34 research outputs found

    Invitation to intersection problems for finite sets

    Get PDF
    Extremal set theory is dealing with families, . F of subsets of an . n-element set. The usual problem is to determine or estimate the maximum possible size of . F, supposing that . F satisfies certain constraints. To limit the scope of this survey most of the constraints considered are of the following type: any . r subsets in . F have at least . t elements in common, all the sizes of pairwise intersections belong to a fixed set, . L of natural numbers, there are no . s pairwise disjoint subsets. Although many of these problems have a long history, their complete solutions remain elusive and pose a challenge to the interested reader.Most of the paper is devoted to sets, however certain extensions to other structures, in particular to vector spaces, integer sequences and permutations are mentioned as well. The last part of the paper gives a short glimpse of one of the very recent developments, the use of semidefinite programming to provide good upper bound

    Minimum saturated families of sets

    Get PDF
    We call a family F\mathcal{F} of subsets of [n][n] ss-saturated if it contains no ss pairwise disjoint sets, and moreover no set can be added to F\mathcal{F} while preserving this property (here [n]={1,,n}[n] = \{1,\ldots,n\}). More than 40 years ago, Erd\H{o}s and Kleitman conjectured that an ss-saturated family of subsets of [n][n] has size at least (12(s1))2n(1 - 2^{-(s-1)})2^n. It is easy to show that every ss-saturated family has size at least 122n\frac{1}{2}\cdot 2^n, but, as was mentioned by Frankl and Tokushige, even obtaining a slightly better bound of (1/2+ε)2n(1/2 + \varepsilon)2^n, for some fixed ε>0\varepsilon > 0, seems difficult. In this note, we prove such a result, showing that every ss-saturated family of subsets of [n][n] has size at least (11/s)2n(1 - 1/s)2^n. This lower bound is a consequence of a multipartite version of the problem, in which we seek a lower bound on F1++Fs|\mathcal{F}_1| + \ldots + |\mathcal{F}_s| where F1,,Fs\mathcal{F}_1, \ldots, \mathcal{F}_s are families of subsets of [n][n], such that there are no ss pairwise disjoint sets, one from each family Fi\mathcal{F}_i, and furthermore no set can be added to any of the families while preserving this property. We show that F1++Fs(s1)2n|\mathcal{F}_1| + \ldots + |\mathcal{F}_s| \ge (s-1)\cdot 2^n, which is tight e.g.\ by taking F1\mathcal{F}_1 to be empty, and letting the remaining families be the families of all subsets of [n][n].Comment: 8 page
    corecore