Simulating hydrological and nonpoint source pollution processes in a karst watershed: A variable source area hydrology model evaluation

AbstractAn ecohydrological watershed model can be used to develop an efficient watershed management plan for improving water quality. However, karst geology poses unique challenges in accurately simulating management impacts to both surface and groundwater hydrology. Two versions of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), Regular-SWAT and Topo-SWAT (which incorporates variable source area hydrology), were assessed for their robustness in simulating hydrology of the karstic Spring Creek watershed of Centre County, Pennsylvania, USA. Appropriate representations of surface water – groundwater interactions and of spring recharge – discharge areas were critical for simulating this karst watershed. Both Regular-SWAT and Topo-SWAT described the watershed discharge adequately with daily Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies (NSE) ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 for calibration and 0.68–0.73 for validation, respectively. Because Topo-SWAT more accurately represented measured daily streamflow, with statistically significant improvement of NSE over Regular-SWAT during validation (p-value=0.05) and, unlike Regular-SWAT, had the capability of spatially mapping recharge/infiltration and runoff generation areas within the watershed, Topo-SWAT was selected to predict nutrient and sediment loads. Total watershed load estimates (518t nitrogen/year, 45t phosphorus/year, and 13600t sediment/year) were within 10% of observed values (−9.2% percent bias for nitrogen, 6.6% for phosphorous, and 5.4% for sediment). Nutrient distributions among transport pathways, such as leaching and overland flow, corresponded with observed values. This study demonstrates that Topo-SWAT can be a valuable tool in future studies of agricultural land management change in karst regions

Plant–water relations in subtropical maize fields under mulching and organic fertilization

The plant–water relationship of maize under conservation practices needs to be assessed to quantify the effectiveness of the practices in conserving soil water for crop production. This study evaluated in three trials how straw and plastic film mulching and organic manure application could potentially change water fluxes in the root zone and increase maize yield. A mathematical model HYDRUS-1D was calibrated against the observed soil water content and drainage data to predict the water fluxes in the root zone soil. The model simulated soil water dynamics in the root zone with satisfactory performance (RMSE of 0.6–2.3%, CD of 0.37–1.41, NSE of 0.18–0.88, and R2 of 0.62–0.91) during both the calibration and validation periods. The model predicted the observed drainage in a lysimeter with only a 5.5–11.7% bias and actual evapotranspiration (ETc) with a 2.6–6.7% bias for the control conditions in all three trials when the model was provided with measured plant growth, soil properties, and weather data. Both measurement and modeling confirmed that mulching augmented soil water storage by reducing ETc, i.e., 0.24–0.37 mm d-1 by straw mulching and 0.05–0.24 mm d-1 by plastic mulching during the trials. Manure application did not affect the ETc rate and resulted in the highest grain yield (6.8–8.3 Mg ha˗1) followed by plastic mulching (6.1–8.1 Mg ha˗1) and straw mulching (5.3–7.5 Mg ha˗1). Manure application increased the harvest index by optimally allocating biomass because of a steady supply of water and nutrients. The straw mulch, plastic mulch, and manure treatments increased grain yield by 13%, 24%, and 35%, respectively, compared to the control condition. Large-scale implementation of these practices would lessen blue water scarcity in agriculture