Mortality reduces overyielding in mixed Scots pine and European beech stands along a precipitation gradient in Europe

Many studies show that mixed species stands can have higher gross growth, or so-called overyielding, compared with monocultures. However, much less is known about mortality in mixed stands. Knowledge is lacking, for example, of how much of the gross growth is retained in the standing stock and how much is lost due to mortality. Here, we addressed this knowledge gap of mixed stand dynamics by evaluating 23 middle-aged, unthinned triplets of monospecific and mixed plots of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) repeatedly surveyed over 6-8 years throughout Europe. For explanation of technical terms in this abstract see Box 1. First, mixed stands produced more gross growth (+10%) but less net growth (MINUS SIGN 28%) compared with the weighted mean growth of monospecific stands. In monospecific stands, 73% of the gross growth was accumulated in the standing stock, whereas only 48% was accumulated in mixed stands. The gross overyielding of pine (2%) was lower than that of beech (18%). However, the net overyielding of beech was still 10%, whereas low growth and dropout of pine caused a substantial reduction from gross to net growth. Second, the mortality rates, the self- and alien-thinning strength, and the stem volume dropout were higher in mixed stands than monospecific stands. The main reason was the lower survival of pine, whereas beech persisted more similarly in mixed compared with monospecific stands. Third, we found a 10% higher stand density in mixed stands compared with monospecific stands at the first survey. This superiority decreased to 5% in the second survey. Fourth, the mixing proportion of Scots pine decreased from 46% to 44% between the first and second survey. The more than doubling of the segregation index (S) calculated by Pielou index (S increased from 0.2 to 0.5), indicated a strong tendency towards demixing due to pine. Fifth, we showed that with increasing water supply the dropout fraction of the gross growth in the mixture slightly decreased for pine, strongly increased for beech, and also increased for the stand as a whole. We discuss how the reduction of inter-specific competition by thinning may enable a continuous benefit of diversity and overyielding of mixed compared with monospecific stands of Scots pine and European beech.OA-hybri

Mortality reduces overyielding in mixed Scots pine and European beech stands along a precipitation gradient in Europe

Many studies show that mixed species stands can have higher gross growth, or so-called overyielding, compared with monocultures. However, much less is known about mortality in mixed stands. Knowledge is lacking, for example, of how much of the gross growth is retained in the standing stock and how much is lost due to mor-tality. Here, we addressed this knowledge gap of mixed stand dynamics by evaluating 23 middle-aged, unthinned triplets of monospecific and mixed plots of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) repeatedly surveyed over 6-8 years throughout Europe. For explanation of technical terms in this abstract see Box 1.First, mixed stands produced more gross growth (+10%) but less net growth (-28%) compared with the weighted mean growth of monospecific stands. In monospecific stands, 73% of the gross growth was accumu-lated in the standing stock, whereas only 48% was accumulated in mixed stands. The gross overyielding of pine (2%) was lower than that of beech (18%). However, the net overyielding of beech was still 10%, whereas low growth and dropout of pine caused a substantial reduction from gross to net growth.Second, the mortality rates, the self-and alien-thinning strength, and the stem volume dropout were higher in mixed stands than monospecific stands. The main reason was the lower survival of pine, whereas beech persisted more similarly in mixed compared with monospecific stands.Third, we found a 10% higher stand density in mixed stands compared with monospecific stands at the first survey. This superiority decreased to 5% in the second survey.Fourth, the mixing proportion of Scots pine decreased from 46% to 44% between the first and second survey. The more than doubling of the segregation index (S) calculated by Pielou index (S increased from 0.2 to 0.5), indicated a strong tendency towards demixing due to pine.Fifth, we showed that with increasing water supply the dropout fraction of the gross growth in the mixture slightly decreased for pine, strongly increased for beech, and also increased for the stand as a whole. We discuss how the reduction of inter-specific competition by thinning may enable a continuous benefit of diversity and overyielding of mixed compared with monospecific stands of Scots pine and European beech

Диагностический и терапевтический потенциал трансформирующего фактора роста β1 при трансплантации солидных органов: результаты последних исследований

Federation Clinical outcomes of solid organ transplantation depend on many factors. One of the main factors is the risk of post-transplant complications, which affect allograft and recipient survival. Multifactorial organ damage in post-transplant complications and the search for diagnostic and prognostic indicators of the condition have contributed to the study and selection of a wide range of proteomic and molecular genetic biomarkers, which have shown to be effective in solid organ transplantation. The use of biomarkers opens up additional possibilities for assessing the risk of complications and their early diagnosis. This potentially reduces the frequency of invasive diagnostic procedures. Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) regulates many biological processes, has anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, participates in immune response, and plays a key role in extracellular matrix (ECM) protein synthesis. ECM dysregulation leads to fibroblast hyperproliferation and increased collagen synthesis and, consequently, tissue fibrosis. The variability of the diagnostic and prognostic potential of TGF-β1 has been demonstrated in studies on recipients of various solid organs. The objective of this review is to analyze recent evidence on the role of TGF-β1 in the development of post-transplant complications and to assess its prospects as a marker of graft pathology or as a target for therapy.Клинические результаты трансплантации солидных органов зависят от многих факторов, и главным среди них остается риск развития посттрансплантационных осложнений, ограничивающих выживаемость аллотрансплантата и реципиента. Концепция многофакторности повреждения органа при развитии посттрансплантационных осложнений и поиск диагностических и прогностических индикаторов патологии способствовали изучению и отбору широкого спектра протеомных и молекулярно-генетических биомаркеров, показавших эффективность при трансплантации солидных органов. Применение биомаркеров открывает дополнительные возможности для оценки риска осложнений и ранней диагностики последних, что потенциально способствует сокращению частоты инвазивных диагностических процедур. Трансформирующий фактор роста-β1 (TGF-β1) регулирует множество биологических процессов, обладает противовоспалительным и иммуносупрессивным действием, участвует в развитии иммунного ответа, а также играет ключевую роль в синтезе белков внеклеточного матрикса, дисрегуляция которого приводит к гиперпролиферации фибробластов и повышенному синтезу коллагена, и как следствие к фиброзу тканей. Вариативность диагностического и прогностического потенциала TGF-β1 показана в результатах исследований реципиентов различных солидных органов. Целью настоящего обзора стал анализ последних данных о роли TGF-β1 в развитии посттрансплантационных осложнений, а также оценка перспективы его применения как маркера патологии трансплантата или в качестве мишени для терапии

Predicting the spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests across Europe

The productivity and functioning of mixed-species forests often differs from that of monocultures. However, the magnitude and direction of these differences are difficult to predict because species interactions can be modified by many potentially interacting climatic and edaphic conditions, stand structure and previous management. Process-based forest growth models could potentially be used to disentangle the effects of these factors and thereby improve our understanding of mixed forest functioning while facilitating their design and silvicultural management. However, to date, the predicted mixing effects of forest growth models have not been compared with measured mixing effects. In this study, 26 sites across Europe, each containing a mixture and monocultures of Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris, were used to calculate mixing effects on growth and yield and compare them with the mixing effects predicted by the forest growth model 3-PGmix. The climate and edaphic conditions, stand structures and ages varied greatly between sites. The model performed well when predicting the stem mass and total mass (and mixing effects on these components), with model efficiency that was usually >0.7. The model efficiency was lower for growth or smaller components such as foliage mass and root mass. The model was also used to predict how mixing effects would change along gradients in precipitation, temperature, potential available soil water, age, thinning intensity and soil fertility. The predicted patterns were consistent with measurements of mixing effects from published studies. The 3-PG model is a widely used management tool for monospecific stands and this study shows that 3-PGmix can be used to examine the dynamics of mixed-species stands and determine how they may need to be managed.This article is based upon work from COST Action EuMIXFOR, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). Funding for the Czech Republic site was provided by the MŠMT projects COST CZ – LD14063 and LD14074. All contributors thank their national funding institutions and the forest owners for agreeing to establish the plots and to measure and analyse data from the plots. The first author was funded by a Heisenberg Fellowship (FO 791/4-1) from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG). Mário Pereira was supported by European Investment Funds by FEDER/COMPETE/POCI– Operacional Competitiveness and Internacionalization Programme, under Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006958 and National Funds by FCT – Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, under the project UID/AGR/04033/2013 as well as by project Interact-Integrative Research in Environment, Agro-Chain and Technology, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000017, research line BEST, co-financed by FEDER/NORTE 2020

A New Method to Reconstruct Recent Tree and Stand Attributes of Temporary Research Plots: New Opportunity to Analyse Mixed Forest Stands

In the last decades, studying effects of mixing tree species is increasingly important. In particular, under changing growing conditions and social requirements, investigations on mixed forest compared to mono-specific stands are of special interest, for example, stability, resilience or ecosystem services. Permanent forest research plots are a unique data source, providing the required information but being time-consuming and costly to establish. Moreover, large data sets of such plots are missing but needed for generalising any findings. Temporary research plots provide ad hoc information of its status quo and require less effort than permanent plots. Usually, such plots provide no information of the recent tree and stand characteristics. We demonstrate a new method developed under the scope of COST action FP 1206 EuMIXFOR (European Network on Mixed Forests) to estimate retrospective tree dynamics and stand characteristics. The results of validation reveal its usefulness for reconstructing 5–10 years. Thus, the method provides new potential in establishing larger networks across several countries, in particular, for studying underlying processes when comparing mono-specific with mixed forest stands

Changes in structural heterogeneity and stand productivity by mixing Scots pine and Maritime pine

Mixed-species stands have been studied extensively due to their potentially superior productivity, multi-functionality benefits and high ecological value compared to pure stands. The higher structural heterogeneity in mixed stands that can emerge from species interactions could be linked to the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem functions. We tested whether changes in stand structure also occur in mixtures of species with similar traits and whether they explain over-yielding patterns. Based on research with 12 triplets of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in the northern Iberian Peninsula (Spain), we provide evidence that species mixing increased structural heterogeneity and may induce over-yielding in mixed-species stands compared to monospecific stands. In this mixture of two light-demanding species, we observed that (i) stand composition influenced the inter-specific crown allometric variation, (ii) structural heterogeneity in mixed stands was caused by both specie-specific traits and species interactions, and (iii) intraspecific and interspecific differences in both crown size plasticity and size-distribution differentiation were associated with the increased relative productivity of mixed stands. We detected that crown complementarity and vertical stratification in the canopy space is a crucial mechanism for enhancing ecosystem productivity in light-demanding species and could be related to light interception and light-use. This work improves our understanding of emerging properties in mixed stands and introduces considerations for properly scaling and tracing mixing effects at individual tree, size distribution and stand levels.Instituto Universitario de Gestión Forestal Sostenibl

Tumor microenvironment in non-melanoma skin cancer resistance to photodynamic therapy

Non-melanoma skin cancer has recently seen an increase in prevalence, and it is estimated that this grow will continue in the coming years. In this sense, the importance of therapy effectiveness has increased, especially photodynamic therapy. Photodynamic therapy has attracted much attention as a minimally invasive, selective and repeatable approach for skin cancer treatment and prevention. Although its high efficiency, this strategy has also faced problems related to tumor resistance, where the tumor microenvironment has gained a well-deserved role in recent years. Tumor microenvironment denotes a wide variety of elements, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts, immune cells, endothelial cells or the extracellular matrix, where their interaction and the secretion of a wide diversity of cytokines. Therefore, the need of designing new strategies targeting elements of the tumor microenvironment to overcome the observed resistance has become evident. To this end, in this review we focus on the role of cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor-associated macrophages in the resistance to photodynamic therapy. We are also exploring new approaches consisting in the combination of new and old drugs targeting these cells with photodynamic therapy to enhance treatment outcomes of non-melanoma skin cance

Mixing effects on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) productivity along a climatic gradient across Europe

Mixed-species stands have been found to be more productive than would be expected from the performance of their component species in monocultures due to facilitation and complementarity between species, although these interactions depend on the combination of species present. Our study focuses on monospecific and mixed species stands of Scots pine and Norway spruce using 20 triplets established in nine countries along a climatic gradient across Europe. Differences in mean tree and stand characteristics, productivity and stand structure were assessed. Basal area increment in mixed stands was 8% higher than expected while volume increment was only 2% greater. Scots pine trees growing in mixed-species stands showed 11% larger quadratic mean diameter, 7% larger dominant diameter, 17% higher basal area and 25% higher stand volume than trees growing in mono specific stands. Norway spruce showed only a non-significant tendency to lower mean values of diameters, heights, basal area, as well standing volume in mixtures than monocultures. Stand structure indices differed between mixed stands and monocultures of Scots pine showing a greater stratification in mixed-species stands. Furthermore, the studied morphological traits showed little variability for trees growing in monospecific stands, except for diameter at breast height, crown length and crown length ratio. For trees growing in mixed stands, all the morphological traits of the trees were identified as different. Some of these morphological traits were associated with relative productivity. Nevertheless, relative productivity in mixed-species stands was not related to site conditions