:188–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.03.018Ogawa T, Tanaka Y, Yasuhara M, Fraser-Smith AC, Gendrin R (1967) Worldwide simultaneity of occurrence of a Q-type burst in the Schumann resonance frequency range. J Geomagn Geoelectr 19:377–384Ouzounov D, Pulinets S, Hattori K, Taylor P (2018) Pre-earthquake processes: a multidisciplinary approach to earthquake prediction studies. American Geophysical Union, WashingtonPalmer SJ, Rycroft MJ, Cermak M (2006) Solar and geomagnetic activity, extremely low frequency magnetic and electric fields and human health at the Earth’s surface. Surv Geophys 27:557–595Parkinson WL, Torreson OW (1931) The diurnal variation of the electric potential of the atmosphere over the oceans. Union Géodésique et Géophysique Internationale Bulletin 8:340–345Pasko VP, Yair Y, Kuo C-L (2012) Lightning related transient luminous events at high altitude in the Earth’s atmosphere: phenomenology, mechanisms, and effects, Space Sci. Rev. 168:475–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9813-9Pöschl U (2005) Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate and health effects. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 44, no. 46 (2005): 7520–40.Price C (2016) ELF Electromagnetic waves from lightning: the Schumann resonances. Atmosphere 7(9):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7090116Price C, Williams E, Elhalel G, & Sentman D (2020). Natural ELF fields in the atmosphere and in living organisms. In J Biometeorol 1-8.Priest ER (1995) Sun and its magnetohydrodynamics. In: Kivelson MG, Russell CT (eds) Introduction to space physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 58–90Probstein RF, Hicks R (1993) Removal of contaminants from soils by electric fields. Science 260(5107):498–503Purcell and Morin (2013) Harvard University. Electricity and Magnetism, 820 pages (3rd). Cambridge University Press, New York. ISBN 978-1-107-01402-2.Rakov VA, Uman MA (2002) Lightning: physics and effects. Press, Cambridge UniversityReiter R (1985) Fields, currents and aerosols in the lower atmosphere, Steinkopff Verlag, NSF Translation TT 76-52030Repacholi, Michael HB, Greenebaum B (1999) Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics 20(3):133–160Revil A, Naudet V, Nouzaret J, Pessel M (2003) Principles of electrography applied to self-potential electrokinetic sources and hydrogeological applications. Water Resour Res 39(5)Rich PR (2003) The molecular machinery of Keilin’s respiratory chain. Biochem Soc Trans 31(Pt 6):1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0311095Rishbeth H, Garriot OK (1969), Introduction to ionospheric physics, Academic Press.Rodger CJ (1999) Red sprites, upward lightning, and VLF perturbations. Rev Geophys 37(3):317–336. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900006Rogers RR (1979) A short course in cloud physics. Press, PergamonRoss E, Chaplin WJ (2019) The behaviour of galactic cosmic-ray intensity during solar activity cycle 24. Sol Phys 294:8Ruggeri F, Zosel F, Mutter N, Różycka M, Wojtas M, Ożyhar A, Schuler B, Krishnan M (2017) Single-molecule electrometry. Nat Nanotechnol 12(5):488–495Runge J, Balasis G, Daglis IA, Papad

The Ol1mpiad: concordance of behavioural faculties of stage 1 and stage 3 Drosophila larvae

This publication hasn't any creative commons license associated. This article has a Company of Biologists User Licence 1.1. The deposited article version contains attached the supplementary materials within the pdf.Mapping brain function to brain structure is a fundamental task for neuroscience. For such an endeavour, the Drosophila larva is simple enough to be tractable, yet complex enough to be interesting. It features about 10,000 neurons and is capable of various taxes, kineses and Pavlovian conditioning. All its neurons are currently being mapped into a light-microscopical atlas, and Gal4 strains are being generated to experimentally access neurons one at a time. In addition, an electron microscopic reconstruction of its nervous system seems within reach. Notably, this electron microscope-based connectome is being drafted for a stage 1 larva - because stage 1 larvae are much smaller than stage 3 larvae. However, most behaviour analyses have been performed for stage 3 larvae because their larger size makes them easier to handle and observe. It is therefore warranted to either redo the electron microscopic reconstruction for a stage 3 larva or to survey the behavioural faculties of stage 1 larvae. We provide the latter. In a community-based approach we called the Ol1mpiad, we probed stage 1 Drosophila larvae for free locomotion, feeding, responsiveness to substrate vibration, gentle and nociceptive touch, burrowing, olfactory preference and thermotaxis, light avoidance, gustatory choice of various tastants plus odour-taste associative learning, as well as light/dark-electric shock associative learning. Quantitatively, stage 1 larvae show lower scores in most tasks, arguably because of their smaller size and lower speed. Qualitatively, however, stage 1 larvae perform strikingly similar to stage 3 larvae in almost all cases. These results bolster confidence in mapping brain structure and behaviour across developmental stages.Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia grants: (SFRH/BPD/75993/2011EXPL/BEX-BID/0497/2013); Cluster of Excellence Cells in Motion; CiM International Max Planck research school; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness; ‘Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2013-2017’ grant: (SEV-2012-0208); CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya; the ‘la Caixa’ International PhD Programme; Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation grant: (BFU2011-26208); Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz; State of Sachsen-Anhalt; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences Magdeburg; Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants: (CRC 779 Motivated behaviour: B11; GE1091/4-1, SPP 1926, Next generation optogenetics, SO1337/2-1, CRC 779 Motivated behaviour: B15; YA272/2-1, PA 787/7-1, (TH1584/1-1, TH1584/3-1); European Commission grant: (FP7-ICT project Miniature Insect Model for Active Learning MINIMAL); Howard Hughes Medical Institute; European Research Council grant: (ERC-2012-StG 309832-PhotoNaviNet); Swiss National Science Foundation grant: (31003A_169993); Landesforschungsförderung Hamburg grant: (LFF-FV27); Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz; State of Sachsen-Anhalt; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences Magdeburg; Cluster of Excellence ImmunoSensation; Baden-Württemberg Stiftung; Zukunftskolleg of the University of Konstanz.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Muscle precursor cells in the developing limbs of two isopods (Crustacea, Peracarida): an immunohistochemical study using a novel monoclonal antibody against myosin heavy chain

In the hot debate on arthropod relationships, Crustaceans and the morphology of their appendages play a pivotal role. To gain new insights into how arthropod appendages evolved, developmental biologists recently have begun to examine the expression and function of Drosophila appendage genes in Crustaceans. However, cellular aspects of Crustacean limb development such as myogenesis are poorly understood in Crustaceans so that the interpretative context in which to analyse gene functions is still fragmentary. The goal of the present project was to analyse muscle development in Crustacean appendages, and to that end, monoclonal antibodies against arthropod muscle proteins were generated. One of these antibodies recognises certain isoforms of myosin heavy chain and strongly binds to muscle precursor cells in malacostracan Crustacea. We used this antibody to study myogenesis in two isopods, Porcellio scaber and Idotea balthica (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Peracarida), by immunohistochemistry. In these animals, muscles in the limbs originate from single muscle precursor cells, which subsequently grow to form multinucleated muscle precursors. The pattern of primordial muscles in the thoracic limbs was mapped, and results compared to muscle development in other Crustaceans and in insects

Modeling spinal muscular atrophy in Drosophila links Smn to FGF signaling

FGF signaling in neurons is regulated by Survival Motor Neuron, a component of a complex that regulates snRNP biogenesis and FGF receptor expression

Drosophila as a Model for MECP2 Gain of Function in Neurons

Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) is a multi-functional regulator of gene expression. In humans loss of MECP2 function causes classic Rett syndrome, but gain of MECP2 function also causes mental retardation. Although mouse models provide valuable insight into Mecp2 gain and loss of function, the identification of MECP2 genetic targets and interactors remains time intensive and complicated. This study takes a step toward utilizing Drosophila as a model to identify genetic targets and cellular consequences of MECP2 gain-of function mutations in neurons, the principle cell type affected in patients with Rett-related mental retardation. We show that heterologous expression of human MECP2 in Drosophila motoneurons causes distinct defects in dendritic structure and motor behavior, as reported with MECP2 gain of function in humans and mice. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that these defects arise from specific MECP2 function. First, neurons with MECP2-induced dendrite loss show normal membrane currents. Second, dendritic phenotypes require an intact methyl-CpG-binding domain. Third, dendritic defects are amended by reducing the dose of the chromatin remodeling protein, osa, indicating that MECP2 may act via chromatin remodeling in Drosophila. MECP2-induced motoneuron dendritic defects cause specific motor behavior defects that are easy to score in genetic screening. In sum, our data show that some aspects of MECP2 function can be studied in the Drosophila model, thus expanding the repertoire of genetic reagents that can be used to unravel specific neural functions of MECP2. However, additional genes and signaling pathways identified through such approaches in Drosophila will require careful validation in the mouse model

Chronic Hypoxia Impairs Muscle Function in the Drosophila Model of Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe progressive myopathy caused by mutations in the DMD gene leading to a deficiency of the dystrophin protein. Due to ongoing muscle necrosis in respiratory muscles late-stage DMD is associated with respiratory insufficiency and chronic hypoxia (CH). To understand the effects of CH on dystrophin-deficient muscle in vivo, we exposed the Drosophila model for DMD (dmDys) to CH during a 16-day ascent to the summit of Mount Denali/McKinley (6194 meters above sea level). Additionally, dmDys and wild type (WT) flies were also exposed to CH in laboratory simulations of high altitude hypoxia. Expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix GeneChips® and validated using qPCR. Hypoxic dmDys differentially expressed 1281 genes, whereas the hypoxic WT flies differentially expressed 56 genes. Interestingly, a number of genes (e.g. heat shock proteins) were discordantly regulated in response to CH between dmDys and WT. We tested the possibility that the disparate molecular responses of dystrophin-deficient tissues to CH could adversely affect muscle by performing functional assays in vivo. Normoxic and CH WT and dmDys flies were challenged with acute hypoxia and time-to-recover determined as well as subjected to climbing tests. Impaired performance was noted for CH-dmDys compared to normoxic dmDys or WT flies (rank order: Normoxic-WT ≈ CH-WT> Normoxic-dmDys> CH-dmDys). These data suggest that dystrophin-deficiency is associated with a disparate, pathological hypoxic stress response(s) and is more sensitive to hypoxia induced muscle dysfunction in vivo. We hypothesize that targeting/correcting the disparate molecular response(s) to hypoxia may offer a novel therapeutic strategy in DMD