Open data from the third observing run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO

The global network of gravitational-wave observatories now includes five detectors, namely LIGO Hanford, LIGO Livingston, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO 600. These detectors collected data during their third observing run, O3, composed of three phases: O3a starting in 2019 April and lasting six months, O3b starting in 2019 November and lasting five months, and O3GK starting in 2020 April and lasting two weeks. In this paper we describe these data and various other science products that can be freely accessed through the Gravitational Wave Open Science Center at https://gwosc.org. The main data set, consisting of the gravitational-wave strain time series that contains the astrophysical signals, is released together with supporting data useful for their analysis and documentation, tutorials, as well as analysis software packages

2D versus 3D transabdominal sonography for the measurement of lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous cesarean delivery

Objective: To evaluate the intermethod reliability of using 3D versus 2D transabdominal sonography in the measurement of lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness in women with previous cesarean delivery, in addition to determining the interobserver reliability of 2D and 3D transabdominal sonography in LUS measurement. Methods: Between February and July 2010 at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, 40 pregnant women with a history of previous cesarean delivery at 36-39 weeks of pregnancy underwent LUS measurement via 2D and 3D transabdominal sonography by 2 observers. The 3D examination was performed on the multiplanar display of the longitudinally acquired LUS volume. Inner myometrial thickness (MT) and full thickness (FT) were measured at the thinnest portion and perpendicular to the contour of the LUS. Results: The 2D and 3D LUS measurements obtained by the 2 observers were comparable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: MT, 0.81 and 0.98, respectively; FT, 0.76 and 0.98, respectively). For transabdominal LUS measurement, 2D MT provided the best interobserver reliability (ICC: 2D MT, 0.95; 2D FT, 0.91; 3D MT, 0.82; 3D FT, 0.77). Conclusion: Compared with the 2D approach, 3D transabdominal sonography does not seem to improve the reliability of LUS measurement. 2D measurement of MT seems to be most reliable between different observers. © 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.link_to_subscribed_fulltex