555 research outputs found

    Is the timed-up and go test feasible in mobile devices? A systematic review

    Get PDF
    The number of older adults is increasing worldwide, and it is expected that by 2050 over 2 billion individuals will be more than 60 years old. Older adults are exposed to numerous pathological problems such as Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, post-stroke, and orthopedic disturbances. Several physiotherapy methods that involve measurement of movements, such as the Timed-Up and Go test, can be done to support efficient and effective evaluation of pathological symptoms and promotion of health and well-being. In this systematic review, the authors aim to determine how the inertial sensors embedded in mobile devices are employed for the measurement of the different parameters involved in the Timed-Up and Go test. The main contribution of this paper consists of the identification of the different studies that utilize the sensors available in mobile devices for the measurement of the results of the Timed-Up and Go test. The results show that mobile devices embedded motion sensors can be used for these types of studies and the most commonly used sensors are the magnetometer, accelerometer, and gyroscope available in off-the-shelf smartphones. The features analyzed in this paper are categorized as quantitative, quantitative + statistic, dynamic balance, gait properties, state transitions, and raw statistics. These features utilize the accelerometer and gyroscope sensors and facilitate recognition of daily activities, accidents such as falling, some diseases, as well as the measurement of the subject's performance during the test execution.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Wearables for independent living in older adults: Gait and falls

    Get PDF
    Solutions are needed to satisfy care demands of older adults to live independently. Wearable technology (wearables) is one approach that offers a viable means for ubiquitous, sustainable and scalable monitoring of the health of older adults in habitual free-living environments. Gait has been presented as a relevant (bio)marker in ageing and pathological studies, with objective assessment achievable by inertial-based wearables. Commercial wearables have struggled to provide accurate analytics and have been limited by non-clinically oriented gait outcomes. Moreover, some research-grade wearables also fail to provide transparent functionality due to limitations in proprietary software. Innovation within this field is often sporadic, with large heterogeneity of wearable types and algorithms for gait outcomes leading to a lack of pragmatic use. This review provides a summary of the recent literature on gait assessment through the use of wearables, focusing on the need for an algorithm fusion approach to measurement, culminating in the ability to better detect and classify falls. A brief presentation of wearables in one pathological group is presented, identifying appropriate work for researchers in other cohorts to utilise. Suggestions for how this domain needs to progress are also summarised

    Free-living monitoring of Parkinson’s disease: lessons from the field

    Get PDF
    Wearable technology comprises miniaturized sensors (e.g. accelerometers) worn on the body and/or paired with mobile devices (e.g. smart phones) allowing continuous patient monitoring in unsupervised, habitual environments (termed free-living). Wearable technologies are revolutionising approaches to healthcare due to their utility, accessibility and affordability. They are positioned to transform Parkinson’s disease (PD) management through provision of individualised, comprehensive, and representative data. This is particularly relevant in PD where symptoms are often triggered by task and free-living environmental challenges that cannot be replicated with sufficient veracity elsewhere. This review concerns use of wearable technology in free-living environments for people with PD. It outlines the potential advantages of wearable technologies and evidence for these to accurately detect and measure clinically relevant features including motor symptoms, falls risk, freezing of gait, gait, functional mobility and physical activity. Technological limitations and challenges are highlighted and advances concerning broader aspects are discussed. Recommendations to overcome key challenges are made. To date there is no fully validated system to monitor clinical features or activities in free living environments. Robust accuracy and validity metrics for some features have been reported, and wearable technology may be used in these cases with a degree of confidence. Utility and acceptability appears reasonable, although testing has largely been informal. Key recommendations include adopting a multi-disciplinary approach for standardising definitions, protocols and outcomes. Robust validation of developed algorithms and sensor-based metrics is required along with testing of utility. These advances are required before widespread clinical adoption of wearable technology can be realise

    What Can Quantitative Gait Analysis Tell Us about Dementia and Its Subtypes? A Structured Review

    Get PDF
    Distinguishing dementia subtypes can be difficult due to similarities in clinical presentation. There is increasing interest in discrete gait characteristics as markers to aid diagnostic algorithms in dementia. This structured review explores the differences in quantitative gait characteristics between dementia and healthy controls, and between four dementia subtypes under single-task conditions: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease dementia, and vascular dementia. Twenty-six papers out of an initial 5,211 were reviewed and interpreted using a validated model of gait. Dementia was associated with gait characteristics grouped by slower pace, impaired rhythm, and increased variability compared to normal aging. Only four studies compared two or more dementia subtypes. People with AD are less impaired in pace, rhythm, and variability domains of gait compared to non-AD dementias. Results demonstrate the potential of gait as a clinical marker to discriminate between dementia subtypes. Larger studies using a more comprehensive battery of gait characteristics and better characterized dementia sub-types are required

    Time-dependent changes in postural control in early Parkinson’s disease: what are we missing?

    Get PDF
    Impaired postural control (PC) is an important feature of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but optimal testing protocols are yet to be established. Accelerometer-based monitors provide objective measures of PC. We characterised time-dependent changes in PC in people with PD and controls during standing, and identified outcomes most sensitive to pathology. Thirty-one controls and 26 PD patients were recruited: PC was measured with an accelerometer on the lower back for 2 minutes (mins). Preliminary analysis (autocorrelation) that showed 2 seconds (s) was the shortest duration sensitive to changes in the signal; time series analysis of a range of PC outcomes was undertaken using consecutive 2-s windows over the test. Piecewise linear regression was used to fit the time series data during the first 30 s and the subsequent 90 s of the trial. PC outcomes changed over the 2 mins, with the greatest change observed during the first 30 s after which PC stabilised. Changes in PC were reduced in PD compared to controls, and Jerk was found to be discriminative of pathology. Previous studies focusing on average performance over the duration of a test may miss time-dependent differences. Evaluation of time-dependent change may provide useful insights into PC in PD and effectiveness of intervention

    ISway: a sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Clinicians need a practical, objective test of postural control that is sensitive to mild neurological disease, shows experimental and clinical validity, and has good test-retest reliability. We developed an instrumented test of postural sway (ISway) using a body-worn accelerometer to offer an objective and practical measure of postural control. METHODS: We conducted two separate studies with two groups of subjects. Study I: sensitivity and experimental concurrent validity. Thirteen subjects with early, untreated Parkinson’s disease (PD) and 12 age-matched control subjects (CTR) were tested in the laboratory, to compare sway from force-plate COP and inertial sensors. Study II: test-retest reliability and clinical concurrent validity. A different set of 17 early-to-moderate, treated PD (tested ON medication), and 17 age-matched CTR subjects were tested in the clinic to compare clinical balance tests with sway from inertial sensors. For reliability, the sensor was removed, subjects rested for 30 min, and the protocol was repeated. Thirteen sway measures (7 time-domain, 5 frequency-domain measures, and JERK) were computed from the 2D time series acceleration (ACC) data to determine the best metrics for a clinical balance test. RESULTS: Both center of pressure (COP) and ACC measures differentiated sway between CTR and untreated PD. JERK and time-domain measures showed the best test-retest reliability (JERK ICC was 0.86 in PD and 0.87 in CTR; time-domain measures ICC ranged from 0.55 to 0.84 in PD and from 0.60 to 0.89 in CTR). JERK, all but one time-domain measure, and one frequency measure were significantly correlated with the clinical postural stability score (r ranged from 0.50 to 0.63, 0.01 < p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we recommend a subset of the most sensitive, reliable, and valid ISway measures to characterize posture control in PD: 1) JERK, 2) RMS amplitude and mean velocity from the time-domain measures, and 3) centroidal frequency as the best frequency measure, as valid and reliable measures of balance control from ISway

    Wearable inertial sensors for human movement analysis

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The present review aims to provide an overview of the most common uses of wearable inertial sensors in the field of clinical human movement analysis.Areas covered: Six main areas of application are analysed: gait analysis, stabilometry, instrumented clinical tests, upper body mobility assessment, daily-life activity monitoring and tremor assessment. Each area is analyzed both from a methodological and applicative point of view. The focus on the methodological approaches is meant to provide an idea of the computational complexity behind a variable/parameter/index of interest so that the reader is aware of the reliability of the approach. The focus on the application is meant to provide a practical guide for advising clinicians on how inertial sensors can help them in their clinical practice.Expert commentary: Less expensive and more easy to use than other systems used in human movement analysis, wearable sensors have evolved to the point that they can be considered ready for being part of routine clinical routine

    Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification Patients with Parkinson`s Disease and Hereditary Ataxias

    Get PDF
    Neurodegenerative diseases are a group of neurological conditions characterized by the loss or destruction of neurons in the central nervous system, resulting in severe impairments and death. Researchers commonly used a two-group classification (Patients with a Neurodegenerative disease vs. healthy subjects of control). Thus, the principal purpose of this article is to distinguish between Parkinson\u27s patients and subjects with Hereditary Ataxias using machine learning techniques. We conducted experiments using a real dataset comprising Gait characteristics derived from the inertial motion sensors of a smartphone (iPhone 5S). This investigation had 67 participants, 53 of who had Parkinson\u27s disease and 14 of whom had Hereditary Ataxias. Methods of feature selection were applied to reduce dimensionality. In addition, five classification algorithms were constructed and assessed based on their accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The Support Vector Machine algorithm achieved an accuracy of 92.7%, a precision of 91.1%, a sensitivity of 96.2%, and a specificity of 89.1%. These results show that the suggested technique might inspire new research issues and have a direct therapeutic impact

    Human activity detection based on mobile devices

    Get PDF
    Aquesta tesi se centra en la detecció d'activitat humana a partir de dispositius mòbils i portàtils. Escollim Hexiwear com el nostre dispositiu portàtil per recollir les dades de l'activitat humana diària, com ara l'acceleració de tres eixos, l'orientació de tres eixos, la velocitat angular i la posició de tres eixos. Aquest projecte consisteix en el desenvolupament d'una aplicació per a telèfon intel·ligent per a l'usuari en l'anàlisi de dades, la visualització de dades i la generació de resultats. L'objectiu és construir un prototip obert i modular que pugui servir d'exemple o plantilla per al desenvolupament d'altres projectes. L'aplicació està desenvolupada amb JAVA per Android Studio. L'aplicació permet a l'usuari connectar-se amb el dispositiu portàtil i reconèixer la seva activitat diària. Per a l'algorisme de classificació de l'activitat diària, hem utilitzat dos mètodes diferents, el primer és mitjançant l'establiment de diferents llindars, el segon és mitjançant l'aprenentatge automàtic. L'aplicació es va provar i els resultats van ser satisfactoris, ja que l'aplicació generada va funcionar correctament. Malgrat les òbvies limitacions, la feina feta és un punt de partida per a desenvolupaments futurs。Esta tesis se centra en la detección de actividad humana basada en dispositivos móviles y portátiles. Elegimos Hexiwear como nuestro dispositivo portátil para recopilar los datos de la actividad humana diaria, como la aceleración de tres ejes, la orientación de tres ejes, la velocidad angular de tres ejes y la posición. Este proyecto implica la creación de una aplicación de teléfono para usuarios de análisis de datos, visualización de datos y generación de resultados. El objetivo es construir un prototipo abierto y modular que pueda servir como ejemplo o plantilla para el desarrollo de otros proyectos. La aplicación está desarrollada usando JAVA por Android Studio. La aplicación permite al usuario conectarse con el dispositivo portátil y reconocer su actividad diaria. Para el algoritmo de clasificación de la actividad diaria, usamos dos métodos diferentes, el primero es establecer umbrales diferentes, el segundo es usar el aprendizaje automático. La aplicación fue probada y los resultados fueron satisfactorios, ya que la aplicación generada funcionó correctamente. A pesar de las limitaciones evidentes, el trabajo realizado es un punto de partida para futuros desarrollos.  This thesis focuses on human activity detection based on mobile and wearable devices. We choose Hexiwear as our wearable device to collect the human daily activity data, like tri-axis acceleration, tri-axis orientation, tri-axis angular velocity and position. This project consists in the development of a smartphone application for the user in data analysis, data visualization and generates results. The objective is to build an open and modular prototype that can serve as an example or template for the development of other projects. The application is developed using JAVA by Android Studio. The application allows the user to connect with the wearable device, and recognize their daily activity. For the daily activity classify algorithm, we used two different methods, the first one is by set different thresholds, the second is by using the machine learning. The application was tested and the results were satisfactory, as the generated application worked properly. Despite the obvious limitations, the work done is a starting point for future developments
    corecore