Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.

BackgroundAn alternative approach to the traditional model of radiologists interpreting screening mammography is necessary due to the shortage of radiologists to interpret screening mammograms in many countries.MethodsWe evaluated the performance of 15 Mexican radiographers, also known as radiologic technologists, in the interpretation of screening mammography after a 6 months training period in a screening setting. Fifteen radiographers received 6 months standardized training with radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) system. A challenging test set of 110 cases developed by the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium was used to evaluate their performance. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, false positive rates, likelihood ratio of a positive test (LR+) and the area under the subject-specific Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for diagnostic accuracy. A mathematical model simulating the consequences in costs and performance of two hypothetical scenarios compared to the status quo in which a radiologist reads all screening mammograms was also performed.ResultsRadiographer's sensitivity was comparable to the sensitivity scores achieved by U.S. radiologists who took the test but their false-positive rate was higher. Median sensitivity was 73.3 % (Interquartile range, IQR: 46.7-86.7 %) and the median false positive rate was 49.5 % (IQR: 34.7-57.9 %). The median LR+ was 1.4 (IQR: 1.3-1.7 %) and the median AUC was 0.6 (IQR: 0.6-0.7). A scenario in which a radiographer reads all mammograms first, and a radiologist reads only those that were difficult for the radiographer, was more cost-effective than a scenario in which either the radiographer or radiologist reads all mammograms.ConclusionsGiven the comparable sensitivity achieved by Mexican radiographers and U.S. radiologists on a test set, screening mammography interpretation by radiographers appears to be a possible adjunct to radiologists in countries with shortages of radiologists. Further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of different training programs in order to obtain acceptable screening accuracy, as well as the best approaches for the use of non-physician readers to interpret screening mammography

Track E Implementation Science, Health Systems and Economics

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138412/1/jia218443.pd

De champignonkwekerslong: een onderzoek naar voorkomen en etiologie in Nederland

Contains fulltext : mmubn000001_096104481.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Promotores : J. Kolk, L. van Griensven, J. van Haaren en A. Cox223 p

International Legal Research Group on Migration Law - the Netherlands

The International Legal Research Group on Migration Law is a cooperation between ELSA, Council of Europe (CoE) and the Parliamentary Assembly (PACE). The cooperation derived from a need to give law students’ across Europe the opportunity to expand their knowledge on this relevant topic. The LRG serves as a significant step towards increasing knowledge about migration law, specifically integration policies, and providing additional learning opportunities to law students everywhere. In order to conduct the research, CoE provided ELSA with a foundation for the Academic Framework to ensure that researching. Based on those materials 28 ELSA National Groups analysed their national legislation and compiled a through-rough report

Improving lung cancer diagnosis by combining exhaled-breath data and clinical parameters

Introduction: Exhaled-breath analysis of volatile organic compounds could detect lung cancer earlier, possibly leading to improved outcomes. Combining exhaled-breath data with clinical parameters may improve lung cancer diagnosis. Methods: Based on data from a previous multi-centre study, this article reports additional analyses. 138 subjects with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 143 controls without NSCLC breathed into the Aeonose. The diagnostic accuracy, presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), of the Aeonose itself was compared with 1) performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis of the distinct clinical parameters obtained, and 2) using this clinical information beforehand in the training process of the artificial neural network (ANN) for the breath analysis. Results: NSCLC patients (mean±sd age 67.1±9.1 years, 58% male) were compared with controls (62.1±7.0 years, 40.6% male). The AUC-ROC of the classification value of the Aeonose itself was 0.75 (95% CI 0.69–0.81). Adding age, number of pack-years and presence of COPD to this value in a multivariate regression analysis resulted in an improved performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.81–0.90). Adding these clinical variables beforehand to the ANN for classifying the breath print also led to an improved performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.79–0.89). Conclusions: Adding readily available clinical information to the classification value of exhaled-breath analysis with the Aeonose, either post hoc in a multivariate regression analysis or a priori to the ANN, significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy to detect the presence or absence of lung cancer

Multi-centre prospective study on diagnosing subtypes of lung cancer by exhaled-breath analysis

Objectives: Lung cancer is a leading cause of mortality. Exhaled-breath analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC's) might detect lung cancer early in the course of the disease, which may improve outcomes. Subtyping lung cancers could be helpful in further clinical decisions. Materials and methods: In a prospective, multi-centre study, using 10 electronic nose devices, 144 subjects diagnosed with NSCLC and 146 healthy subjects, including subjects considered negative for NSCLC after investigation, breathed into the Aeonose™ (The eNose Company, Zutphen, Netherlands). Also, analyses into subtypes of NSCLC, such as adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and analyses of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were performed. Results: Choosing a cut-off point to predominantly rule out cancer resulted for NSCLC in a sensitivity of 94.4%, a specificity of 32.9%, a positive predictive value of 58.1%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 85.7%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76. For AC sensitivity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were 81.5%, 56.4%, 79.5%, and 0.74, respectively, while for SCC these numbers were 80.8%, 45.7%, 93.0%, and 0.77, respectively. SCLC could be ruled out with a sensitivity of 88.9% and an NPV of 96.8% with an AUC of 0.86. Conclusion: Electronic nose technology with the Aeonose™ can play an important role in rapidly excluding lung cancer due to the high negative predictive value for various, but not all types of lung cancer. Patients showing positive breath tests should still be subjected to further diagnostic testing