16 research outputs found
Functional polymorphisms in the promoter regions of MMP2 and MMP3 are not associated with melanoma progression
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are enzymes that cleave various components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and basement membranes. MMPs are expressed in melanocytes and their overexpression has been linked to tumor development, progression and metastasis. At the genetic level, the following functional promoter polymorphisms are known to modify the gene transcription: -1306 C/T and -735 C/T in the MMP2 gene, and -1171 5A/6A in the MMP3 gene. Functional polymorphisms in MMP genes' promoter regions may modulate the risk for melanoma progression.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We evaluated MMP2 and MMP3 germline polymorphisms in a group of 1002 melanoma patients using PCR-based methods, including fragment size analysis and melting temperature profiles. Two-sided Chi-Square, Cochran-Armitage tests for trend, Fisher's exact tests, and Kendall's Tau tests were performed to evaluate the associations between genotype and various clinical and epidemiologic factors. Multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression, adjusting for known melanoma confounders such as age, sex, phenotypic index, moles, freckles, and race. Survival estimates were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in survival were assessed using the log rank test.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. After adjustment for age, sex and phenotypic characteristics of melanoma risk, no significant associations were identified with the clinical, pathological, and epidemiological variables studied. The melting profile for MMP2 -735 C/T identified a new change in one sample. A new PCR-amplification followed by direct sequencing confirmed a heterozygote G to A substitution at position -729.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study does not provide strong evidence for further investigation into the role of the MMP2 and MMP3 variants in melanoma progression.</p
Mutational analysis of the modulation of tyrosinase by tyrosinase-related proteins 1 and 2 in vitro.
Mutational analysis of the modulation of tyrosinase by tyrosinase-related proteins 1 and 2 in vitro
The albino (tyrosinase, Tyrc), brown (tyrosinase-related protein 1, Tyrp1b) and slaty (tyrosinase-related protein 2, tyrp2slt) loci are all involved in the regulation of melanogenesis. Phenotypes of inbred mice mutant at two or more of these loci are not always explicable by simple summation of the established or suspected catalytic functions of the gene products. These phenotypes suggest that relationships among the proteins extend beyond the obvious fact that they catalyze different steps in the same melanogenic pathway, and that they may also interact intimately in such a way that a mutation in one impacts the function of the other(s). Previous studies have attributed catalytic activities to each member of this trio; however, it has been difficult to study the proteins individually, either in vivo or in tissues or cells. Therefore, we undertook to transfect the genes, in revealing combinations, into COS-7 cells (which have no melanogenic apparatus of their own) to clarify the interacting functions of their encoded proteins. Specifically, we attempted to evaluate the effects of Tyrp1 and Tyrp2 proteins on tyrosinase protein. We report evidence that Tyrp1 stabilizes tyrosinase, confirming previous observations, and, in addition, demonstrate that Tyrp1 decreases tyrosinase activity. By contrast, Tyrp2 increases tyrosinase activity by stabilizing the protein. We conclude that both Tyrp1 and Tyrp2, in addition to other catalytic functions they may possess, act together to modulate tyrosinase activity
Mutational Analysis of the Modulation of Tyrosinase by Tyrosinase-Related Proteins 1 and 2 In Vitro
Multi-target fluorescencein situ hybridization in bladder washings for prediction of recurrent bladder cancer
Enhancement of arsenic trioxide cytotoxicity by dietary isothiocyanates in human leukemic cells via a reactive oxygen species-dependent mechanism
Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content
Online reviews have received much attention recently in the literature, as their visibility has been proven to play an important role during the purchase process. Furthermore, recent theoretical insight argue that the votes casted on how helpful an online review is (review helpfulness) are of particular importance, since they constitute a focal point for examining consumer decision making during the purchase process. In this paper, we explore the interplay between online review helpfulness, rating score and the qualitative characteristics of the review text as measured by readability tests. We construct a theoretical model based on three elements: conformity, understandability and expressiveness and we investigate the directional relationship between the qualitative characteristics of the review text, review helpfulness and the impact of review helpfulness on the review score. Furthermore, we examine whether this relation holds for extreme and moderate review scores. To validate this model we applied four basic readability measures to a dataset containing 37,221 reviews collected from Amazon UK, in order to determine the relationship between the percentage of helpful votes awarded to a review and the review text’s stylistic elements. We also investigated the interrelationships between extremely helpful and unhelpful reviews, as well as absolutely positive and negative reviews using intergroup comparisons. We found that review readability had a greater effect on the helpfulness ratio of a review than its length; in addition, extremely helpful reviews received a higher score than those considered less helpful. The present study contributes to the ever growing literature on on-line reviews by showing that readability tests demonstrate a directional relationship with average length reviews and their helpfulness and that this relationship holds both for moderate and extreme review scores