The influence of mass tourism and hygroscopic inertia in relative humidity fluctuations of museums located in historical buildings

The preservation of artefacts in museum collections is profoundly affected by fluctuations in temperature and relative humidity. This work presents the results of an experimental laboratorial study, conducted in a flow chamber to demonstrate the enormous potential of hygroscopic materials in stabilizing interior relative humidity. In order to assess the risk of mass tourism and hygroscopic inertia of finishing materials, associated with the hygrothermal behavior of museums, an analysis of several numerical scenarios, with a different number of visitors per hour, and finishing materials, in order to quantify the risks associated with the fluctuations of relative humidity. The results of sensitivity studies performed are presented for the case of a museum in Porto

Planetary health: from concept to decisive action.

Planetary health sets the ambitious task of understanding the dynamic and systemic relationships between global environmental changes, their effects on natural systems, and how changes to natural systems affect human health and wellbeing at multiple scales: global (eg, climate), regional (eg, transboundary fire emissions), and local (eg, persistent organic pollutants). By emphasising interconnections between human health and environmental changes and enabling holistic thinking about overlapping challenges and integrated solutions for present and future generations, the concept of planetary health offers an opportunity to advance the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, including identification of co-benefits across targets, encouraging effective cross-sector action and partnerships, and ensuring policy coherence. In turn, the agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offers substantial opportunities to advance planetary health. As the scientific evidence strengthens and public appreciation of humanity's dependence on the state of natural systems increases, now is the time to move from concept to decisive action to protect planetary health

Community-based infant hearing screening in a developing country: parental uptake of follow-up services

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Universal newborn hearing screening is now considered an essential public health care for the early detection of disabling life-long childhood hearing impairment globally. However, like any health interventions in early childhood, parental support and participation is essential for achieving satisfactory uptake of services. This study set out to determine maternal/infant socio-demographic factors associated with follow-up compliance in community-based infant hearing screening programmes in a developing country.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>After health educational/counselling sessions, infants attending routine childhood immunisation clinics at four primary care centres were enrolled into a two-stage infant hearing screening programme consisting of a first-stage screening with transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and second-stage screening with automated auditory brainstem response. Infants referred after the second-stage screening were scheduled for diagnostic evaluation within three months. Maternal and infant factors associated with completion of the hearing screening protocol were determined with multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No mother declined participation during the study period. A total of 285 out of 2,003 eligible infants were referred after the first-stage screening out of which 148 (51.9%) did not return for the second-stage, while 32 (39.0%) of the 82 infants scheduled for diagnostic evaluation defaulted. Mothers who delivered outside hospitals were significantly more likely to return for follow-up screening than those who delivered in hospitals (Odds ratio: 1.62; 95% confidence intervals: 0.98 – 2.70; p = 0.062). No other factors correlated with follow-up compliance for screening and diagnostic services.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Place of delivery was the only factor that correlated albeit marginally with infant hearing screening compliance in this population. The likely influence of issues such as the number of return visits for follow-up services, ineffective tracking system and the prevailing unfavourable cultural perception towards childhood deafness on non-compliance independently or through these factors warrant further investigation.</p

Guidelines for Modeling and Reporting Health Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Actions

Background: Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers. Objective: The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for modeling studies on scoping, estimating, and reporting population health effects from climate change mitigation actions. Methods: An expert panel of HEM researchers was recruited to participate in developing guidance for conducting HEM studies. The primary literature and a synthesis of HEM studies were provided to the panel. Panel members then participated in a modified Delphi exercise to identify areas of consensus regarding HEM estimation. Finally, the panel met to review and discuss consensus findings, resolve remaining differences, and generate guidance regarding conducting HEM studies. Results: The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engagement: HEM modeling, including model structure, scope and scale, demographics, time horizons, counterfactuals, health response functions, and metrics; parameterization and reporting; approaches to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; accounting for policy uptake; and discounting. Discussion: This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting HEM estimates to make them more comparable and useful for policymakers. Harmonization of HEM estimates has the potential to lead to advances in and improved synthesis of policy-relevant research that can inform evidence-based decision making and practice

Guidelines for Modeling and Reporting Health Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Actions.

BACKGROUND: Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for modeling studies on scoping, estimating, and reporting population health effects from climate change mitigation actions. METHODS: An expert panel of HEM researchers was recruited to participate in developing guidance for conducting HEM studies. The primary literature and a synthesis of HEM studies were provided to the panel. Panel members then participated in a modified Delphi exercise to identify areas of consensus regarding HEM estimation. Finally, the panel met to review and discuss consensus findings, resolve remaining differences, and generate guidance regarding conducting HEM studies. RESULTS: The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engagement: HEM modeling, including model structure, scope and scale, demographics, time horizons, counterfactuals, health response functions, and metrics; parameterization and reporting; approaches to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; accounting for policy uptake; and discounting. DISCUSSION: This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting HEM estimates to make them more comparable and useful for policymakers. Harmonization of HEM estimates has the potential to lead to advances in and improved synthesis of policy-relevant research that can inform evidence-based decision making and practice. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6745

Influencing resilience: The role of policy entrepreneurs in mainstreaming climate adaptation

One way to make development pathways more resilient in the face of a changing climate has been through mainstreaming adaptation into government policies, planning and sectoral decision‐making. To date, many of the transferable lessons have taken the form of technical approaches such as risk assessments and toolkits. This article instead draws on evidence from South Asia to emphasise some of the more tacit and informal approaches used to influence adaptation policy. Despite their apparent significance in policy processes, such tactics are often neither planned for nor well reported in resilience‐building projects and programme documents. Using evidence to populate a typology of influencing strategies, this article looks particularly at the role of policy entrepreneurs who navigate the political complexity of both formal and informal governance systems to promote successful adaptation mainstreaming. It concludes with recommendations for adaptation and resilience programming that can more effectively harness the breadth of influencing strategies

No effect of featural attention on body size aftereffects

Prolonged exposure to images of narrow bodies has been shown to induce a perceptual aftereffect, such that observers' point of subjective normality (PSN) for bodies shifts toward narrower bodies. The converse effect is shown for adaptation to wide bodies. In low-level stimuli, object attention (attention directed to the object) and spatial attention (attention directed to the location of the object) have been shown to increase the magnitude of visual aftereffects, while object-based attention enhances the adaptation effect in faces. It is not known whether featural attention (attention directed to a specific aspect of the object) affects the magnitude of adaptation effects in body stimuli. Here, we manipulate the attention of Caucasian observers to different featural information in body images, by asking them to rate the fatness or sex typicality of male and female bodies manipulated to appear fatter or thinner than average. PSNs for body fatness were taken at baseline and after adaptation, and a change in PSN (ΔPSN) was calculated. A body size adaptation effect was found, with observers who viewed fat bodies showing an increased PSN, and those exposed to thin bodies showing a reduced PSN. However, manipulations of featural attention to body fatness or sex typicality produced equivalent results, suggesting that featural attention may not affect the strength of the body size aftereffect.9 page(s

Responsible Scientists And A Citizens' Panel: New Storylines For Creative Engagement Between Science And The Public

Uncertainties over emerging technologies and their potential effect on society and the environment often lead to controversy between scientists, policymakers and the public. Opening up the debates and involving citizens and social scientists early in the process of developing new technology is one way of responding to this issue of governance. By doing so, the hope is that the ethical implications and acceptability of new science can be more carefully considered and framed in a responsible and democratised context. To explore an example of aspiration in practice, a series of interdisciplinary public engagement events was organised at Durham University under the title New Storylines for Living with Environmental Change: Citizens' Perspectives. In this commentary we report on one of these events, a one-day workshop entitled Responsible Science and Public Engagement, where a citizens' panel aimed to explore ways of conducting deliberative engagement with scientists using the creative arts and a scientific dilemmas café format. © 2013 Royal Geographical Society.18018388Anderson, D.G., (2000) Identity and ecology in arctic Siberia: The number one reindeer brigade, , Oxford University Press, OxfordBrace, C., Geoghegan, H., Human geographies of climate change: landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges (2010) Progress in Human Geography, 35, pp. 284-302Bucchi, M., Neresini, F., Science and public participation (2008) The handbook of science and technology studies, pp. 449-472. , Hackett E J, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M and Wajcman J eds MIT Press, Cambridge MA and London -Callon, M., An essay on framing and overflowing (1998) The laws of the markets, pp. 244-269. , Callon M ed Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review, Oxford and MaldenCallon, M., The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge (1999) Science, Technology and Society, 4, pp. 81-94Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthe, Y., (2009), Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy Burchell G trans MIT Press, Cambridge MACallon, M., Law, J., Rip, A., How to study the force of science (1986) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology, pp. 3-15. , Callon M, Law J and Rip A eds Macmillan Press, Basingstoke and London -(2001) Social nature: theory, practice and politics, , Castree N and Braun B eds Blackwell, Oxford and MaldenCrang, M., Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see? (2003) Progress in Human Geography, 27, pp. 494-504Davies, G., Burgess, J., Eames, M., Mayer, S., Staley, K., Stirling, A., Williamson, S., (2003), www.deliberative-mapping.org/papers/dm-wellcome.pdf, Deliberative mapping: appraising options for addressing 'the Kidney Gap' Wellcome Trust final report Accessed 18 April 2013Davies, S.R., How we talk when we talk about nano: the future in laypeople's talk (2011) Futures, 43, pp. 317-326Engdahl, E., Lidskog, R., Risk, communication and trust: towards an emotional understanding of trust (2012) Public Understanding of Science, , doi: 10.1177/0963662512460953Gabrys, J., Yusoff, K., Arts, sciences and climate change: practices and politics at the threshold (2012) Science as Culture, 21, pp. 1-24Geoghegan, H., Leyson, C., On climate change and cultural geography: farming on the Lizard Peninsula Cornwall, UK (2012) Climactic Change, 113, pp. 55-66Hawkins, H., Geography and art. An expanding field: site, the body and practice (2012) Progress in Human Geography, 37, pp. 52-71Heidegger, M., (1962), Being and time Macquarrie J and Robinson E trans Basil Blackwell, OxfordHeidegger, M., (1971), Poetry, language, thought Hofstadter A trans Harper and Row, New YorkHilgartner, S., (2000) Science on stage: expert advice as public drama, , Stanford University Press, Stanford CAHoffmann-Reim, H., Wynne, B., In risk analysis one has to admit ignorance (2002) Nature, 416, p. 123(2000) Science and society, , House of Lords The Stationery Office, LondonIngold, T., (2000) The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, , Routledge, London and New YorkIrwin, A., The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance (2006) Social Studies of Science, 36, pp. 299-320Irwin, A., Wynne, B., (2003) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology, , University of Cambridge Press, CambridgeIrwin, A., Elgaard Jensen, T., Jones, K.E., The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice (2012) Social Studies of Science, 43, pp. 118-135Joss, S., Public participation in science and technology policy- and decision-making - ephemeral phenomenon or lasting change? (1999) Science and Public Policy, 26, pp. 290-293Kearnes, M., Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P., Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B., From bio to nano: learning lessons from the UK agricultural biotechnology controversy (2006) Science as Culture, 15, pp. 291-307Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P., Wilsdon, J., (2006) Governing at the nano-scale: people, policies and emerging technologies, , www.demos.co.uk/files/governingatthenanoscale.pdf, Demos, London Accessed 18 April 2013Lane, S.N., Odoni, N., Landström, C., Whatmore, S.J., Ward, N., Bradley, S., Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method (2011) Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, pp. 15-36Last, A., Experimental geographies (2012) Geography Compass, 6, pp. 706-724Last, A., Mutable matter - exploring nanotechnological futures through sensory methods (2012) Leonardo, 45, pp. 132-139Latour, B., (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy, , Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA and LondonLatour, B., Weibel, P., (2005) Making things public: atmospheres of democracy, , MIT Press, Cambridge MALeach, M., Scoones, I., Wynne, B., Introduction: science, citizenship and globalization (2005) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement, pp. 3-14. , Leach M, Scoones I and Wynne B eds Zed Books, London and New York -Macnaghten, P., Chilvers, J., Governing risky technologies (2012) Critical risk research: practices, politics and ethics, pp. 99-124. , Kearnes M B, Klauser F R and Lane S N eds Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester -Macnaghten, P., Guivant, J.S., Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom (2011) Public Understanding of Science, 20, pp. 207-220Macnaghten, P.M., Kearnes, M.B., Wynne, B., Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? (2005) Science Communication, 27, pp. 268-291Macnaghten, P., Szerszynski, B., Living the global social experiment: an analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance (2013) Global Environmental Change, 23, pp. 465-474Miles, M., Representing nature: art and climate change (2010) Cultural Geographies, 17, pp. 19-35(1979) Technology on trial: public participation in decision-making related to science and technology, , OECD OECD, ParisPickering, A., (2010) The cybernetic brain: sketches of another future, , University of Chicago Press, Chicago and LondonPielke, R.A., (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge(1998) Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 21st Report: setting environmental standards, , RCEP HMSO, LondonRogers, A., Geographies of the performing arts: landscapes, places and cities (2012) Geography Compass, 6, pp. 60-75Rose, G., (2012) Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, , Sage, London(2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties, , Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering The Royal Society, LondonSaunders, A., Moles, K., The spatial practice of public engagement: 'doing' geography in the South Wales valleys (2013) Social and Cultural Geography, 14, pp. 23-40Sykes, K., Macnaghten, P., Responsible innovation - opening up dialog and debate (2013) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, pp. 85-107. , Owen R, Bessant J and Heintz M eds John Wiley and Sons, Chichester -Tolia-Kelly, D.P., The geographies of cultural geography II: visual culture (2012) Progress in Human Geography, 36, pp. 135-142Whatmore, S.J., Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise (2009) Progress in Human Geography, 33, pp. 587-598Wilsdon, J., Willis, R., (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream, , Demos, LondonWynne, B., Elephants in the rooms where publics encounter 'science'? A response to Darrin Durant, 'Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public' (2008) Public Understanding of Science, 17, pp. 21-33van Est, R., The broad challenge of public engagement in science: commentary on 'Constitutional moments in governing science and technology' (2011) Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, pp. 639-648Yusoff, K., Biopolitical economies and the political aesthetics of climate change (2010) Theory, Culture and Society, 27, pp. 73-99Yusoff, K., Gabrys, J., Climate change and the imagination Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (2011) Climate Change, 2, pp. 516-53