30 research outputs found
COVID-19 symptoms at hospital admission vary with age and sex: results from the ISARIC prospective multinational observational study
Background:
The ISARIC prospective multinational observational study is the largest cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We present relationships of age, sex, and nationality to presenting symptoms.
Methods:
International, prospective observational study of 60â109 hospitalized symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 recruited from 43 countries between 30 January and 3 August 2020. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate relationships of age and sex to published COVID-19 case definitions and the most commonly reported symptoms.
Results:
âTypicalâ symptoms of fever (69%), cough (68%) and shortness of breath (66%) were the most commonly reported. 92% of patients experienced at least one of these. Prevalence of typical symptoms was greatest in 30- to 60-year-olds (respectively 80, 79, 69%; at least one 95%). They were reported less frequently in children (â€â18 years: 69, 48, 23; 85%), older adults (â„â70 years: 61, 62, 65; 90%), and women (66, 66, 64; 90%; vs. men 71, 70, 67; 93%, each Pâ<â0.001). The most common atypical presentations under 60 years of age were nausea and vomiting and abdominal pain, and over 60 years was confusion. Regression models showed significant differences in symptoms with sex, age and country.
Interpretation:
This international collaboration has allowed us to report reliable symptom data from the largest cohort of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Adults over 60 and children admitted to hospital with COVID-19 are less likely to present with typical symptoms. Nausea and vomiting are common atypical presentations under 30 years. Confusion is a frequent atypical presentation of COVID-19 in adults over 60 years. Women are less likely to experience typical symptoms than men
WikipĂ©dia comme terrain de recherche : mĂ©thodes et enjeux de lâanalyse des inĂ©galitĂ©s Ă©pistĂ©miques genrĂ©es dâune encyclopĂ©die collaborative
International audienceThis paper will present the methods and challenges of a collective and interdisciplinary research project (Wikif) which aims to understand how the issue of women scholarsâ biographies is approached and taken into account on the collaborative encyclopedia Wikipedia. First, we will introduce the context of the gendered inequalities on the French speaking Wikipedia. We will then explain how the mixed methods we used in this project are relevant and complementary and how we have associated different remediation interventions to it.Cet article a pour objectif de prĂ©senter les mĂ©thodes et enjeux dâun projet de recherche collectif et interdisciplinaire (nommĂ© Wikif) qui vise Ă comprendre comment la question des biographies de femmes scientifiques est abordĂ©e danslâencyclopĂ©die collaborative WikipĂ©dia. AprĂšs une prĂ©sentation du contexte de prise en compte de ces inĂ©galitĂ©s dans la version francophone de WikipĂ©dia, nous expliquerons plus prĂ©cisĂ©ment la pertinence et la complĂ©mentaritĂ© de la mĂ©thodologie mixte qui a Ă©tĂ© adoptĂ©e au sein de ce projet, et comment nous y avons associĂ© des opĂ©rations de remĂ©diation
Rousseau et la philosophie
Le prĂ©sent volume rassemble des contributions prĂ©sentĂ©es les 11 et 12 mai 2001 au colloque « Rousseau et la philosophie », organisĂ© Ă la Sorbonne par le Centre dâHistoire des SystĂšmes de PensĂ©e Moderne (UniversitĂ© Paris I) et le Centre dâĂtudes en RhĂ©torique, Philosophie et Histoire des IdĂ©es (Ăcole normale supĂ©rieure des Lettres et Sciences humaines). Lâobjet de cette rencontre Ă©tait de dĂ©gager la cohĂ©rence du rapport quâentretint Rousseau avec lâambition, les textes et les problĂšmes philosophiques : quelle place Rousseau fit-il aux traditions quâil discute ou dont il sâinspire ? quel rapport se reconnut-il avec Descartes, ainsi quâavec les philosophes de son temps et, parmi eux, les matĂ©rialistes ? quelle situation revendique-t-il pour la philosophie politique dĂ©veloppĂ©e dans les deux versions du Contrat social ? celle-ci constitue-t-elle le cĆur de lâanthropologie qui paraĂźt se dĂ©gager de lâĂconomie politique, des deux Discours, de lâĂmile ? en quoi se relie-t-elle aux thĂšses dĂ©veloppĂ©es dans les textes esthĂ©tiques ou dans La Nouvelle HĂ©loĂŻse? peut-on parler dâun systĂšme de Rousseau
Laparoscopic Revision of Bariatric Surgeries in Two Patients with Severe Resistant Hypocalcemia After Endocrine Cervical Surgery
International audienc