117 research outputs found

    Implicación de diferentes genes reguladores y funcionales en respuesta a estrés hídrico en diferentes híbridos de Prunus

    Get PDF
    Los recursos hĂ­dricos del suelo se verĂĄn reducidos como consecuencia del cambio climĂĄtico, por tanto se hace indispensable entender la respuesta fisiolĂłgica de las raĂ­ces a condiciones de sequĂ­a. Los genotipos ‘Garnem’ almendro x melocotonero (P. amygdalus x P. persica) y sus descendientes, el trihĂ­brido ‘P.2175’ x ‘Garnem’-3 y el trihĂ­brido ‘P.2175’ x ‘Garnem’-9 (P. cerasifera x [P. amygdalus x P. persica]) se sometieron a un periodo de dĂ©ficit hĂ­drico. Se analizĂł conductancia estomĂĄtica y potencial hĂ­drico foliar, asĂ­ como la expresiĂłn de cuatro genes mediante RT-qPCR relacionados con la sĂ­ntesis de ABA. Los factores de transcripciĂłn dedo de zinc A20/AN1, y bZIP mostraron diferencias de expresiĂłn con los genes funcionales: una proteĂ­na LEA y una dehidrina, tanto en el tratamiento como en la recuperaciĂłn, sugiriendo un papel regulador en la respuesta al estrĂ©s en los distintos genotipos estudiados.Este trabajo ha sido financiado por el proyecto RTA2011-00089 del Instituto Nacional de InvestigaciĂłn y TecnologĂ­a Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) y el Gobierno de AragĂłn (grupo A12

    Chilling-Dependent Release of Seed and Bud Dormancy in Peach Associates to Common Changes in Gene Expression

    Get PDF
    Reproductive meristems and embryos display dormancy mechanisms in specialized structures named respectively buds and seeds that arrest the growth of perennial plants until environmental conditions are optimal for survival. Dormancy shows common physiological features in buds and seeds. A genotype-specific period of chilling is usually required to release dormancy by molecular mechanisms that are still poorly understood. In order to find common transcriptional pathways associated to dormancy release, we analyzed the chilling-dependent expression in embryos of certain genes that were previously found related to dormancy in flower buds of peach. We propose the presence of short and long-term dormancy events affecting respectively the germination rate and seedling development by independent mechanisms. Short periods of chilling seem to improve germination in an abscisic acid-dependent manner, whereas the positive effect of longer cold treatments on physiological dwarfing coincides with the accumulation of phenylpropanoids in the seed

    Chromatin-associated regulation of sorbitol synthesis in flower buds of peach

    Full text link
    [EN] Key message PpeS6PDH gene is postulated to mediate sorbitol synthesis in flower buds of peach concomitantly with specific chromatin modifications. Abstract Perennial plants have evolved an adaptive mechanism involving protection of meristems within specialized structures named buds in order to survive low temperatures and water deprivation during winter. A seasonal period of dormancy further improves tolerance of buds to environmental stresses through specific mechanisms poorly known at the molecular level. We have shown that peach PpeS6PDH gene is down-regulated in flower buds after dormancy release, concomitantly with changes in the methylation level at specific lysine residues of histone H3 (H3K27 and H3K4) in the chromatin around the translation start site of the gene. PpeS6PDH encodes a NADPH-dependent sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, the key enzyme for biosynthesis of sorbitol. Consistently, sorbitol accumulates in dormant buds showing higher PpeS6PDH expression. Moreover, PpeS6PDH gene expression is affected by cold and water deficit stress. Particularly, its expression is up-regulated by low temperature in buds and leaves, whereas desiccation treatment induces PpeS6PDH in buds and represses the gene in leaves. These data reveal the concurrent participation of chromatin modification mechanisms, transcriptional regulation of PpeS6PDH and sorbitol accumulation in flower buds of peach. In addition to its role as a major translocatable photosynthate in Rosaceae species, sorbitol is a widespread compatible solute and cryoprotectant, which suggests its participation in tolerance to environmental stresses in flower buds of peach.This work was funded by the Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)-FEDER (RF2013-00043-C02-02) and the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain (AGL2010-20595). AL was funded by a fellowship co-financed by the European Social Fund and the Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA).Lloret, A.; Martinez Fuentes, A.; AgustĂ­ FonfrĂ­a, M.; Badenes, ML.; Rios, G. (2017). Chromatin-associated regulation of sorbitol synthesis in flower buds of peach. Plant Molecular Biology. 95(4-5):507-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-017-0669-6S507517954-5Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64:5245–5250. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496Bai S, Saito T, Ito A et al (2016) Small RNA and PARE sequencing in flower bud reveal the involvement of sRNAs in endodormancy release of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia ‘Kosui’). BMC Genomics 17:230. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2514-8Bielenberg DG, Wang Y, Li Z et al (2008) Sequencing and annotation of the evergrowing locus in peach (Prunus persica [L.] Batsch) reveals a cluster of six MADS-box transcription factors as candidate genes for regulation of terminal bud formation. Tree Genet Genomes 4:495–507. doi: 10.1007/s11295-007-0126-9Bieleski RL (1969) Accumulation and translocation of sorbitol in apple phloem. Aust J Biol Sci 22:611–620. doi: 10.1071/BI9690611Bieleski RL (1982) Sugar alcohols. In: Loewus F, Tanner W (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, new series 13A. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 158–192Bortiri E, Oh SH, Gao FY, Potter D (2002) The phylogenetic utility of nucleotide sequences of sorbitol 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in Prunus (Rosaceae). Am J Bot 89:1697–1708. doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.10.1697Chouard P (1960) Vernalization and its relations to dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 11:191–238. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.11.060160.001203Conde D, Le Gac AL, Perales M et al (2017) Chilling-responsive DEMETER-LIKE DNA demethylase mediates in poplar bud break. Plant Cell Environ 40:2236–2249. doi: 10.1111/pce.13019Couvillon GA, Erez A (1985) Influence of prolonged exposure to chilling temperatures on bud break and heat requirement for bloom of several fruit species. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 110:47–50de la Fuente L, Conesa A, Lloret A, Badenes ML, RĂ­os G (2015) Genome-wide changes in histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation associated with bud dormancy release in peach. Tree Genet Genomes 11:45. doi: 10.1007/s11295-015-0869-7Deng W, Buzas DM, Ying H et al (2013) Arabidopsis polycomb repressive complex 2 binding sites contain putative GAGA factor binding motifs within coding regions of genes. BMC Genomics 14:593. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-593Escobar-GutiĂ©rrez AJ, GaudillĂšre JP (1996) Distribution, metabolism and role of sorbitol in higher plants—A review. Agronomie 16:281–298. doi: 10.1051/agro:19960502Escobar-GutiĂ©rrez AJ, Zipperlin B, Carbonne F, Moing A, GaudillĂ©re JP (1998) Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning and metabolite content during drought stress in peach seedlings. Aust J Plant Physiol 25:197–205. doi: 10.1071/PP97121Eshghi S, Tafazoli E, Dokhani S, Rahemi M, Emam Y (2007) Changes in carbohydrate contents in shoot tips, leaves and roots of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch) during flower-bud differentiation. Sci Hortic 113:255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.03.014Everard JD, Cantini C, Grumet R, Plummer J, Loescher WH (1997) Molecular cloning of mannose-6-phosphate reductase and its developmental expression in celery. Plant Physiol 113:1427–1435. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.4.1427Fennell A (2014) Genomics and functional genomics of winter low temperature tolerance in temperate fruit crops. Crit Rev Plant Sci 33:125–140. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2014.870410Figueroa CM, Iglesias AA (2010) Aldose-6-phosphate reductase from apple leaves: importance of the quaternary structure for enzyme activity. Biochimie 92:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2009.09.013Gao M, Tao R, Miura K, Dandekar AM, Sugiura A (2001) Transformation of Japanese persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb) with apple cDNA encoding NADP-dependent sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Plant Sci 160:837–845. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00458-1Grant CR, ap Rees T (1981) Sorbitol metabolism by apple seedlings. Phytochemistry 20:1505–1511. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)98521-2Hartman MD, Figueroa CM, Arias DG, Iglesias AA (2017) Inhibition of recombinant aldose-6-phosphate reductase from peach leaves by hexose-phosphates, inorganic phosphate and oxidants. Plant Cell Physiol 58:145–155. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw180Horvath DP, Anderson JV, Chao WS, Foley ME (2003) Knowing when to grow: signals regulating bud dormancy. Trends Plant Sci 8:534–540. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.013Horvath DP, Sung S, Kim D, Chao W, Anderson J (2010) Characterization, expression and function of DORMANCY ASSOCIATED MADS-BOX genes from leafy spurge. Plant Mol Biol 73:169–179. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9596-5Hussain S, Niu Q, Yang F, Hussain N, Teng Y (2015) The possible role of chilling in floral and vegetative bud dormancy release in Pyrus pyrifolia. Biol Plant 59:726–734. doi: 10.1007/s10535-015-0547-5Hyndman D, Baumanb DR, Herediac VV, Penning TM (2003) The aldo-keto reductase superfamily homepage. Chem Biol Interact 143–144:621–631. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2797(02)00193-XIto A, Sakamoto D, Moriguchi T (2012) Carbohydrate metabolism and its possible roles in endodormancy transition in Japanese pear. Sci Hortic 144:187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.07.009Ito A, Sugiura T, Sakamoto D, Moriguchi T (2013) Effects of dormancy progression and low-temperature response on changes in the sorbitol concentration in xylem sap of Japanese pear during winter season. Tree Physiol 33:398–408. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt021Jung S, Bassett C, Bielenberg DG et al (2015) A standard nomenclature for gene designation in the Rosaceae. Tree Genet Genomes 11:108. doi: 10.1007/s11295-015-0931-5Kanayama Y, Mori H, Imaseki H, Yamaki S (1992) Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding NADP-sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from apple. Plant Physiol 100:1607–1608Kanayama Y, Watanabe M, Moriguchi R, Deguchi M, Kanahama K, Yamaki S (2006) Effects of low temperature and abscisic acid on the expression of the sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene in apple leaves. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 75:20–25. doi: 10.2503/jjshs.75.20Kumar G, Rattan UK, Singh AK (2016a) Chilling-mediated DNA methylation changes during dormancy and its release reveal the importance of epigenetic regulation during winter dormancy in apple (Malus x domestica Borkh). PLoS ONE 11:e0149934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149934Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016b) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 70 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP et al (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404Leida C, Terol J, MartĂ­ G et al (2010) Identification of genes associated with bud dormancy release in Prunus persica by suppression subtractive hybridization. Tree Physiol 30:655–666. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpq008Leida C, Conesa A, LlĂĄcer G, Badenes ML, RĂ­os G (2012) Histone modifications and expression of DAM6 gene in peach are modulated during bud dormancy release in a cultivar-dependent manner. New Phytol 193:67–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03863.xLiang D, Cui M, Wu S, Ma F-W (2012) Genomic structure, sub-cellular localization, and promoter analysis of the gene encoding sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from apple. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:904–914. doi: 10.1007/s11105-011-0409-zLiu D, Ni J, Wu R, Teng Y (2013) High temperature alters sorbitol metabolism in Pyrus pyrifolia leaves and fruit flesh during late stages of fruit enlargement. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 138:443–451Lloret A, Conejero A, Leida C et al (2017) Dual regulation of water retention and cell growth by a stress-associated protein (SAP) gene in Prunus. Sci Rep 7:332. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00471-7Lo Bianco R, Rieger M, Sung S-JS (2000) Effect of drought on sorbitol and sucrose metabolism in sinks and sources of peach. Physiol Plant 108:71–78. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.108001071.xLoescher WH (1987) Physiology and metabolism of sugar alcohols in higher-plants. Physiol Plant 70:553–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1987.tb02857.xLoescher WH, Marlow GC, Kennedy RA (1982) Sorbitol metabolism and sink-source interconversions in developing apple leaves. Plant Physiol 70:335–339. doi: 10.1104/pp.70.2.335Marquat C, Vandamme M, Gendraud M, PĂ©tel G (1999) Dormancy in vegetative buds of peach: relation between carbohydrate absorption potentials and carbohydrate concentration in the bud during dormancy and its release. Sci Hortic 79:151–162. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00203-9Niu Q, Li J, Cai D et al (2016) Dormancy-associated MADS-box genes and microRNAs jointly control dormancy transition in pear (Pyrus pyrifolia white pear group) flower bud. J Exp Bot 67:239–257. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv454Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett 26:509–515. doi: 10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47RĂ­os G, Leida C, Conejero A, Badenes ML (2014) Epigenetic regulation of bud dormancy events in perennial plants. Front Plant Sci 5:247. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00247Saito T, Bai S, Imai T, Ito A, Nakajima I, Moriguchi T (2015) Histone modification and signalling cascade of the dormancy-associated MADS-box gene, PpMADS13-1, in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) during endodormancy. Plant Cell Environ 38:1157–1166. doi: 10.1111/pce.12469SantamarĂ­a ME, HasbĂșn R, Valera MJ et al (2009) Acetylated H4 histone and genomic DNA methylation patterns during bud set and bud burst in Castanea sativa. J Plant Physiol 166:1360–1369. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.02.014Shen B, Hohmann S, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ (1999) Roles of sugar alcohols in osmotic stress adaptation replacement of glycerol by mannitol and sorbitol in yeast. Plant Physiol 121:45–52. doi: 10.1104/pp.121.1.45Sheveleva EV, Marquez S, Chmara W, Zegeer A, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ (1998) Sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression in transgenic tobacco high amounts of sorbitol lead to necrotic lesions. Plant Physiol 117:831–839. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.3.831Silver N, Best S, Jian J, Thein SL (2006) Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. BMC Mol Biol 7:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-7-33Talavera G, Castresana J (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol 56:564–577. doi: 10.1080/10635150701472164Tao R, Uratsu SL, Dandekar AM (1995) Sorbitol synthesis in transgenic tobacco with apple cDNA encoding NADP-dependent sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Plant Cell Physiol 36:525–532. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078789Teo G, Suzuki Y, Uratsu SL et al (2006) Silencing leaf sorbitol synthesis alters long-distance partitioning and apple fruit quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18842–18847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605873103Trotel P, Bouchereau A, Niogret MF, Larher F (1996) The fate of osmo-accumulated proline in leaf discs of Rape (Brassica napus L) incubated in a medium of low osmolarity. Plant Sci 118:31–45. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(96)04422-6Verde I, Abbott AG, Scalabrin S et al (2013) The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat Genet 45:487–494. doi: 10.1038/ng.2586Webb KL, Burley JWA (1962) Sorbitol translocation in apple. Science 137:766. doi: 10.1126/science.137.3532.766Wisniewski M, Norelli J, Artlip T (2015) Overexpression of a peach CBF gene in apple: a model for understanding the integration of growth, dormancy, and cold hardiness in woody plants. Front Plant Sci 6:85. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00085Yadav R, Prasad R (2014) Identification and functional characterization of sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase protein from rice and structural elucidation by in silico approach. Planta 240:223–238. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2076-

    A mutation in the melon Vacuolar Protein Sorting 41prevents systemic infection of Cucumber mosaic virus

    Get PDF
    [EN] In the melon exotic accession PI 161375, the gene cmv1, confers recessive resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) strains of subgroup II. cmv1 prevents the systemic infection by restricting the virus to the bundle sheath cells and impeding viral loading to the phloem. Here we report the fine mapping and cloning of cmv1. Screening of an F2 population reduced the cmv1 region to a 132 Kb interval that includes a Vacuolar Protein Sorting 41 gene. CmVPS41 is conserved among plants, animals and yeast and is required for post-Golgi vesicle trafficking towards the vacuole. We have validated CmVPS41 as the gene responsible for the resistance, both by generating CMV susceptible transgenic melon plants, expressing the susceptible allele in the resistant cultivar and by characterizing CmVPS41 TILLING mutants with reduced susceptibility to CMV. Finally, a core collection of 52 melon accessions allowed us to identify a single amino acid substitution (L348R) as the only polymorphism associated with the resistant phenotype. CmVPS41 is the first natural recessive resistance gene found to be involved in viral transport and its cellular function suggests that CMV might use CmVPS41 for its own transport towards the phloem.The TILLING platform is supported by the Program Saclay Plant Sciences (SPS, ANR-10-LABX-40) and the European Research Council (ERC-SEXYPARTH). This work was supported by grants AGL2009-12698-C02-01 and AGL2012-40130-C02-01 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, the Spanish Ministry of Econom and Competitiveness, through the "Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D" 2016-2019 (SEV-2015-0533)" and the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya.Giner, A.; Pascual, L.; Bourgeois, M.; Gyetvai, G.; Rios, P.; PicĂł Sirvent, MB.; Troadec, C.... (2017). A mutation in the melon Vacuolar Protein Sorting 41prevents systemic infection of Cucumber mosaic virus. Scientific Reports. 7:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10783-3S1127Anderson, P. K. et al. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19, 535–544, doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.021 (2004).Nicaise, V. Crop immunity against viruses: outcomes and future challenges. Frontiers in Plant Science 5, 660, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00660 (2014).Kang, B.-C., Yeam, I. & Jahn, M. Genetics of plant virus resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 43, 581–621, doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.011205.141140 (2005).Fraser, R. S. S. The genetics of plant-virus interactions: implications for plant breeding. Euphytica 63, 175–185, doi: 10.1007/bf00023922 (1992).Truniger, V. & Aranda, M. Recessive resistance to plant viruses. Advances in virus research 119–159 (2009).Sanfaçon, H. Plant translationfactors and virus resistance. Viruses 7, 3392–3419, doi: 10.3390/v7072778 (2015).Yang, P. et al. PROTEIN DISULFIDE ISOMERASE LIKE 5-1 is a susceptibility factor to plant viruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 2104–2109, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320362111 (2014).Ouibrahim, L. et al. Cloning of the Arabidopsis rwm1 gene for resistance to Watermelon mosaic virus points to a new function for natural virus resistance genes. The Plant Journal 79, 705–716, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12586 (2014).Rubio, M., NicolaĂŻ, M., Caranta, C. & Palloix, A. Allele mining in the pepper gene pool provided new complementation effects between pvr2-eIF4E and pvr6-eIF(iso)4E alleles for resistance to pepper veinal mottle virus. Journal of General Virology 90, 2808–2814, doi: 10.1099/vir.0.013151-0 (2009).Ibiza, V. P., Cañizares, J. & Nuez, F. EcoTILLING in Capsicum species: searching for new virus resistances. BMC Genomics 11, 631–631, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-631 (2010).Chandrasekaran, J. et al. Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Molecular Plant Pathology. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12375 (2016).RodrĂ­guez-HernĂĄndez, A. et al. Melon RNA interference (RNAi) lines silenced for Cm-eIF4E show broad virus resistance. Molecular plant pathology 13, 755–763, doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00785.x (2012).Edwardson, J. R. & Christie, R. G. In CRC Handbook of Viruses Infecting Legumes (eds J.R. Edwardson & R.G. Christie) 293–319 (CRC Press, 1991).Roossinck, M. J. Cucumber mosaic virus, a model for RNA virus evolution. Molecular Plant Pathology 2, 59–63 (2001).Caranta, C. et al. QTLs involved in the restriction of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) long-distance movement in pepper. Theor Appl Genet 104, 586–591 (2002).Valkonen, J. P. & Watanabe, K. N. Autonomous cell death, temperature sensitivity and the genetic control associated with resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) in diploid potatoes (Solanum spp). Theor Appl Genet 99, 996–1005 (1999).Ohnishi, S. et al. Multigenic system controlling viral systemic infection determined by the interactions between Cucumber mosaic virus genes and quantitative trait loci of soybean cultivars. Phytopathology 101, 575–582, doi: 10.1094/phyto-06-10-0154 (2011).Kobori, T., Satoshi, T. & Osaki, T. Movement of Cucumber mosaic virus is restricted at the interface between mesophyll and phloem pathway in Cucumis figarei. Journal of General Plant Pathology 66, 159–166, doi: 10.1007/pl00012939 (2000).Argyris, J. M., Pujol, M., MartĂ­n-HernĂĄndez, A. M. & Garcia-Mas, J. Combined use of genetic and genomics resources to understand virus resistance and fruit quality traits in melon. Physiologia Plantarum 155, 4–11, doi: 10.1111/ppl.12323 (2015).Diaz, J. A. et al. Potential sources of resistance for melon to nonpersistently aphid-borne viruses. Plant Disease 87, 960–964 (2003).Karchi, Z., Cohen, S. & Govers, A. Inheritance of resistance to Cucumber Mosaic virus in melons. Phytopathology 65, 479–481 (1975).Risser, G., Pitrat, M. & Rode, J. C. Etude de la rĂ©sistance du melon (Cucumis melo L.) au virus de la mosaĂŻque du concombre. Ann AmĂ©l Plant 27, 509–522 (1977).Dogimont, C. et al. Identification of QTLs contributing to resistance to different strains of Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus in melon. Acta Hortic 510, 391–398 (2000).Essafi, A. et al. Dissection of the oligogenic resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus in the melon accession PI 161375. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118, 275–284 (2009).Guiu-AragonĂ©s, C., DĂ­az-PendĂłn, J. A. & MartĂ­n-HernĂĄndez, A. M. Four sequence positions of the movement protein of Cucumber mosaic virus determine the virulence against cmv1-mediated resistance in melon. Molecular Plant Pathology 16, 675–684, doi: 10.1111/mpp.12225 (2015).Guiu-AragonĂ©s, C. et al. The complex resistance to Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus (CMV) in the melon accession PI 161375 is governed by one gene and at least two quantitative trait loci. Molecular Breeding 34, 351–362, doi: 10.1007/s11032-014-0038-y (2014).Guiu-AragonĂ©s, C. et al. cmv1 is a gate for Cucumber mosaic virus transport from bundle sheath cells to phloem in melon. Mol. Plant Pathology 17, 973–984 (2016).Sanseverino, W. et al. Transposon Insertions, Structural Variations, and SNPs Contribute to the Evolution of the Melon Genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32, 2760–2774, doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv152 (2015).Pols, M. S., ten Brink, C., Gosavi, P., Oorschot, V. & Klumperman, J. The HOPS Proteins hVps41 and hVps39 Are Required for Homotypic and Heterotypic Late Endosome Fusion. Traffic 14, 219–232, doi: 10.1111/tra.12027 (2013).Asensio, C. S. et al. Self-assembly of VPS41 promotes sorting required for biogenesis of the regulated secretory pathway. Developmental cell 27, 425–437, doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.10.007 (2013).Kolesnikova, L. et al. Vacuolar protein sorting pathway contributes to the release of Marburg virus. Journal of Virology8 3, 2327–2337, doi: 10.1128/JVI.02184-08 (2009).Nuñez-Palenius, H. G. et al. Melon Fruits: Genetic Diversity, Physiology, and Biotechnology Features. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 28, 13–55, doi: 10.1080/07388550801891111 (2008).Castelblanque, L. et al. Improving the genetic transformation efficiency of Cucumis melo subsp. melo “Piel de Sapo” via Agrobacterium. Procedings of the IXth UECARPIA Meeting on Genetics and Breeding of Cucurbitaceae, 21-24th May, Avignon,, 627–631 (2008).Dahmani-Mardas, F. et al. Engineering melon plants with improved fruit shelf life using the TILLING approach. PLoS ONE 5, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015776 (2010).Esteras, C. et al. SNP genotyping in melons: genetic variation, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126, 1285–1303, doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2053-5 (2013).Leida, C. et al. Variability of candidate genes, genetic structure and association with sugar accumulation and climacteric behavior in a broad germplasm collection of melon (Cucumis melo L.). BMC Genetics 16, 28, doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0183-2 (2015).Balderhaar, H. Jk & Ungermann, C. CORVET and HOPS tethering complexes – coordinators of endosome and lysosome fusion. Journal of Cell Science 126, 1307–1316, doi: 10.1242/jcs.107805 (2013).Darsow, T., Katzmann, D. J., Cowles, C. R. & Emr, S. D. Vps41p Function in the Alkaline Phosphatase Pathway Requires Homo-oligomerization and Interaction with AP-3 through Two Distinct Domains. Molecular Biology of the Cell 12, 37–51 (2001).Ostrowicz, C. W. et al. Defined subunit arrangement and Rab interactions are required for functionality of the HOPS tethering complex. Traffic 11, 1334–1346, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01097.x (2010).Solinger, J. A. & Spang, A. Tethering complexes in the endocytic pathway: CORVET and HOPS. FEBS Journal 280, 2743–2757, doi: 10.1111/febs.12151 (2013).Rehling, P., Dawson, T., Katzmann, D. J. & Emr, S. D. Formation of AP-3 transport intermediates requires Vps41 function. Nature Cell Biology 1, 346–353 (1999).Niihama, M., Takemoto, N., Hashiguchi, Y., Tasaka, M. & Morita, M. T. ZIP genes encode proteininvolved inmembrane trafficking of the TGN–PVC/Vacuoles. Plant and Cell Physiology 50, 2057–2068, doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp137 (2009).Wang, A. & Krishnaswamy, S. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-mediated recessive resistance to plant viruses and its utility in crop improvement. Molecular Plant Pathology 13, 795–803, doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00791.x (2012).Ruffel, S. et al. A natural recessive resistance gene against potato virus Y in pepper corresponds to the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E). The Plant Journal 32, 1067–1075, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01499.x (2002).Morosky, S., Lennemann, N. J. & Coyne, C. B. BPIFB6 regulatessecretory pathway trafficking and Enterovirus replication. Journal of Virology 90, 5098–5107, doi: 10.1128/jvi.00170-16 (2016).Serra-Soriano, M., PallĂĄs, V. & Navarro, J. A. A model for transport of a viral membrane protein through the early secretory pathway: minimal sequence and endoplasmic reticulum lateral mobility requirements. The Plant Journal 77, 863–879, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12435 (2014).Vale-Costa, S. & Amorim, M. J. Recycling Endosomes and Viral Infection. Viruses 8, 64, doi: 10.3390/v8030064 (2016).Carette, J. E. et al. Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann-Pick C1. Nature 477, 340–343, doi: 10.1038/nature10348 (2011).Barajas, D., MartĂ­n, I. Fd. C., Pogany, J., Risco, C. & Nagy, P. D. Noncanonical role for the host Vps4 AAA + ATPase ESCRT protein in the formation of Tomato bushy stunt virus replicase. PLoS Pathog 10, e1004087, doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004087 (2014).Richardson, L. G. L. et al. A unique N-Tterminal sequence in the Carnation Italian ringspot virus p36 replicase-associated protein interacts with the host cell ESCRT-I component Vps23. Journal of Virology 88, 6329–6344, doi: 10.1128/JVI.03840-13 (2014).Jiang, J., Patarroyo, C., Garcia Cabanillas, D., Zheng, H. & LalibertĂ©, J.-F. The vesicle-forming 6K2 protein of Turnip mosaic virus interacts with the COPII coatomer Sec. 24a for viral systemic infection. Journal of Virology 89, 6695–6710, doi: 10.1128/jvi.00503-15 (2015).GenovĂ©s, A., Navarro, J. A. & PallĂĄs, V. Theintra- and intercellular movement of Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV) depends on an active secretory pathway. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 23, 263–272, doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-3-0263 (2010).Amano, M. et al. High-resolution mapping of zym, a recessive gene for Zucchini yellow mosaic virus resistance in cucumber. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126, 2983–2993, doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2187-5 (2013).Lewis, J. D. & Lazarowitz, S. G. Arabidopsis synaptotagmin SYTA regulates endocytosis and virus movement protein cell-to-cell transport. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 2491–2496, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909080107 (2010).Rizzo, T. & Palukaitis, P. Construction of full-length cDNA clones of Cucumber mosaic virus RNAs 1, 2 and 3: Generation of infectious RNA transcripts. Molecular and General Genetics 122, 249–256 (1990).Zhang, L., Handa, K. & Palukaitis, P. Mapping local and systemic symptom determinants of Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus in tobacco. The Journal of General Virology 75, 3185–3191 (1994).Fukino, N., Sakata, Y., Kunihisa, M. & S., M. Characterisation of novel simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for melon (Cucumis melo L.) and their use for genotype identification. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 82, 330–334 (2007).Garcia-Mas, J. et al. The genome of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 11872–11877, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205415109 (2012).Untergasser, A. et al. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40, e115–e115, doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596 (2012).Gonzalo, M. J. et al. Simple-sequence repeat markers used in merging linkage maps of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Theor Appl Genet 110, 802–811 (2005).Doyle, J. J. & Doyle, J. L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus1 2, 13–15 (1990).Argyris, J. M. et al. Use of targeted SNP selection for an improved anchoring of the melon (Cucumis melo L.) scaffold genome assembly. BMC Genomics 16, 4, doi: 10.1186/s12864-014-1196-3 (2015).Proost, S. et al. PLAZA 3.0: an access point for plant comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Research 43, D974–D981, doi: 10.1093/nar/gku986 (2015).Choi, Y., Sims, G. E., Murphy, S., Miller, J. R. & Chan, A. P. Predicting the Functional Effect of Amino Acid Substitutions and Indels. PLoS ONE 7, e46688, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046688 (2012).Li, B. et al. Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions. Bioinformatics 25, 2744–2750, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp528 (2009).Earley, K. W. et al. Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. The Plant Journal 45, 616–629, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02617.x (2006).Gonzalez-Ibeas, D. et al. MELOGEN: an EST database for melon functional genomics. BMC Genomics 8, 306 (2007).Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 29, 2002–2007 (2001).Dalmais, M. et al. UTILLdb, a Pisum sativum in silico forward and reverse genetics tool. Genome Biology 9, R43–R43, doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r43 (2008).SaladiĂ©, M. et al. Comparative transcriptional profiling analysis of developing melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit from climacteric and non-climacteric varieties. BMC Genomics 16, 440, doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1649-3 (2015)

    Whole-genome resequencing of Cucurbita pepo morphotypes to discover genomic variants associated with morphology and horticulturally valuable traits

    Get PDF
    [EN] Cucurbita pepo contains two cultivated subspecies, each of which encompasses four fruit-shape morphotypes (cultivar groups). The Pumpkin, Vegetable Marrow, Cocozelle, and Zucchini Groups are of subsp. pepo and the Acorn, Crookneck, Scallop, and Straightneck Groups are of subsp. ovifera. Recently, a de novo assembly of the C. pepo subsp. pepo Zucchini genome was published, providing insights into its evolution. To expand our knowledge of evolutionary processes within C. pepo and to identify variants associated with particular morphotypes, we performed whole-genome resequencing of seven of these eight C. pepo morphotypes. We report for the first time whole-genome resequencing of the four subsp. pepo (Pumpkin, Vegetable Marrow, Cocozelle, green Zucchini, and yellow Zucchini) morphotypes and three of the subsp. ovifera (Acorn, Crookneck, and Scallop) morphotypes. A high-depth resequencing approach was followed, using the BGISEQ-500 platform that enables the identification of rare variants, with an average of 33.5X. Approximately 94.5% of the clean reads were mapped against the reference Zucchini genome. In total, 3,823,977 high confidence single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified. Within each accession, SNPs varied from 636,918 in green Zucchini to 2,656,513 in Crookneck, and were distributed homogeneously along the chromosomes. Clear differences between subspecies pepo and ovifera in genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium are highlighted. In fact, comparison between subspecies pepo and ovifera indicated 5710 genes (22.5%) with Fst > 0.80 and 1059 genes (4.1%) with Fst = 1.00 as potential candidate genes that were fixed during the independent evolution and domestication of the two subspecies. Linkage disequilibrium was greater in subsp. ovifera than in subsp. pepo, perhaps reflective of the earlier differentiation of morphotypes within subsp. ovifera. Some morphotype-specific genes have been localized. Our results offer new clues that may provide an improved understanding of the underlying genomic regions involved in the independent evolution and domestication of the two subspecies. Comparisons among SNPs unique to particular subspecies or morphotypes may provide candidate genes responsible for traits of high economic importance.This work has been supported by Hellenic Agricultural Organization (ELGO) Demeter. Furthermore, we thank the Conselleria de Educacio, Investigacio, Cultura i Esport (Generalitat Valenciana) for funding Project Prometeo 2017/078 "Seleccion de Variedades Tradicionales y Desarrollo de Nuevas Variedades de Cucurbitaceas Adaptadas a la Produccion Ecologica". Also, this work was supported by Chiang Mai University.Xanthopoulou, A.; Montero-Pau, J.; Mellidou, I.; Kissoudis, C.; Blanca Postigo, JM.; PicĂł Sirvent, MB.; Tsaballa, A.... (2019). Whole-genome resequencing of Cucurbita pepo morphotypes to discover genomic variants associated with morphology and horticulturally valuable traits. Horticulture Research. 6:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0176-9S1176Maynard, D. & Paris, H. in The Encyclopedia of Fruits & Nuts (eds Paull, R. E. & Janick, J.) 276–313 (CABI, New Jersey, U.S.A., 2018).Paris, H. S. in Genetics and Genomics of Cucurbitaceae, Grumet, Rebecca, Katzir, Nurit, Garcia-Mas, Jordi (Eds.) 111–154 (Springer, New York, U.S.A., 2016).Whitaker, T. W. & Davis, G. N. Cucurbits (Leonard Hill (Books) Ltd., London, and Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, 1962).Paris, H. S. History of the cultivar-groups of Cucurbita pepo. Hortic. Rev. 25, 71–170 (2001).Paris, H. S. A proposed subspecific classifiaction for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia (USA) 61, 133–138 (1986).Lira, R., Andres, T. C. & Nee, M. in Systematic and Ecogeographic Studies on Crop Genepools, Vol. 9, 1–115 (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Roma, Italia, 1995).Castellanos-Morales, G. Historical biogeography and phylogeny of Cucurbita: insights from ancestral area reconstruction and niche evolution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 128, 38–54 (2018).Paris, H. S., Lebeda, A., Kƙistkova, E., Andres, T. C. & Nee, M. H. Parallel evolution under domestication and phenotypic differentiation of the cultivated subspecies of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Econ. Bot. 66, 71–90 (2012).Dong, W., Wu, D., Li, G., Wu, D. & Wang, Z. Next-generation sequencing from bulked segregant analysis identifies a dwarfism gene in watermelon. Sci. Rep. 8, 2908 (2018).Galpaz, N. et al. Deciphering genetic factors that determine melon fruit‐quality traits using RNA‐Seq‐based high‐resolution QTL and eQTL mapping. Plant J. 94, 169–191 (2018).Gur, A. et al. Genome-wide linkage-disequilibrium mapping to the candidate gene level in melon (Cucumis melo). Sci. Rep. 7, 9770 (2017).Blanca, J. et al. Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). BMC Genom. 12, 104 (2011).Esteras, C. et al. High-throughput SNP genotyping in Cucurbita pepo for map construction and quantitative trait loci mapping. BMC Genom. 13, 80 (2012).Montero-Pau, J. et al. An SNP-based saturated genetic map and QTL analysis of fruit-related traits in Zucchini using genotyping-by-sequencing. BMC Genom. 18, 94 (2017).Vicente-DĂłlera, N. et al. First TILLING platform in Cucurbita pepo: a new mutant resource for gene function and crop improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112743 (2014).Wyatt, L. E., Strickler, S. R., Mueller, L. A. & Mazourek, M. An acorn squash (Cucurbita pepo ssp. ovifera) fruit and seed transcriptome as a resource for the study of fruit traits in Cucurbita. Hortic. Res. 2, 14070 (2015).Xanthopoulou, A. et al. De novo comparative transcriptome analysis of genes involved in fruit morphology of pumpkin cultivars with extreme size difference and development of EST-SSR markers. Gene 622, 50–66 (2017).Montero‐Pau, J. et al. De novo assembly of the zucchini genome reveals a whole‐genome duplication associated with the origin of the Cucurbita genus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1161–1171 (2018).Garcia-Mas, J. et al. Cloning and mapping of resistance gene homologues in melon. Plant Sci. 161, 165–172 (2001).Xanthopoulou, A. et al. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in Greek Genebank collection of summer squash (‘Cucurbita pepo’) landraces using start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism and ISSR markers. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 9, 14 (2015).Huang, J. et al. A reference human genome dataset of the BGISEQ-500 sequencer. Gigascience 6, gix024 (2017).Natarajan, K. N. et al. Comparative analysis of sequencing technologies for single-cell transcriptomics. Genome Biol. 20, 70 (2019).Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).Tian, L. et al. Transcript and proteomic analysis of developing white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) roots. BMC Plant Biol. 9, 1 (2009).Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).Bradbury, P. J. et al. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633–2635 (2007).Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015).Team, R. C. (2015). http://www.r-project.org/ .Krzywinski, M. I. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645 (2009).Kosman, E. & Leonard, K. J. Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species. Mol. Ecol. 14, 415–424 (2005).Huson, D. H. & Bryant, D. Estimating Phylogenetic Trees and Networks Using SplitsTree 4. www.splitstree.org (2005).Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strainw1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).Wu, S. et al. A common genetic mechanism underlies morphological diversity in fruits and other plant organs. Nat. Commun. 9, 4734 (2018).Drevensek, S. et al. The Arabidopsis TRM1–TON1 interaction reveals a recruitment network common to plant cortical microtubule arrays and eukaryotic centrosomes. Plant Cell 24, 178–191 (2012).Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2014).Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587 (2017).Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2017).Bailey, T. L. et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W202–W208 (2009).Leida, C. et al. Variability of candidate genes, genetic structure and association with sugar accumulation and climacteric behavior in a broad germplasm collection of melon (Cucumis melo L.). BMC Genet. 16, 28 (2015).Esteras, C. et al. SNP genotyping in melons: genetic variation, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 1285–1303 (2013).Maria JosĂ© Gonzalo et al. Re-evaluation of the role of Indian germplasm as center of melon diversification based on genotyping-by-sequencing analysis. BMC Genom. 20, p. 448 (2019).Nimmakayala, P. et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms generated by genotyping by sequencing to characterize genome-wide diversity, linkage disequilibrium, and selective sweeps in cultivated watermelon. BMC Genom. 15, 767 (2014).Gonzalo, M. J. & Monforte, A. J. in Genetics and Genomics of Cucurbitaceae, Grumet, Rebecca, Katzir, Nurit, Garcia-Mas, Jordi (Eds.) 269–290 (Springer, New York, U.S.A., 2016).Pomares-Viciana, T. et al. First RNA-seq approach to study fruit set and parthenocarpy in zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.). BMC Plant Biol. 19, 61 (2019).Lu, S. et al. The cauliflower Or gene encodes a DnaJ cysteine-rich domain-containing protein that mediates high levels of ÎČ-carotene accumulation. Plant Cell 18, 3594–3605 (2006).Jin, B., Kim, J., Jung, J., Kim, D. & Park, Y. Characterization of IQ domain gene homologs as common candidate genes for elongated fruit shape in cucurbits. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 36, 85–97 (2018).van der Knaap, E. et al. What lies beyond the eye: the molecular mechanisms regulating tomato fruit weight and shape. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 227 (2014).Xiao, H., Jiang, N., Schaffner, E., Stockinger, E. J. & Van Der Knaap, E. A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319, 1527–1530 (2008).Dou, J. et al. Genetic mapping reveals a candidate gene (ClFS1) for fruit shape in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 131, 947–958 (2018).Pan, Y. et al. Round fruit shape in WI7239 cucumber is controlled by two interacting quantitative trait loci with one putatively encoding a tomato SUN homolog. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 573–586 (2017).Liu, J. et al. Banana Ovate family protein MaOFP1 and MADS-box protein MuMADS1 antagonistically regulated banana fruit ripening. PLoS ONE 10, e0123870 (2015).Liu, J. et al. Mu MADS 1 and Ma OFP 1 regulate fruit quality in a tomato ovate mutant. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 989–1001 (2018).Cong, B., Barrero, L. S. & Tanksley, S. D. Regulatory change in YABBY-like transcription factor led to evolution of extreme fruit size during tomato domestication. Nat. Genet. 40, 800 (2008).Huang, Z., Van Houten, J., Gonzalez, G., Xiao, H. & van der Knaap, E. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of SUN, OFP and YABBY gene family in tomato. Mol. Genet. Genom. 288, 111–129 (2013).Bowman, J. L. The YABBY gene family and abaxial cell fate. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3, 17–22 (2000).Liu, J., Van Eck, J., Cong, B. & Tanksley, S. D. A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13302–13306 (2002).Tsaballa, A., Pasentsis, K., Darzentas, N. & Tsaftaris, A. S. Multiple evidence for the role of an Ovate-like gene in determining fruit shape in pepper. BMC Plant Biol. 11, 46 (2011).Wang, S., Chang, Y., Guo, J. & Chen, J. G. Arabidopsis Ovate family protein 1 is a transcriptional repressor that suppresses cell elongation. Plant J. 50, 858–872 (2007).Lazzaro, M. D., Wu, S., Snouffer, A., Wang, Y. & Van Der Knaap, E. Plant organ shapes are regulated by protein interactions and associations with microtubules. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1766 (2018)

    Cartilha sobre conta vinculada

    Get PDF
    OrientaçÔes bĂĄsicas sobre a operacionalização da Conta Vinculada nos termos do art. 19-A e Anexo VII da Instrução Normativa SLTI/MP nÂș 2, de 30 de abril de 2008, com alteraçÔes posteriores
    • 

    corecore