27 research outputs found
Implementing precision methods in personalizing psychological therapies:Barriers and possible ways forward
Implementing precision methods in personalizing psychological therapies: barriers and possible ways forward
This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordData availability:
No data was used for the research described in the article.Highlights:
• Personalizing psychological treatments means to customize treatment for individuals to enhance outcomes.
• The application of precision methods to clinical psychology has led to data-driven psychological therapies.
• Applying data-informed psychological therapies involves clinical, technical, statistical, and contextual aspects
Dopamine-associated cached values are not sufficient as the basis for action selection.
Phasic dopamine transmission is posited to act as a critical teaching signal that updates the stored (or "cached") values assigned to reward-predictive stimuli and actions. It is widely hypothesized that these cached values determine the selection among multiple courses of action, a premise that has provided a foundation for contemporary theories of decision making. In the current work we used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to probe dopamine-associated cached values from cue-evoked dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens of rats performing cost-benefit decision-making paradigms to evaluate critically the relationship between dopamine-associated cached values and preferences. By manipulating the amount of effort required to obtain rewards of different sizes, we were able to bias rats toward preferring an option yielding a high-value reward in some sessions and toward instead preferring an option yielding a low-value reward in others. Therefore, this approach permitted the investigation of dopamine-associated cached values in a context in which reward magnitude and subjective preference were dissociated. We observed greater cue-evoked mesolimbic dopamine release to options yielding the high-value reward even when rats preferred the option yielding the low-value reward. This result identifies a clear mismatch between the ordinal utility of the available options and the rank ordering of their cached values, thereby providing robust evidence that dopamine-associated cached values cannot be the sole determinant of choices in simple economic decision making