Continuous glucose monitoring demonstrates low risk of clinically significant hypoglycemia associated with sulphonylurea treatment in an African type 2 diabetes population: results from the OPTIMAL observational multicenter study

This is the final version. Available from BMJ Publishing via the DOI in this record. Data availability statement: Data are available on reasonable request. Data analyzed in this study are available to researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding author.INTRODUCTION: People living with diabetes in low-resource settings may be at increased hypoglycemia risk due to food insecurity and limited access to glucose monitoring. We aimed to assess hypoglycemia risk associated with sulphonylurea (SU) and insulin therapy in people living with type 2 diabetes in a low-resource sub-Saharan African setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was conducted in the outpatients' diabetes clinics of two hospitals (one rural and one urban) in Uganda. We used blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and self-report to compare hypoglycemia rates and duration in 179 type 2 diabetes patients treated with sulphonylureas (n=100) and insulin (n=51) in comparison with those treated with metformin only (n=28). CGM-assessed hypoglycemia was defined as minutes per week below 3mmol/L (54mg/dL) and number of hypoglycemic events below 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) for at least 15 minutes. RESULTS: CGM recorded hypoglycemia was infrequent in SU-treated participants and did not differ from metformin: median minutes/week of glucose <3 mmol/L were 39.2, 17.0 and 127.5 for metformin, sulphonylurea and insulin, respectively (metformin vs sulphonylurea, p=0.6). Hypoglycemia risk was strongly related to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting glucose, with most episodes occurring in those with tight glycemic control. After adjusting for HbA1c, time <3 mmol/L was 2.1 (95% CI 0.9 to 4.7) and 5.5 (95% CI 2.4 to 12.6) times greater with sulphonylurea and insulin, respectively, than metformin alone. CONCLUSIONS: In a low-resource sub-Saharan African setting, hypoglycemia is infrequent among people with type 2 diabetes receiving sulphonylurea treatment, and the modest excess occurs predominantly in those with tight glycemic control.National Institute for Health Research (NIHR

Histological validation of a type 1 diabetes clinical diagnostic model for classification of diabetes

This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recordAims: Misclassification of diabetes is common due to an overlap in the clinical features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Combined diagnostic models incorporating clinical and biomarker information have recently been developed that can aid classification, but they have not been validated using pancreatic pathology. We evaluated a clinical diagnostic model against histologically defined type 1 diabetes. Methods: We classified cases from the Network for Pancreatic Organ donors with Diabetes (nPOD) biobank as type 1 (n = 111) or non-type 1 (n = 42) diabetes using histopathology. Type 1 diabetes was defined by lobular loss of insulin-containing islets along with multiple insulin-deficient islets. We assessed the discriminative performance of previously described type 1 diabetes diagnostic models, based on clinical features (age at diagnosis, BMI) and biomarker data [autoantibodies, type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (T1D-GRS)], and singular features for identifying type 1 diabetes by the area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic (AUC-ROC). Results: Diagnostic models validated well against histologically defined type 1 diabetes. The model combining clinical features, islet autoantibodies and T1D-GRS was strongly discriminative of type 1 diabetes, and performed better than clinical features alone (AUC-ROC 0.97 vs. 0.95; P = 0.03). Histological classification of type 1 diabetes was concordant with serum C-peptide [median < 17 pmol/l (limit of detection) vs. 1037 pmol/l in non-type 1 diabetes; P < 0.0001]. Conclusions: Our study provides robust histological evidence that a clinical diagnostic model, combining clinical features and biomarkers, could improve diabetes classification. Our study also provides reassurance that a C-peptide-based definition of type 1 diabetes is an appropriate surrogate outcome that can be used in large clinical studies where histological definition is impossible. Parts of this study were presented in abstract form at the Network for Pancreatic Organ Donors Conference, Florida, USA, 19–22 February 2019 and Diabetes UK Professional Conference, Liverpool, UK, 6–8 March 2019.Diabetes UKNational Institutes of Health (NIH)National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)JDRFHelmsley Charitable Trus

Circulating C-peptide levels in living children and young people and pancreatic beta cell loss in pancreas donors across type 1 diabetes disease duration.

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the American Diabetes Association via the DOI in this record Data Availability: Further information about the data is available from the corresponding author upon request.C-peptide declines in type 1 diabetes although many long-duration patients retain low, but detectable levels. Histological analyses confirm that beta cells can remain following type 1 diabetes onset. We explored the trends observed in C-peptide decline in UK Genetic Resource Investigating Diabetes (UK GRID) cohort (N=4,079), with beta cell loss in pancreas donors from the network for Pancreatic Organ donors with Diabetes (nPOD) biobank and the Exeter Archival Diabetes Biobank (EADB) (combined N=235), stratified by recently reported age at diagnosis endotypes (< 7, 7-12, ≥ 13 years) across increasing diabetes durations. The proportion of individuals with detectable C-peptide declined beyond the first year after diagnosis, but this was most marked in the youngest age group (< 1 year duration: age < 7 years: 18/20 (90%), 7-12 years: 107/110 (97%), ≥ 13 years: 58/61 (95%) versus. 1-5 years post diagnosis: < 7 years: 172/522 (33%), 7-12 years: 604/995 (61%), ≥ 13 years: 225/289 (78%)). A similar profile was observed in beta cell loss, with those diagnosed at younger ages experiencing more rapid loss of islets containing insulin-positive (insulin+) beta cells < 1 year post diagnosis: age < 7 years: 23/26 (88%), 7-12 years: 32/33 (97%), ≥ 13 years: 22/25 (88%) versus. 1-5 years post diagnosis: < 7 years: 1/12 (8.3%) ,7-12 years: 7/13 (54%), ≥ 13 years: 7/8 (88%)). These data should be considered in the planning and interpretation of intervention trials designed to promote beta cell retention and function.Diabetes UKDiabetes UKDiabetes UKThe Leona M. & Harry B. Helmsley Charitable TrustJuvenile Diabetes Research FoundationWellcome Trus

An increase in recording interval in continuous glucose monitors results in the identification of fewer hypoglycaemic episodes but interpolation can help to identify some of these missed episodes

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recordPoster presented at Diabetes UK Professional Conference 2022, Hybrid 28 March 2022, QEII Centre, London, Online 29 March - 1 April 2022Research Englan

Milder loss of insulin-containing islets in individuals with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes-associated TCF7L2 genetic variants

This is the author accepted manuscript.Data availability: The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Aims/hypothesis TCF7L2 variants are the strongest genetic risk factor for type 2 diabetes. In individuals with type 1 diabetes, these variants are associated with a higher C-peptide AUC, a lower glucose AUC during an OGTT, single autoantibody positivity near diagnosis, particularly in individuals older than 12 years of age, and a lower frequency of type 1 diabetes-associated HLA genotypes. Based on initial observations from clinical cohorts, we tested the hypothesis that type 2 diabetes-predisposing TCF7L2 genetic variants are associated with a higher percentage of residual insulin-containing cells (ICI%) in pancreases of donors with type 1 diabetes, by examining genomic data and pancreatic tissue samples from the Network for Pancreatic Organ donors with Diabetes (nPOD) programme. Methods We analysed nPOD donors with type 1 diabetes (n=110; meanSD age at type 1 diabetes onset 12.27.9 years, meanSD diabetes duration 15.313.7 years, 53% male, 80% non-Hispanic White, 12.7% African American, 7.3% Hispanic) using data pertaining to residual beta cell number; quantified islets containing insulin-positive beta cells in pancreatic tissue sections; and expressed these values as a percentage of the total number of islets from each donor (meanSD ICI% 9.821.5, range 0–92.2). Results Donors with a high ICI% (≥5) (n=30; 27%) vs a low ICI% (<5) (n=80; 73%) were older at onset (15.36.9 vs 11.18 years, p=0.013), had a shorter diabetes duration at procurement (7.07.4 vs 18.514.3 years, p<0.001), a higher African ancestry score (0.20.3 vs 0.10.2, p=0.043) and a lower European ancestry score (0.70.3 vs 0.90.3, p=0.023). After adjustment for age of onset (p=0.105), diabetes duration (p<0.001), BMI z score (p=0.145), sex (p=0.351) and African American race (p=0.053), donors with the TCF7L2 rs7903146 T allele (TC or TT, 45.5%) were 2.91 times (95% CI 1.02, 8.3) more likely to have a high ICI% than those without it (CC) (p=0.047). Conclusions/interpretation Overall, these data support the presence of a type 1 diabetes endotype associated with a genetic factor that predisposes to type 2 diabetes, with donors in this category exhibiting less severe beta cell loss. It is possible that in these individuals the disease pathogenesis may include mechanisms associated with type 2 diabetes and thus this may provide an explanation for the poor response to immunotherapies to prevent type 1 diabetes or its progression in a subset of individuals. If so, strategies that target both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes-associated factors when they are present may increase the success of prevention and treatment in these individuals.National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Diabetes UKJDRFNetwork for Pancreatic Organ donors with Diabetes (nPOD)Leona M. & Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trus