research

Minimum saturated families of sets

Abstract

We call a family F\mathcal{F} of subsets of [n][n] ss-saturated if it contains no ss pairwise disjoint sets, and moreover no set can be added to F\mathcal{F} while preserving this property (here [n]={1,,n}[n] = \{1,\ldots,n\}). More than 40 years ago, Erd\H{o}s and Kleitman conjectured that an ss-saturated family of subsets of [n][n] has size at least (12(s1))2n(1 - 2^{-(s-1)})2^n. It is easy to show that every ss-saturated family has size at least 122n\frac{1}{2}\cdot 2^n, but, as was mentioned by Frankl and Tokushige, even obtaining a slightly better bound of (1/2+ε)2n(1/2 + \varepsilon)2^n, for some fixed ε>0\varepsilon > 0, seems difficult. In this note, we prove such a result, showing that every ss-saturated family of subsets of [n][n] has size at least (11/s)2n(1 - 1/s)2^n. This lower bound is a consequence of a multipartite version of the problem, in which we seek a lower bound on F1++Fs|\mathcal{F}_1| + \ldots + |\mathcal{F}_s| where F1,,Fs\mathcal{F}_1, \ldots, \mathcal{F}_s are families of subsets of [n][n], such that there are no ss pairwise disjoint sets, one from each family Fi\mathcal{F}_i, and furthermore no set can be added to any of the families while preserving this property. We show that F1++Fs(s1)2n|\mathcal{F}_1| + \ldots + |\mathcal{F}_s| \ge (s-1)\cdot 2^n, which is tight e.g.\ by taking F1\mathcal{F}_1 to be empty, and letting the remaining families be the families of all subsets of [n][n].Comment: 8 page

    Similar works