Pneumonies communautaires non graves : la recherche d’une documentation microbiologique n’est pas nécessaire

National audienceMicrobiological diagnosis of infectious diseases must be searched for when easily available, with reliable results that will have an impact on patient management. These criteria do not apply for community-acquired pneumonia: (i) reliable samples most often require invasive testings (e.g. broncho-alveolar lavage through fibroscopy); (ii) on the other hand, non invasive tests suffer from multiple caveats (low sensitivity and/or low specificity, delayed diagnosis, cost) and (iii) the benefit of targeted treatment as compared to empirical treatment has not been demonstrated. Consequently, all recent guidelines rely on empirical treatment for non-severe community-acquired pneumonia, based on rigourous analysis of the clinical situation.La documentation microbiologique des pathologies anti-infectieuses doit être recherchée lorsqu’elle est aisément accessible, avec des résultats fiables et qui auront un impact sur la prise en charge des patients. Ces critères ne sont pas présents dans la majorité des cas de pneumonies aiguës communautaires : (i) l’obtention de prélèvements fiables et de qualité nécessite en règle le recours à des méthodes invasives (fibroscopie/lavage broncho-alvéolaire) ; (ii) à l’inverse, les méthodes non invasives souffrent de multiples carences (faible sensibilité et/ou faible spécificité, diagnostic seulement a posteriori, coût) et (iii) la supériorité d’une antibiothérapie ciblée par rapport à une antibiothérapie empirique n’est pas démontrée dans ce contexte. De fait, toutes les recommandations récentes reposent sur un traitement empirique des pneumonies aiguës communautaires non graves, basé sur une analyse rigoureuse de la situation

Treatment of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Meningitis:A Survey Among Infectious Diseases Specialists in France, Sweden, Australia, and Denmark

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe attitudes toward treatment of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) meningitis and prioritize future trials. METHODS: This was a self-administered online survey of HSV-2 meningitis treatment among infectious diseases (ID) specialists in France, Sweden, Australia, and Denmark. RESULTS: A total of 223 ID specialists (45% female) from France (36%), Denmark (24%), Sweden (21%), and Australia (19%) participated in the survey, primarily from university hospitals (64%). The estimated overall response rate was 11% and ranged from 6% (Australia) to 64% (Denmark). Intravenous (IV) acyclovir followed by oral valacyclovir was the favored treatment in 110 of 179 (61%), whereas monotherapy with either IV acyclovir or oral valacyclovir was used by 35 of 179 (20%) and 34 of 179 (19%), respectively. The median total duration was reported to be 7 days (interquartile range, 7–10 days) regardless of antiviral regimen. Immunocompromise influenced decisions on antiviral treatment in 110 of 189 (58%) of respondents, mainly by prolonged total duration of treatment (36/110 [33%]), prolonged IV administration (31/110 [28%]), and mandatory antiviral treatment (25/110 [23%]). Treatment with acyclovir/valacyclovir versus placebo and comparison of acyclovir versus valacyclovir were assigned the highest prioritization scores for future randomized controlled trials on HSV-2 meningitis. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of indications for as well as type and duration of antiviral treatment varied substantially among ID specialists

Understanding central nervous system efficacy of antimicrobials

The requirements for antimicrobial treatment to reach the central nervous system (CNS) are of maximal importance, for two major reasons: (i) the brain is an immuno-privileged site, with virtually no leukocytes in the brain parenchyma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at baseline; (ii) the blood–brain barrier (BBB) drastically reduces the diffusion of antimicrobials into the CNS [1]. Treatment of CNS infections has been a major area of research since the discovery of the first antimicrobials. Treatment regimens recommended for encephalitis [2, 3], meningitis [4], and brain abscess [5], have to comply with the pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of available antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, and antiparasitic agents [6]. Due to the numerous constraints created by the BBB, therapeutic options are quite limited, so that current practices for treatment of CNS infections are remarkably similar worldwide, with much less heterogeneity than for other major infectious diseases (e.g. pneumonia, abdominal, or skin and skin structure infections). This paper summarizes the main parameters that must be taken into account to ensure efficacy of antimicrobial agents in the CNS, with an emphasis on antibacterial drugs

Ruptures d'approvisionnement en médicaments anti-infectieux: causes et conséquences

International audienceAnti-infective drugs stock-outs are increasingly frequent, and this is unlikely to change. There are numerous causes for this, mostly related to parameters difficult to control: i) 60 to 80% of raw material or components are produced outside of Europe (compared to 20% 30 years ago), with subsequent loss of independence for their procurement; ii) the economic crisis drives the pharmaceutical companies to stop producing drugs of limited profitability (even among important drugs); iii) the enforcement of regulatory requirements and quality control procedures result in an increasing number of drugs being blocked during production. The therapeutic class most affected by drug stock-outs is that of anti-infective drugs, especially injectable ones, and many therapeutic dead ends have recently occurred. We provide an update on this issue, and suggest 2 major actions for improvement: i) to implement a group dedicated to anticipating drug stock-outs within the anti-infective committee in each health care center, with the objectives of organizing and coordinating the response whenever a drug stock-out is deemed at risk (i.e., contingency plans, substitution, communication to prescribers); ii) a national reflection lead by scientific societies, in collaboration with government agencies, upstream of the most problematic drug stock-outs, to elaborate and disseminate consensus guidelines for the management of these stock-outs

Incidence of Pneumocystis jiroveci Pneumonia among Groups at Risk in HIV-negative Patients

International audienceBackground - Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative immunocompromised patients is associated with high mortality rates. Although trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole provides a very effective prophylaxis, pneumocystosis still occurs and may even be emerging due to suboptimal characterization of patients most at risk, hence precluding targeted prophylaxis. Methods - We retrospectively analyzed all cases of documented pneumocystosis in HIV-negative patients admitted in our institution, a referral center in the area, from January 1990 to June 2010, and extracted data on their underlying condition(s). To estimate incidence rates within each condition, we estimated the number of patients followed-up in our area for each condition by measuring the number of patients admitted with the corresponding international classification diagnostic code, through the national hospital discharge database (Program of Medicalization of the Information System [PMSI]). Results - From 1990 to 2010, 293 cases of pneumocystosis were documented, of which 154 (52.6%) tested negative for HIV. The main underlying conditions were hematological malignancies (32.5%), solid tumors (18.2%), inflammatory diseases (14.9%), solid organ transplant (12.3%), and vasculitis (9.7%). Estimated incidence rates could be ranked in 3 categories: 1) high risk (incidence rates >45 cases per 100,000 patient-year): polyarteritis nodosa, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, polymyositis/dermatopolymyositis, acute leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma; 2) intermediate risk (25-45 cases per 100,000 patient-year): Waldenström macroglobulinemia, multiple myeloma, and central nervous system cancer; and 3) low risk (<25 cases per 100,000 patient-year): other solid tumors, inflammatory diseases, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Conclusions - These estimates may be used as a guide to better target pneumocystosis prophylaxis in the groups most at risk

Diagnostic stewardship in infectious diseases:a continuum of antimicrobial stewardship in the fight against antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has been exacerbated by the inappropriate use of diagnostics, leading to excessive prescription of antimicrobials, and is an imminent threat to global health. Diagnostic stewardship (DS) is an auxiliary to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and comprises ordering the right tests, for the right patient, at the right time. It also promotes the judicious use of rapid and novel molecular diagnostic tools to enable the initiation of proper antibiotic therapy, while avoiding excessive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Proper interpretation of test results is crucial to avoid overdiagnosis and excessive healthcare costs. Although many rapid diagnostic tools have been developed with a high diagnostic yield, they are often limited by accessibility, cost, and lack of knowledge regarding their use. Careful consideration of clinical signs and symptoms with knowledge of the local epidemiology are essential for DS. This enables appropriate interpretation of microbiological results. Multidisciplinary teams that include well trained professionals should cooperate to promote DS. Challenges and barriers to the implementation of DS are mostly caused by scarcity of resources and lack of trained personnel and, most importantly, lack of knowledge. The lack of resources is often due to absence of awareness of the impact that good medical microbiology diagnostic facilities and expertise can have on the proper use of antibiotics.</p

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 Clone in Long-Term Care Facility

We performed a longitudinal analysis of 661 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates obtained from patients in a long-term care facility. USA300 clone increased from 11.3% of all MRSA isolates in 2002 to 64.0% in 2006 (p<0.0001) and was mostly recovered from skin or skin structures (64.3% vs. 27.0% for non-USA300 MRSA; p<0.0001)

Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection and Endocarditis―A Prospective Cohort Study

Equipe CHU UB (EA) Pôle MERS CT3 Hors Enjeu The VIRSTA Study Group : Clinical centres: Besançon: Catherine Chirouze, Elodie Curlier, Cécile Descottes-Genon, Bruno Hoen, Isabelle Patry, Lucie Vettoretti. Dijon: Pascal Chavanet, Jean-Christophe Eicher, Sandrine Gohier-Treuvelot, Marie-Christine Greusard, Catherine Neuwirth, André Péchinot, Lionel Piroth. Lyon: Marie Célard, Catherine Cornu, François Delahaye, Malika Hadid, Pascale Rausch. Montpellier: Audrey Coma, Florence Galtier, Philippe Géraud, Hélène Jean-Pierre, Vincent Le Moing, Catherine Sportouch, Jacques Reynes. Nancy: Nejla Aissa, Thanh Doco- Lecompte, François Goehringer, Nathalie Keil, Lorraine Letranchant, Hepher Malela, Thierry May, Christine Selton-Suty. Nîmes: Nathalie Bedos, Jean-Philippe Lavigne, Catherine Lechiche, Albert Sotto. Paris: Xavier Duval, Emila Ilic Habensus, Bernard Iung, Catherine Leport, Pascale Longuet, Raymond Ruimy. Rennes: Eric Bellissant, Pierre-Yves Donnio, Fabienne Le Gac, Christian Michelet, Matthieu Revest, Pierre Tattevin, Elise Thebault. Coordination and statistical analyses: François Alla, Pierre Braquet, Marie-Line Erpelding, Laetitia Minary, Sarah Tubiana. Centre National de Référence des staphylocoques: Michèle Bès, Jérôme Etienne, Anne Tristan, François Vandenesch. Sponsor CHU de Montpellier: Sandrine Barbas, Christine Delonca, Virginie Sussmuth, Anne Verchère. Alain Makinson reviewed the manuscript for English correctness.International audienceOBJECTIVES: To update the epidemiology of S. aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) in a high-income country and its link with infective endocarditis (IE).METHODS: All consecutive adult patients with incident SAB (n = 2008) were prospectively enrolled between 2009 and 2011 in 8 university hospitals in France. RESULTS: SAB was nosocomial in 54%, non-nosocomial healthcare related in 18% and community-acquired in 26%. Methicillin resistance was present in 19% of isolates. SAB Incidence of nosocomial SAB was 0.159/1000 patients-days of hospitalization (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.111-0.219). A deep focus of infection was detected in 37%, the two most frequent were IE (11%) and pneumonia (8%). The higher rates of IE were observed in injecting drug users (IE: 38%) and patients with prosthetic (IE: 33%) or native valve disease (IE: 20%) but 40% of IE occurred in patients without heart disease nor injecting drug use. IE was more frequent in case of community-acquired (IE: 21%, adjusted odds-ratio (aOR) = 2.9, CI = 2.0-4.3) or non-nosocomial healthcare-related SAB (IE: 12%, aOR = 2.3, CI = 1.4-3.5). S. aureus meningitis (IE: 59%), persistent bacteremia at 48 hours (IE: 25%) and C-reactive protein > 190 mg/L (IE: 15%) were also independently associated with IE. Criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock were met in 30% of SAB without IE (overall in hospital mortality rate 24%) and in 51% of IE (overall in hospital mortality rate 35%).CONCLUSION: SAB is still a severe disease, mostly related to healthcare in a high-income country. IE is the most frequent complication and occurs frequently in patients without known predisposing condition