43 research outputs found
Second rate or a second chance? Assessing biomass and biodiversity recovery in regenerating Amazonian forests
© 2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Secondary forests (SFs) regenerating on previously deforested land account for large, expanding areas of tropical forest cover. Given that tropical forests rank among Earth’s most important reservoirs of carbon and biodiversity, SFs play an increasingly pivotal role in the carbon cycle and as potential habitat for forest biota. Nevertheless, their capacity to regain the biotic attributes of undisturbed primary forests (UPFs) remains poorly understood. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of SF recovery, using extensive tropical biodiversity, biomass, and environmental datasets. These data, collected in 59 naturally regenerating SFs and 30 co-located UPFs in the eastern Amazon, cover >1,600 large- and small-stemmed plant, bird, and dung beetles species and a suite of forest structure, landscape context, and topoedaphic predictors. After up to 40 years of regeneration, the SFs we surveyed showed a high degree of biodiversity resilience, recovering, on average among taxa, 88% and 85% mean UPF species richness and composition, respectively. Across the first 20 years of succession, the period for which we have accurate SF age data, biomass recovered at 1.2% per year, equivalent to a carbon uptake rate of 2.25 Mg/ha per year, while, on average, species richness and composition recovered at 2.6% and 2.3% per year, respectively. For all taxonomic groups, biomass was strongly associated with SF species distributions. However, other variables describing habitat complexity—canopy cover and understory stem density—were equally important occurrence predictors for most taxa. Species responses to biomass revealed a successional transition at approximately 75 Mg/ha, marking the influx of high-conservation-value forest species. Overall, our results show that naturally regenerating SFs can accumulate substantial amounts of carbon and support many forest species. However, given that the surveyed SFs failed to return to a typical UPF state, SFs are not substitutes for UPFs
Carbon-focused conservation may fail to protect the most biodiverse tropical forests
As one of Earth’s most carbon-dense regions, tropical forests are central to climate change mitigation efforts. Their unparalleled species richness also makes them vital for safeguarding biodiversity. However, because research has not been conducted at management-relevant scales and has often not accounted for forest disturbance, the biodiversity implications of carbon conservation strategies remain poorly understood. We investigated tropical carbon–biodiversity relationships and trade-offs along a forest-disturbance gradient, using detailed and extensive carbon and biodiversity datasets. Biodiversity was positively associated with carbon in secondary and highly disturbed primary forests. Positive carbon–biodiversity relationships dissipated at around 100 MgC ha–1, meaning that in less disturbed forests more carbon did not equal more biodiversity. Simulated carbon conservation schemes therefore failed to protect many species in the most species-rich forests. These biodiversity shortfalls were sensitive to opportunity costs and could be decreased for small carbon penalties. To ensure that the most ecologically valuable forests are protected, biodiversity needs to be incorporated into carbon conservation planning
Feasibility of virtual therapy in rehabilitation of Parkinson's disease patients: pilot study
Racionalidade terapêutica: elementos médico-sanitários nas demandas judiciais de medicamentos
The second internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA as a tool for Latin American anopheline taxonomy: a critical review
Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation
© 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. Concerted political attention has focused on reducing deforestation, and this remains the cornerstone of most biodiversity conservation strategies. However, maintaining forest cover may not reduce anthropogenic forest disturbances, which are rarely considered in conservation programmes. These disturbances occur both within forests, including selective logging and wildfires, and at the landscape level, through edge, area and isolation effects. Until now, the combined effect of anthropogenic disturbance on the conservation value of remnant primary forests has remained unknown, making it impossible to assess the relative importance of forest disturbance and forest loss. Here we address these knowledge gaps using a large data set of plants, birds and dung beetles (1,538, 460 and 156 species, respectively) sampled in 36 catchments in the Brazilian state of Pará. Catchments retaining more than 69-80% forest cover lost more conservation value from disturbance than from forest loss. For example, a 20% loss of primary forest, the maximum level of deforestation allowed on Amazonian properties under Brazil's Forest Code, resulted in a 39-54% loss of conservation value: 96-171% more than expected without considering disturbance effects. We extrapolated the disturbance-mediated loss of conservation value throughout Pará, which covers 25% of the Brazilian Amazon. Although disturbed forests retained considerable conservation value compared with deforested areas, the toll of disturbance outside Pará's strictly protected areas is equivalent to the loss of 92,000-139,000 km2 of primary forest. Even this lowest estimate is greater than the area deforested across the entire Brazilian Amazon between 2006 and 2015 (ref. 10). Species distribution models showed that both landscape and within-forest disturbances contributed to biodiversity loss, with the greatest negative effects on species of high conservation and functional value. These results demonstrate an urgent need for policy interventions that go beyond the maintenance of forest cover to safeguard the hyper-diversity of tropical forest ecosystems
The response of tropical rainforests to drought : lessons from recent research and future prospects
Key message: we review the recent findings on the influence of drought on tree mortality, growth or ecosystem functioning in tropical rainforests. Drought plays a major role in shaping tropical rainforests and the response mechanisms are highly diverse and complex. The numerous gaps identified here require the international scientific community to combine efforts in order to conduct comprehensive studies in tropical rainforests on the three continents. These results are essential to simulate the future of these ecosystems under diverse climate scenarios and to predict the future of the global earth carbon balance. - Context: tropical rainforest ecosystems are characterized by high annual rainfall. Nevertheless, rainfall regularly fluctuates during the year and seasonal soil droughts do occur. Over the past decades, a number of extreme droughts have hit tropical rainforests, not only in Amazonia but also in Asia and Africa. The influence of drought events on tree mortality and growth or on ecosystem functioning (carbon and water fluxes) in tropical rainforest ecosystems has been studied intensively, but the response mechanisms are complex.- Aims: herein, we review the recent findings related to the response of tropical forest ecosystems to seasonal and extreme droughts and the current knowledge about the future of these ecosystems. - Results: this review emphasizes the progress made over recent years and the importance of the studies conducted under extreme drought conditions or in through-fall exclusion experiments in understanding the response of these ecosystems. It also points to the great diversity and complexity of the response of tropical rainforest ecosystems to drought. - Conclusion: the numerous gaps identified here require the international scientific community to combine efforts in order to conduct comprehensive studies in tropical forest regions. These results are essential to simulate the future of these ecosystems under diverse climate scenarios and to predict the future of the global earth carbon balance
Determination of dissolved organic nitrogen in seawater using Kjeldahl digestion after inorganic nitrogen removal
8 páginas, 6 tablas, 1 figura[EN] An update of the Kjeldahl method is presented for the direct determination of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in seawater. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen is previously removed: ammonium as NH3 with NaOH at pH 9.4; and, subsequently, nitrate and nitrite as nitric oxide with FeSO4 in acid medium. The sample is then mineralized to ammonium, which is measured with a Technicon autoanalyzer by the indophenol blue method. The range of recovery for tested standard compounds is similar to those obtained by high temperature oxidation (HTO) techniques. Direct determination of DON by the method described in this work marks an improvement in precision, in comparison with other methods; the standard deviation obtained for samples of seawater is +/-0.2 mu mol.l(-1). The precision of DON measurements is not dependent on dissolved inorganic nitrogen analysis. For several stations in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean, DON values ranged between 3 and 10 mu mol.l(-1).[FR] La méthode de Kjeldahl a été modifiée pour réaliser la mesure directe de l'azote
organique dissous (NOD) dans l'eau de mer. Les composés inorganiques dissous
dans l'échantillon sont préalablement éliminés comme suit: l'ammonium, en
rendant le milieu basique avec de la soude; le nitrate et le nitrite, en les
transformant en oxyde nitrique par le FeS04 en milieu acide. L'échantillon est
ensuite minéralisé pour transformer le NOD en ammonium dont la concentration
est déterminée sur un AutoAnalyseur Technicon.
La récupération des produits standard est identique à celle obtenue par des
techniques d'oxydation à haute température. La détermination du NOD par cette
méthode est améliorée car elle ne dépend plus de la mesure des concentrations
en azote minéral comme dans les autres méthodes. L'écart-type est d'environ
±0,2 J.Lmol.l-1 pour des échantillons d'eau de mer.
Les concentrations, mesurées par cette technique à plusieurs stations de l'océan
Atlantique NE, varient de 3 à 10 J.Lmol.l- 1•Support for this work came from the EEC project MAST2-
CT93-0065.Peer reviewe