394 research outputs found
Children's rights in pediatrics
The United Nations Convention of Children's Rights (UNCRC) introduced in 1989 has generated a global movement for the protection of children's rights and has brought about a paradigm change in how children are perceived. Pediatric healthcare professionals are interacting with children and therefore with children's rights on a daily basis. However, although at least 18 of the 54 articles are relevant for pediatric practice, there is limited systematic training on how pediatricians can support children's rights in the clinical setting. This article discusses the principles and aims of the UNCRC and proposes a comprehensive checklist of rights vis-Ã -vis issues that arise in clinical practic
Digital health: meeting the ethical and policy challenges
Digital health encompasses a wide range of novel digital
technologies related to health and medicine. Such technologies
rely on recent advances in the collection and
analysis of ever increasing amounts of data from both
patients and healthy citizens. Along with new opportunities,
however, come new ethical and policy challenges.
These range from the need to adapt current evidencebased
standards, to issues of privacy, oversight, accountability
and public trust as well as national and international
data governance and management. This review illustrates
key issues and challenges facing the rapidly unfolding digital
health paradigm and reflects on the impact of big data
in medical research and clinical practice both internationally
and in Switzerland. It concludes by emphasising five
conditions that will be crucial to fulfil in order to foster innovation
and fair benefit sharing in digital health
Is there a duty to participate in digital epidemiology?
This paper poses the question of whether people have a duty to participate in digital epidemiology. While
an implied duty to participate has been argued for in relation to biomedical research in general, digital
epidemiology involves processing of non-medical, granular and proprietary data types that pose different
risks to participants. We first describe traditional justifications for epidemiology that imply a duty to
participate for the general public, which take account of the immediacy and plausibility of threats, and the
identifiability of data. We then consider how these justifications translate to digital epidemiology,
understood as an evolution of traditional epidemiology that includes personal and proprietary digital data
alongside formal medical datasets. We consider the risks imposed by re-purposing such data for digital
epidemiology and propose eight justificatory conditions that should be met in justifying a duty to
participate for specific digital epidemiological studies. The conditions are then applied to three
hypothetical cases involving usage of social media data for epidemiological purposes. We conclude with
a list of questions to be considered in public negotiations of digital epidemiology, including the
application of a duty to participate to third-party data controllers, and the important distinction between
moral and legal obligations to participate in research
Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?
We explored the characteristics and motivations of people who, having obtained their genetic or genomic data from Direct-To-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) companies, voluntarily decide to share them on the publicly accessible web platform openSNP. The study is the first attempt to describe open data sharing activities undertaken by individuals without institutional oversight. In the paper we provide a detailed overview of the distribution of the demographic characteristics and motivations of people engaged in genetic or genomic open data sharing. The geographical distribution of the respondents showed the USA as dominant. There was no significant gender divide, the age distribution was broad, educational background varied and respondents with and without children were equally represented. Health, even though prominent, was not the respondents' primary or only motivation to be tested. As to their motivations to openly share their data, 86.05% indicated wanting to learn about themselves as relevant, followed by contributing to the advancement of medical research (80.30%), improving the predictability of genetic testing (76.02%) and considering it fun to explore genotype and phenotype data (75.51%). Whereas most respondents were well aware of the privacy risks of their involvement in open genetic data sharing and considered the possibility of direct, personal repercussions troubling, they estimated the risk of this happening to be negligible. Our findings highlight the diversity of DTC-GT consumers who decide to openly share their data. Instead of focusing exclusively on health-related aspects of genetic testing and data sharing, our study emphasizes the importance of taking into account benefits and risks that stretch beyond the health spectrum. Our results thus lend further support to the call for a broader and multi-faceted conceptualization of genomic utility
- …