A preliminary investigation into the prevalence and prediction of problematic cell phone use

Abstract Background and aims Likening mobile phone use dependency to the classification of excessive behaviors may be necessarily equivalent in seriousness to previously established addictions such as problematic computing or excessive gambling. The aim of the study explores into the behavior of excessive use of mobile phones as a pathological behavior. Methods Two studies investigated criteria for problematic mobile phone usage by examining student (Study 1, N = 301) and nonstudent (Study 2, N = 362) responses to a set of adapted mobile phone addiction inventories. Study 1 investigated cell phone addiction inventories as constructs designed to measure problematic cell phone use. Additionally, Study 2 sought to predict age, depression, extraversion, emotional stability, impulse control, and self-esteem as independent variables that augment respondents' perceptions of problematic use. Results The results from Study 1 and Study 2 indicate that 10 to 25% of the participants tested exhibited problematic cell phone usage. Additionally, age, depression, extraversion, and low impulse control are the most suitable predictors for problematic use. Conclusions The results of the two studies indicate that problematic mobile phone use does occur and ought to be taken seriously by the psychological community. Presently, there is limited data providing conclusive evidence for a comprehensible categorization of cell phone addiction, as well as a unified explanatory model specific to problematic mobile phone use. Studies such as this one may contribute substantial findings, adding scientific significance, and offering a valuable submission for the ongoing progress of creating intervention frameworks relative to “virtual addictions”

Factors Associated with Antibiotic Use for Acute Bronchitis

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical features of adults diagnosed with acute bronchitis, and to identify clinical variables associated with antibiotic treatment of acute bronchitis. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Primary care office practices at a group-model HMO in the Denver metropolitan area. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients were adults seeking care for acute respiratory illnesses. Participating clinicians included internists, family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and registered nurses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinicians voluntarily completed encounter forms for patients presenting with acute respiratory illnesses between February and May, 1996. Acute bronchitis was the primary diagnosis in 16% of acute respiratory illness visits (n = 1,525). The most frequent symptoms of acute bronchitis were cough (92%), phlegm production (63%), “runny nose” (50%), and throat pain (50%). The most frequent physical examination findings were pharyngeal erythema (45%), cervical lymphadenopathy (19%), wheezes (18%), and rhonchi (17%). Antibiotics were prescribed to 85% of patients diagnosed with acute bronchitis. Purulent nasal discharge by patient report, and sinus tenderness on physical examination were moderately associated with antibiotic treatment (p = .06 and .08, respectively). Antibiotic prescription rates did not vary by patient age or gender, duration of illness, days of work lost due to illness, or clinician type. CONCLUSIONS: Acute bronchitis is frequently treated with antibiotics in ambulatory practice. The clinical factors we identified to be associated with antibiotic use for acute bronchitis appear to play a minor role in explaining the excessive use of antibiotics for this condition. These findings suggest that clinicians use the diagnosis of acute bronchitis as an indication for antibiotic treatment, despite clinical trials and expert recommendations to the contrary