30 research outputs found

    COVID-19 symptoms at hospital admission vary with age and sex: results from the ISARIC prospective multinational observational study

    Get PDF
    Background: The ISARIC prospective multinational observational study is the largest cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We present relationships of age, sex, and nationality to presenting symptoms. Methods: International, prospective observational study of 60 109 hospitalized symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 recruited from 43 countries between 30 January and 3 August 2020. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate relationships of age and sex to published COVID-19 case definitions and the most commonly reported symptoms. Results: ‘Typical’ symptoms of fever (69%), cough (68%) and shortness of breath (66%) were the most commonly reported. 92% of patients experienced at least one of these. Prevalence of typical symptoms was greatest in 30- to 60-year-olds (respectively 80, 79, 69%; at least one 95%). They were reported less frequently in children (≀ 18 years: 69, 48, 23; 85%), older adults (≄ 70 years: 61, 62, 65; 90%), and women (66, 66, 64; 90%; vs. men 71, 70, 67; 93%, each P < 0.001). The most common atypical presentations under 60 years of age were nausea and vomiting and abdominal pain, and over 60 years was confusion. Regression models showed significant differences in symptoms with sex, age and country. Interpretation: This international collaboration has allowed us to report reliable symptom data from the largest cohort of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Adults over 60 and children admitted to hospital with COVID-19 are less likely to present with typical symptoms. Nausea and vomiting are common atypical presentations under 30 years. Confusion is a frequent atypical presentation of COVID-19 in adults over 60 years. Women are less likely to experience typical symptoms than men

    WikipĂ©dia comme terrain de recherche : mĂ©thodes et enjeux de l’analyse des inĂ©galitĂ©s Ă©pistĂ©miques genrĂ©es d’une encyclopĂ©die collaborative

    No full text
    International audienceThis paper will present the methods and challenges of a collective and interdisciplinary research project (Wikif) which aims to understand how the issue of women scholars’ biographies is approached and taken into account on the collaborative encyclopedia Wikipedia. First, we will introduce the context of the gendered inequalities on the French speaking Wikipedia. We will then explain how the mixed methods we used in this project are relevant and complementary and how we have associated different remediation interventions to it.Cet article a pour objectif de prĂ©senter les mĂ©thodes et enjeux d’un projet de recherche collectif et interdisciplinaire (nommĂ© Wikif) qui vise Ă  comprendre comment la question des biographies de femmes scientifiques est abordĂ©e dansl’encyclopĂ©die collaborative WikipĂ©dia. AprĂšs une prĂ©sentation du contexte de prise en compte de ces inĂ©galitĂ©s dans la version francophone de WikipĂ©dia, nous expliquerons plus prĂ©cisĂ©ment la pertinence et la complĂ©mentaritĂ© de la mĂ©thodologie mixte qui a Ă©tĂ© adoptĂ©e au sein de ce projet, et comment nous y avons associĂ© des opĂ©rations de remĂ©diation

    Rousseau et la philosophie

    No full text
    Le prĂ©sent volume rassemble des contributions prĂ©sentĂ©es les 11 et 12 mai 2001 au colloque « Rousseau et la philosophie », organisĂ© Ă  la Sorbonne par le Centre d’Histoire des SystĂšmes de PensĂ©e Moderne (UniversitĂ© Paris I) et le Centre d’Études en RhĂ©torique, Philosophie et Histoire des IdĂ©es (École normale supĂ©rieure des Lettres et Sciences humaines). L’objet de cette rencontre Ă©tait de dĂ©gager la cohĂ©rence du rapport qu’entretint Rousseau avec l’ambition, les textes et les problĂšmes philosophiques : quelle place Rousseau fit-il aux traditions qu’il discute ou dont il s’inspire ? quel rapport se reconnut-il avec Descartes, ainsi qu’avec les philosophes de son temps et, parmi eux, les matĂ©rialistes ? quelle situation revendique-t-il pour la philosophie politique dĂ©veloppĂ©e dans les deux versions du Contrat social ? celle-ci constitue-t-elle le cƓur de l’anthropologie qui paraĂźt se dĂ©gager de l’Économie politique, des deux Discours, de l’Émile ? en quoi se relie-t-elle aux thĂšses dĂ©veloppĂ©es dans les textes esthĂ©tiques ou dans La Nouvelle HĂ©loĂŻse? peut-on parler d’un systĂšme de Rousseau
    corecore