Free-living monitoring of Parkinson’s disease: lessons from the field

Wearable technology comprises miniaturized sensors (e.g. accelerometers) worn on the body and/or paired with mobile devices (e.g. smart phones) allowing continuous patient monitoring in unsupervised, habitual environments (termed free-living). Wearable technologies are revolutionising approaches to healthcare due to their utility, accessibility and affordability. They are positioned to transform Parkinson’s disease (PD) management through provision of individualised, comprehensive, and representative data. This is particularly relevant in PD where symptoms are often triggered by task and free-living environmental challenges that cannot be replicated with sufficient veracity elsewhere. This review concerns use of wearable technology in free-living environments for people with PD. It outlines the potential advantages of wearable technologies and evidence for these to accurately detect and measure clinically relevant features including motor symptoms, falls risk, freezing of gait, gait, functional mobility and physical activity. Technological limitations and challenges are highlighted and advances concerning broader aspects are discussed. Recommendations to overcome key challenges are made. To date there is no fully validated system to monitor clinical features or activities in free living environments. Robust accuracy and validity metrics for some features have been reported, and wearable technology may be used in these cases with a degree of confidence. Utility and acceptability appears reasonable, although testing has largely been informal. Key recommendations include adopting a multi-disciplinary approach for standardising definitions, protocols and outcomes. Robust validation of developed algorithms and sensor-based metrics is required along with testing of utility. These advances are required before widespread clinical adoption of wearable technology can be realise

Multifactorial assessment of Parkinson’s disease course and outcomes using trajectory modeling in a multiethnic, multisite cohort – extension of the LONG-PD study

BackgroundThe severity, progression, and outcomes of motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD) are quite variable. Following PD cohorts holds promise for identifying predictors of disease severity and progression.MethodsPD patients (N = 871) were enrolled at five sites. Enrollment occurred within 5 years of initial motor symptom onset. Disease progression was assessed annually for 2-to-10 years after onset. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify groups differing in disease progression. Models were developed for UPDRS-III scores, UPDRS-III tremor and bradykinesia-rigidity subscores, Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage, Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) scores, and UPDRS-III, H&Y and MMSE scores considered together. Predictors of trajectory-group membership were modeled simultaneously with the trajectories. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis evaluated survival free of PD outcomes.ResultsThe best fitting models identified three groups. One showed a relatively benign, slowly progressing trajectory (Group 1), a second showed a moderate, intermediately progressing trajectory (Group 2), and a third showed a more severe, rapidly progressing trajectory (Group 3). Stable trajectory-group membership occurred relatively early in the disease course, 5 years after initial motor symptom. Predictors of intermediate and more severe trajectory-group membership varied across the single variable models and the multivariable model jointly considering UPDRS-III, H&Y and MMSE scores. In the multivariable model, membership in Group 2 (28.4% of patients), relative to Group 1 (50.5%), was associated with male sex, younger age-at-onset, fewer education-years, pesticide exposure, absence of reported head injury, and akinetic/rigid subtype at initial presentation. Membership in Group 3 (21.3%), relative to Group 1, was associated with older age-at-onset, fewer education-years, pesticide exposure, and the absence of a tremor-predominant subtype at initial presentation. Persistent freezing, persistent falls, and cognitive impairment occurred earliest and more frequently in Group 3, later and less frequently in Group 2, and latest and least frequently in Group 1. Furthermore, autonomic complications, dysphagia, and psychosis occurred more frequently in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1.ConclusionModeling disease course using multiple objective assessments over an extended follow-up duration identified groups that more accurately reflect differences in PD course, prognosis, and outcomes than assessing single parameters over shorter intervals

Impaired perception of surface tilt in progressive supranuclear palsy

<div><p>Introduction</p><p>Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is characterized by early postural instability and backward falls. The mechanisms underlying backward postural instability in PSP are not understood. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that postural instability in PSP is a result of dysfunction in the perception of postural verticality.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We gathered posturography data on 12 subjects with PSP to compare with 12 subjects with idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and 12 healthy subjects. Objective tests of postural impairment included: dynamic sensory perception tests of gravity and of surface oscillations, postural responses to surface perturbations, the sensory organization test of postural sway under altered sensory conditions and limits of stability in stance.</p><p>Results</p><p>Perception of toes up (but not toes down) surface tilt was reduced in subjects with PSP compared to both control subjects (p≤0.001 standing, p≤0.007 seated) and subjects with PD (p≤0.03 standing, p≤0.04 seated). Subjects with PSP, PD and normal controls accurately perceived the direction of gravity when standing on a tilting surface. Unlike PD and control subjects, subjects with PSP exerted less postural corrective torque in response to toes up surface tilts.</p><p>Discussion</p><p>Difficulty perceiving backward tilt of the surface or body may account for backward falls and postural impairments in patients with PSP. These observations suggest that abnormal central integration of sensory inputs for perception of body and surface orientation contributes to the pathophysiology of postural instability in PSP.</p></div

Postural motor control: Forward platform translation.

<p>CoP displacement in response to forward platform translations. A) Group raw data mean±SEM B) Group mean±SEM. CoP: center of pressure, CoM: center of mass; AP: anterior-posterior.</p

Participant characteristics.

<p>Participant characteristics.</p

Longitudinal Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease in Different Ethnic Cohorts: The DodoNA and LONG-PD Study

Background: Different factors influence severity, progression, and outcomes in Parkinson's disease (PD). Lack of standardized clinical assessment limits comparison of outcomes and availability of well-characterized cohorts for collaborative studies. Methods: Structured clinical documentation support (SCDS) was developed within the DNA Predictions to Improve Neurological Health (DodoNA) project to standardize clinical assessment and identify molecular predictors of disease progression. The Longitudinal Clinical and Genetic Study of Parkinson's Disease (LONG-PD) was launched within the Genetic Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease (GEoPD) consortium using a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) format mirroring the DodoNA SCDS. Demographics, education, exposures, age at onset (AAO), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts I-VI or Movement Disorders Society (MDS)–UPDRS, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)/Short Test of Mental Status (STMS)/Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), dopaminergic therapy, family history, nursing home placement, death and blood samples were collected. DodoNA participants (396) with 6 years of follow-up and 346 LONG-PD participants with up to 3 years of follow-up were analyzed using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) focused on: AAO, education, family history, MMSE/MoCA/STMS, UPDRS II-II, UPDRS-III tremor and bradykinesia sub-scores, Hoehn and Yahr staging (H&Y) stage, disease subtype, dopaminergic therapy, and presence of autonomic symptoms. The analysis was performed with either cohort as the training/test set. Results: Patients are classified into slowly and rapidly progressing courses by AAO, MMSE score, H &Y stage, UPDRS-III tremor and bradykinesia sub-scores relatively early in the disease course. Late AAO and male sex assigned patients to the rapidly progressing group, whereas tremor to the slower progressing group. Classification is independent of which cohort serves as the training set. Frequencies of disease-causing variants in LRRK2 and GBA were 1.89 and 2.96%, respectively. Conclusions: Standardized clinical assessment provides accurate phenotypic characterization in pragmatic clinical settings. Trajectory analysis identified two different trajectories of disease progression and determinants of classification. Accurate phenotypic characterization is essential in interpreting genomic information that is generated within consortia, such as the GEoPD, formed to understand the genetic epidemiology of PD. Furthermore, the LONGPD study protocol has served as the prototype for collecting standardized phenotypic information at GEoPD sites. With genomic analysis, this will elucidate disease etiology and lead to targeted therapies that can improve disease outcomes. © Copyright © 2020 Markopoulou, Aasly, Chung, Dardiotis, Wirdefeldt, Premkumar, Schoneburg, Kartha, Wilk, Wei, Simon, Tideman, Epshteyn, Hadsell, Garduno, Pham, Frigerio and Maraganore