Equipement et traitement d’eau pour la gestion quotidienne de l’hémodialyse à domicile

Home hemodialysis (HD) must remain one technique among many in the treatment of end-stage renal failure. For this reason, everything must be done to ensure that patients, with the help of their health care team, have a choice. The management of accessibility to home water treatment is still difficult today despite the significant progress made in recent decades. The development of (Daily Home Hemodialysis) without having to install water treatment in a patient’s home is notable progress that has given the necessary impetus to the development of patient treatment at home. The challenges remain great—particularly in the development of sorbent dialysis, which should be addressed with the help of nanotechnology while working to increase the number of patients treated. There is also a need to create an eco-responsible attitude by reducing the amount and wastage of water used.L’hémodialyse à domicile doit rester une technique parmi tant d’autres pour traiter l’insuffisance rénale terminale. Pour cela tout doit être mis en place pour que les patients puissent avoir le choix, aidés par leur équipe soignante. La gestion de l’accessibilité à un traitement d’eau à domicile reste encore de nos jours difficile malgré les progrès notables lors des dernières décennies. Le développement de l’HDQD sans avoir à installer un traitement d’eau au domicile des patients est un progrès notable qui a donné un élan nécessaire au développement du traitement du patient au domicile. Les défis restent grands malgré tout, notamment pour le développement de la dialyse à sorbants qui devrait revoir le jour avec l’aide des nanotechnologies  cela aidera à augmenter le nombre de patients, mais aussi à avoir une attitude éco responsable, en diminuant les quantités d’eau utilisées et les déchets générés par ce type de traitement

A case-control study indicates that coagulation imbalance is associated with arteriosclerosis and markers of endothelial dysfunction in kidney failure

International audienceEndothelial dysfunction, one of many causes of arterial changes in end-stage kidney disease (kidney failure), is a likely link between early vascular aging and the risk of thrombosis or bleeding in this condition. To evaluate this, we compared links between arterial stiffness and endothelial/coagulation factors in 55 patients receiving hemodialysis therapy and 57 age-/sex-matched control individuals. Arterial stiffness was assessed from carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, and coagulation status from the endogenous thrombin generating potential. Markers of endothelial dysfunction (von Willebrand factor, tissue factor pathway inhibitor), neutrophil extracellular traps and tissue factor-positive extracellular vesicles were higher in patients with kidney failure. Prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, and D-dimer markers of in vivo coagulation activation were also higher. However, in vitro in the presence of platelets, endogenous thrombin generating potential was lower and its downregulation by activated protein C impaired. Antiplatelet drugs did not affect these parameters. In multiple regression analysis, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, D-dimer, factor VIII and monocyte-derived tissue factor-positive extracellular vesicles correlated with higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. In patients with kidney failure, in vivo hypercoagulability occurred with reduced thrombin generation in platelet-rich plasma, likely explaining the opposing thrombotic and bleeding tendencies in patients with kidney failure. Importantly, arteriosclerosis is more closely related to a prothrombotic state. Thus, coagulation changes plus arterial stiffness highlight a major therapeutic challenge for anticoagulant and antiplatelet drug use

Two Years’ Experience of Intensive Home Hemodialysis with the Physidia S³ System: Results from the RECAP Study

The RECAP study reports results and outcomes (clinical performances, patient acceptance, cardiac outcomes, and technical survival) achieved with the S3 system used as an intensive home hemodialysis (HHD) platform over a three-year French multicenter study. Ninety-four dialysis patients issued from ten dialysis centers and treated more than 6 months (mean follow-up: 24 months) with S3 were included. A two-hour treatment time was maintained in 2/3 of patients to deliver 25 L of dialysis fluid, while 1/3 required up to 3 h to achieve 30 L. The additional convection volume produced by means of the SeCoHD tool (internal filtration backfiltration) was 3 L/session, and the net ultrafiltration produced to achieve dry weight was 1.4 L/session. On a weekly basis, an average 156 L of dialysate corresponding to 94 L of urea clearance when considering 85% dialysate saturation under low flow conditions was delivered. Such urea clearance was equivalent to 9.2 [8.0–13.0] mL/min weekly urea clearance and a standardized Kt/V of 2.5 [1.1–4.5]. The predialysis concentration of selected uremic markers remained remarkably stable over time. Fluid volume status and blood pressure were adequately controlled by means of a relatively low ultrafiltration rate (7.9 mL/h/kg). Technical survival on S3 was 72% and 58% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The S3 system was easily handled and kept by patients at home, as indicated by technical survival. Patient perception was improved, while treatment burden was reduced. Cardiac features (assessed in a subset of patients) tended to improve over time. Intensive hemodialysis relying on the S3 system offers a very appealing option for home treatment with quite satisfactory results, as shown in the RECAP study throughout a two-year follow-up time, and offers the best bridging solution to kidney transplantation

Two Years’ Experience of Intensive Home Hemodialysis with the Physidia S3 System: Results from the RECAP Study

The RECAP study reports results and outcomes (clinical performances, patient acceptance, cardiac outcomes, and technical survival) achieved with the S3 system used as an intensive home hemodialysis (HHD) platform over a three-year French multicenter study. Ninety-four dialysis patients issued from ten dialysis centers and treated more than 6 months (mean follow-up: 24 months) with S3 were included. A two-hour treatment time was maintained in 2/3 of patients to deliver 25 L of dialysis fluid, while 1/3 required up to 3 h to achieve 30 L. The additional convection volume produced by means of the SeCoHD tool (internal filtration backfiltration) was 3 L/session, and the net ultrafiltration produced to achieve dry weight was 1.4 L/session. On a weekly basis, an average 156 L of dialysate corresponding to 94 L of urea clearance when considering 85% dialysate saturation under low flow conditions was delivered. Such urea clearance was equivalent to 9.2 [8.0–13.0] mL/min weekly urea clearance and a standardized Kt/V of 2.5 [1.1–4.5]. The predialysis concentration of selected uremic markers remained remarkably stable over time. Fluid volume status and blood pressure were adequately controlled by means of a relatively low ultrafiltration rate (7.9 mL/h/kg). Technical survival on S3 was 72% and 58% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The S3 system was easily handled and kept by patients at home, as indicated by technical survival. Patient perception was improved, while treatment burden was reduced. Cardiac features (assessed in a subset of patients) tended to improve over time. Intensive hemodialysis relying on the S3 system offers a very appealing option for home treatment with quite satisfactory results, as shown in the RECAP study throughout a two-year follow-up time, and offers the best bridging solution to kidney transplantation

Low incidence of SARS-CoV-2, risk factors of mortality and the course of illness in the French national cohort of dialysis patients

International audienceThe aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of COVID-19 disease in the French national population of dialysis patients, their course of illness and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality. Our study included all patients on dialysis recorded in the French REIN Registry in April 2020. Clinical characteristics at last follow-up and the evolution of COVID-19 illness severity over time were recorded for diagnosed cases (either suspicious clinical symptoms, characteristic signs on the chest scan or a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) for SARS-CoV-2. A total of 1,621 infected patients were reported on the REIN registry from March 16th, 2020 to May 4th, 2020. Of these, 344 died. The prevalence of COVID-19 patients varied from less than 1% to 10% between regions. The probability of being a case was higher in males, patients with diabetes, those in need of assistance for transfer or treated at a self-care unit. Dialysis at home was associated with a lower probability of being infected as was being a smoker, a former smoker, having an active malignancy, or peripheral vascular disease. Mortality in diagnosed cases (21%) was associated with the same causes as in the general population. Higher age, hypoalbuminemia and the presence of an ischemic heart disease were statistically independently associated with a higher risk of death. Being treated at a selfcare unit was associated with a lower risk. Thus, our study showed a relatively low frequency of COVID-19 among dialysis patients contrary to what might have been assumed