3 research outputs found

    Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for multivariable PI controller design

    Full text link
    A multiobjective optimisation engineering design (MOED) methodology for PI controller tuning in multivariable processes is presented. The MOED procedure is a natural approach for facing multiobjective problems where several requirements and specifications need to be fulfilled. An algorithm based on the differential evolution technique and spherical pruning is used for this purpose. To evaluate the methodology, a multivariable control benchmark is used. The obtained results validate the MOED procedure as a practical and useful technique for parametric controller tuning in multivariable processes.This work was partially supported by the FPI-2010/19 grant and the project PAID-06-11 from the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia and the projects DPI2008-02133, TIN2011-28082 and ENE2011-25900 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.Reynoso Meza, G.; Sanchís Saez, J.; Blasco Ferragud, FX.; Herrero Durá, JM. (2012). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for multivariable PI controller design. Expert Systems with Applications. 39(9):7895-7907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.111S7895790739

    Comparison of design concepts in multi-criteria decision-making using level diagrams

    Full text link
    [EN] In this work, we address the evaluation of design concepts and the analysis of multiple Pareto fronts in multi-criteria decision-making using level diagrams. Such analysis is relevant when two (or more) design concepts with different design alternatives lie in the same objective space, but describe different Pareto fronts. Therefore, the problem can be stated as a Pareto front comparison between two (or more) design concepts that only differ in their relative complexity, implementation issues, or the theory applied to solve the problem at hand. Such analysis will help the decision maker obtain a better insight of a conceptual solution and be able to decide if the use of a complex concept is justified instead of a simple concept. The approach is validated in a set of multi-criteria decision making benchmark problems. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.This work was partially supported by the FPI-2010/19 Grant and Project PAID-06-11 from the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia and by Projects ENE2011-25900, TIN2011-28082 (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation) and GV/2012/073, PROMETEO/2012/028 (Generalitat Valenciana).Reynoso Meza, G.; Blasco Ferragud, FX.; Sanchís Saez, J.; Herrero Durá, JM. (2013). Comparison of design concepts in multi-criteria decision-making using level diagrams. INFORMATION SCIENCES. 221(1):124-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.09.049S124141221
    corecore